Recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims
Advertisements

Enforcement of Arbitral Awards and Foreign Court Judgments in Ukraine Oksana Yeremeyeva Senior Counsel Bar Council of England and Wales seminar.
The institute of a cross-border-insolvency is the independent branch in the system of Private International Law. There are some fundamental difficulties.
Interim measures in Russian courts in support of international arbitration: principles, procedure and the range of remedies available BRLA seminar 25 January.
Resolution of social conflicts European Social Mediator Steering committee meeting Valencia (Spain) 5-8 October 2009 Danutė Šlionskienė, Lithuanian Trade.
Arbitration in Poland Practical issues Monika Hartung Legal Adviser, Partner Warsaw 16 June 2011.
Recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments in the Russian Federation Khristofor Ivanyan, Partner.
INTRODUCTION INTO PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Marko Jovanovic, LL.M. MASTER IN EUROPEAN INTEGRATION Private International Law in the.
Basic notions and sources of law
The influence of geo-political and constitutional-legal factors on the specifics of the development of the Kaliningrad region in the context of WTO Gorodilov.
The movement of legal services between the European Union and Switzerland: Polish and Swiss legal solutions after Poland's accession to the EU Inga Kawka,
Chapter Eight Economic arbitraytion and economic lawsuits.
EU: Bilateral Agreements of Member States
EU: Bilateral Agreements of Member States. Formerly concluded international agreements of Member States with third countries Article 351 TFEU The rights.
8-th CIS Local Counsel Forum Kiev-Odessa, June 2013 Recognition and Enforcement of EU Countries Court Decisions in European Union: Illustration –
ENFORCING FOREIGN COURT JUDGMENTS : EXAMPLES/CASES.
AGENCY IN LIBYA OVERVIEW.  In1971, the Agency Law permitted the Libyan nationals to carry out activities of commercial agency  In 1975, the Libyan government.
Circulation of authentic instruments under Regulation 650/2012 speaker – Ivaylo Ivanov – Bulgarian Notary Chamber.
European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims JUDr. Radka Chlebcová.
Basic concept of constitutional law of Republic of Kazakhstan
Small claims procedure Regulation (EC) No 861/2007of European Parlament and of the Council of 11 July establishing a European Small Claims Procedure (OJ.
Discussion “International Cooperation: Service of Documents, Taking of Evidence” – Practical Implementation of Regulations No 1393/2007 and No 1206/2001.
Introduction to EU Civil Judicial Cooperation Dr. Francesco Pesce Assistant Professor in International Law Università degli Studi di Genova (IT)
Service of documents within European Union Regulation (EC) No 1393/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 November 2007 on the service.
European civil procedure law Judicial cooperation in civil matters.
MODULE II: THE INSTRUMENTS OF JUDICIAL COOPERATION IN CRIMINAL MATTERS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE.- TOPIC 4 THE 1959 CONVENTION ON MUTUAL.
1 University of Augsburg German and European Company Law - Addendum Prof. Dr. Otmar Thömmes 5 / 6 July 2013.
INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION Leonardo Graffi STUDYING LAW AT ROMA TRE FALL SEMESTER 22 October 2010.
“THE UNITARY PATENT AND THE UNIFIED PATENT COURT: A PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW PERSPECTIVE” Prof Dr Paul L.C. Torremans School of Law University of Nottingham.
Wang Jing & Co. 敬海律师事务所 WANG JING & CO. Mr. WANG Jing 王敬 Managing Partner 管理合伙人 October 2013 Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards in.
Supreme Court Decision on Enforceability of a US Court Decision Dr. Shoichi Okuyama AIPPI Japan AIPLA Pre-meeting on October 22, 2014.
1. common courts military courts administrative courts tribunals The Supreme Court The Supreme Administrative Court The Constitutional Tribunal and The.
INTERNATIONAL MARITIME LAW SEMINAR 2015 Recent Developments in Maritime Law Around the World – POLAND Bills’ of lading law and jurisdiction clauses from.
FEDERAL ANTIMONOPOLY SERVICE Control over foreign investments into the entities of strategic importance (the Russian model) Mr. Andrey Tsyganov Deputy.
European enforcement order for uncontested claims Regulation n. 805/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of April
Lecturer: Lina Vladimirovna Zhornyak, associated professor.
The UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration: 25 Years 4 June 2010 “The Influence of the UNCITRAL Model Law in Hong Kong and China”
Legal Framework of Intellectual Property Protection during Exhibition The Intellectual Property Center of Shanghai University of Political Science and.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 31 – Common Foreign, Security and.
Turkish private international law on matrimonial property and successions Zeynep Derya TARMAN Koç Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi
EU legislation on customs brokers: overall view Jerzy Szczawiński Customs Service of the Republic of Poland TAIEX Workshop on the Functioning of the Customs.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 5 – Public Procurement Bilateral screening:
Lecture number 12 Topic: Basic rights, freedoms and duties of man and citizens in the Republic of Uzbekistan.
“INTERNATIONAL FAMILIES” UNDER EU PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW
The Mediation Centre of Chamber of Notaries in Gdańsk
The activities of the state tax authorities
EU Sanctions on Individuals
European Union Law Law 326.
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
Tax Court system in Germany The role of the Federal Tax Court
The 22nd of January Friday.
Support of the foreign language profile of law tuition at the Faculty of Law in Olomouc CZ.1.07/2.2.00/
Prescription Vs Expiration
Alexander BIRYUKOV Doctor of Law,
Lecture 6.1 treaties Article 2(1) (a) of the 1969 Vienna convention defines a treaty as “an international agreement concluded between states in written.
Recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments and arbitral awards in Russia Roman Zaitsev, PhD, Partner 05/09/2018.
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments and Arbitral Awards
New Customs Legislation of the Eurasian Economic Union
INTRODUCTION INTO PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW OF THE EUROPEAN UNION
European actions.
Facts which need not be proved by evidence
The United Nations.
Function of the International Court of Justice (ICJ):
Case 195/08 PPU Rinau.
President of the Russian Association of International Law
Legal Environment for Business in Nepal 26 February 2017
Constitution and I’ll Law
Legal Foundations of European Union Law II
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
SIMPLIFIED MEASURES FOR CUSTOMER’S IDENTIFICATION
Presentation transcript:

Recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments in the Lugansk People's Republic and the Donetsk People's Republic PAVEL BIRIUKOV Voronezh State University, Universitetskaya pl., 1, Russia, 394000, Voronezh Professor E-mail: birukovpn@yandex.ru

Part I. Recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments in the LPR The Lugansk People's Republic (hereinafter LPR) was proclaimed on April 27, 2014 within the territory of the Lugansk region of Ukraine. The Basic Act of the LPR (Constitution) was adopted on April 27, 2014. The Constitution entered into force on May 18, 2014. According to Art. 7 of the Constitution, the Republic has its own Constitution and legislation in force throughout the territory of the LPR. The acts of the Republic must be published.

According to Art. 86 of the Constitution, acts and other statutory acts in force on the territory of the Republic "before the entry into force of this Constitution are applied in a part that does not contradict the Constitution." Courts in the Republic administer justice in accordance to the legislation of the Republic. The Constitution has the highest legal force, direct effect and is applied throughout the territory of the Republic. The Act "On Normative Legal Acts in the Lugansk People's Republic" establishes a hierarchy of normative legal acts. The LPR codes, acts and other normative legal acts should not contradict the Constitution. Acts should not contradict the codes.

Art. 6 of the Act "On the judicial system" on April 30, 2015 fixes "the binding force of judgments of foreign courts, international courts and arbitration in the territory of the Republic is determined by international treaties of the Republic." Unfortunately, the LPR has not concluded such international treaties yet. The act "On the Supreme Court of the Lugansk People's Republic" 2015 determines the powers of the Supreme Court, its composition. The Supreme Court of the Republic resolves "issues related to the international agreements of the LPR“ (Art. 2).

According to the information from the LPR, the economic courts of Ukraine in the Republic do not function. The powers, procedure of formation and activities of the of Arbitration Court shall be established by the Act "On the Arbitration Court of the Lugansk People's Republic". This act has not been adopted yet. June 14, 2018 this act was rejected in the second reading. So, there are no arbitration courts in the LPR. Article 1 of the draft of the Code Civil Procedure (hereinafter CCP) provided for: "The procedure for civil proceedings in the courts of general jurisdiction is determined by the Constitution of the Republic, this Code and other acts adopted in accordance to it." If an international treaty of the Republic establishes other rules of civil proceedings than those provided by the act, the rules of the international treaty must be applied. The recognition and the execution in the territory of the LPR decisions of foreign courts are determined by international treaties of the Republic and this Code (Art. 13 of the draft CCP).

Chapter 45 of the CCP is devoted to the recognition and enforcement of decisions of foreign courts and arbitrations. In principle, the norms of the Code correspond to the rules of the Russian CCP. So, the decisions of foreign courts are recognized and enforced in the Republic, if this is stipulated in the international agreement of the LPR. Decisions of foreign courts shall mean decisions on civil cases, with the exception of cases on economic disputes and other cases related to the implementation of entrepreneurial and other economic activities, verdicts in cases concerning compensation for damage caused by the crime.

The decision of a foreign court may be presented for compulsory execution within three years from the date of its entry into legal force. The petition for the recovery is considered by the court at the place of residence or the location of the debtor in the Republic. In the event that the debtor does not have a place of residence or location in the Republic, or his location is unknown, at the location of his property (Article 439 of the CCP). Article 440 of the CCP contains the requisites of the application for compulsory execution of the decision and a list of required documents.

You can see the list of required documents, that must be attached: 1) a copy of the decision of a foreign court certified by a foreign court, on the authorization of whose enforcement the petition has been initiated; 2) an official document stating that the decision entered into legal force, if this does not follow from the text of the decision itself; 3) a document on the execution of the decision, if it was previously executed in the territory of the relevant foreign state; 4) a document from which it follows that the party against whom the decision was taken and who did not take part in the process was informed in due time and in due course of the time and place of the case; 5) a certified translation of these documents into one of the official languages ​​of the LPR.

Hier You can see the list of requirements for the refusal to enforce the decision of a foreign court: 1) the decision on the law of the country in whose territory it is adopted, has not entered into legal force or is not enforceable; 2) the party against whom the decision was taken was deprived of the opportunity to take part in the proceedings due to the fact that it was not given a timely and duly with notice of the time and place of consideration of the case; 3) the consideration of the case refers to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts in the LPR;

4) there is a legally enforceable court decision in the LPR adopted in a dispute between the same parties, on the same subject and on the same grounds, or in the proceedings of a court in the Republic, there is a case brought on by a dispute between the same parties, on the same subject and on the same grounds before the institution of proceedings in a foreign court; 5) the execution of the decision may damage the sovereignty or threaten the security of the Republic or is contrary to the public order of the LPR; 6) the deadline for presenting the decision for compulsory execution expired and this period was not restored by the court in the LPR at the request of the recovery.

In 2016, the Ministry of Justice of the LPR established the Bailiffs Service. The Decree of the Council of Ministers of the Republic on October 18, 2016 approved the Interim Procedure for the Execution of Enforcement Proceedings in the territory of the LPR. However, in these documents there is no indication of the execution of foreign judgments. Thus, the legislative regulation of the issue of recognition and enforcement of decisions of foreign courts is clearly insufficient. There are no international treaties on the execution of foreign judgments. Separate decisions of courts of Ukraine regarding alimony are accepted for execution, but without special procedure. Accordingly, the general judicial practice of recognition and enforcement, as far as I know from sources in the LPR, is missing.

I think, that the future of LРR is problematic I think, that the future of LРR is problematic. The only chance is to unite with the DРR. But it will be quite a different story.

Part II. Recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments in the DPR The Constitution of the Donetsk People's Republic (hereinafter DPR) was adopted on May 14, 2014 and entered into force on September 11, 2015. According to Art. 86 of the Constitution and other normative legal acts in force on the territory of the Republic before the entry into force of the Constitution are applied in part that does not contradict it. Thus, on May 16, 2014 - the date of the "fixed" legislation of Ukraine, which is also considered the legislation of the Republic.

After this date, it is necessary to define «the right» legislation. June 2, 2014 the Decree "On the application of legislation on the territory of the DPR in the transitional period“ by DPR Council of Ministers was adopted. According to the Decree the acts of Ukraine and other states are applied on the territory the DPR in part that does not contradict the Declaration of Sovereignty and the Constitution of the Republic. This document makes it difficult to understand the legal system of the DPR. Now the Decree is valid in a new edition - on January 10, 2015.

June 29, 2015 the Act "On international treaties of the Donetsk People's Republic" was adopted. The Act «On Normative Acts» 2015 approved the hierarchy (хайерарки) of normative acts in the Republic. The Order of the Chairman of the Supreme Court of the DPR of January 9, 2015, approved the "Provisional Procedure for the Implementation of Arbitration Proceedings." According to the Order, arbitration cases are resolved in accordance with the rules established by the Code of Arbitration Proceedings and Code of Civil Proceedings of Ukraine effective as of the day of adoption of the Declaration of Sovereignty (April 7, 2014).

The Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) and the Code of Arbitrage Procedure (CAP) are not adopted in the Republic. The norms of the relevant codes of Ukraine are applied. They are similar to the corresponding norms of the CAP and the CCP of the Russian Federation. At the same time, there is a rapid reorientation to the legislation of the RF. Legislation of Ukraine is not applied on purpose. Since international treaties on the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments in the Republic have not been concluded, the courts do not consider such cases

Conclusion I believe that the DPR is a stronger entity than the LPR Conclusion I believe that the DPR is a stronger entity than the LPR. I think that it should become the center of Novorossia. June 24, 2014 Donetsk and Lugansk People's Republics announced a decision to unite in a confederal state - the Union of People's Republics (Novorossiia). However, in the spring of 2015, the agreement on the confederation was suspended. The project was "frozen", since the creation of Novorossia is not envisaged by «the Minsk agreements». Thus, the project "Novorossiia" can be renewed, "if Kiev violates the announced ceasefire, if there is an escalation of hostilities."

Thank you for attention! © P. Biriukov, 2018