Rémi Bos, Christian Gainer, Marla B. Feller  Current Biology 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 79, Issue 6, Pages (September 2013)
Advertisements

Volume 87, Issue 2, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 22, Issue 16, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 54, Issue 6, Pages (June 2007)
Volume 75, Issue 1, Pages (July 2012)
Mark E.J. Sheffield, Michael D. Adoff, Daniel A. Dombeck  Neuron 
Topography of Head Direction Cells in Medial Entorhinal Cortex
Development of Direction Selectivity in Mouse Cortical Neurons
Spatial Memory Engram in the Mouse Retrosplenial Cortex
Volume 88, Issue 2, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 71, Issue 5, Pages (September 2011)
Hiroaki Norimoto, Yuji Ikegaya  Current Biology 
Responses to Spatial Contrast in the Mouse Suprachiasmatic Nuclei
Joshua P. Bassett, Thomas J. Wills, Francesca Cacucci  Current Biology 
Pattern and Component Motion Responses in Mouse Visual Cortical Areas
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages (January 2017)
Walking Modulates Speed Sensitivity in Drosophila Motion Vision
Environmental Enrichment Rescues Binocular Matching of Orientation Preference in Mice that Have a Precocious Critical Period  Bor-Shuen Wang, Liang Feng,
Adam M. Corrigan, Jonathan R. Chubb  Current Biology 
Keratocyte Fragments and Cells Utilize Competing Pathways to Move in Opposite Directions in an Electric Field  Yaohui Sun, Hao Do, Jing Gao, Ren Zhao,
Volume 14, Issue 11, Pages (March 2016)
James H. Marshel, Alfred P. Kaye, Ian Nauhaus, Edward M. Callaway 
Volume 83, Issue 5, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 87, Issue 6, Pages (September 2015)
Manipulating the Cellular Circadian Period of Arginine Vasopressin Neurons Alters the Behavioral Circadian Period  Michihiro Mieda, Hitoshi Okamoto, Takeshi.
Dynamic Processes Shape Spatiotemporal Properties of Retinal Waves
Volume 27, Issue 16, Pages e3 (August 2017)
Volume 82, Issue 4, Pages (May 2014)
Yukiyasu Kamitani, Frank Tong  Current Biology 
Odor Processing by Adult-Born Neurons
Emily I. Bartle, Tara M. Urner, Siddharth S. Raju, Alexa L. Mattheyses 
Effects of Locomotion Extend throughout the Mouse Early Visual System
Guifen Chen, Daniel Manson, Francesca Cacucci, Thomas Joseph Wills 
Volume 75, Issue 1, Pages (July 2012)
Jennifer L. Hoy, Iryna Yavorska, Michael Wehr, Cristopher M. Niell 
Keram Pfeiffer, Uwe Homberg  Current Biology 
Walking Modulates Speed Sensitivity in Drosophila Motion Vision
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages e5 (January 2018)
Benjamin Scholl, Daniel E. Wilson, David Fitzpatrick  Neuron 
Georg B. Keller, Tobias Bonhoeffer, Mark Hübener  Neuron 
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages (March 2009)
Parallel Mechanisms Encode Direction in the Retina
Development of Direction Selectivity in Mouse Cortical Neurons
Non-overlapping Neural Networks in Hydra vulgaris
Alon Poleg-Polsky, Huayu Ding, Jeffrey S. Diamond  Cell Reports 
Guilhem Ibos, David J. Freedman  Neuron 
Pattern and Component Motion Responses in Mouse Visual Cortical Areas
Michal Rivlin-Etzion, Wei Wei, Marla B. Feller  Neuron 
Seasonal Encoding by the Circadian Pacemaker of the SCN
Benjamin Scholl, Daniel E. Wilson, David Fitzpatrick  Neuron 
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages (January 2017)
Gilad A. Jacobson, Peter Rupprecht, Rainer W. Friedrich 
Volume 87, Issue 6, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 58, Issue 4, Pages (May 2008)
Bor-Shuen Wang, Rashmi Sarnaik, Jianhua Cang  Neuron 
Volume 89, Issue 6, Pages (March 2016)
Volume 67, Issue 5, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages e6 (August 2018)
Farran Briggs, W. Martin Usrey  Neuron 
Bálint Lasztóczi, Thomas Klausberger  Neuron 
Locomotion Controls Spatial Integration in Mouse Visual Cortex
Emily I. Bartle, Tara M. Urner, Siddharth S. Raju, Alexa L. Mattheyses 
Inhomogeneous Encoding of the Visual Field in the Mouse Retina
Spatial-Temporal Patterns of Retinal Waves Underlying Activity-Dependent Refinement of Retinofugal Projections  Ben K. Stafford, Alexander Sher, Alan.
Gaby Maimon, Andrew D. Straw, Michael H. Dickinson  Current Biology 
Surround Integration Organizes a Spatial Map during Active Sensation
Volume 27, Issue 17, Pages e2 (September 2017)
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages (March 2015)
Direction-Selective Dendritic Action Potentials in Rabbit Retina
Jacqueline R. Hembrook-Short, Vanessa L. Mock, Farran Briggs 
Presentation transcript:

Role for Visual Experience in the Development of Direction-Selective Circuits  Rémi Bos, Christian Gainer, Marla B. Feller  Current Biology  Volume 26, Issue 10, Pages 1367-1375 (May 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.03.073 Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Current Biology 2016 26, 1367-1375DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2016.03.073) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Two-Photon Calcium Imaging Reliably Identifies Both ON and ON-OFF DSGCs in Response to UV-Drifting Bars (A) Two-photon fluorescent image of OGB-1 in ganglion cell layer of P13 retina. Red and blue circles indicate ON and ON-OFF DSGCs, respectively. (B) Examples of OGB-1 calcium signals (ΔF/Fo) in response to a UV bar moving in eight different directions (black arrows). (C) Average calcium responses (ΔF/Fo) and tuning curves of three ON DSGCs and four ON-OFF DSGCs from the same field of view in response to a UV-drifting bar. The colored lines inside the polar plots indicate the vector sum. Numbers around polar plots are indicating the amplitude of calcium signals (ΔF/Fo). V, ventral; N, nasal; D, dorsal; T, temporal. (D) Preferred directions remain stable between two consecutive imaging sessions for both ON (red) and ON-OFF DSGCs (blue) at eye-opening (top, n = 73 cells from three retinas) and in adult (bottom, n = 30 cells from two retinas). Pref. dir., preferred direction. r2 indicates the measure of goodness of fit of linear regression. (E) Examples of OGB-1 calcium signals (ΔF/Fo) from an ON-OFF DSGC (top) and an ON DSGC (bottom) in the same field of view from a P14 retina before (top), after 15-min bath application of GABAA receptor blocker (GABAzine, 10 μM; middle) and after 30 min of rinsing (bottom). Tuning curves for each condition are shown on right. (F) Direction-selective index of ON DSGCs (red) and ON-OFF DSGCs (blue) from P13–P14 and adult retinas before, during, and after GABAzine application. Black circles and error bars show mean ± SD (∗∗∗p < 0.001, one-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc test). (G) Summary effects of GABAzine (5–10 μM; white bars) and its rinse (gray bars) on the direction-selective index (DSI) as compared to control at eye-opening (left, n = 36 DSGCs with 16 ON DSGCs and 20 ON-OFF DSGCs from two retinas) and in adult (right, n = 20 DSGCs with 12 ON DSGCs and 8 ON-OFF DSGCs from two retinas). Means and SD are shown. (∗∗∗p < 0.001, one-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc test.) See also Figure S1 and Table S1. Current Biology 2016 26, 1367-1375DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2016.03.073) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Clustering of the Preferred Directions of ON and ON-OFF DSGCs along the Cardinal Axes Requires Visual Experience (A) The preferred directions are plotted as polar plots (left) and histograms (right) for ON DSGCs (red) and ON-OFF DSGCs (blue) in adult (top), at eye-opening (middle top), after dark-rearing (middle bottom) and after re-exposure the dark-reared mice to a normal light cycle (12 hr darkness: 12 hr light) for 30–50 days (bottom). Solid black lines of polar plots indicate a vector sum length of 0.5 (see the Supplemental Information for definition). Solid gray lines on the histograms indicate the von Mises distributions with fixed angles (0°, 105°, and 263° for ON DSGCs and 0°, 90°, 180°, and 270° for ON-OFF DSGCs). (B) Average silhouette values as a function of the different cluster numbers for ON DSGCs (left) and ON-OFF DSGCs (right) in adult (black line), at P13–P14 (magenta), after dark-rearing (green), after re-exposure to light (gray) and in random distribution (blue). Silhouette values were calculated using k-means clustering analysis of the preferred directions observed in (A). Mean and SD are given for each cluster (∗∗p < 0.01, one-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc test). (C) Direction selectivity index and tuning strength represented by the vector sum length of ON (left) and ONOFF (right) DSGCs in adult (black), P13–P14 (magenta), dark-reared (green), and dark-reared mice re-exposed to light (gray). Mean and SD are represented (∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001 one-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc test). See also Figures S2 and S3 and Tables S2 and S3. Current Biology 2016 26, 1367-1375DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2016.03.073) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Non-cardinal DSGCs Do Not Display Broader Direction-Selective Tuning or Distinct Speed-Tuning (A) Examples of OGB-1 calcium signals (ΔF/Fo) from four non-cardinal ON-OFF DSGCs in a P13 retina with tuning curves shown at right. Numbers around polar plots are indicating the amplitude of calcium signals (ΔF/Fo). (B) Direction selectivity index and magnitude of the vector sum of ON DSGCs (top) and ON-OFF DSGCs (bottom) that are aligned (light gray circles, cardinal) or not aligned (dark gray circles, non-cardinal) along the cardinal axes at eye-opening (P13–P14, n = 157 cardinal ON DSGCs and n = 88 non-cardinal ON DSGCs; n = 330 cardinal ON-OFF DSGCs and n = 103 non-cardinal ON-OFF DSGCs from seven retinas) and after dark-rearing (DR, n = 132 cardinal ON DSGCs and n = 39 non-cardinal ON DSGCs; n = 229 cardinal ON-OFF DSGCs and n = 108 non-cardinal ON-OFF DSGCs from six retinas). (p > 0.05, one-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc test.) Mean and SD are shown. (C and D) Direction-selectivity index as a function of the preferred directions of ON DSGCs (left) and ON-OFF DSGCs (right) that are aligned (light-gray circles) or not aligned (dark-gray circles) along the cardinal axes at P13–P14 (n = 245 ON DSGCs and n = 433 ON-OFF DSGCs from seven retinas) and after dark-rearing (n = 171 ON DSGCs and n = 337 ON-OFF DSGCs from six retinas). Each circle represents one DSGC. Mean and SD are shown. (E) Preferred directions are stable between two consecutive imaging sessions for non-cardinal ON (red) and ON-OFF DSGCs (blue) at eye-opening (top, n = 23 cells from three retinas) and after dark-rearing (bottom, n = 12 cells from two retinas). Pref. dir., preferred direction. (F and G) Speed tuning of non-cardinal (top) and cardinal (bottom) ON-OFF (blue) and ON (red) DSGCs as assessed by three different bar speeds (left, 0.25 mm/s; middle, 0.5 mm/s; right, 1 mm/s) from adult dark-reared (F) and P13–P14 (G) retinas. (H) Comparison of the speed tuning from cardinal (light-gray circles) and non-cardinal (dark-gray circles) ON (left) and ON-OFF (right) DSGCs. DSIs were normalized to the value recorded at 0.5 mm/s in dark-reared (top, n = 37 cardinal ON DSGCs and n = 30 non-cardinal ON DSGCs; n = 69 cardinal ON-OFF DSGCs and n = 31 non-cardinal ON-OFF DSGCs) and young mice (bottom, n = 19 cardinal ON DSGCs and n = 12 non-cardinal ON DSGCs; n = 65 cardinal ON-OFF DSGCs and n = 17 non-cardinal ON-OFF DSGCs) (∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, one-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc test). Mean and SD are shown. Current Biology 2016 26, 1367-1375DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2016.03.073) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Clustering of GFP+ DSGCs along the Cardinal Axes Occurs by a Process of Realignment that Depends on Visual Experience (A) Two-photon fluorescent images (left) show the GFP signal (top, green channel) and the calcium dye Rhod-2 signal (bottom, red channel) in the ganglion cell layer of a P14 Drd4-GFP mouse. The three white-circled GFP+ ON-OFF DSGCs produce the shown Rhod-2 calcium responses (ΔF/Fo) (middle) and tuning curves (right). All have the same nasally oriented preferred direction. Numbers around polar plots are indicating the amplitude of calcium signals (ΔF/Fo). (B) Polar plots and histograms of preferred directions for GFP+ ON-OFF DSGCs from DRD4-GFP mice (left) and TRHR-GFP mice (right) in adult (top), at eye-opening (middle) and after dark-rearing (bottom). Solid black lines of polar plots indicate a vector sum length of 0.5 (see the Supplemental Information for definition). (C) Percentage of GFP+ ON-OFF DSGCs (DRD4-GFP line, left; TRHR-GFP line, right) that are nasally (N, blue), dorsally (D, yellow), ventrally (V, red) tuned or untuned (white) at eye-opening (P13–P14), in adult and after dark-rearing. Total number of imaged GFP+ cells is given within bars. (D) Percentage of nasally tuned ON-OFF DSGCs (DRD4-GFP line, left; TRHR-GFP line, right) that are GFP+ (gray) or GFP- (white) at eye-opening (P13–P14), in adult and after dark-rearing. Total number of imaged nasally tuned DSGCs is indicated within bars. (E) Direction selectivity index of cardinal (light gray circle) and non-cardinal (dark-gray circle) ON-OFF DSGCs from DRD4-GFP and TRHR-GFP mice at P13–P14 (left) and after dark-rearing (right) (p > 0.05, Mann-Whitney t test). Means and SD are shown. See also Figure S4 and Table S4. Current Biology 2016 26, 1367-1375DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2016.03.073) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions