Voter Suppression and the Ecological Fallacy: A Colorado Case Study

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Elections New Clerk’s Workshop November 2013 By: Nicole Thuotte - OPI.
Advertisements

Voter Registration and Participation PAUL MITCHELL VICE PRESIDENT – POLITICAL DATA INC.
Voting and Political Participation
2014 Colorado Election Survey Robert M. Stein Andrew Menger Rice University and Greg Vonnahme University of Missouri-Kansas City Prepared for presentation.
1 Dr. Brenda C. Snipes Broward County Supervisor of Elections.
Political Science Tony E. Carey Jr., Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of Political Science Racial and Ethnic Politics in the 2012 Presidential Primaries.
ID the IV, DV, unit of analysis, control variable (if any)
CHAPTER 6 POLITICAL PARTICIPATION. A Closer Look at Nonvoting Vote Turnout in Western Nations --Two Ways of Calculating.
Why Do People Vote, and Does it Matter if They Don’t? Michael Alvarez PS 120.
Voting Behavior of Naturalized Citizens: Sarah R. Crissey Thom File U.S. Census Bureau Housing and Household Economic Statistics Division Presented.
LATINO YOUTH EMPOWERMENT Isabel Reyes Ricardo Lopez.
Registration Systems in The United States Stephen Ansolabehere Harvard University.
The Right to Vote The success of a democratic government depends on popular participation – voting is the key. “Suffrage”: the right to vote (“franchise”).
Organization of Political Parties. How does it all fit together? Citizenship Naturalization Political Parties Third parties Lobbyists, PACs, Interest.
An Introduction to the Statewide Database September 24, 2012 Karin Mac Donald & Nicole Boyle Berkeley Law
Status of Delivery of California’s Official Redistricting Database Citizen’s Redistricting Commission; 3/24/2011 Karin Mac Donald, Statewide Database,
Chapter 8: Political Participation
Chapter 8: Political Participation
-is low voter turnout a reality -comparison of turnout statistics between countries -who has control of elections and it’s effect -what factors hold down.
California’s New Three-Strikes Law Benefits, Costs, and Alternatives (Early 1990s study of.
What is the easiest way for citizens to influence the government?
US Government Mrs. Lacks Voter Turnout. Qualifications (set by states) Citizenship: must be a US citizen Residency: must vote where you live (or where.
Reporting Abstract Requirements and Procedures. New Reporting Requirement Official Abstract of Votes New form to be completed and submitted to the Secretary.
AP – Political participation. Enduring questions 1. What role did the framers of the Constitution believe average citizens should play in America’s representative.
Chapter 8- Political Participation I. A Closer Look at Nonvoting A. The Problem of Nonvoting and its Sources 1. Misleading statistics and different measures.
{ Voting in Texas February 1, {{ RegistrationCasting a Ballot Voting is a Two-Step Process 1. Fill out a registration application to register to.
Voter Registration and Participation
Voting in the U.S. AP Government and Politics Akwete McAlister.
North Carolina Voter ID Law Struck Down in Court of Appeals VOTER ID LEGISLATION September 2, 2016 | Madelaine Pisani and Justin C. Brown Sources: Alan.
Election Day.
What Happened?.
Senior Consultant, The Annie E. Casey Foundation
Voting in Texas GOVT 2306, Unit 4.
WHO ARE THE VOTERS IN ALACHUA COUNTY AND WHAT PART OF THE COMMUNITY DO THEY REPRESENT? Presented By Team 2 – Ursula Garfield, Leanna Woods, Melissa Lail,
Bipartisan Election Advisory Commission
November 8, 2016 Election Results Florida’s Gulf Coast
Voter Turnout Overview 2016 Results
Voting and Political Participation in Texas
Voting In Alachua County
Political Participation
AP US Government Mrs. Lacks
Miami Dade County Public Schools Voter Registration Drive
Voting Turnout and Behavior
Political Participation
Colorado Secretary of State’s Office
Candidates and Voting.
PROGRESSIVE 15.
5def Rising Campaign Cost
Voter Education November 2015 Elections.
Voter Registrar: Things to Do and When
Chapter 8: Political Participation
Automatic Voter Registration
A Guide to AB 918 & New Language Access Requirements in State Law
Chapter Review Problems
Who can Vote? And Types of Elections
Political Participation
Voting.
Lecture 48 Voting and Representation II
What is Gerrymandering?
Process and Anticipated Schedule
African American.
What is the easiest way for citizens to influence the government?
Voting by Federal Postcard Application (FPCA)
Voting by Federal Postcard Application (FPCA)
Working with Your County Elections Officer
CE 5e Chapter 10 Section 1 Mr. Collins and Mrs. Kozlik
Unit 5 – political participation
Elections Essential Question: What are the ways that citizens can influence government?
Political Participation
Ap u.s. government & politics
Presentation transcript:

Voter Suppression and the Ecological Fallacy: A Colorado Case Study Dr. Paul C. Sutton Department of Geography & the Environment University of Denver Association of American Geographers Tampa, Florida April 9th, 2012

The Political Game Raising Barriers to Voting with Predictable Consequences In late 2011, the republican secretary of state for Colorado announced that the state’s mail-in ballots would henceforth only be sent out automatically to those who were ‘active’ voters, meaning they had voted in the last general election. The county clerks of Denver and Pueblo counties were concerned this would have a discriminatory impact on Black and Hispanic voters in their counties.

The Team Denver and Pueblo counties worked with the Brennan Center for Justice and Colorado Common Cause to fight Gessler’s new mandate. Seth Masket (DU Poly Sci professor) and I were consulted for the spatio-demographic analysis of the consequences of this mandate were it to be implemented.

The Data: Voter Registration Precincts

The Modifiable Areal Unit Problem Merging Census & Voter Registration Data Census Block Group Data with Aggregrate Demographic Info Counts of Black Counts of Hispanic Counts of White Are in RED Voting Precinct Data with Aggregate voter Info Counts of IFTV Counts of Voters Are in BLACK Assume homogeneity within Census block group polygons.

The Null Hypotheses #1) The proportion of ‘Inactive Failed to Vote’ designations in the voting precincts is unrelated to the proportion of African American persons in those precincts. #2) The proportion of ‘Inactive Failed to Vote’ designations in the voting precincts is unrelated to the proportion of Hispanic persons in those precincts. #3) The proportion of ‘Inactive Failed to Vote’ designations in the voting precincts is unrelated to the proportion of White persons in those precincts.

Statistical Analysis #1 % IFTV and % White The Higher the proportion of Inactive Failed to Vote (IFTV) The Lower the percentage of Population that is White. Statistically Significant

Statistical Analysis #2 % IFTV and % Hispanic The Higher the proportion of Inactive Failed to Vote (IFTV) The Higher the percentage of Population that is Hispanic. Statistically Significant

Statistical Analysis #3 % IFTV and % Black The Higher the proportion of Inactive Failed to Vote (IFTV) The Higher the percentage of Population that is Black. Statistically Significant

The Conclusions #1) The proportion of ‘Inactive Failed to Vote’ designations in the voting precincts is unrelated to the proportion of African American persons in those precincts. REJECTED #2) The proportion of ‘Inactive Failed to Vote’ designations in the voting precincts is unrelated to the proportion of Hispanic persons in those precincts. #3) The proportion of ‘Inactive Failed to Vote’ designations in the voting precincts is unrelated to the proportion of White persons in those precincts.

The Caveats We have two problems 1) The Modifiable Areal Unit Problem (MAUP) with the merging of Voting Precinct data with Census Block Group Data. 2) The Ecological Fallacy In this case high % IFTV and high % Black correlate. Our conclusion would be wrong if the whites (or non-blacks) in high % black voting precincts were extremely more likely to have been IFTV (same with precincts with high % Hispanic) There is NO evidence to support this. The numbers are so extreme that some voter suppression would have been inevitable.

The Maps % IFTV, % Black, %Hispanic, and % White in Denver

Summary of Court Findings The Court emphasized that Colorado law prohibited “any elector’s registration record from being canceled solely for failure to vote” but that the Secretary's interpretation of the law would have required some voters who had missed a single election to “re-register” to vote, “effectively penaliz[ing]” citizens “for not voting.” This would have “impeded the voting of some 4,000 – 6,000 IFTV electors in Denver in November 2011 … and tens-of-thousands of citizens statewide.”

Questions and/or Comments? Some URLs that may be of interest on this topic: Seth Masket’s blog http://mischiefsoffaction.blogspot.com.au/2013/02/raising-barriers-to-voting-with.html UCSB summary http://geog.ucsb.edu/mobile/events/department-news/1180/alumnus-paul-sutton-maps-voter-suppression-in-colorado/ Brennan Center for Justice Summary http://www.brennancenter.org/press-release/colorado-victory-judge-rules-voting-rights