Title Slide Notes: This presentation on GoogleDrive will be converted into PowerPoint, just like last presentation. (Jeff)

pictures

New Agenda (replace old) *Update the Agenda from last presentation (Jeff)

Problem Statement/Project Overview *same from previous presentation* (James)

Update the CRs from previous presentation (Jameel) Customer Needs Update the CRs from previous presentation (Jameel)

Engineering Requirements Update the ERs from previous presentation (Jameel)

HOQ Update HOQ (Jameel)

Functional Decomp Chart (Jeff)

Morph Chart (Jeff)

Concept Options/Models SOTM Benchmarking (James) Benchmarking from earlier(reuse) (James)

SATCOM-on-the-Move Benchmarking SATCOM-on-the-Move Benchmarking *note this gets swapped from our earlier benchmarking General Dynamics X Band SATCOM on the Move DRS Technologies SATCOM on the move (2 Port Cross Pol Ku-Band) Rockwell Collins SWE-DISH SATCOM On-The-Move CCT Frequecy Recieving 10.95 - 12.75 GHz 10.70 - 12.75 GHz 10.95 – 12.75 GHz Frequency Transmitting 13.75 - 14.50 GHz 13.75 - 14.5 GHz 13.75 – 14.5 GHz Pedestal 2 Axis Az/El 360 Degree Azimuth Mount Tracking Performance FCC VMES Compliant (< 0.20° - 99% of the time during Churchville B conditions EI angle < 80°) NA ≤ 0.1° RMS Size 27.5" x 27.5" x 37.5" 37.5 x 27.5 x 14.5 inches 49" x 49" x 51" Supply Voltage 28V Power 336W cont, 1260W peak 3000W peak Weight 182 lbs 60-85 lbs depending on options 300 lbs

Solution Benchmarking *note this is the benchmarking we did in the first presentation (swap the two)

Selection Criteria (Generic)(partacz) Things to Consider: Effectiveness Is the sub-component going to be effective at it’s intended job? Ease of Implementation Will the sub-component be easy to integrate into the system as a whole? Availability Is the sub-component frequently used in other applications? Power Efficient Will the sub-component draw a lot of power? Reliability Does the sub-component have a known history of malfunctioning? Cost Effective Does the sub-component fit into the given budget for the project? Safe/Easy to Operate Is the sub-component potential hazardous or harmful in any way? Is the sub-component easy to work with? Weight Does the sub-component weigh too much for the potential applications? Size Efficient Is the sub-component’s size too large for the potential applications? Visual Appeal Does the system look ‘cool’? Will it provide great demonstration material?

Failure models of concept (Partacz)

Concept Selection Pugh Chart (quintinilla) need costing data for each choice!! (reference benchmarking)

Invoke Motion

Support The System Need to finish this...

Support The Pointer

Power the Device

Receive Geo-PNT Data Need one other thing to compare to...

Process Geo-PNT Signal what do you think?

Direct Device

Point Device

Feasibility Analysis Process/convert/interpret signal received from Geo-PNT Microcontroller A microcontroller is a very portable and easy to use option. Any microcontroller that we would require for this project does not need significant power and therefore would likely be inexpensive. Most modern microcontrollers should be able to handle processing data at the rate that the Geo-PNT outputs. The Geo-PNT has conventional outputs that will easily line up with a selected microcontroller. In general, we will want to do real-world testing during good weather outside, and development testing inside so environmental factors are not of concern. Alternate: Laptop A laptop is easy to use and acquire as everyone on the team has one. In this regard, it is very feasible. Development work on the microcontroller will likely be able to transfer to the laptop with little to no extra work. A laptop possesses the required processing power that we need and will also be able to easily drive our motor solution. It also satisfies connection to the Geo-PNT as well as the microcontroller. A laptop will be less mobile than the microcontroller however. It will also require a bit more care. This can be achieved through the use of long connection wires while keeping the laptop inside the vehicle. An added bonus of a laptop is the ease of displaying relevant data during development and test drives.

Feasibility Analysis Concept Decision (see below…) Responsible Function james Process/convert/interpret signal received from Geo-PNT ricardo Receive data from the Geo-PNT Transfer (send/receive) control signal jameel Aiming demonstration device mayer Invoke Motion Calculate error margins partacz Support the pointer Drive/direct device at target location Concept Decision (see below…) Concept Fallback Plan (Backup Plan) [Option 1 and Option 2] (Ricardo)

Feasibility Analysis Concept Decision (see below…) Responsible Function james Process/convert/interpret signal received from Geo-PNT ricardo Receive data from the Geo-PNT Transfer (send/receive) control signal jameel Aiming demonstration device mayer Invoke Motion Calculate error margins partacz Support the pointer Drive/direct device at target location Concept Decision (see below…) Concept Fallback Plan (Backup Plan) [Option 1 and Option 2] (Ricardo)

Feasibility Analysis Concept Decision (see below…) Responsible Function james Process/convert/interpret signal received from Geo-PNT ricardo Receive data from the Geo-PNT Transfer (send/receive) control signal jameel Aiming demonstration device mayer Invoke Motion Calculate error margins partacz Support the pointer Drive/direct device at target location Concept Decision (see below…) Concept Fallback Plan (Backup Plan) [Option 1 and Option 2] (Ricardo)

Feasibility Analysis Concept Decision (see below…) Responsible Function james Process/convert/interpret signal received from Geo-PNT ricardo Receive data from the Geo-PNT Transfer (send/receive) control signal jameel Aiming demonstration device mayer Invoke Motion Calculate error margins partacz Support the pointer Drive/direct device at target location Concept Decision (see below…) Concept Fallback Plan (Backup Plan) [Option 1 and Option 2] (Ricardo)

Feasibility Analysis - Support Pointer (Partacz) http://alamoastronomy.org/images/meadelx902.jpg http://orlandosteadicam.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/dji-ronin-2.jpg http://www.networkwebcams.co.uk/images/sony_er521_centre.jpg

Feasibility Analysis - Support Pointer (Partacz)

Feasibility Analysis - Support Pointer (Partacz)

Feasibility Analysis Concept Decision (see below…) Responsible Function james Process/convert/interpret signal received from Geo-PNT ricardo Receive data from the Geo-PNT Transfer (send/receive) control signal jameel Aiming demonstration device mayer Invoke Motion Calculate error margins partacz Support the pointer Drive/direct device at target location Concept Decision (see below…) Concept Fallback Plan (Backup Plan) [Option 1 and Option 2] (Ricardo)

Concept Decision (see below…) (ricardo) Concept Fallback Plan (Backup Plan) [Option 1 and Option 2] (Ricardo)

Feasibility Analysis Concept Decision (see below…) Responsible Function james Process/convert/interpret signal received from Geo-PNT ricardo Receive data from the Geo-PNT Transfer (send/receive) control signal jameel Aiming demonstration device mayer Invoke Motion Calculate error margins partacz Support the pointer Drive/direct device at target location Concept Decision (see below…) Concept Fallback Plan (Backup Plan) [Option 1 and Option 2] (Ricardo)

Option One Advantages: Extra Axis - Camera orientation control Video of pointing data Smaller overall system Disadvantages More difficult to monitor system Extra Axis - Harder to program

Option Two Advantages: Obvious line of site 2 Axis - Simpler to control Easier to monitor system Disadvantages Laser is less presentable 2 Axis - Camera video will not have a horizontal horizon line Less mobile

Option 3: The contrast Boat as vehicle Same specifications as before except with: Boat as vehicle Serial interfacing with the Geo-PNT Satellite Dish Connections Self-Video Production Picture Advantages: Visually appealing Good range of motion demonstration Cost midpoint Disadvantages: Very difficult to implement Severe environmental concerns Less reliable Less efficient in terms of reliability, size, power, and safety. This is mostly a talk slide as we aren’t really going to develop this solution. Sell this as a brainstorming idea that is cheap but still very visually appealing. Unfortunately it isnt easy to implement and fails most of the rest of our selection criteria. Note: see slide notes

System Level Design Decisions

Complete System PUGH Chart Option #1 Option #2 Option #3 Effectiveness Datum + Ease of Implementation - Availability Power Efficient Reliability Cost Effective Safe/Easy to Operate Weight Size Efficient Visual Appeal Overall

Functional Architecture mayer

Draft Test Plan Preliminary test plan - high level... Engineering Requirement Unit of Measure Marginal Value Comments/Status Test Plan (how are you going to verify satisfaction) Accuracy and Minimum Angular Error of Attitudes Roll and Pitch degrees 0.2 Visual Measurement based on Aiming device ability to point at specified target Accuracy of Attitude Yaw 0.5 Position Accuracy Error Horizontal meters 1.5 Position Accuracy Error Vertical 2.5 Position Accuracy Error Velocity meters/sec 0.1 Accuracy of Error Over Time of Attitudes Roll and Pitch degrees/hr 3 Time-trial Visual Measurement based on Aiming device ability to point at specified target Accuracy of Error Over Time of Attitude Yaw Time-trial of Visual Measurement based on Aiming device ability to point at specified target Number of Videos per Demo number 1 N/A Geo-PNT is Mounted to a Mobile Object >0 Basic Observation Motion in Yaw 360 Range of Motion Measurement and Analysis Motion in Pitch and Roll 180 System Functionality Continues without User Intervention indefinate Provide User Manual Y/N Provide Written and Visual Test Reports Preliminary test plan - high level... Leo’s TOAD [Test Observe Analyze Demonstrate] (Jameel)

Risk Management

Risk Management

Project Plan Mention tasks assigned to each team member (partacz) add schedule from home computer show entire semester schedule and detailed schedule for next phase