Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 13, Issue 10, Pages (October 2006)
Advertisements

Philippe Derreumaux, Tamar Schlick  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Biology of Amyloid: Structure, Function, and Regulation
Structural Basis for the Highly Selective Inhibition of MMP-13
Green-Red Flashers to Accelerate Biology
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages (April 2014)
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages (March 2014)
Arvin C. Dar, Michael S. Lopez, Kevan M. Shokat  Chemistry & Biology 
Marcel Zimmermann, Julian D. Hegemann, Xiulan Xie, Mohamed A. Marahiel 
Β-Hairpin Folding Mechanism of a Nine-Residue Peptide Revealed from Molecular Dynamics Simulations in Explicit Water  Xiongwu Wu, Bernard R. Brooks  Biophysical.
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Molecular dynamics simulations
The Binding of Antibiotics in OmpF Porin
Volume 19, Issue 10, Pages (October 2012)
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (November 2010)
Carlos R. Baiz, Andrei Tokmakoff  Biophysical Journal 
Structure of RGS4 Bound to AlF4−-Activated Giα1: Stabilization of the Transition State for GTP Hydrolysis  John J.G. Tesmer, David M. Berman, Alfred G.
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2007)
The Influence of Amino Acid Protonation States on Molecular Dynamics Simulations of the Bacterial Porin OmpF  Sameer Varma, See-Wing Chiu, Eric Jakobsson 
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 13, Issue 10, Pages (October 2006)
Volume 15, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (September 2010)
Carlos R. Baiz, Andrei Tokmakoff  Biophysical Journal 
G. Fiorin, A. Pastore, P. Carloni, M. Parrinello  Biophysical Journal 
A General Strategy for Creating “Inactive-Conformation” Abl Inhibitors
Volume 89, Issue 4, Pages (October 2005)
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 26, Issue 4, Pages e3 (April 2018)
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (February 2007)
Volume 12, Issue 11, Pages (November 2005)
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
A Drug-Drug Interaction Crystallizes a New Entry Point into the UPR
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
Structural Basis for the Highly Selective Inhibition of MMP-13
Absence of Ion-Binding Affinity in the Putatively Inactivated Low-[K+] Structure of the KcsA Potassium Channel  Céline Boiteux, Simon Bernèche  Structure 
Insights into Oncogenic Mutations of Plexin-B1 Based on the Solution Structure of the Rho GTPase Binding Domain  Yufeng Tong, Prasanta K. Hota, Mehdi.
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages (May 2016)
Rahul Raman, V. Sasisekharan, Ram Sasisekharan  Chemistry & Biology 
Volume 7, Issue 7, Pages (July 2000)
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Karina Kubiak, Wieslaw Nowak  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (June 2006)
Michael A. McDonough, Christopher J. Schofield  Chemistry & Biology 
Structural Basis of Swinholide A Binding to Actin
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2014)
Flexing and Stretching in Nonribosomal Peptide Synthetases
Arvin C. Dar, Michael S. Lopez, Kevan M. Shokat  Chemistry & Biology 
Molecular Similarity Analysis Uncovers Heterogeneous Structure-Activity Relationships and Variable Activity Landscapes  Lisa Peltason, Jürgen Bajorath 
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (March 2013)
Damian Dawidowski, David S. Cafiso  Structure 
Peter König, Rafael Giraldo, Lynda Chapman, Daniela Rhodes  Cell 
Volume 95, Issue 7, Pages (October 2008)
Mechanism of Interaction between the General Anesthetic Halothane and a Model Ion Channel Protein, III: Molecular Dynamics Simulation Incorporating a.
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (April 2012)
Volume 84, Issue 4, Pages (April 2003)
Insights from Free-Energy Calculations: Protein Conformational Equilibrium, Driving Forces, and Ligand-Binding Modes  Yu-ming M. Huang, Wei Chen, Michael J.
A General Strategy for Creating “Inactive-Conformation” Abl Inhibitors
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (July 2012)
Christian X. Weichenberger, Manfred J. Sippl  Structure 
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 98, Issue 4, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Stanley J Watowich, John J Skehel, Don C Wiley  Structure 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages 427-435 (April 2006) Biomimetic Facially Amphiphilic Antibacterial Oligomers with Conformationally Stiff Backbones  Haizhong Tang, Robert J. Doerksen, Ticora V. Jones, Michael L. Klein, Gregory N. Tew  Chemistry & Biology  Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages 427-435 (April 2006) DOI: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2006.02.007 Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Oligomer 1 Is Based on 1,3-Dicarboxy Benzene, while the New Backbone 2 Contains a 4,6-Dicarboxy Pyrimidine The two additional nitrogen atoms provide new hydrogen bond acceptors to limit rotation around the aromatic carbon-carbonyl single bond, which is not confined in 1, as shown by the arrows. Chemistry & Biology 2006 13, 427-435DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2006.02.007) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Synthesis of a Pyrimidine-4,6-Dicarboxylic Acid Diamide Foldamer and Other Model Oligomers (A and B) (A) Synthesis of pyrimidine oligomers 5 and 6 and (B) three model compounds for which crystal structures were obtained in which the potential for intramolecular interactions was systematically varied. When comparing these structures with 5, compound 7 [5] contains only the N–H···S interaction, 8 possesses only the N–H···N interaction, and 9 has all of these intramolecular interactions removed. Chemistry & Biology 2006 13, 427-435DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2006.02.007) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Conformation of Pyrimidine-4,6-Dicarboxylic Acid Diamide from X-Ray and Computation (Top) Crystal structure of 5 showing intramolecular interactions that confine the molecular conformation to an extended structure placing polar amine and nonpolar t-butyl groups on opposite faces. The N–H···N distances are 2.08 Å and 2.18 Å, and the amide N–H···S distances are 2.57 Å and 2.56 Å. Atom colors: C, gray; H, white; N, light blue; O, red; S, yellow. (Bottom) Calculated B3LYP/6-311G(d,p) lowest-energy conformation for 5′. Atom colors: C, green; H, white; N, blue; O, red; S, yellow. Two different atom color schemes are used to easily distinguish crystal structures from calculated structures. Chemistry & Biology 2006 13, 427-435DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2006.02.007) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Conformations of Other Oligomers from X-Ray and Computation (Left) Crystal structures for 7, 8, and 9. In each case, the designed intramolecular interactions are as expected. For 7 and 8, the N–H···S and N–H···N intramolecular interactions, respectively, are observed, while all hydrogen bonding in 9 is intermolecular. As a result, 9 is able to adopt a bent conformation, unlike compounds 5, 7, and 8. The two N–H···S distances of 7 are 2.46 Å and 2.54 Å, while the pair of N–H···N distances on 8 are 2.25 Å and 2.14 Å. Atom colors: C, gray; H, white; N, light blue; O, red; S, yellow. (Right) B3LYP/6-311G(d,p) lowest-energy conformations for 7′, 8, and 9. Atom colors: C, green; H, white; N, blue; O, red; S, yellow. Two different atom color schemes are used to easily distinguish crystal structures from calculated structures. Chemistry & Biology 2006 13, 427-435DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2006.02.007) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Dose-Dependent Leakage of the Membrane Potential Dye, diSC3-5, from S. aureus in the Presence of 10 Significant leakage is observed even at 0.125 times the MIC. Chemistry & Biology 2006 13, 427-435DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2006.02.007) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions