Volume 23, Issue 12, Pages (December 2015)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Nir Kalisman, Gunnar F. Schröder, Michael Levitt  Structure 
Advertisements

Volume 21, Issue 12, Pages (December 2013)
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Identification of Structural Mechanisms of HIV-1 Protease Specificity Using Computational Peptide Docking: Implications for Drug Resistance  Sidhartha.
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
Rhomboid Protease Dynamics and Lipid Interactions
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages (May 2013)
Solution Structure of the U11-48K CHHC Zinc-Finger Domain that Specifically Binds the 5′ Splice Site of U12-Type Introns  Henning Tidow, Antonina Andreeva,
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages (December 2009)
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages (December 2005)
Chen-Chou Wu, William J. Rice, David L. Stokes  Structure 
AnchorDock: Blind and Flexible Anchor-Driven Peptide Docking
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2007)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages e2 (January 2018)
Volume 24, Issue 11, Pages (November 2016)
Large-Scale Conformational Dynamics of the HIV-1 Integrase Core Domain and Its Catalytic Loop Mutants  Matthew C. Lee, Jinxia Deng, James M. Briggs, Yong.
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (February 2013)
Structure and RNA Interactions of the N-Terminal RRM Domains of PTB
How Does a Voltage Sensor Interact with a Lipid Bilayer
Volume 108, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (February 2005)
Structural and Biochemical Mechanisms for the Specificity of Hormone Binding and Coactivator Assembly by Mineralocorticoid Receptor  Yong Li, Kelly Suino,
Mechanism of the αβ Conformational Change in F1-ATPase after ATP Hydrolysis: Free- Energy Simulations  Yuko Ito, Mitsunori Ikeguchi  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages e3 (May 2017)
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Veronica Salmaso, Mattia Sturlese, Alberto Cuzzolin, Stefano Moro 
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages (June 2016)
Regulation of the Protein-Conducting Channel by a Bound Ribosome
“DFG-Flip” in the Insulin Receptor Kinase Is Facilitated by a Helical Intermediate State of the Activation Loop  Harish Vashisth, Luca Maragliano, Cameron F.
Structural Basis for the Differential Effects of CaBP1 and Calmodulin on CaV1.2 Calcium-Dependent Inactivation  Felix Findeisen, Daniel L. Minor  Structure 
Structural Analysis of Ligand Stimulation of the Histidine Kinase NarX
Binding Dynamics of Isolated Nucleoporin Repeat Regions to Importin-β
A Gating Mechanism of the Serotonin 5-HT3 Receptor
Daniel Hoersch, Tanja Kortemme  Structure 
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
Volume 96, Issue 7, Pages (April 2009)
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (March 2012)
Ligand Binding to the Voltage-Gated Kv1
Elizabeth J. Little, Andrea C. Babic, Nancy C. Horton  Structure 
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages (June 2016)
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages e2 (January 2018)
Alemayehu A. Gorfe, Barry J. Grant, J. Andrew McCammon  Structure 
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages (December 2005)
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (February 2013)
Remodeling KRAS Structure
Volume 15, Issue 12, Pages (December 2007)
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (September 2010)
Reduced Curvature of Ligand-Binding Domain Free-Energy Surface Underlies Partial Agonism at NMDA Receptors  Jian Dai, Huan-Xiang Zhou  Structure  Volume.
Structural Insight into AMPK Regulation: ADP Comes into Play
Structural and Biochemical Mechanisms for the Specificity of Hormone Binding and Coactivator Assembly by Mineralocorticoid Receptor  Yong Li, Kelly Suino,
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages e3 (January 2018)
In Search of the Hair-Cell Gating Spring
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 17, Issue 10, Pages (October 2009)
Two Pathways Mediate Interdomain Allosteric Regulation in Pin1
Gydo C.P. van Zundert, Adrien S.J. Melquiond, Alexandre M.J.J. Bonvin 
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (July 2012)
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (December 2004)
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages (February 2009)
Volume 112, Issue 6, Pages (March 2017)
Volume 98, Issue 4, Pages (February 2010)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 23, Issue 12, Pages 2280-2290 (December 2015) Ligand Binding Mechanism in Steroid Receptors: From Conserved Plasticity to Differential Evolutionary Constraints  Karl Edman, Ali Hosseini, Magnus K. Bjursell, Anna Aagaard, Lisa Wissler, Anders Gunnarsson, Tim Kaminski, Christian Köhler, Stefan Bäckström, Tina J. Jensen, Anders Cavallin, Ulla Karlsson, Ewa Nilsson, Daniel Lecina, Ryoji Takahashi, Christoph Grebner, Stefan Geschwindner, Matti Lepistö, Anders C. Hogner, Victor Guallar  Structure  Volume 23, Issue 12, Pages 2280-2290 (December 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2015.09.012 Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Structure 2015 23, 2280-2290DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2015.09.012) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Evolutionary Relationship of the Steroid Receptors with Structural Comparison of GR- and MR-LBD (A) Evolutionary relationship of the steroid hormone receptors (ERα, ERβ, MR, GR, PR, and AR). Decimal numbers = distance; integers = bootstrap value. (B) GR (yellow) in complex with dexamethasone (magenta) overlaid on MR (light blue) in complex with dexamethasone (magenta). The AF-2 surface is located where helices 3, 4, and 12 meet. (C) Details near the region where helices 3, 7, and 11 meet. (D) The chemical structures of dexamethasone and dibC. The steroidal A, B, C, and D rings and positions 3 and 17 are marked on the dexamethasone structure. Structure 2015 23, 2280-2290DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2015.09.012) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Comparison of the Complex Structures of MR:Dexa and MR:dibC (A) Stereo view of the 2mFo-dFc density map of the MR:Dexa ligand binding pocket. (B) The structure of MR (light blue) in complex with dexamethasone (magenta) superimposed on MR (dark blue) in complex with dibC (white). The steroid template overlays nearly perfectly (RMSD 0.28 Å) with all hydrophilic interactions conserved. Structure 2015 23, 2280-2290DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2015.09.012) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Comparison of the Complex Structures of MR:Dexa, MR:dibC, GR:Dexa, and GR:dibC (A) MR (light blue) in complex with dexamethasone (magenta) overlaid on MR (dark blue) in complex with dibC (white). (B) The cyclohexyl motif of dibC comes into direct conflict with residues from H7 (MR:Dexa), enforcing a new structural state. (C) MR (dark blue) in complex with dibC (white) superimposed on GR (yellow) in complex with dexamethasone (magenta). (D) GR (yellow) in complex with dexamethasone (magenta) overlaid on GR (orange) in complex with dibC (white). Structure 2015 23, 2280-2290DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2015.09.012) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Ligand Exit Pathway for the MR:Dexa Complex (A) The ligand center of mass is highlighted as blue beads. The ligand atoms are shown as transparent space fill. (B) Detail of the backbone rearrangement along the exit pathway. The MR:Dexa and MR:dibC X-ray structures are shown in light and dark blue, respectively, with dexamethasone in the binding pocket in magenta. Three protein cartoon snapshots and one pose of dexamethasone as it passes through the receptor surface from the exit simulations are shown in green. (C) Cα RMSF relative the average structure along the MR:Dexa exit pathway plotted for each residue. The dotted line denotes the average RMSF across the LBD. Helices 6 and 7 are marked with green shading. Structure 2015 23, 2280-2290DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2015.09.012) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Ligand Exit Pathway for the GR:Dexa Complex (A) The ligand center of mass is highlighted as blue beads. The ligand atoms are shown as transparent space fill. (B) Detail of the backbone rearrangement along the exit pathway. The GR:Dexa and GR:dibC X-ray structures are shown in light yellow and orange, respectively. Three snapshots from the exit simulations are shown in green, and dexamethasone in the binding pocket is shown for reference in magenta. (C) Cα RMSF relative the average structure along the GR:Dexa exit pathway where helices 6 and 7 are marked with green shading. Structure 2015 23, 2280-2290DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2015.09.012) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Unbiased Simulation of Dexamethasone Entering the MR Binding Pocket (A) Each line represents the ligand heavy atom RMSD to the ligand from the crystallographic structure for a single trajectory. Two of the trajectories represented by blue and red lines enter the ligand binding pocket at steps 52 and 214, respectively. (B) The ligand center of mass for the two trajectories that enter the binding pocket are shown as blue and red spheres. The region where the ligands enter the binding pocket is emphasized as a surface with two ligands from the simulations shown in full stick representation. Structure 2015 23, 2280-2290DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2015.09.012) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Refined Ligand Binding Simulations and Estimated Binding Free Energy (A) The protein-ligand interaction energy plotted against the ligand heavy atom RMSD to the crystallographic structure along the 400 refinement trajectories in MR:Dexa. (B) MR (blue) in complex with dexamethasone (magenta) overlaid on the lowest interaction energy structure after the refined exploration (green). (C) X-Z 2D projection of the PMF obtained in the MSM analysis for the same process. Structure 2015 23, 2280-2290DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2015.09.012) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 Evolutionary Conservation of the LBD for the Steroid Receptors The graphs show normalized amino acid variability score for pairwise comparisons of MR (A), PR (B), AR (C), ERα (D), and ERβ (E) in blue versus GR in red plotted against the GR amino acid sequence. The variability score was average normalized and smoothed using a five-amino-acid sliding window. Helices 1–12 are annotated using vertical bars (green: H6–7; blue: H10–11; gray: all others). High variability scores indicate less conservation. Structure 2015 23, 2280-2290DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2015.09.012) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions