European Urology Oncology

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 61, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Advertisements

European Urology Focus
Volume 72, Issue 2, Pages (August 2017)
Volume 68, Issue 2, Pages (August 2015)
Volume 57, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Volume 72, Issue 5, Pages (November 2017)
Testosterone Therapy in Men With Prostate Cancer
Volume 66, Issue 2, Pages (August 2014)
Prostate Cancer: Highlights from 2006
European Urology Oncology
Volume 61, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 74, Issue 2, Pages (August 2018)
Volume 70, Issue 4, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 51, Issue 4, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 73, Issue 3, Pages (March 2018)
Volume 71, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
Volume 68, Issue 4, Pages (October 2015)
European Urology Oncology
Volume 68, Issue 1, Pages (July 2015)
Tumour Grade, Treatment, and Relative Survival in a Population-based Cohort of Men with Potentially Curable Prostate Cancer  Sam Ladjevardi, Gabriel Sandblom,
Volume 74, Issue 1, Pages (July 2018)
Volume 67, Issue 2, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 67, Issue 2, Pages (February 2015)
Elizabeth K. Bancroft, Rosalind A. Eeles
European Urology Oncology
Volume 74, Issue 2, Pages (August 2018)
Volume 68, Issue 3, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 64, Issue 5, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 71, Issue 6, Pages (June 2017)
European Urology Oncology
Laurent Boccon-Gibod  European Urology Supplements 
Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer in a Real-life Cohort: Comparing Outcomes for PRIAS-eligible and PRIAS-ineligible Patients  Timo F.W. Soeterik,
Volume 73, Issue 2, Pages (February 2018)
Thromboembolic Events Following Surgery for Prostate Cancer
Volume 65, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 61, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Cytoreductive Radical Prostatectomy in Men with Prostate Cancer and Skeletal Metastases  Axel Heidenreich, Nicola Fossati, David Pfister, Nazareno Suardi,
Volume 72, Issue 1, Pages (July 2017)
Volume 74, Issue 2, Pages (August 2018)
Selma Masic, Janet E. Cowan, Samuel L. Washington, Hao G
Development and External Validation of Nomograms To Predict Adverse Pathological Characteristics After Robotic Prostatectomy: Results of a Prospective,
European Urology Oncology
The Diverse Genomic Landscape of Clinically Low-risk Prostate Cancer
Heterogeneity in Definitions of High-risk Prostate Cancer and Varying Impact on Mortality Rates after Radical Prostatectomy  Matthew Mossanen, Kenneth.
European Urology Oncology
European Urology Oncology
Volume 59, Issue 4, Pages (April 2011)
Trend of Adverse Stage Migration in Patients Treated with Radical Prostatectomy for Localized Prostate Cancer  Felix Preisser, Michele Marchioni, Sebastiano.
European Urology Oncology
European Urology Oncology
Jonathan S. Brajtbord, Michael S. Leapman, Matthew R. Cooperberg 
Psychotherapeutic Interventions Targeting Prostate Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review of the Literature  Liliana Vartolomei, Shahrokh F. Shariat, Mihai.
Correlations between Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and Gleason Score in Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review  Alexey Surov, Hans Jonas Meyer, Andreas.
European Urology Oncology
European Urology Oncology
European Urology Oncology
Axel Heidenreich  European Urology Supplements 
European Urology Oncology
European Urology Oncology
Volume 68, Issue 2, Pages (August 2015)
Fernando P. Secin, Fernando J. Bianco, Nicholas T
Oncoforum Urology: Prostate Cancer 2008 at a Glance
European Urology Oncology
Axel Heidenreich  European Urology Supplements 
European Urology Oncology
Salvage Local Treatments After Focal Therapy for Prostate Cancer
European Urology Oncology
European Urology Oncology
European Urology Oncology
Assessing a Patient’s Individual Risk of Biopsy-detectable Prostate Cancer: Be Aware of Case Mix Heterogeneity and A Priori Likelihood  Jan F.M. Verbeek,
Presentation transcript:

European Urology Oncology Validation of the Decipher Test for Predicting Distant Metastatic Recurrence in Men with High-risk Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer 10 Years After Surgery  Thomas Van den Broeck, Lisa Moris, Thomas Gevaert, Lorenzo Tosco, Elien Smeets, Nick Fishbane, Yang Liu, Christine Helsen, Jennifer Margrave, Christine Buerki, Elai Davicioni, Hendrik Van Poppel, Wouter Everaerts, Sheila Weinmann, Robert Den, John Davis, Edward Schaeffer, R. Jeffrey Karnes, Frank Claessens, Steven Joniau  European Urology Oncology  DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.12.007 Copyright © 2018 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 1 CONSORT diagram showing the study design and the patient selection process for the Leuven cohort. Bx=biopsy; EAU=European Association of Urology; PC=prostate cancer; PLND=pelvic lymph node dissection; PSA=prostate-specific antigen. European Urology Oncology DOI: (10.1016/j.euo.2018.12.007) Copyright © 2018 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 2 Decipher score distribution plots. (A) Decipher score distributions among cases and controls. Horizontal lines denote the median scores and interquartile range. Whiskers of the boxplot represent all of the values included. Dashed lines represent the cut points for the Decipher risk groups. (B) Decipher risk-group distributions among cases and controls. European Urology Oncology DOI: (10.1016/j.euo.2018.12.007) Copyright © 2018 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 3 Cumulative incidence analysis: incidence of metastatic recurrence stratified according to Decipher score groups. Time from radical prostatectomy (RP) to distant metastases (Mets), with time zero representing the date of surgery. European Urology Oncology DOI: (10.1016/j.euo.2018.12.007) Copyright © 2018 Terms and Conditions

European Urology Oncology DOI: (10.1016/j.euo.2018.12.007) Copyright © 2018 Terms and Conditions

European Urology Oncology DOI: (10.1016/j.euo.2018.12.007) Copyright © 2018 Terms and Conditions