Dr Axel Walther Head of Research Bristol Cancer Institute UK

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Palumbo A et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 536.
Advertisements

Brown JR et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 523.
Srdan (Serge) Verstovsek M.D., Ph.D. Professor of Medicine Department of Leukemia University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston, Texas, USA JAK.
Herceptin® (trastuzumab) in combination with chemotherapy: pivotal metastatic breast cancer survival data 1.
Effect of Age on Efficacy and Safety Outcomes in Patients (Pts) with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM) Receiving Lenalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone.
Taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer (MBC): investigational agents TTP = median time to disease progression OS = median overall survival.
Xeloda ® plus oxaliplatin: rationale in colorectal cancer (CRC)  Oxaliplatin is active in CRC, especially when combined with 5-FU/leucovorin (LV)  Superior.
Anas Younes, M.D. Director, Clinical & Translational Research
Phase III studies of Xeloda® in colorectal cancer (CRC)
Thymidine phosphorylase (TP) upregulation Dose- and time-dependent upregulation of TP in human colon cancer xenografts PaclitaxelDocetaxel.
Weekly MLN9708, an Investigational Oral Proteasome Inhibitor, in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Results from a Phase I Study After Full Enrollment.
Capecitabine versus Bolus 5-FU/Leucovorin as Adjuvant Therapy for Colon Cancer: X-ACT Trial Results James Cassidy, MD Colorectal Cancer Update Think Tank.
Herceptin ® : leading the way in metastatic breast cancer care Steffen Kahlert.
Axel Grothey, MD Professor of Oncology Mayo Clinic Rochester, Minnesota Strategies to Improve Patient Outcomes in Gastric and Gastroesophageal Junction.
Xeloda ® monotherapy in pancreatic cancer: phase II study  42 patients with advanced/metastatic pancreatic cancer received intermittent Xeloda 1,250mg/m.
Randomized Phase III Trial Comparing FOLFIRINOX (F: 5FU/Leucovorin [LV], Irinotecan [I], and Oxaliplatin [O]) versus Gemcitabine (G) as First-Line Treatment.
WHAT WILL THE KEY ISSUES IN END- POINT ASSESSMENT BE, IN FUTURE OVARIAN CANCER TRIALS INVOLVING NOVEL TARGETED AGENTS? first line treatment maintenance/consolidation.
A paradigm shift in the treatment of advanced lung cancer: survival and symptom benefits with Tarceva Tudor-Eliade Ciuleanu Cancer Institute Ion Chiricuta.
OCEANS: A Randomized, Double- Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Phase III Trial of Chemotherapy with or without Bevacizumab (BEV) in Patients with Platinum-
Maintenance Therapy with Bortezomib plus Thalidomide (VT) or Bortezomib plus Prednisone (VP) in Elderly Myeloma Patients Included in the GEM2005MAS65 Spanish.
CALYPSO Trial: Carboplatin & Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) versus Carboplatin & Paclitaxel in Relapsed, Platinum- Sensitive Ovarian Cancer Pujade-Lauraine.
Low Dose Decitabine Versus Best Supportive Care in Elderly Patients with Intermediate or High Risk MDS Not Eligible for Intensive Chemotherapy: Final Results.
Mok TS, Wu SL, Thongprasert S, et al. Gefitinib or carboplatin-paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2009;361: Gefitinib Superior.
Relapsed/Refractory Ovarian Cancer: Decision Points in Diagnosis and New Treatment Strategies Friday, March 24, 2006 Palm Springs Convention Center Primrose.
1 LUX-Lung 3 clinical trial ECOG=Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Sequist LV et al. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(27): Treatment-naïve Advanced NSCLC.
Case Discussion: Second Opinion
CCO Independent Conference Coverage
Belani CP et al. ASCO 2009; Abstract CRA8000. (Oral Presentation)
Alessandra Gennari, MD PhD
1 Stone RM et al. Proc ASH 2015;Abstract 6.
CCO Independent Conference Coverage
LUX-Lung 6 clinical trial
CCO Independent Conference Coverage
CCO Independent Conference Highlights
PARP INHIBITION IN OVARIAN CANCER
LUX-Lung 3 clinical trial
PHASE I/II STUDY OF PEGYLATED LIPOSOMAL DOXORUCIN (PLD) AND GEMCITABINE (GEM) IN RECURRENT PLATIN RESISTANT OVARIAN CANCER (OC). A Study of the VWOG.
Farletuzumab in platinum sensitive ovarian cancer with low CA125
Gajria D et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract P
SOLO2: Safety, HRQoL With Maintenance Olaparib in Germline BRCA-Mutated Platinum-Sensitive Relapsed Serous Ovarian Cancer CCO Independent Conference Highlights*
Randomized, Open-Label Phase 1/2 Study of Pomalidomide Alone or in Combination with Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed and Refractory Multiple.
Slide set on: McCarthy PL, Owzar K, Hofmeister CC, et al
HOPE: Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation study
Vahdat L et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract P
What do we do after FOLFIRINOX? Gemcitabine-Based Therapy is Standard
CCO Independent Conference Coverage
Elotuzumab, Lenalidomide, and Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Relapsed/Refractory Myeloma Slideset on: Lonial S, Vij R, Harousseau JL, et al. Elotuzumab in combination.
Phase III Investigation of Neoadjuvant Carboplatin ± Veliparib in Combination With Chemotherapy in Early-Stage TNBC CCO Independent Conference Highlights*
until tumour progression until tumour progression
MOCA Living Well: Understanding PARP Inhibitors in Ovarian Cancer
Activity Goals. Perspectives on PARP Inhibitors in Ovarian Cancer Has the Time Come for Individualized Care?
Fenaux P et al. Lancet Oncol 2009;10(3):
Bergh J et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 23.
Badoux X et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 6508.
GEMSTONE Educational Case Summary
Baselga J et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 45.
This program will include a discussion of off-label treatment and investigational agents not approved by the FDA for use in the United States, and data.
Maintenance Therapy in Advanced Ovarian Cancer
First efficacy and safety results from XELOX-1/NO16966, a randomised 2x2 factorial phase III trial of XELOX vs FOLFOX4 + bevacizumab or placebo in first-line.
Conclusion Dr Antonio González Martín Head of Medical Oncology
Parp Inibitori nel carcinoma ovarico in pazienti con o senza mutazione di BRCA Giorgio Valabrega FPO IRCCS Candiolo Università degli studi di Torino.
(A) Safety profile overview.
MAINTENANCE THERAPY WITH PARP INHIBITORS
EVOLUTION OF PARP INHIBITORS IN OVARIAN CANCER
1 Verstovsek S et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract Cervantes F et al.
Volume 152, Issue 3, Pages (March 2019)
ONCOLOGYEDUCATION.COM ARTICLE SUMMARIES
The latest clinical evidence on PARP inhibitor maintenance therapy
1University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium;
Efficacy of BSI-201, a PARP Inhibitor, in Combination with Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (GC) in Triple Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer (mTNBC): Results.
Presentation transcript:

Dr Axel Walther Head of Research Bristol Cancer Institute UK Practical experience with PARP inhibitors in ovarian cancer maintenance Dr Axel Walther Head of Research Bristol Cancer Institute UK ESMO 2018 Munich, Germany

PARPi? Mrs AJ – 66 years old CA125 Months Carboplatin Paclitaxel Bevacizumab Carboplatin Gemcitabine Bevacizumab Carboplatin Weekly paclitaxel Carboplatin PLD PARPi? CA125 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 Months PLD, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin

3 questions about PARPi maintenance What benefits do PARP inhibitors provide for my patient? Are the available PARP inhibitors acceptable and tolerable? Are PARP inhibitors safe to use for long-term therapy?

Efficacy comparison HR=0.27 (0.17 to 0.41)P<0.001 Progression-free survival for licensed PARP inhibitors, gBRCAmut cohorts HR=0.27 (0.17 to 0.41)P<0.001 100% HR=0.27 (0.17 to 0.41)P<0.001 80% Niraparib Rucaparib Olaparib tablets 60% 40% 20% 6 12 18 24 6 12 18 24 6 12 18 24 Months Months Months Mirza MR, et al. N Engl J Med 2016;375(22):2154-2164. Coleman RL, et al. Lancet 2017;390:1949-1961. Pujade-Lauraine E, et al. Lancet Oncol 2017;18:1274-1284. gBRCAmut, germline breast cancer gene mutation

Preferred therapy schedule Patient preferences Survey of 1,954 patients <70 / >70 Preferred therapy schedule Increasing the chance of cure Improvement of QoL No deterioration of QoL Delaying the tumour progression Shrinking the tumour Decrease of CA-125 Other Daily (oral) Every 3 weeks (infusion) Twice a day (oral) Twice a week (oral) Weekly (infusion) Other schedule 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 0% 15% 30% 45% 60% 75% >70 18-70 QoL, quality of life Sehouli J, et al. EXPRESSION IV. ESGO 2017 Abstract.

ENGOT-OV16 / NOVA: quality of life outcome “I have lack of energy” “I have nausea” Patients (%) Patients (%) “I have pain” “I have vomiting” Patients (%) Patients (%) Solid lines represent “Any Symptoms”; Dashed lines represent “Severe Symptoms” Size of circles corresponds to # of patients Oza A, et al. Lancet Oncol 2018;19(8):1117-1125. Niraparib Placebo

Combined side-effects across licensed PARPi All grade selected side-effects, all PARPi Comparative incidence MDS, myelodysplastic syndrome Mirza MR, et al. N Engl J Med 2016;375(22):2154-2164. Coleman RL, et al. Lancet 2017;390:1949-1961. Pujade-Lauraine E, et al. Lancet Oncol 2017;18:1274-1284.

ENGOT-OV16 / NOVA: selected adverse events Incidence for patients on niraparib (all grades) Thrombocytopenia Nausea patients (%) Anaemia Vomiting patients (%) Neutropenia Diarrhoea* patients (%) *TESARO, Inc. Data on File. Berek JS, et al. Ann Oncol 2018;29(8):1784-1792.

Timeline of thrombocytopenia Mean change in platelet levels from baseline in ENGOT-OV16 / NOVA trial (109/L ± standard error) 150 120 89 59 28 -2 -32 -63 -93 -124 -154 Niraparib Placebo First Month of Treatment Is when thrombocytopenia typically manifests1 Median time to onset of Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia was 23 days2 Median time to resolution with dose interruption and/or dose reduction for Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia was 10 days2 Cycle 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Day 21 Adapted from Mirza MR, et al. N Engl J Med 2016;375(22):2154-2164.

Effect of body weight on side-effect incidence Incidence for patients on niraparib Anaemia Diarrhoea Berek JS, et al. Ann Oncol 2018;29(8):1784-1792.

Dose individualisation Dose individualisation based on body weight and platelets does not impact efficacy Baseline body weight: <77 kg Baseline platelets: <150,000/µL OR Time (months) 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 4 8 12 16 20 24 ■ 200 mg ■ 100 mg ■ 300 mg PFS Starting dose Dose individualisation Patients <77 kg or platelets <150,000 200 mg (Two 100 mg capsules, QD) 300 mg 200 mg 100 mg Patients ≥77 kg and platelets ≥150,000 300 mg (Three 100 mg capsules, QD) From Month 4: HR (300 vs 200): 1.01 (95%CI: 0.69, 1.48) From Month 4: HR (300 vs 100): 1.05 (95%CI: 0.84, 1.31) *With dose modifications HR, hazard ratio; PFS, progression free survival; QD, once daily 1. Moore KN, et al. Gynecol Oncol 2018: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.01.011 2. Lord R, et al. SGO 2018.

Individualised dosing reduces haematological adverse events in PRIMA study Haematological toxicities Grade Pre-amendment, fixed starting dose 300 mg QD (Pooled niraparib & placebo) Post-amendment, individualised starting dose 300 + 200 mg QD N=480 N=247 Thrombocytopenia Any grade, n (%) 164 (34.2) 50 (20.2) ≥Grade 3, n (%) 110 (22.9) 22 (8.9) Grade 4, n (%) 76 (16.5) 8 (3.2) Anaemia† 229 (47.7) 77 (31.2) 101 (21.0) 27 (10.9) Neutropenia‡ 148 (30.8) 57 (23.1) 75 (15.6) 23 (9.3) *†Anaemia events included anaemia and haemoglobin decrease ‡Neutropenia events included neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and neutrophil count decrease QD, once daily Gonzalez-Martin A, et al. PRIMA. Presented at ESMO 2018.

How to manage haematological adverse events? 1st occurrence 2nd occurrence Platelets <100,000/µL Withhold for up to 28 days and monitor blood count weekly until platelet counts ≥100,000/µL Resume at same or reduced dose based on clinical evaluation If platelet count is <75,000/µL at any time, resume at a reduced dose Withhold for up to 28 days, weekly FBC until platelet counts ≥100,000/µL Resume at reduced dose Discontinue if platelets have not returned to acceptable levels within 28 days of dose interruption, or if patient already has already undergone dose reduction to 100 mg QD Neutrophil <1,000/µL or haemoglobin <8 g/dL Withhold for up to 28 days, weekly FBC until neutrophils ≥1,500/µL or Hb ≥9 g/dL Resume at a reduced dose Discontinue if neutrophils and/or haemoglobin have not returned to acceptable levels within 28 days of dose interruption, or if patient has already undergone dose reduction to 100 mg QD If patient not recovering, MDS should be excluded FBC, full blood count; Hb, haemoglobin; QD, once daily Modified from https://www.ema.europa.eu/documents/product-information/zejula-epar-product-information_en.pdf

How to manage haematological adverse events? 1st occurrence 2nd occurrence Platelets <100,000/µL Withhold for up to 28 days and monitor blood count weekly until platelet counts ≥100,000/µL Resume at same or reduced dose based on clinical evaluation If platelet count is <75,000/µL at any time, resume at a reduced dose Withhold for up to 28 days, weekly FBC until platelet counts ≥100,000/µL Resume at reduced dose Discontinue if platelets have not returned to acceptable levels within 28 days of dose interruption, or if patient already has already undergone dose reduction to 100 mg QD Neutrophil <1,000/µL or haemoglobin <8 g/dL Withhold for up to 28 days, weekly FBC until neutrophils ≥1,500/µL or Hb ≥9 g/dL Resume at a reduced dose Discontinue if neutrophils and/or haemoglobin have not returned to acceptable levels within 28 days of dose interruption, or if patient has already undergone dose reduction to 100 mg QD If patient not recovering, MDS should be excluded FBC, full blood count; Hb, haemoglobin; QD, once daily Modified from https://www.ema.europa.eu/documents/product-information/zejula-epar-product-information_en.pdf

Mrs AJ – 66 years old, gBRCA wild-type Discuss maintenance therapy with your patient before CT start Carboplatin Paclitaxel Bevacizumab Carboplatin Gemcitabine Bevacizumab Carboplatin Weekly Paclitaxel Carboplatin PLD Niraparib CA125 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60 66 72 CT, chemotherapy; PLD, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin Months

Personal recommendations for using PARPi based on clinical practice experience Prime the patient about intended PARP inhibitor use at the initiation of the preceding line of chemotherapy Allow patient 1 cycle length recovery after completion of chemotherapy Warn patient about the increased toxicity in the first 2-3 months, and that they tend to settle Monitor blood counts weekly for niraparib, fortnightly for other PARPi until stable for four weeks Pro-actively manage side-effects with best supportive care from day 1, cycle 1 For adverse drug reactions, including haematological toxicities, dose interruption, reduction and/or discontinuation are recommended AEs Interruption Dose reduction Discontinuation

Take home points PARP inhibitors significantly improve prognosis in patients with ovarian cancer PARP inhibitors are generally very well tolerated, permitting long-term use Pro-active management of side-effects maintains quality of life Inform patients early of intended PARP inhibitor use