T. Markiewicz / SLAC MAP at SLAC Working Meeting 2 July 2014

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project Discussion Detector Multiplicities & Timing Requirements Warm vs. Cold Tom Markiewicz SLAC ALCPG SLAC 8 January.
Advertisements

NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project NLC IR Layout and Background Estimates Jeff Gronberg/LLNL For the Beam Delivery Group LCWS - October 25, 2000.
October 20th, 2006 A. Mazzacane 1 4 th Concept Software First Results.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project Backgrounds Update Tom Markiewicz SLAC LCWS Cornell 15 July 2003.
Status of ongoing studies for comparing 2-mrad and 20-mrad IRs T. Maruyama SLAC.
The Detector and Interaction Region for a Photon Collider at TESLA
Evaluation of G4 Releases in CMS (Sub-detector Studies) Software used Electrons in Tracker Photons in the Electromagnetic Calorimeter Pions in the Calorimeter.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project NLC Backgrounds What’s New? Tom Markiewicz LC’99, Frascati, Italy October 1999.
ATHENS HEP2003 A.Kyriakis (Preshower INP Demokritos group)1 The CMS Preshower Detector Overview CERN Armenia : Yerevan Physics Institute Belarus : Minsk.
1 LumiCal Optimization and Design Takashi Maruyama SLAC SiD Workshop, Boulder, September 18, 2008.
MdcPatRec Tracking Status Zhang Yao, Zhang Xueyao Shandong University.
Backgrounds in the NLC BDS ISG9 December 10 – Takashi Maruyama SLAC.
Status report on the Asian Solid State Tracking R&D March 31, 2003 M. Iwasaki University of Tokyo.
Kati Lassila-Perini/HIP HIP CMS Software and Physics project evaluation1/ Electron/ physics in CMS Kati Lassila-Perini HIP Activities in the.
M. Dugger, February Triplet polarimeter study Michael Dugger* Arizona State University *Work at ASU is supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation.
The CMS detector as compared to ATLAS CMS Detector Description –Inner detector and comparison with ATLAS –EM detector and comparison with ATLAS –Calorimetric.
SiD R&D tasks for the LOI - Subsystem R&D tasks - Summary of SiD R&D - Prioritization of R&D tasks -> Document for DoE/NSF ~Feb 2009 (Mainly based on Marty’s.
Higher harmonics flow measurement of charged hadrons and electrons in wide kinematic range with PHENIX VTX tracker Maki KUROSAWA for PHENIX collaboration.
Silicon Detector Tracking ALCPG Workshop Cornell July 15, 2003 John Jaros.
Bangalore, India1 Performance of GLD Detector Bangalore March 9 th -13 th, 2006 T.Yoshioka (ICEPP) on behalf of the.
1 LumiCal Optimization Simulations Iftach Sadeh Tel Aviv University Collaboration High precision design May 6 th 2008.
1 Simulation of Neutron Backgrounds in the ILC Extraction Line Beam Dump Siva Darbha Supervisors: Lewis Keller and Takashi Maruyama.
12/20/2006ILC-Sousei Annual KEK1 Particle Flow Algorithm for Full Simulation Study ILC-Sousei Annual KEK Dec. 20 th -22 nd, 2006 Tamaki.
Machine-Detector Interface Nikolai Mokhov Fermilab February 19, 2014.
1/24 SiD FCAL Takashi Maruyama Tom Markiewicz SLAC TILC’09, Tskuba, Japan, April 2009 Contributors: SLAC M. BreidenbachFNALW. Cooper G. Haller K.
Eunil Won/Korea U1 A study of configuration for silicon based Intermediate Trackers (IT) July Eunil Won Korea University.
BESIII offline software group Status of BESIII Event Reconstruction System.
Tracking: An Experimental Overview Richard Partridge Brown / SLAC Fermilab ALCPG Meeting.
MDI Simulations at SLAC Takashi Maruyama, Lew Keller, Thomas Markiewicz, Uli Wienands, SLAC MAP Collaboration Meeting, FNAL June 21, 2013.
Photon & e+e- Hits in Muon Higgs Factory T. Markiewicz T. Maruyama SLAC MAP Collaboration Meeting. Fermilab 29 May 2014.
ICARUS T600: low energy electrons
 discrimination with converted photons
Effect of L* Changes on Vertex Detector and Forward Calorimeter Performance LCWS 2015 Whistler, BC, Canada November Bruce Schumm UCSC/SCIPP 1.
IOP HEPP Conference Upgrading the CMS Tracker for SLHC Mark Pesaresi Imperial College, London.
IFR Status Summary W. Baldini on behalf of the IFR Group
GLAST LAT tracker signal simulation and trigger timing study
Calorimeter Occupancies University of Cambridge
Panagiotis Kokkas Univ. of Ioannina
Detection of muons at 150 GeV/c with a CMS Preshower Prototype
Track Finding.
Final Focus Synchrotron Radiation
Neutron and Photon Backscattering from the ILC Beam Dump
CMS SLHC Calorimeter Trigger Upgrade,
ECAL – CLIC_ILD vs. CLICdet_2015
The Compact Muon Solenoid Detector
5% The CMS all silicon tracker simulation
Charged PID in Arbor 23/02/2016 Dan YU.
Report about “Forward Instrumentation” Issues
Reconstruction of TauTau events
The Silicon Track Trigger (STT) at DØ
Han Jifeng BESIII MUON GROUP IHEP, CAS
Revisions and Updates, December 13. Some technical details:
Tony Hill Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Radiation Backgrounds in the ATLAS New Small Wheel
by M. Della Negra, P. Jenni, and T. S. Virdee
STAR Detector Event selection and triggers Corrections to data
Higgs Factory Backgrounds
GEANT Simulations and Track Reconstruction
Simulation of Neutron Backgrounds in the ILC Extraction Line Beam Dump
Detector Optimization using Particle Flow Algorithm
Backgrounds using v7 Mask in 9 Si Layers at a Muon Higgs Factory
Machine-Detector Interface
MAP 2014 Spring Workshop Fermilab May, 2014
Status of CEPC HCAL Optimization Study in Simulation LIU Bing On behalf the CEPC Calorimeter working group.
Hit density at scoring planes at r=10, 30, and 50 cm.
Converted Photon Hits in Muon Higgs Factory
Hit Density Geant 3 scoring planes
Background Simulations at Fermilab
An Easy to Use Track Comparison Tool
Sheraton Waikiki Hotel
Presentation transcript:

T. Markiewicz / SLAC MAP at SLAC Working Meeting 2 July 2014 Comparison of Photon from v2 versus v7 masks in innermost VXD Layer at a Muon Higgs Factory T. Markiewicz / SLAC MAP at SLAC Working Meeting 2 July 2014

Masks v2 versus v7 2 July 2014 - MAP at SLAC T. Markiewicz

320um Silicon Conversion/Scoring Planes Barrel Detector Radius (cm) Half Length (cm) VXD 5.5 20.5 Tracker 50.0 91.0 ECAL 131.0 200 Barrel Detector Radius (cm) Half Length (cm) VXD 7.7 28.7 Tracker 50.0 91.0 ECAL 131.0 200 Endcap Z (cm) Rin (cm) Rout (cm) VXD 24.8 6.7 18.4 Tracker 92.0 25.2 53.3 ECAL 200.1 38.0 130.9 Endcap Z (cm) Rin (cm) Rout (cm) VXD 30.0 6.7 18.4 Tracker 92.0 25.2 53.3 ECAL 200.1 38.0 130.9 2 July 2014 - MAP at SLAC T. Markiewicz

FLUKA Photons v2 mask versus GEANT converted photons v7 mask Time when photon produced by showering decay electron (all 9 Silicon layers in this plot) V7 converted photon backgrounds = 12% v2 backgrounds 5100 x 2% = 102 to get background associated with one bunch X100 to get background associated with one bunch 2 July 2014 - MAP at SLAC T. Markiewicz

Time and z of produced photon background v7 v2 2 July 2014 - MAP at SLAC T. Markiewicz

z of produced photon background v7 v2 2 July 2014 - MAP at SLAC T. Markiewicz

Z Distribution of Photons in Innermost Barrel VXD Use this to get Peak/Average occupancy (Should also look at azimuth) v2 v7 First hit only Inner VXD: Conversion eff: 6581/1,121,001=0.587% Hit Multiplicity = 89207/6581 = 13.555 2 July 2014 - MAP at SLAC T. Markiewicz

Time Distribution of photon hits on Inner VXD Barrel time_parent time_parent time_child rel. to parent time_child rel. to parent 2 July 2014 - MAP at SLAC T. Markiewicz

Time Distribution of photon hits on Inner VXD Barrel time=time_parent+time_child time=time_parent+time_child Source of photons Source of photons 2 July 2014 - MAP at SLAC T. Markiewicz

V7 Hit multiplicity (all layers) Note that nh counts parent plus all children 2 July 2014 - MAP at SLAC T. Markiewicz

Hit Density Comparison 2 July 2014 - MAP at SLAC T. Markiewicz

Conclusions Factor of 8 reduction in photons emanating from v7 mask relative to v2 mask Hit density calculated in v2 via scoring and using a 2% photon to 1 e- hit conversion efficience In v7 analysis, in innermost layer we see same hit density as ~x8-10 hits/converted photon compensate for reduced incident photon flux Next steps: Check v2 e+/e- versus v7 as Check conversion efficiency Check #/hits per converted photon and the spatial & time distribution of those hits 2 July 2014 - MAP at SLAC T. Markiewicz

Innermost VXD Layer: Separation between Hits Set MaxHit=2 20 um bins 2 July 2014 - MAP at SLAC T. Markiewicz

Numerology for hits on Innermost VXD Layer Set MaxHit=2 Inner VXD: 1,121,001 photons make a hit on this layer There are a total of 89207 hits seen 6581 photons make one or more hits on this & other layers In 5872 cases all the hits stay on this Inner VXD layer; In 709 cases the last hit in the n-tuple is on a different layer 1053 of 6581 (or 5872) events only have one e- hit on the layer In 4819 of 5872 events, all the hits stay on the inner VXD layer When >1 hit, the max. probability of separation between first and last hit is 1mm Conversion eff: 6581/1,121,001=0.587% Hit Multiplicity = 89207/6581 = 13.555 This is ~ 3.1x the mean number of hits when histogram truncated at 20 hits. 2 July 2014 - MAP at SLAC T. Markiewicz