Laboratory Investigation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CDC perspective on non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing E
Advertisements

Define case and conduct case finding
FOODBORNE OUTBREAK ASSOCIATED WITH FRIED RICE, HARDIN COUNTY, MAY 2006 ASHOKA INDUKURI EPIDEMIOLOGIST LINCOLN TRAIL DISTRICT HEALTH DEPT.
1Surveillance and outbreak detection Foodborne Disease Outbreak Investigation Team Training: Module 2 – Foodborne Disease Surveillance and Outbreak Detection.
The Role of the Laboratory in Foodborne Outbreak Investigations Dubai, February 17, 2014 Cheryl Bopp, M.S. Unit Lead, Epidemic Investigations Laboratory.
Non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli: Isolation and detection challenges Cheryl Bopp, M.S., Chief, Epidemic Investigations Laboratory Unit,
Role of Laboratory in a Foodborne Outbreak Vietnam FETP Foodborne Outbreak Training Course Hanoi, Vietnam June 4, 2009.
Role of the laboratory in disease surveillance
Foodborne diseases and outbreaks1 Foodborne Disease Outbreak Investigation Team Training: Module 1 – Foodborne Diseases and Outbreaks.
Investigating Foodborne Disease Outbreaks: The CDC Perspective Ian Williams, PhD, MS Chief, Outbreak Response and Prevention Branch Division of Foodborne,
Foodborne Disease Surveillance in the U.S.: FoodNet, PulseNet, and Outbreak Alert! Caroline Smith DeWaal Center for Science in the Public Interest (U.S.)
1 Don L. Zink, Ph.D. Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition U.S. Food & Drug Administration College Park, MD The Challenge of Emerging Foodborne.
Capability Cliff Notes Series PHEP Capability 12—Public Health Laboratory Testing What Is It And How Will We Measure It?
Laboratory Investigation
Epidemiology of Foodborne Disease ENVR 421 Mark D. Sobsey.
Genetically Modified Foods Food Safety
Molecular Surveillance of Foodborne Infections Peter Gerner-Smidt, MD, PhD Chief of PulseNet USA CDC
Lee H. Harrison, MD Associate Professor
Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists Overview of Microbiology Methods Investigation strategies and methods May 2007.
DR.M.F MOUSSA B.Sc,M.B.B.S Diplomé en Santé Publique Victoria Hospital,Candos.
What happens in the body after the microbes that produce illness are swallowed? After they are swallowed, there is a delay, called the incubation period,
Presented by: Kim Chandler
Special thanks to: Marion County Health Department Purdue University Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis HACCP Solution Company Indiana.
Is for Epi Epidemiology basics for non-epidemiologists.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service FSIS Foodborne Illness Investigations: Current Thinking Scott A. Seys, MPH Chief,
Non-Invasive Enteritis and Food Poisoning. FOODBORNE ILLNESS (Bacterial) Foodborne illness results from eating food contaminated with organisms or toxins.
Module 1 Section 1.3 DNA Technology
Global Foodborne Infections Network (GFN) Building capacity to detect, control and prevent foodborne and other enteric infections from farm to table National.
Microbial Hazards. Microorganisms are everywhere -- they can be: – Pathogens – cause disease – Spoilers – cause the quality of food to deteriorate – Beneficial.
Manipulation of DNA. Restriction enzymes are used to cut DNA into smaller fragments. Different restriction enzymes recognize and cut different DNA sequences.
Molecular Techniques in Microbiology These include 9 techniques (1) Standard polymerase chain reaction Kary Mullis invented the PCR in 1983 (USA)Kary.
E. coli O157:H7 -- Illness trends and recent data from outbreak investigations, United States Shiga Toxin –Producing E. coli Addressing the Challenges,
ANNETTE SILVIA PhD PUBLIC HEALTH, EPIDEMIOLOGY WALDEN UNIVERSITY PUBH 8165–2 DR. FREDERICK GRANT SUMMER QUARTER, 2013 Introduction to Foodborne Illness.
Data Needed to Measure HACCP Impacts on Public Health Jack Guzewich, R.S., M.P.H. Pathogen Reduction Dialogue Panel 2 May 6, 2002.
Salmonella Reference Laboratory Epidemiology of Salmonella enterica from C. O’ Hare 1, N. Delappe 1, G. Doran 1, D. Morris 2, D. Kilmartin 2,
Explaining the FSIS Sampling Program for Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Raw Ground Beef Kristina Barlow, Priya Kadam, Stephanie Buchanan, Priscilla Levine.
Unit 1 – Living Cells.  The study of the human genome  - involves sequencing DNA nucleotides  - and relating this to gene functions  In 2003, the.
Shiga Toxin E. coli Rapid detection is key!. Intestinal Diseases Difficult to diagnose clinically – Most have very similar symptoms Treatment & patient.
MODULE 2 – FOODBORNE DISEASE SURVEILLANCE AND OUTBREAK DETECTION FOODBORNE DISEASE OUTBREAK INVESTIGATION TEAM TRAINING.
What is Foodborne Illness?. Foodborne Illness AKA – foodborne disease What is it? – illness resulting from the consumption of food – commonly known as.
Outbreak Investigation
Outbreak Investigation
Understanding Epidemiology
ACUTE GASTROENTERITIS
CHAPTER 1 & 2 ServSafe Questions
MICROBIAL FOOD SAFETY A FOOD SYSTEMS APPROACH
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA, USA
Whole Genome Sequencing for Epidemiologists – A Brief Introduction
Pathology 417 – Case 1: Microbiology Laboratory
Foodborne Illness Review
COLLEGE OF VETERINARY MEDICINE
Food Safety on the Go 2012 Edition
Whole genome sequencing: New methods for traceback investigations
PhD LABORATORY POSTING SEMINAR (MLS 818)
Molecular epidemics of Norovirus related Outbreak in Korea
Foodborne Pathogens: Bacteria
Objectives To differentiate between food infection and food intoxication. To identify causes of the growth and spread of harmful bacteria. To summarize.
اسهال عفوني (Infectious Diarrhea)
Diagnosed Food Handlers
Outbreak Investigation
The 12 “Most Unwanted” Bacteria
Complex Outbreak Response
Foodborne Illness and its Impact
Surveillance and Detection – Implications for Response
Response Teams – Planning and Preparation
Gastro- intestinal diseases
1.1.3 MI.
Rapid diagnosis of gastrointestinal pathogens
Presentation transcript:

Laboratory Investigation Epi-Ready Laboratory Investigation Module 5

Module Objectives By the end of this module, participants will be able to discuss the approaches the laboratory investigator utilizes as a member of the foodborne outbreak response team. Describe sample collection methods necessary for identifying agents of foodborne disease. Identify approaches for maintaining sample integrity during a foodborne outbreak investigation. Discuss the diagnostic testing methods available to the laboratory investigator.

The Laboratory Investigator Sample collection methods Laboratory sample integrity Diagnostic, food and environmental testing

Cross-Disciplinary Activities Epidemiologic Investigator Focuses on clinical sampling to identify causative agent of disease Environmental Investigator Collects appropriate food and environmental samples for analysis

Standardized Laboratory Methods Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) Bacteriological Analytic Manual Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook

Specimen Collection Guidance Diagnosis and Management of Foodborne Illness: A Primer for Physicians (CDC 2004) Guidelines for Confirmation of Foodborne-Disease Outbreaks (MMWR March 17, 2000) Outbreaks of Undetermined Etiology (OUE) Guidelines (CIFOR) Surveillance Summaries

Specimen Collection Methodology

Activity Several people have been showing up in the emergency department of the local hospital. All have diarrhea, some bloody. They all have a mild to severe fever and most have had nausea and a few stated they have vomited. They recall eating at a local restaurant 3 or 4 days ago but do not recall what they ate. A husband and wife seek care at an urgent care facility. The husband is complaining of abdominal cramps, diarrhea and gas. He states his stools seem greasy. He states his symptoms started a few days ago. His wife is complaining of severe abdominal cramps and gas. They love to hike. A person presents at the emergency department of the local hospital with sudden onset of nausea and vomiting. He states he had a meal approximately 3 hours ago of rice and beans. Work in your table groups. 10 minute working in table groups and 5 minutes to report. Use the CIFOR – OUE guidelines. Given the scenarios, identify the most probable disease agent, the specimen to be collected and how it should be prepared.

Collecting Stool Specimens The following video is a product of the Northwest Center for Foodborne Outbreak Management, Epidemiology and Surveillance (FOMES)– the Oregon Food Safety Center of Excellence Imbed Video

Food Sampling Must be supported by epidemiologic, environmental and laboratory information May have to look at ingredients Containers and sampling equipment must be sterile Sampler must adhere to aseptic techniques Shipped at temperature at which it was collected – except TCS foods Make sure all containers are labeled

Environmental Surface Sampling Daunting task – 100’s of samples required Deliberative process – takes a team Sample by zone May be beneficial for isolation of Salmonella spp. and Listeria monocytogenes in processing operations Contact laboratory pre and post sampling

Specimen and Sample Integrity Contact laboratory Seal the container! Clean and sanitize the container Properly label container Use tamper tape or tamper- resistant bags Chain of Custody

Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests Laboratory Analysis Direct Microscopy Immunoassays Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests Culture-based Assays

Direct Microscopy Common method for diagnosis of many pathogenic intestinal parasites. Labor-intensive Requires highly-skilled laboratorians

Immunoassay Detects surface antigens or other molecules Relatively fast and easy to read results Accurate and reliable Can be used in clinical settings ELISA and EIA are common

Commercially-available Immunoassays - Food Bacillus cereus toxin Campylobacter spp. Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin E. coli O157:H7 Listeria monocytogenes Salmonella spp. Shigella spp. Vibrio cholera At best, immunoassays can differentiate to the serotype level and these tests are useless in linking food to cases based on subtyping.

Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests Culture-independent Diagnostic Testing (CIDT) Fast Syndrome-based Not dependent on viability of organism Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Test developed in the 1980’s PCR RT-PCR RT-qPCR Multiplex PCR

The Benefits of CIDT for Public Health Surveillance of pathogens for which there were previously no practical test enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) and enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC) Faster information for local public health action Potential application in developing countries Multi-analyte approach yields Improved data for some pathogens Information about polymicrobic (mixed) infections

Challenges of CIDT to Public Health Difficult to monitor disease burden and associated trends No ability to conduct antimicrobial susceptibility Interpretation issues for public health action such as screening potential carriers and test-of-cure No isolates produced Loss of trained microbiologist

Culture-based Identification Classic method to identify bacteria to species level Produces an isolate to identify a pathogen Isolates are necessary to differentiate bacteria to the sub-species level

Pulsed-field Gel Electrophoresis (PFGE) DNA is separated from the isolate by lysing the bacterial cell DNA is placed in agarose and loaded on a gel A pulsing electric field is applied to the gel and DNA separates based on size Source: CDC

PulseNet USA and PulseNet International

Evolving PulseNet Source: CDC

Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) An isolate is needed This is a laboratory and computational process WGS first used as a surveillance and response technique in 2013 – Listeria initiative WGS is a process of genotyping - understanding the genetic makeup of an organism Source: CDC

Multilocus Sequence Typing (MLST) Process of sequencing to characterize isolates of bacterial species Primarily focuses on the 7 housekeeping genes Present in all isolates within a species and their rate of genetic variability is relatively low

SNP-Based Approach to WGS Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Variation in a single nucleotide – A,T, C,G within a genomic sequence Presence of SNPs does not indicate bacterial strains are unrelated Number of SNPs as a measure of relatedness varies by species

Allele-based Approach to WGS Alleles (Allelomorphs) are pairs of genes at a specific place on a chromosome that occur as an alternate form. The presence of an allele(s) does not indicate that a bacterial strain is unrelated Number of alleles as a measure of relatedness varies by species Allele

Case Study Compare results of PFGE and WGS in a multi-state outbreak of Salmonella Poona associated with the consumption of cucumbers. Source: CDC

Cases Identified by Date of Onset

Case Count Map 1 - <50 50 - <99 99 - <147 147 - <196 196 - 245

PFGE – WGS Comparative Results Source: Kozyreva, PLoS Curr. 2016 November 22; 8:

Metagenomics A process to identify all of the DNA present in a sample Identification of pathogen and subtyping in as little as 1.5 hours University of Georgia and CDC have identified pathogen with quasi- metagenomics A portable sequencer in a laboratory in the University of Georgia Center for Food Safety in Griffin, Georgia Photo courtesy of University of Georgia

Summary Describe sample collection methods necessary to identify agents of foodborne disease Identify approaches to maintain sample integrity during a foodborne outbreak investigation Discuss the diagnostic testing methods available to the laboratory investigator

Epidemiologic Investigation Coming Up Next Epidemiologic Investigation