Standard Market Design (SMD) in New England Federal Energy Regulation Commission Conference on Standard Market Design January 22, 2002 David LaPlante Vice.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
In the Post 06 Environment November 9, 2006 Jim Eber Demand Response.
Advertisements

National Grids Involvement in New Englands Forward Capacity Market Helping to Bring Demand Resources into the Supply Mix Tim Roughan Director, Distributed.
PG&Es 2009 Participating Load Pilot. 2 Overview Regulatory Context Pilot Characteristics Lessons Next Steps.
Achieving Price-Responsive Demand in New England Henry Yoshimura Director, Demand Resource Strategy ISO New England National Town Meeting on Demand Response.
Electricity and Natural Gas Supply, Reserves, and Resource Adequacy CMTA Energy Conference Energy: Growing Californias Economy William J. Keese California.
The Midwest ISO from a Transmission Owner Perspective.
MISO Day 2: A Transmission Users (Marketers) Perspective Leon White August 8, 2007.
© 2004 Dominion Dominion Proposal January 24, 2005.
NAESB Strawman January 24-25, Problem Statement Enough generators must have fuel to meet peak load New England Cold Snap crisis heightened interest.
Definition of Firm Energy and Interruptible Transmission Two Issues Causing Problems for Business in the Western Interconnection.
Ace usa How to Make Retail Markets Work Presentation by Patricia Goudarzi, ACE USA Power Products to the New England Conference of Public Utility Commissioners.
NECPUC SYMPOSIUM Concurrent B Natural Gas Conditions Facing New England Mark R. Babula ISO New England Inc. Supervisor - Power Supply & Reliability June.
Electricity Industry The Potential Effect of Locational Marginal Pricing on Renewable Resources for Environmental Issues in Energy NECPUC Annual Symposium.
Demand Resource Operable Capacity Analysis – Assumptions for FCA 5.
2000, Independent Electricity Market Operator All Rights Reserved 1.
Ancillary Services Market, Day-Ahead Load Response and Special Case Nodal Pricing Implementation Vamsi Chadalavada FERC Technical Conference March 4, 2005.
Overview of CAISO Stakeholder Process for FERC Order 764 Compliance Implementation of 15 minute scheduling and settlement Jim Price, CAISO Presentation.
EuroPEX Decentralized Market Coupling as the preferred cross-border method B. den Ouden, President of Europex APEx Annual Conference 2004 Leipzig, Germany,
Highlights of the 2003 New York ISO State of the Market Report David B. Patton, Ph.D. Potomac Economics Independent Market Advisor April 14, 2004.
SAS 70 Third Party Report on Controls Overview and Timetable Finance / Audit Committee Meeting Austin, Texas January 14, 2003/ February 18, 2003.
Capacity Planning For Products and Services
Managing Demand and Capacity
New England Developments in Demand Response and Smart Grid 2010 National Town Meeting on Demand Response and Smart Grid Henry Yoshimura, Director, Demand.
Enhanced Day Ahead Commitment Project: Enhancements to the DACP IESOTP 244-3d.
03/11/2013 MARKETS COMMITTEE Aleks Mitreski MARKET DEVELOPMENT (413) Overview of Market Rule revisions.
SEPTEMBER 12, 2012 | MARKETS COMMITTEE Aleks Mitreski MARKET DEVELOPMENT (413) Hourly Offer and Intraday.
ERGEG Advice Comitology Guidelines on Fundamental Electricity Data Transparency Florence Forum 13 December 2010 Bente Danielsen.
Number bonds to 10,
California Energy Commission 1 Energy Workshops for W&WW Agencies UTILITY STRATEGIES FOR SHIFTING PEAK DEMAND PERIOD WATER & ENERGY USE REGIONAL STRATEGIES:
Congestion Management Settlement Credits December, 2002.
JANUARY 14-15, 2014 | NEPOOL MARKETS COMMITTEE Matthew Brewster MARKET DEVELOPMENT | Conceptual design.
Ancillary Services Update NEPOOL Markets Committee October 14, 2003 Jim Milligan ISO-NE Markets Development.
OCTOBER 8, 2014 Bob Laurita INTERNAL MARKET MONITORING New Import Capacity Resource FCM Market Power Mitigation Order to Show Cause Compliance Filing.
Cost Ranges for the Development and Operation of a Day One Regional Transmission Organization PL
Gloria Godson VP, Federal Regulatory Policy Reliability Pricing Model Part 2.
Highlights of the 2004 State of the Market Report New York Electricity Markets David B. Patton, Ph.D. Potomac Economics Independent Market Advisor May.
Demand Response in New York State Northwest Power and Conservation Council DR workshop February 24, 2006.
MISO’s Midwest Market Initiative APEX Ron McNamara October 31, 2005.
Enhancing Interruptible Rates Through MISO Demand Response: WIEG Annual Meeting June 19, 2008 Presented by: Kavita Maini, Principal KM Energy Consulting,
Market Overview in Electric Power Systems Market Structure and Operation Introduction Market Overview Market Overview in Electric Power Systems Mohammad.
1 ISO/RTO Council Wholesale Demand Response Projects & OpenADR David Forfia.
The Continuing Evolution of U.S. Electricity Markets
Demand Response in MISO Markets NASUCA Panel on DR November 12, 2012.
PJM © PJM Overview ARIPPA Valley Forge, PA November 8, 2007.
Welcome New York Independent System Operator. (Pre-NYISO) Regulated Market Physical contracts Regulated industry Cost Based System Two Party Deals Bundled.
(C) NordPool1 The Nordic Power Market Zonal Pricing Jan Vidar Thoresen Managing Director Nord Pool Consulting AS.
Overview of the North American and Canadian Markets 2008 APEX Conference in Sydney, Australia October 13, 2008 Hung-po Chao Director, Market Strategy and.
1 New England Demand Response Resources: Present Observations and Future Challenges Henry Yoshimura Demand Resources Department ISO New England, Inc. Holyoke,
Power Plant BI POWER GENERATION Evolution of Plant Ownership From Regulated Era Regulated Utility Monopolies To “Partially” Deregulated Era Independent.
1 Capacity Markets Investment in Generation Capacity Payments October 31, 2005 J. W. Charlton.
Bulk Power Transmission System
1 Electricity System and Energy Market Basics David J. Lawrence Manager, Auxiliary Market Products Prepared for: RGGI I&L Workshop June 15, 2006.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Economic DR participation in energy market ERCOT April 14, 2014 Pete Langbein.
PJM © 2006 The Institute for Regulatory Policy Studies Illinois State University Conference May 12, 2006 Jeff Bladen PJM Interconnection.
1 Pacific Northwest Hydro-Thermal System and RTO West Market Design FERC Market Design Workshop January 23, 2002.
Demand Response: What It Is and Why It’s Important 2007 APPA National Conference San Antonio, Texas June 26, :00 a.m. to Noon Glenn M. Wilson Director.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Demand Side Working Group Loads in SCED Angelo Marcino Real-Time Market Operations – PJM April 14, 2014.
Texas Nodal Team Cost Benefit Group Background to Standard Market Design in New England March 2, 2004 Michael Taniwha Manager, Market Administration ISO.
G 200 L 200 ISO NEW ENGLAND T H E P E O P L E B E H I N D N E W E N G L A N D ’ S P O W E R. Southwest Connecticut RFP Markets Committee November 14, 2003.
Programs/Products that ERCOT Does Not Presently Offer ERCOT Demand Side Working Group New DR Product Options Subgroup Jay Zarnikau Frontier Associates.
1 Dr. Ahmed Kaloko Chief Economist Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Harrisburg, Pennsylvania Transition from Public Service to Competitive Markets.
©2003 PJM 1 Presentation to: Maryland Public Service Commission May 16, 2003.
FERC Standard Market Design Working Papers
Asia-Pacific Energy Regulatory Forum
Calculation of BGS-CIEP Hourly Energy Price Component Using PJM Hourly Data for the PSE&G Transmission Zone.
Benefits of ICAP Reliability Economics
Calculation of BGS-CIEP Hourly Energy Price Component Using PJM Hourly Data for the PSE&G Transmission Zone.
Benefits of New England’s Proposed Capacity Market
Summer Peak Energy Pricing in New England: The ISO-NE Response
Vice President, Markets Development
Presentation transcript:

Standard Market Design (SMD) in New England Federal Energy Regulation Commission Conference on Standard Market Design January 22, 2002 David LaPlante Vice President, Markets Development ISO New England Inc.

2 Presentation Topics ISO-NE selection of Standard Market Design SMD description –Initial implementation –Planned enhancements SMD and smaller market participants

3 What is SMD? PJMs current market design (Locational Marginal Pricing, Multi-Settlement) with the following enhancements: –Spinning reserve market –Electronic Dispatch signals sent directly to all generators every five minutes –Marginal losses included in prices –Automated market mitigation procedures –Dispatch of Hydro-electric units with offers and self-schedules –Detailed business processes for SMD operation –Auction all financial transmission rights

4 Why SMD in New England? Decision made in early 2001 based upon: –Schedule for New England custom CMS/MSS design showed: CMSQ12003 CMS/MSSQ12004 at Best –New, unproven/untested market design –Final budget of $100 - $120 Million –Expiration of retail standard offers at year-end 2003

5 Why ISO-NE Switched to SMD Full implementation of locational marginal pricing and multi- settlement one year earlier and at lower cost Reduced risk of market problems upon implementation –Proven market design Reduced risk of implementation problems –Use of existing software for day-ahead market, real-time market and external transactions Step toward convergence of northeast markets Provides long-term benefits in market design and software development

6 Standard Market Design Features Market participation voluntary Provides ability for participants with physical supply to self-supply their requirements and self-schedule resources opt out of the market Anticipate 75-80% reliance on bilateral marketplace for energy needs to continue

7 SMD Enhancements Spinning reserve market –Needed in New England because of need to back down thermal units to provide reserves Electronic dispatch signals sent every 5-minutes –ISO-NE dispatches all generation directly Marginal losses included in prices –Dispatch in NE includes penalty factors, for losses must be included in prices Automated market mitigation procedures –Extend current ISO-NE mitigation into SMD

8 SMD Enhancements: Hydro Generation Options in the Day Ahead Market A.Self-schedule generation and offer prices for any additional water B.Submit all available water and associated prices for dispatch by ISO C.Combination of A and B. These produce financially binding hourly schedules

9 Hydro Options - A Picture Day-ahead Schedule $10 $20 $30 $40 $50 $60 $70 $80 $90 $100 Prices for incremental output Available capacity Output MW

10 A.Fixed day-ahead schedule coupled with owner option to increase/decrease output via self-schedule - Allows owner to respond to market conditions B.Fixed day-ahead schedule with economic dispatch priced below it - Allows owner to respond to market conditions stay below maximum dispatch C.Full economic dispatch based upon offer prices SMD Enhancements: Hydro Generation Options in the Real-Time Market

11 SMD Enhancements - Business Processes Market rules define market for market participants ISO-NE has developed detailed set of internal business processes on how to run market internally These are being validated with PJM Once complete, we will make them available to all for SMD implementation at no cost

12 SMD Enhancements - Financial Transmission Rights Auctions All financial transmission rights will be auctioned off Revenue from those auctions allocated to load Assures those who value them most highly will get load Semi-annual/annual auctions

13 SMD and Smaller Market Participants New England has many small (10 MW to ~ 100 MW) public power utilities Two joint action agencies have been formed to support their participants in the wholesale markets These agencies provide the technical and managerial support for the municipals The allocation of financial transmission rights to those utilities is an outstanding issue

14 Future Enhancements to SMD(V2.0) New York ISO and ISO-NE have agreed to enhancements to SMD based on review of best practices –Hourly bidding –Co-optimizing energy with regulation and spinning reserves –Off-line reserve markets

15 Reasons for Enhancements Hourly bidding –Improves ability of generators to schedule limited energy resources; both hydro and interruptible gas Co-optimization of energy and reserves in real-time –Improves efficiency of real-time dispatch and may allow more complete utilization of transmission system Off-line reserve market options under review –Longer-term option-like market –Day-ahead with associated real-time Market

16 Developing a Standard Market Design The bulk of the standard has to be absolute However, some portion should be open to innovation and evolution –Allows vendors to distinguish products and compete

17 Applying this Theory to a Standard for Electricity Markets Candidate features for standardization: –Locational Pricing –Day-Ahead Market –Real-Time Market –Financial Transmission Rights –External Transaction Scheduling Rules Candidate Features for Innovation: –Ancillary service market design, including co-optimization –ICAP product and market for it