Volume 119, Issue 3, Pages (October 2004)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bhalchandra Jadhav, Klemens Wild, Martin R. Pool, Irmgard Sinning 
Advertisements

Volume 124, Issue 6, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (March 2004)
Volume 127, Issue 5, Pages (December 2006)
Jue Chen, Gang Lu, Jeffrey Lin, Amy L Davidson, Florante A Quiocho 
Structure of the Rab7:REP-1 Complex
Volume 125, Issue 1, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 8, Issue 16, Pages (July 1998)
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (September 2013)
Volume 124, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
Peter Chien, Robert A. Grant, Robert T. Sauer, Tania A. Baker 
Xiaojing He, Yi-Chun Kuo, Tyler J. Rosche, Xuewu Zhang  Structure 
Structure of a Transient Intermediate for GTP Hydrolysis by Ras
Structure of RGS4 Bound to AlF4−-Activated Giα1: Stabilization of the Transition State for GTP Hydrolysis  John J.G. Tesmer, David M. Berman, Alfred G.
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages (November 2009)
Structural Basis for an Unexpected Mode of SERM-Mediated ER Antagonism
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (November 2000)
Crystal Structure of the Rab9A-RUTBC2 RBD Complex Reveals the Molecular Basis for the Binding Specificity of Rab9A with RUTBC2  Zhe Zhang, Shanshan Wang,
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages (October 2007)
Crystal Structure of ARF1•Sec7 Complexed with Brefeldin A and Its Implications for the Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Mechanism  Elena Mossessova, Richard.
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (March 2016)
Phospho-Pon Binding-Mediated Fine-Tuning of Plk1 Activity
Crystal Structures of Ral-GppNHp and Ral-GDP Reveal Two Binding Sites that Are Also Present in Ras and Rap  Nathan I. Nicely, Justin Kosak, Vesna de Serrano,
Solution and Crystal Structures of a Sugar Binding Site Mutant of Cyanovirin-N: No Evidence of Domain Swapping  Elena Matei, William Furey, Angela M.
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Sebastiano Pasqualato, Jacqueline Cherfils  Structure 
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
Volume 20, Issue 11, Pages (November 2012)
Crystal Structure of a DinB Lesion Bypass DNA Polymerase Catalytic Fragment Reveals a Classic Polymerase Catalytic Domain  Bo-Lu Zhou, Janice D. Pata,
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (October 2002)
Volume 128, Issue 3, Pages (February 2007)
Volume 20, Issue 9, Pages (September 2012)
Volume 20, Issue 10, Pages (October 2012)
Volume 103, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (October 2017)
Jinzhong Lin, Matthieu G. Gagnon, David Bulkley, Thomas A. Steitz  Cell 
Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages (January 2009)
Structure, Exchange Determinants, and Family-Wide Rab Specificity of the Tandem Helical Bundle and Vps9 Domains of Rabex-5  Anna Delprato, Eric Merithew,
Jiao Yang, Melesse Nune, Yinong Zong, Lei Zhou, Qinglian Liu  Structure 
Volume 17, Issue 10, Pages (October 2009)
GEFs and GAPs: Critical Elements in the Control of Small G Proteins
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (April 2004)
Volume 112, Issue 5, Pages (March 2003)
An Autoregulatory Mechanism Imposes Allosteric Control on the V(D)J Recombinase by Histone H3 Methylation  Chao Lu, Alyssa Ward, John Bettridge, Yun Liu,
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (May 1999)
Shehab A. Ismail, Ingrid R. Vetter, Begona Sot, Alfred Wittinghofer 
Gang Dong, Martina Medkova, Peter Novick, Karin M. Reinisch 
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Structure of an RNA Silencing Complex of the CRISPR-Cas Immune System
Structural Basis of Rab Effector Specificity
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (October 2000)
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages (March 2008)
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 60, Issue 2, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 17, Issue 8, Pages (August 2009)
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Structure of the Get3 targeting factor in complex with its membrane protein cargo by Agnieszka Mateja, Marcin Paduch, Hsin-Yang Chang, Anna Szydlowska,
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
Jue Wang, Jia-Wei Wu, Zhi-Xin Wang  Structure 
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
Volume 127, Issue 7, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Petra Hänzelmann, Hermann Schindelin  Structure 
Structural Basis for Activation of ARF GTPase
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (October 2017)
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (March 2004)
Volume 95, Issue 2, Pages (October 1998)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 119, Issue 3, Pages 393-405 (October 2004) Structural Analysis of Autoinhibition in the Ras Activator Son of Sevenless  Holger Sondermann, Stephen M. Soisson, Sean Boykevisch, Shao-Song Yang, Dafna Bar-Sagi, John Kuriyan  Cell  Volume 119, Issue 3, Pages 393-405 (October 2004) DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.10.005

Figure 1 Structure of SOSDH-PH-cat (A) Domain organization of SOS and overview of a ternary Ras:SOS complex. The crystal structure of the Ras:SOScat:RasY64A•GppNp ternary complex is shown (Margarit et al., 2003; PDB code 1NVV). The helical hairpin of the Cdc25 domain is shown in orange. (B) The crystal structure of SOSDH-PH-cat. Two orthogonal views are shown with coloring according to the diagram shown in (A). (C) Comparison of SOSDH-PH-cat with the structure of the ternary Ras:SOScat:Ras•GTP complex (PDB code 1NVV). The structures were aligned through superpositioning of the two respective Rem domains of SOSDH-PH-cat and SOScat. Ras at the catalytic site is not shown for clarity (see [A]). Note that the distal RasY64A•GppNp (green) in the ternary complex overlaps with the DH domain of SOSDH-PH-cat. A close-up view of the Rem-Cdc25 interface is shown (right). Cell 2004 119, 393-405DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2004.10.005)

Figure 2 Kinetic Analysis of SOSDH-PH-cat and Mutant Forms of SOScat and SOSDH-PH-cat (A) Interactions between the DH and Rem domains in SOSDH-PH-cat. The combination of mutations analyzed in (E) and (F) and in Figure 5 are shown. (B) Interactions between the Rem domain of SOS and Ras at the distal binding site on SOS. The structure of a ternary Ras:SOScat:Ras•GTP complex is shown (PDB code 1NVV; Margarit et al., 2003). Mutations analyzed in (D) and (F) and Figures 3 and 5 are shown. Asterisks indicate double mutants. (C) Nucleotide exchange rates for SOSDH-PH-cat. Ras•mantGDP (1 μM) was incubated in buffer containing unlabeled GDP (200 μM) in the absence or presence of SOSDH-PH-cat (1 μM). The release of labeled nucleotide in the presence of stoichiometric amounts of RasY64A•GppNp (1× and 20×) is shown. (D) Comparison of SOScat- and SOScat:W729E-mediated nucleotide release. The assay conditions are identical to (C), except that the wild-type and the mutant form of SOSCat (see [B]) were used. (E) Nucleotide exchange by SOSDH-PH-cat with mutations in the DH:Rem domain interface. The assay conditions are identical to (C), except that the mutant form of SOSDH-PH-Cat, SOSDH-PH-cat:triple.mut (see [A]), was used. (F) Comparison of nucleotide exchange rates of wild-type and mutant forms of SOSDH-PH-cat and SOScat. Rates were fitted to single exponentials. Error bars indicate standard deviations of three independent experiments. Colors are consistent with (C), (D), and (E). Orange bars represent the basal, unstimulated SOSDH-PH-cat-mediated exchange rate; gray and red bars show rates in presence of 1 μM and 20 μM RasY64A•GTP, respectively. SOScat-catalyzed exchange rates in the absence and presence of RasY64A•GTP are shown in olive and green, respectively. Nucleotide exchange rates for wild-type SOScat and two mutant variants, SOScat:W729E and SOScat:L687E/R688A (see [B]), are shown. Cell 2004 119, 393-405DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2004.10.005)

Figure 3 Binding of Ras to the Catalytic Site of SOS RasC118S/A122C was labeled with Oregon green and loaded with GDP. Fluorescence anisotropy was used to measure the affinity of RasC118S/A122C•GDP (1 μM) for the catalytic site of SOScat:W729E, SOScat:RasY64A•GppNp (10 μM), and SOSDH-PH-cat. The fluorescence anisotropy of RasC118S/A122C•GDP alone was subtracted from each data point of the titration. Affinities were estimated by nonlinear regression (Kd, Ras•GDP:SOScat:Mut.W729E ∼14.5 μM; Kd, Ras•GDP:SOScat:RasY64A•GppNp ∼1.9 μM; Kd, Ras •GDP: SOSDH-PH-cat ∼29.9 μM). Cell 2004 119, 393-405DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2004.10.005)

Figure 4 Structure of a Ras:SOScat:RasY64A•GDP Complex (A) Distal RasY64A•GDP•Pi in the structure of the ternary complex. The electron density map shown has amplitudes of (|Fo| − |Fc|), with Fo and Fc being the observed and calculated structure factors. Phases were calculated from a model at a stage of the refinement prior to inclusion of nucleotide. The blue electron density contour is at 3.8σ. Mg2+ is shown as a yellow sphere. (B) Distal RasY64A•GppNp in the structure of the ternary Ras:SOScat:RasY64A•GppNp complex (Margarit et al., 2003). The electron density map shown was calculated as in (A), with phases calculated from a model of the Ras:SOScat:RasY64A•GppNp complex (PDB code 1NVV) at a stage of the refinement prior to inclusion of nucleotide. The electron density contour is at 3.8σ. (C) Distal Ras in the ternary Ras:SOScat:RasY64A•GDP•Pi complex, refined with GTP instead of GDP bound to Ras. In this case, the phases used to calculate the electron density map were derived from a model that included GTP, with (|Fo| − |Fc|) amplitudes. Positive density is shown in blue, and negative density is shown in red. The electron densities are contoured at 3σ and −3σ, respectively. (D) Comparison of distal Ras conformations in Ras:SOScat:Ras•GXP complexes. Distal Ras•GppNp from structures of ternary complexes (PDB codes 1NVV [gray] and 1NVW [black]) were superimposed on RasY64A•GDP•Pi (orange) from the ternary complex. Switch 1 and 2 regions are highlighted (blue, RasY64A•GDP•Pi; magenta, RasY64A•GppNp; green, Raswt•GppNp). (E) Comparison of distal Ras in the Ras:SOScat:RasY64A•GDP•Pi complexes with conformations of free Ras. Distal RasY64A•GDP•Pi from the ternary complex structure was superimposed on Ras•GTP (PDB code 121P) and Ras•GDP (PDB code 4Q21). Switch 1 and 2 regions are highlighted (blue, RasY64A•GDP•Pi; red, Raswt•GDP; green, Raswt•GTP). Cell 2004 119, 393-405DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2004.10.005)

Figure 5 Binding of Ras to the Distal Site of SOS (A) Binding of RasY64A to the distal binding sites of SOS. Binding of Oregon green-labeled RasY64A/C118S/A122C to SOScat was monitored by changes in fluorescence anisotropy. RasY64A/C118S/A122C (1 μM) was loaded with GppNp (green) or GDP (red). Increasing amounts of wild-type SOScat (filled symbols) or SOScat:W729E (open symbols) were added. The fluorescence anisotropy of RasY64A/C118S/A122C alone was subtracted from each data point of the titration. Affinities were estimated by nonlinear regression (Kd, RasY64A•GppNp:SOScat ∼3.6 μM; Kd, RasY64A•GppNp:SOScat ∼24.5 μM; no binding to SOScat:W729E). (B) RasY64A binding to SOScat and SOSDH-PH-cat. Fluorescence anisotropy of labeled RasY64A/C118S/A122C (1 μM) was measured in the absence and presence of wild-type SOScat, SOScat:W729E, wild-type SOSDH-PH-cat, or SOSDH-PH-cat:triple.mut (10 μM). For mutant forms of SOScat and SOSDH-PH-cat variants, only RasY64A/C118S/A122C•GppNp binding is shown, since GDP-loaded Ras is expected to show weaker binding based on the results described in (A). Cell 2004 119, 393-405DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2004.10.005)

Figure 6 Activation of ERK MAP Kinase by SOS COS1 cells were transiently cotransfected with HA-tagged ERK2 and T7-tagged SOS constructs as indicated. ERK2 activation was measured in serum-starved cells by an immunoprecipitated kinase-kinase assay using myelin basic protein (MBP) as a substrate. Results were normalized to the vector control reaction. Western blots detecting T7- and HA-tagged proteins are shown. (A) Activation of ERK2 by SOScat and SOScat mutants. Results shown in the bar diagram are from three independent experiments. Error bars indicate standard deviations of three independent experiments. The amout of 32P incorporation into MBP was quantified by phosphorimaging. Autoradiograms and Western blots shown are from a single representative experiment. (B) Activation of ERK2 by SOS truncations. Results shown are from a single representative experiment. Experiments were repeated three times with similar results. Cell 2004 119, 393-405DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2004.10.005)

Figure 7 Models for SOS Activation (A) Schematic diagram of potential states of SOS activity. In the autoinhibited nucleotide exchange reaction mediated by SOSDH-PH-cat, the distal (allosteric) Ras binding site on SOS is blocked by the DH-PH unit of SOS resulting in low affinity of the catalytic site of SOS for Ras and low enzymatic activity (top). For an intermediate level of SOS activity (the SOScat-mediated nucleotide exchange), the nucleotide exchange activity of SOS is dependent on Ras•GDP binding to the distal binding site on SOS (middle). Ras•GTP binding at the distal binding site on SOS stimulates the nucleotide exchange reaction robustly (bottom). (B) Position of the phosphatidyl inositol binding site in SOSDH-PH-cat. The Sos PH domain was superimposed with the crystal structure of the PH domain from Dapp1 (PDB code 1FAO; Ferguson et al., 2000) in complex with Inositol-1,3,4,5-tetrakisphosphate. The membrane plane is indicated. Positioning of the phosphatidyl inositol binding site close to the membrane orients both Ras binding sites of SOS in a parallel plane with the membrane (bottom; see Figure 1C for details). Cell 2004 119, 393-405DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2004.10.005)