Volume 393, Issue 10171, Pages 531-540 (February 2019) Are gender gaps due to evaluations of the applicant or the science? A natural experiment at a national funding agency Holly O Witteman, PhD, Michael Hendricks, PhD, Prof Sharon Straus, MD, Prof Cara Tannenbaum, MD The Lancet Volume 393, Issue 10171, Pages 531-540 (February 2019) DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32611-4 Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions
Figure 1 Changes in Canadian Institutes of Health Research grant programmes The Lancet 2019 393, 531-540DOI: (10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32611-4) Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions
Figure 2 Funding success by grant programme Points indicate model-predicted means and error bars indicate 95% CIs. The Lancet 2019 393, 531-540DOI: (10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32611-4) Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions
Figure 3 Foundation programme results by review stage The review focus in stage 1 was the calibre of the researcher, and in stages 2 and 3 was quality of research. The Lancet 2019 393, 531-540DOI: (10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32611-4) Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions