Compensation 101 Today’s lesson plan: Compensation 101 - How To Use Market Data To Support Your Compensation Philosophy.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DELEGATION AUTHORITY. Agencies Delegated: Classifications Classifications Hire Above Minimum Hire Above Minimum Temporary Salary Adjustments Temporary.
Advertisements

Town Hall Presentation January 9-10, 2002 Curtis Powell Vice President for Human Resources The Division of Human Resources and William M. Mercer, Incorporated.
Assessment of Current Compensation Rates Potential Cost Savings Opportunities XYZ Manufacturing Company.
1 Market Pricing Organizations seek to offer market based pay rates in order to attract and retain competent employees There are two basic methods to recognize.
XYZ Company Market Competitiveness Analysis: Senior Management Presentation December 30, 2003.
Building Market- Competitive Compensation Systems
COMPENSATION STRATEGIES FOR NONPROFITS October 30, 2008 Bay Area Nonprofit HR Network San Francisco, CA.
Market Based Pay System The Market Based Pay System Project.
Designing Pay Levels, Mix, and Pay Structures
Fox, Lawson & Associates Compensation Study Summary Findings
Compensation Philosophy Performance-driven and market-referenced –We value high performance and compensate employees based on their contributions to the.
Staff Compensation Program Update
1 Compensation Update Lori Dougherty Director of Compensation December 8, 2009 Brandeis University pays competitive base market salaries as part of a total.
Compensation Deborah Marsh November Total Rewards Total Rewards definition Total Rewards definition Why Total Rewards? Why Total Rewards? Elements.
1 Surveying Market Pay Just as skill, effort, responsibility, and working conditions have been used to differentiate rates of pay among major job groupings,
Strategic Staffing Chapter 1
MANA 4328 Dennis C. Veit Human Resource Staffing and Performance Management “Beginning the Staffing Process” MANA 4328 Dennis C. Veit
Total Rewards and Compensation
© 2010 McGraw Hill Ryerson 8-1 COMPENSATION Third Canadian Edition Milkovich, Newman, Cole.
Designing Pay Levels, Mix, and Pay Structures
STAFF COMPENSATION PROGRAM TOWN HALL MEETINGS FEBRUARY 2004.
Competitive Market Compensation Review July 2009 Project Overview.
FAR Roundtable Luncheon Program Developing Market – Based Pay Practices March 22, 2006 Jim Moss Managing Director.
Prentice Hall, Inc. © A Human Resource Management Approach STRATEGIC COMPENSATION Prepared by David Oakes Chapter 8 Building Market-Competitive.
Market Pay. Company’s Compensation Strategy Example: Base Pay will lag market (25 th percentile) Base Pay will lag market (25 th percentile) Base + Target.
Pay Structure Decisions
Designing Pay Levels, Mix, and Pay Structures
Compensation Management
SECCP Salaried Employees Compensation and Classification Program June, 2005.
Erin Packwood 2005 Competitive Compensation Review Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) January 17, 2006.
Staff Compensation Program – Phase 2 Internal Equity Adjustments October 2005.
Non-Academic Staff Compensation Program Employee Presentation 2013.
Surveying Market Pay & Compensation Practices
1 ACC FY07 Classification and Compensation Study.
Designing Pay Levels, Mix, and Pay Structures
Compensation:  Compensation is the methods and practices of maintaining balance between interests of operating the company within the fiscal budget and.
By: Juan P. Garcia Organizational Research Services Director EMPLOYER OF CHOICE Total Rewards, Trends and Plan Design Take a Chomp Out of Your Comp!
Prentice Hall, Inc. © A Human Resource Management Approach STRATEGIC COMPENSATION Prepared by David Oakes Chapter 9 Building Pay Structures That.
1 Pay Study Review City Auditor’s Office December 8, 2003.
Collecting Market Data Presented to NPELRA April 15, 2002 Bruce G. Lawson, CCP Fox Lawson & Associates LLC (602)
Benchmarking Compensation & Benefits: How Do You Compare? Christina L. Greathouse, Ph.D. Strategic Performance Group April 30, 2008.
JOB EVALUATION & SALARY STRUCTURE DESIGN
-09/06/13, - Page 1 The Ohio State University - Classification and Compensation Talking Points - CONFIDENTIAL – for internal use only -  Compensation.
Texas A& M University Central Texas Staff Salary Study Process February 25, 2014.
Establishing Strategic Pay Plans
TOTAL REWARDS ANNUAL ACTION ITEM #2. 2 AGENDA  Purpose of the Presentation  Our Approach  Total Rewards Philosophy Review  Compensation- Current State/Future.
Chapter 5 Compensation & Benefits
Compensation Management. Compensation Employee compensation – refers to extrinsic and intangible rewards. – refers to all forms of pay or rewards going.
Chapter 9 Managing Compensation
Compensation Study Preliminary Results Overview Presented by: CBIZ Human Capital Services October 26, 2015.
AFOA HR CONFERENCE 2015 Compensation 101
Market Pay. Market Pricing Data Analysis Job Matching/Survey Selection Compensation Philosophy = Analyzing external salary survey data to establish the.
Advances in Human Resource Development and Management Course code: MGT 712 Lecture 12.
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Part 4 Compensation of Human Resources.
11-1 McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved. fundamentals of Human Resource Management 4 th edition by.
Compensation Study Preliminary Results Presented by: CBIZ Human Capital Services January 11, 2016.
Creating a Salary Structure 101
Human Resources Department Bridget Paris, Compensation Specialist Work Session July 7, 2011.
8 - 1 McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 8 Designing Pay Levels, Mix and Pay Structures.
Discussion on Compensation. Goal To assist in securing and retaining a staff of necessary quality to achieve the goals and objectives of the organization.
Fair Pay for Northern California Nonprofits: The 2016 Compensation & Benefits Survey HIGHLIGHTS AND TRENDS May 12, 2016 Sponsored by CompassPoint Nonprofit.
City of Galveston Classification & Compensation Study Discussion Preliminary Findings and Recommendations.
New Mexico Highlands University
Welcome to the Winner’s Circle! Trends in Healthcare Compensation Arkansas Healthcare Human Resources Association April 1, 2016.
Building Market- Competitive Compensation Systems MGT 4543 Compensation Management Chapter 7.
Compensation Structure and Merit Process
Designing pay levels, mix and pay structures
A Compensation Analysis For Human Resources Professionals
FINDING THE RIGHT BALANCE
Agenda • Introductions • Project Objectives • Project Steps
Presentation transcript:

Compensation 101 Today’s lesson plan: Compensation 101 - How To Use Market Data To Support Your Compensation Philosophy

Compensation Philosophy Market Pricing = Putting all of the pieces together for the final product = Taking accurate measurements based on the foundation created = Selecting appropriate resources that are easily recognizable; limit custom design = Foundation for defining your market and competitive position Data Analysis Job Matching Compensation Philosophy

Foundation for defining your market and competitive position. Compensation philosophy: We use an external market-referenced approach to attracting and retaining top candidates in Southeast Michigan. We pursue all avenues to get what we want; no company is safe from our recruiting efforts. We strive to lead the market and pay more than the going rate to our employees based on demonstrated skill and performance– our money grows on trees. Compensation Philosophy

Foundation for defining your market and competitive position. So what do we know about this company in terms of the market-referenced approach? What is the hiring and retention strategy? What is the labor market? What is the market position? Compensation Philosophy

Selecting appropriate resources that are easily recognizable Using our job descriptions that are reviewed and updated every year… Select benchmark jobs from the surveys Do not rely on job titles or levels Job Matching

Selecting appropriate resources that are easily recognizable There are few jobs in the market that will match your jobs 100% in terms of job content Therefore one rule of thumb is to consider the match to be appropriate if 70% or more of the job content is similar Job Matching

Selecting appropriate resources that are easily recognizable So what do you do about the job that doesn’t meet the 70% criteria? Consider different approaches to tackle the “person-specific” jobs in your organization Job Matching

Selecting appropriate resources that are easily recognizable; limit custom design Let’s say 60% of a job is “chief bottle washer” and 40% of a job is “executive chef”. What can you do? Pay market rate of similar benchmark job Pay the market rate of the bottle washer Pay the “bottle washer” rate + a premium % Combine the market data 60%/40% Pay the highest market rate of the two jobs Job Matching

Taking accurate measurements based on the foundation created What did we say in our compensation philosophy about: Our labor market? Our target competitive pay? Our market position? Data Analysis

Taking accurate measurements based on the foundation created Target - Pay more than the going rate The Median or 50th percentile is generally considered to be the going rate of pay for the position Paying more than the going rate might could mean using the 75th percentile for competitive positioning Data Analysis

Taking accurate measurements based on the foundation created Market Position - Lead the market All survey data must be aged Salary surveys will typically publish projected structure and budget increases Select your change rate and a future common date to age your data Data Analysis

Taking accurate measurements based on the foundation created Reacting to trends Data jumping up or down? Consider removing data from your study that appears inconsistent based on your research Data Analysis

Putting all of the pieces together for the final product Market Pricing What do you do with multiple survey sources or data points? Take the average of the data points for each job Weight surveys/data differently based on your compensation strategy Weight surveys/data differently based on the quality of the survey/data

Putting all of the pieces together for the final product Market Pricing What do you do with the market data points? Could use the data points (10th %, 25th %, 50th %, 75th %, 90th %) to establish market rates for each job or to develop/update salary ranges

Putting all of the pieces together for the final product Market Pricing Pay rates are set – they are aligned with the compensation philosophy……so now what? Compare incumbent pay to the market data and analyze need to adjust pay

Putting all of the pieces together for the final product Market Pricing Look at incumbent pay or job family pay compared to market rate. Market index – divide the base salary by the market rate Compa-ratio – divide the base salary by the midpoint 1.00 or greater – at or above market rate/midpoint Less than 1.00 – below market rate/midpoint

Putting all of the pieces together for the final product Market Pricing Things to consider if it appears you are over/underpaying: Match to market Skill/performance Accuracy of survey data Labor market conditions Plan to correct issues over time

Putting all of the pieces together for the final product Market Pricing Educating staff: Communicate, communicate, communicate Transparency Support the “right” decisions

Compensation Philosophy Market Pricing Final Exam Data Analysis Job Matching Compensation Philosophy