Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (August 2003)
Advertisements

Bhalchandra Jadhav, Klemens Wild, Martin R. Pool, Irmgard Sinning 
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Structural Basis of DNA Recognition by p53 Tetramers
Volume 105, Issue 4, Pages (May 2001)
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages (July 2005)
Beyond the “Recognition Code”
Volume 124, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (September 2013)
Molecular Basis of Box C/D RNA-Protein Interactions
Tom Huxford, De-Bin Huang, Shiva Malek, Gourisankar Ghosh  Cell 
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (August 2003)
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Allosteric Effects of the Oncogenic RasQ61L Mutant on Raf-RBD
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
Volume 90, Issue 4, Pages (August 1997)
Diabetes Mutations Delineate an Atypical POU Domain in HNF-1α
Volume 108, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (April 2007)
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Solution Structure of a Telomeric DNA Complex of Human TRF1
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
Crystal Structure of the MazE/MazF Complex
Structural Analysis of Ligand Stimulation of the Histidine Kinase NarX
Volume 19, Issue 12, Pages (December 2011)
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 10, Issue 10, Pages (October 2002)
Volume 9, Issue 8, Pages (August 2001)
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Qian Steven Xu, Rebecca B. Kucera, Richard J. Roberts, Hwai-Chen Guo 
Elizabeth J. Little, Andrea C. Babic, Nancy C. Horton  Structure 
Structure of the DNA-Bound T-Box Domain of Human TBX3, a Transcription Factor Responsible for Ulnar-Mammary Syndrome  Miquel Coll, Jonathan G Seidman,
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (February 2007)
An Atomic Model of the Interferon-β Enhanceosome
Kay Perry, Young Hwang, Frederic D. Bushman, Gregory D. Van Duyne 
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Antonina Roll-Mecak, Chune Cao, Thomas E. Dever, Stephen K. Burley 
Yi Mo, Benjamin Vaessen, Karen Johnston, Ronen Marmorstein 
The basis for K-Ras4B binding specificity to protein farnesyl-transferase revealed by 2 Å resolution ternary complex structures  Stephen B Long, Patrick.
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages (May 2016)
Structural Basis for Specificity in the Poxvirus Topoisomerase
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 52, Issue 3, Pages (November 2013)
Structural Insight into AMPK Regulation: ADP Comes into Play
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Carlos R. Escalante, Leyi Shen, Dimitris Thanos, Aneel K. Aggarwal 
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (June 2006)
Recognition of AT-Rich DNA Binding Sites by the MogR Repressor
Hideki Kusunoki, Ruby I MacDonald, Alfonso Mondragón  Structure 
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
The 2.0 å structure of a cross-linked complex between snowdrop lectin and a branched mannopentaose: evidence for two unique binding modes  Christine Schubert.
Clemens C. Heikaus, Jayvardhan Pandit, Rachel E. Klevit  Structure 
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Structure of a HoxB1–Pbx1 Heterodimer Bound to DNA
Peter König, Rafael Giraldo, Lynda Chapman, Daniela Rhodes  Cell 
Structure of an IκBα/NF-κB Complex
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Three protein kinase structures define a common motif
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Restriction Enzyme BsoBI–DNA Complex
Sabine Pokutta, William I. Weis  Molecular Cell 
Structural Basis for Activation of ARF GTPase
Presentation transcript:

Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages 75-83 (January 2007) DNA Recognition Mechanism of the ONECUT Homeodomain of Transcription Factor HNF-6  Daisuke Iyaguchi, Min Yao, Nobuhisa Watanabe, Jun Nishihira, Isao Tanaka  Structure  Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages 75-83 (January 2007) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2006.11.004 Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Structural Overview of the DNA-Binding Domain Complexed with DNA (A) An overview of the HNF-6-DNA complex. The cut domain and the homeodomain of HNF-6 are shown in light blue and yellow, respectively. Helices 1–9 are labeled. (B) Two overviews of the Oct-1-DNA complex related by 70° rotation about the axis parallel to the helical axis of the DNA showing that the POU domain (left figure) and the homeodomain (right figure) can be superimposed with the cut domain and the homeodomain of (A). The POU-specific domain and the homeodomain of Oct-1 are shown in green and orange, respectively. (C) HNF-6 and Oct-1 are shown in the same colors as in (A) and (B). HNF-6 (left) and Oct-1 (right) are related by 90° rotation about the horizontal axis to (A) and the right view of (B), respectively. Structure 2007 15, 75-83DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2006.11.004) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Sequence of the DNA Duplex Used for Cocrystallization and of the DNA-Binding Domain of HNF-6 (A) DNA duplex used for cocrystallization. Base pairs 1–13 are from the rat TTR promoter. The 5′-half subsite and the 3′-half subsite are boxed. Asterisks indicate the positions replaced by 5-bromouridines for phasing. (B) DNA duplex used for cocrystallization of Oct-1. The ATGC subsite (5′ half) and the AAAT subsite (3′ half) of an octamer site are boxed (Klemm et al., 1994). (C) The amino acid sequence of the DNA-binding domain of HNF-6 is shown; the single-letter amino acid code is used. The regions corresponding to the cut domain and the homeodomain are boxed, and the linker segment is labeled. Helices seen in the crystal structure are indicated below the sequence. Structure 2007 15, 75-83DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2006.11.004) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Structural Comparison of the Cut Domain and the POU-Specific Domain (A) Structural comparison of the cut domains of the DNA-bound and DNA-free structures. The cut domain of the DNA-bound crystal structure is shown in light blue, and that of the DNA-free NMR structure is shown in pink. Helices 1–6 of the cut domain are labeled. (B) Structural comparison of the POU-specific domains of the DNA-bound and DNA-free structures. The POU-specific domain of the DNA-bound crystal structure of Oct-1 is shown in green, and that of the DNA-free NMR structure is shown in red. (C) Structural comparison of the cut domain and the POU-specific domain. The cut domain of the DNA-bound crystal structure of HNF-6 is shown in light blue. The POU-specific domain of the DNA-bound crystal structure of Oct-1 is shown in green. Helices 1–6 of the cut domain are labeled. Structure 2007 15, 75-83DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2006.11.004) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Sequence Comparison of the Cut Domain of HNF-6 and the POU-Specific Domain of Oct-1 Residue numbers and secondary structures in the DNA-binding structure of the cut domain and the POU-specific domain are shown above and below each sequence, respectively. Residues involved in the formation of the hydrophobic core are shown in red. Residues hydrogen bonding to backbone atoms and bases of the DNA are shown in light blue and green, respectively. Residues hydrogen bonding to both backbone atoms and bases are shown in purple. Residues identical between the two domains are boxed. Structure 2007 15, 75-83DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2006.11.004) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Protein-DNA Contacts Schematic diagram of protein-DNA contacts. Residues from the cut domain are shown in light blue, and the homeodomain is shown in yellow. The bases, phosphates, and sugars contacted by each domain are indicated in the corresponding colors. The bases contacted by both domains are shown in red. Solid black lines indicate hydrogen bonds. van der Waals interactions are indicated as dashed blue lines. Water molecules are shown as green spheres. Structure 2007 15, 75-83DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2006.11.004) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Detailed View of the Homeodomain-DNA Interactions Interactions of Asn-143, Met-146, Asn-147, and Arg-150 with DNA are shown. Dashed red lines indicate hydrogen bonds. van der Waals interactions are indicated as dashed blue lines. Water molecules are shown as green spheres. Residue numbers and base numbers are labeled. Structure 2007 15, 75-83DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2006.11.004) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Conformational Change in DNA Backbone structures of DNA complexed with HNF-6 and Oct-1 are shown. HNF-6 (left) and Oct-1 (right) are shown in the same colors as in Figure 1. Structure 2007 15, 75-83DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2006.11.004) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions