Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (July 2017)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 50, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Advertisements

Figure 5 ISOX and vorinostat partially restore splicing pattern in DM1 patient-derived fibroblasts. (A) ISOX and vorinostat partially rescue mis-splicing.
Astrocytes Resist HIV-1 Fusion but Engulf Infected Macrophage Material
Skin-Specific Expression of ank-393, a Novel Ankyrin-3 Splice Variant
Community Behavior and Spatial Regulation within a Bacterial Microcolony in Deep Tissue Sites Serves to Protect against Host Attack  Kimberly M. Davis,
Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
Volume 136, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 11, Issue 11, Pages (June 2015)
Bulge- and Basal Layer-Specific Expression of Fibroblast Growth Factor-13 (FHF-2) in Mouse Skin  Mitsuko Kawano, Satoshi Suzuki, Masashi Suzuki, Junko.
Activation of the Innate Signaling Molecule MAVS by Bunyavirus Infection Upregulates the Adaptor Protein SARM1, Leading to Neuronal Death  Piyali Mukherjee,
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (August 2017)
A Single Templating RNA in Yeast Telomerase
Volume 14, Issue 10, Pages (March 2016)
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages (August 2018)
Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (November 2011)
Volume 130, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 16, Issue 9, Pages (August 2016)
Nachiket Shembekar, Hongxing Hu, David Eustace, Christoph A. Merten 
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (January 2003)
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages (April 2012)
Figure 3. MAb 19H9 displays broad cross-reactivity with IAV strains of different subtypes. (A), Amino acid sequence ... Figure 3. MAb 19H9 displays broad.
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages (July 2016)
Astrocytes Resist HIV-1 Fusion but Engulf Infected Macrophage Material
The IFITMs Inhibit Zika Virus Replication
SV40 VP2 and VP3 Insertion into ER Membranes Is Controlled by the Capsid Protein VP1: Implications for DNA Translocation out of the ER  Robert Daniels,
Jungmook Lyu, Vicky Yamamoto, Wange Lu  Developmental Cell 
Volume 1, Issue 3, Pages (September 2013)
Volume 17, Issue 9, Pages (November 2016)
Characterization of Kdap, A Protein Secreted by Keratinocytes
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Nucleocapsid Phosphorylation and RNA Helicase DDX1 Recruitment Enables Coronavirus Transition from Discontinuous to Continuous Transcription  Chia-Hsin.
A Single Templating RNA in Yeast Telomerase
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (October 2014)
ADAR Regulates RNA Editing, Transcript Stability, and Gene Expression
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages (May 2018)
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (March 2013)
Volume 11, Issue 11, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (April 2018)
Melissa B. Uccellini, Adolfo García-Sastre  Cell Reports 
Shrimp miR-34 from Shrimp Stress Response to Virus Infection Suppresses Tumorigenesis of Breast Cancer  Yalei Cui, Xiaoyuan Yang, Xiaobo Zhang  Molecular.
Synthetic Oligonucleotides Inhibit CRISPR-Cpf1-Mediated Genome Editing
Urtzi Garaigorta, Francis V. Chisari  Cell Host & Microbe 
EVA1A/TMEM166 Regulates Embryonic Neurogenesis by Autophagy
Nur Hayati Jaafar Marican, Sara B. Cruz-Migoni, Anne-Gaëlle Borycki 
Yuri Oleynikov, Robert H. Singer  Current Biology 
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (November 2014)
Cellular 5′-3′ mRNA Exonuclease Xrn1 Controls Double-Stranded RNA Accumulation and Anti-Viral Responses  Hannah M. Burgess, Ian Mohr  Cell Host & Microbe 
Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages (December 2013)
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 11, Issue 9, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages (July 2015)
Dan Yu, Rongdiao Liu, Geng Yang, Qiang Zhou  Cell Reports 
Volume 30, Issue 4, Pages (April 2009)
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (November 2014)
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages (March 2017)
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (February 2016)
Volume 23, Issue 13, Pages (June 2018)
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (March 2016)
Role of Cell-Penetrating Peptides in Intracellular Delivery of Peptide Nucleic Acids Targeting Hepadnaviral Replication  Bénédicte Ndeboko, Narayan Ramamurthy,
Dengue Virus-Induced Autophagy Regulates Lipid Metabolism
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (October 2016)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 251-263 (July 2017) Analysis of IAV Replication and Co-infection Dynamics by a Versatile RNA Viral Genome Labeling Method  Dan Dou, Iván Hernández-Neuta, Hao Wang, Henrik Östbye, Xiaoyan Qian, Swantje Thiele, Patricia Resa-Infante, Nancy Mounogou Kouassi, Vicky Sender, Karina Hentrich, Peter Mellroth, Birgitta Henriques-Normark, Gülsah Gabriel, Mats Nilsson, Robert Daniels  Cell Reports  Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 251-263 (July 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.06.021 Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Cell Reports 2017 20, 251-263DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.06.021) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Single-Cell IAV Gene Segment vRNA Labeling Approach (A) Diagram of an IAV and the eight single-stranded vRNA gene segments. (B) PLP design for detecting the IAV gene segments. Each PLP contains ∼20-nucleotide 5′ and 3′ arms that hybridize to adjacent sequences in a gene segment and barcodes for identifying the gene segment (colored) and strain (brown). (C) In situ labeling of IAV gene segments. cDNAs are synthesized from each vRNA in fixed cells. Templates are digested using RNase H. PLPs are hybridized and ligated to produce a template for synthesizing a rolling-circle product (RCP), which creates a concatemer of complementary barcode copies that are detected using complementary fluorescently labeled barcode probes. (D) Single-cell RCP visualization and quantification. RCPs are detected by cycles of barcode probe hybridization (up to five probes at a time), fluorescence microscopy imaging, and stripping. RCP images from different cycles are compiled and aligned, and the RCPs are assigned to the nuclei and cell segments defined by nuclei staining and cell autofluorescence. Cell Reports 2017 20, 251-263DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.06.021) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 PLPs Detect IAV Gene Segments during Entry and Replication (A) The IAV genome (vRNA) replication cycle. After endocytosis, IAVs fuse with the endosomal membrane, releasing the vRNAs into the cytosol. The vRNAs are replicated in the nucleus by the vRNA-dependent RNA polymerase (vRdRP), assembled, and exported for packaging at the plasma membrane. BFLA1 inhibits endosomal acidification and fusion. LMB inhibits the nuclear export. (B) qPCR analysis of cellular and extracellular (media) NP and NA vRNA levels. vRNA levels were normalized to 0 hr p.i. (cellular) or 4 hr p.i. (extracellular). Mean values with the SD from two independent experiments are displayed. (C) The in situ labeling of IAV gene segments in untreated and BFLA1-treated (100 nM) MDCK cells 2 hr p.i. The percentage of gene segment RCPs that co-localize with the nucleus and the SD were determined from two independent experiments analyzing ∼1,000 cells. The box-and-whisker plot (5%–95% CI) shows the nucleus image occupancy from the corresponding image fields. (D) In situ labeling of IAV gene segments in untreated or LMB-treated (10 nM) MDCK cells at 8 hr p.i. LMB was added 5 hr p.i. The RCP nuclear co-localization and SD were determined from three independent experiments. (E) Representative image of the eight IAV gene segment RCPs generated in MDCK cells 8 hr p.i. with an MOI of ∼0.3. Cell nuclei were stained with Hoechst. Inset shows the higher magnification of a cell. (F) Graph showing the percentage of ∼1,000 cells that contained the indicated number of distinct gene segment RCPs in the nucleus at 8 hr p.i. (G) Correlation plot showing the relative increases in the NP vRNA levels versus the number of NP gene segment RCPs in ∼500 infected cells at the indicated times post-infection. Values normalized to 4 hr p.i. and are shown as ± SD. Cell Reports 2017 20, 251-263DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.06.021) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Detection of IAV Gene Segments with Single-Nucleotide Variations (A) Diagram depicting the single-nucleotide differences in each WSN and WSNIso gene segment. Amino acid codons for the indicated IAV gene are given as a position reference. (B) Viral titers obtained during the rescue of WSN and WSNIso by reverse genetics in co-cultured 293T and MDCK cells. (C) Representative immunoblots showing the relative NA, HA, NP, and M1 protein levels in isolated WSN and WSNIso particles. (D) PLP pair design to differentiate IAV gene segments that differ by one nucleotide. In each gene segment PLP pair, the terminal 3′ nucleotide (strain-specific nucleotide) is designed to hybridize with the respective vRNA nucleotide substitution in the WSNIso or WSN sequence. (E) The recognition for each gene segment PLP pair was determined in solution (Figure S3) by quantifying the number of RCPs generated from the same amount of vRNA. (F) RNA was extracted from MDCK cells (16 hr p.i.) or mouse lung tissue harvested 12 hr p.i. with the indicated viruses and RCPs were generated with the HA PLP pair. The graph shows the percentage of WSN (green) and WSNIso (red) RCPs from each sample. Cell Reports 2017 20, 251-263DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.06.021) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 In Situ IAV Genome Labeling Can Identify Infections with Single-Nucleotide Precision (A) MDCK cells infected with the indicated virus were labeled 6 hr p.i. using the individual gene segment PLP pairs (Figure S4), and the resulting number of RCPs for each PLP are displayed as a box-and-whisker plot. (B) MDCK cells infected with WSN or WSNIso were labeled 6 hr p.i. with the eight PLP pairs. Strain-specific barcodes were used for visualization, and the RCP per cell numbers for each PLP set are shown for ∼25,000 cells. (C) MDCK cells infected with WSN or WSNIso were trypsinized 2 hr p.i., the cells were combined, reseeded on the same slide, and labeled 4 hr later with the eight WSN and WSNIso PLP pairs. A representative image is shown with arrows indicating WSN-infected (green) or WSNIso-infected (red) cells. The an inset shows the nuclei staining. (D) Representative images of lung cryosections from mice 2 days post-inoculation with WSN or WSNIso, or co-inoculation with WSN and WSNIso, which were labeled with the eight WSN and WSNIso PLP pairs. The insets display the mosaics of the lung sections with the respective image region. The number of RCPs and the SD from the indicated PLP set was obtained from analyzing two entire lung cryosection mosaics. RCP signals are displayed as enlarged circles for better visualization. Cell Reports 2017 20, 251-263DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.06.021) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Single-Cell Analysis of IAV Entry by In Situ Gene Segment Labeling (A) Infection procedure for IAV gene segment labeling during viral entry. WSN at either a low (∼0.3) or a high (∼3) MOI was bound to MDCK cells at 4°C, unbound virus was removed, and entry was initiated by shifting the cells to 37°C. Labeling was performed at the indicated times post-binding. (B) Percentage of cells possessing one or more RCPs plotted with respect to the time post-binding for the low and high MOI infections. For each time point, ∼1,000 cells were examined. (C) The number of gene segment RCPs per infected cell is shown as a box-and-whisker plot for ∼1,000 cells at each time point following infection with the low (left panel) or high (right panel) MOI. (D and E) Representative images of the IAV gene segment labeling at the indicated times post-binding with the low (D) and high (E) MOI. The RCPs were visualized with the strain-specific barcode (low and high MOI) and the gene segment barcodes (high MOI). (F) Cell diagrams of the parameters for classifying the five infection stages based on the number of labeled gene segments and the percentage of nuclear co-localization. (G) Distribution of the infection stages in the cell population at the indicated times following infection with the low (left panel) or high (right panel) MOI. More than 12,000 cells were analyzed. Cell Reports 2017 20, 251-263DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.06.021) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Co-labeling of IAV Genomes Reveals the Time Window for Productive Cell Co-infections (A) Diagram of the co-infection experiment. Cells were bound with the primary IAV (WSN) at 4°C using an MOI of ∼3, unbound virus was removed, and the secondary IAV (WSNIso) was added at an equal MOI at the indicated times (red arrows) after the 37°C temperature shift. Cells were labeled 8 hr p.i. with WSN, resulting in increasingly shorter durations of the WSNIso infections. (B) Representative control images of the WSNIso gene segment labeling to account for the shorter durations of the infection. Cells were only infected with WSNIso. (C) Representative images of the WSN (green) and WSNIso (red) gene segment labeling in co-infected cells. The secondary WSNIso infections were initiated at the indicated times after WSN binding (listed on the left). The durations of the WSNIso infections are listed on the right. (D) Distribution of the WSNIso infection stages in the control samples (no WSN primary infection) as the duration of the infection becomes shorter. (E) Left: distribution of the WSNIso infection stages as the virus was added at increasing time intervals (listed in parentheses) after the primary WSN infection. For each time point, ∼2,000 cells were examined. Right: combined distribution of the WSN infection stages in the cell populations from all samples. Cell Reports 2017 20, 251-263DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.06.021) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 The Primary IAV Replication Stage Defines the Cell Susceptibility to Secondary Infections The model displays the distribution of the five IAV replication stages that were observed by gene segment PLP labeling over the course of an infection. Each stage is diagramed with respect to the cell population and the corresponding infection time that was observed using a single (primary) IAV infection. The time window and the stages of a primary IAV infection in which the cell is susceptible to co-infection by a secondary IAV are shown above the graph. Cell Reports 2017 20, 251-263DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.06.021) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions