Single Side Coupler for input coupler of L0-1

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RF-Gun beam based alignment at PITZ/FLASH
Advertisements

Emittance dilution due to misalignment of quads and cavities of ILC main linac revised K.Kubo For beam energy 250 GeV,
Emittance dilution due to misalignment of quads and cavities of ILC main linac K.Kubo For beam energy 250 GeV, TESLA-type optics for 24MV/m.
On Cavity Tilt + Gradient Change (Beam Dynamics) K. Kubo K. Kubo.
1 ILC Bunch compressor Damping ring ILC Summer School August Eun-San Kim KNU.
Diagnostics and commissioning on ERLP Yuri Saveliev ASTeC CONFORM Project: EMMA Design Review Workshop February 2007, Daresbury Laboratory.
ILC RF phase stability requirements and how can we demonstrate them Sergei Nagaitsev Oct 24, 2007.
Performance Analysis Using Genesis 1.3 Sven Reiche LCLS Undulator Parameter Workshop Argonne National Laboratory 10/24/03.
C.Limborg-Deprey ERL Workshop, Jefferson March 20th 2005 Optimum electron distribution for space charge dominated beams.
C.Limborg-Deprey Beam Dynamics for RF gun November 3 rd 2004 Beam Dynamics Justification of RF Gun Modifications.
C.Limborg-Deprey Beam Dynamics Justifying L01 November 3 rd 2004 Beam Dynamics Justifications of modification of.
Richard F Boyce Injector UpdateL0-1 Accelerator 3 November L0-1 Design, Manufacturing & Testing R. F. Boyce, SLAC.
Cecile Limborg-Deprey Injector Commissioning September Injector Commissioning Plans C.Limborg-Deprey Gun exit measurements.
Injector RF Design Review November 3, 2004 John Schmerge, SLAC L0-1 Electrical and Mechanical Tolerances John Schmerge, SLAC.
David H. Dowell Injector Physics/Diagnostics/Gun&L0 RF April 29-30, 2004 Injector Physics / Diagnostics / Gun & L0 Linac.
F Specifications for the dark current kicker for the NML test facility at Fermilab S. Nagaitsev, M. Church, P. Piot, C.Y. Tan, J. Steimel Fermilab May.
LCLS-II Transverse Tolerances Tor Raubenheimer May 29, 2013.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility 1 of 20 Distribution State A “Direct” Injection D. Douglas, C. Tennant, P. Evtushenko JLab.
Influence of the Third Harmonic Module on the Beam Size Maria Kuhn University of Hamburg Bachelor Thesis Presentation.
I.V. Bazarov, ERL advisory mtg, Sept 2012 CLASSE Cornell University CHESS & ERL Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-based ScienceS and Education (CLASSE)
S2E optics design and particles tracking for the ILC undulator based e+ source Feng Zhou SLAC ILC e+ source meeting, Beijing, Jan. 31 – Feb. 2, 2007.
Overview of ERL MEIC Cooler Design Studies S.V. Benson, Y. Derbenev, D.R. Douglas, F. Hannon, F. Marhauser, R. A Rimmer, C.D. Tennant, H. Zhang, H. Wang,
K. Floettmann30 th Nov XFEL Injector matching The present XFEL injector foresees operation of the first four cavities of the first module to operate.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Containing a.
Accelerator Science and Technology Centre Extended ALICE Injector J.W. McKenzie, B.D. Muratori, Y.M. Saveliev STFC Daresbury Laboratory,
Beam breakup and emittance growth in CLIC drive beam TW buncher Hamed Shaker School of Particles and Accelerators, IPM.
Beam Dynamics in the ESS Linac Under the Influence of Monopole and Dipole HOMs A.Farricker 1, R.M.Jones 1, R.Ainsworth 2 and S.Molloy 3 1 The University.
Aaron Farricker 107/07/2014Aaron Farricker Beam Dynamics in the ESS Linac Under the Influence of Monopole and Dipole HOMs.
J. Pfingstner Imperfections tolerances for on-line DFS Improved imperfection tolerances for an on-line dispersion free steering algorithm Jürgen Pfingstner.
Kiyoshi Kubo Electron beam in undulators of e+ source - Emittance and orbit angle with quad misalignment and corrections - Effect of beam pipe.
1 DFS Studies on the Main Linac with Rnd-walk-like motion LET Beam Dynamics Workshop 12 th December 2007 Freddy Poirier.
Main Linac Tolerances What do they mean? ILC-GDE meeting Beijing Kiyoshi Kubo 1.Introduction, review of old studies 2.Assumed “static” errors.
Isabell-A. Melzer-Pellmann LET Beam Dynamics Workshop, Lumi scans with wakefields in Merlin Lumi scans with wakefields in Merlin Isabell-A.
Michael Röhrs On-crest slice emittance measurements Michael Roehrs.
Beam dynamics simulations with the measured SPARC gun- solenoid field G. Bazzano, P. Musumeci, L. Picardi, M. Preger, M. Quattromini, C. Ronsivalle, J.
Progress in CLIC DFS studies Juergen Pfingstner University of Oslo CLIC Workshop January.
Slide 1 of 28 Matthew Fraser – HIE-ISOLDE Review Meeting, 15 th June 2009.
Review of Alignment Tolerances for LCLS-II SC Linac Arun Saini, N. Solyak Fermilab 27 th April 2016, LCLS-II Accelerator Physics Meeting.
Laminar Velocity Bunching A. Bacci V – LI 2 FE Collaboration meeting, March 2011, Frascati.
S.M. Polozov & Ko., NRNU MEPhI
RF-kick in the CLIC accelerating structures
Correlated Misalignments Studies for LCLS-II SC Linac
For Discussion Possible Beam Dynamics Issues in ILC downstream of Damping Ring LCWS2015 K. Kubo.
Emittance Dilution and Preservation in the ILC RTML
X-band FEL beam dynamics issues
DFS Simulations on ILC bunch compressor
Developments on Proposed
FPC Coupler RF Dipole Kick
CEPC injector high field S-band accelerating structure design and R&D
Thermal emittance measurement Gun Spectrometer
Injector Performance Requirements Conventional Facilities Update
ERL Main-Linac Cryomodule
Overview Multi Bunch Beam Dynamics at XFEL
Superconducting High Brightness RF Photoinjector Design
Test of Booster at UITF Reza Kazimi (12/12/18)
VELA TDC: Bunch Length and Longitudinal Phasespace Measurements Update
Physics Design on Injector I
Alignment Sensitivities
PARMELA computation for revised gun geometry C.Limborg-Deprey
Studies on orbit corrections
Gain Computation Sven Reiche, UCLA April 24, 2002
Simulations for the LCLS Photo-Injector C
COMB beam: TSTEP simulations up to THz station
Operational Experience with LCLS RF systems
Injector Physics C. Limborg-Deprey, D. Dowell ,Z. Li. ,H. Loos, J
Coupler Effects in High Energy Part of XFEL Linac
Evgenij Kot XFEL beam dynamics meeting,
Recent Measurements in ACC1 (12.9. & )
Main Linac Beam Optics and Tolerances
Igor Zagorodnov and Martin Dohlus
Presentation transcript:

Single Side Coupler for input coupler of L0-1 Jan27-04 Agenda: C.Limborg Tolerances based on maximum emittance growth Review of Blue book analytical computation Zenghai Li Computations with S3P of angular kicks from single side input coupler Discussion of geometry define dual coupler geometry to be run by Zenghai Discussion on other studies gun dual feed, gun geometry, wakefields at first iris

Reminder: The 80% emittance is around 0.9 mm.mrad Tolerance : No more than 1-2% growth from Head-Tail & Wakefield effects Linear Head-Tail kick at entrance of L0-1 No Solenoid, No Wakefield With Solenoid, No Wakefield

First Linac Section Alignment: Wakefield effects Effects of Wakefields (ignoring ): Position : 150 m maximum Angular :  120 rad maximum Position Misalignement 150 m maximum Angular Misalignment  120 rad ~2% increase level ~2% increase level At end beamline At end beamline

“PHASE TERM” In phase with force Fz Centroid deflection if field on crest “AMPLITUDE TERM” In quadrature with force Fz Strong Head-to-tail effect if field on crest Without cavity offset : With cavity offset : determined from microwave perturbation measurements , but conditions are not described in blue book

Without Cavity Offset Amplitude term dominant (around crest) With Cavity Offset = Amplitude term corrected but not phase term (which becomes dominant beyond +/- 20 degrees off crest)

Conclusions: Tolerance is 120 rad for a 10 ps bunch (due to wakefields along the structure) Without cavity offset , amplitude term is dominant with a 1.2 mrad head-to-tail differential kick when cavity operated around crest With the cavity offset, only amplitude term is corrected. The amplitude of the head-to-tail is now small enough around crest for a 10 ps bunch, however we want to be able to operate : at least +/- 40 degrees off-crest run ~20ps bunch l This result is based on the 0.1% factor measured many years ago (in conditions that we ignore in particular for the field gradient) For all those reasons a numerical computation was needed