Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (April 2003)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 95, Issue 7, Pages (December 1998)
Advertisements

Volume 15, Issue 5, Pages (September 2004)
The Crystal Structure of a GroEL/Peptide Complex
Volume 125, Issue 1, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (March 1999)
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 124, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
Tom Huxford, De-Bin Huang, Shiva Malek, Gourisankar Ghosh  Cell 
The Crystal Structure of the Human Hepatitis B Virus Capsid
Yvonne Groemping, Karine Lapouge, Stephen J. Smerdon, Katrin Rittinger 
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Intramolecular interactions of the regulatory domains of the Bcr–Abl kinase reveal a novel control mechanism  Hyun-Joo Nam, Wayne G Haser, Thomas M Roberts,
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
Structure of the Angiopoietin-2 Receptor Binding Domain and Identification of Surfaces Involved in Tie2 Recognition  William A. Barton, Dorothea Tzvetkova,
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (December 2004)
The Nuclear Xenobiotic Receptor CAR
Volume 110, Issue 1, Pages (July 2002)
Structural Basis for an Unexpected Mode of SERM-Mediated ER Antagonism
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Young Jun Im, James H. Hurley  Developmental Cell 
Structure of the Yeast Hst2 Protein Deacetylase in Ternary Complex with 2′-O-Acetyl ADP Ribose and Histone Peptide  Kehao Zhao, Xiaomei Chai, Ronen Marmorstein 
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (March 2000)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 9-19 (October 2005)
Mechanism of Sirtuin Inhibition by Nicotinamide: Altering the NAD+ Cosubstrate Specificity of a Sir2 Enzyme  José L. Avalos, Katherine M. Bever, Cynthia.
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (August 1999)
Core Structure of gp41 from the HIV Envelope Glycoprotein
Andrew H. Huber, W.James Nelson, William I. Weis  Cell 
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
Zhenjian Cai, Nabil H. Chehab, Nikola P. Pavletich  Molecular Cell 
Structural Elements of an Orphan Nuclear Receptor–DNA Complex
Volume 9, Issue 8, Pages (August 2001)
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (August 2006)
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
Structure of the Catalytic Region of DNA Ligase IV in Complex with an Artemis Fragment Sheds Light on Double-Strand Break Repair  Takashi Ochi, Xiaolong.
Volume 95, Issue 7, Pages (December 1998)
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Crystallographic Analysis of the Recognition of a Nuclear Localization Signal by the Nuclear Import Factor Karyopherin α  Elena Conti, Marc Uy, Lore Leighton,
Yi Mo, Benjamin Vaessen, Karen Johnston, Ronen Marmorstein 
The basis for K-Ras4B binding specificity to protein farnesyl-transferase revealed by 2 Å resolution ternary complex structures  Stephen B Long, Patrick.
Volume 91, Issue 7, Pages (December 1997)
Crystal Structure of a Phosphoinositide Phosphatase, MTMR2
ICAT Inhibits β-Catenin Binding to Tcf/Lef-Family Transcription Factors and the General Coactivator p300 Using Independent Structural Modules  Danette.
Volume 9, Issue 8, Pages (August 2001)
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (December 2001)
Volume 85, Issue 5, Pages (May 1996)
Crystal Structure of the N-Terminal Domain of Sialoadhesin in Complex with 3′ Sialyllactose at 1.85 Å Resolution  A.P. May, R.C. Robinson, M. Vinson,
Volume 127, Issue 2, Pages (October 2006)
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages (February 2005)
Structural and Biochemical Mechanisms for the Specificity of Hormone Binding and Coactivator Assembly by Mineralocorticoid Receptor  Yong Li, Kelly Suino,
Carl C. Correll, Betty Freeborn, Peter B. Moore, Thomas A. Steitz  Cell 
Structure of BamHI Bound to Nonspecific DNA
Partial Agonists Activate PPARγ Using a Helix 12 Independent Mechanism
Crystal Structure of a Procaspase-7 Zymogen
Jia-Wei Wu, Amy E. Cocina, Jijie Chai, Bruce A. Hay, Yigong Shi 
Structural Insights into the Mode of Action of a Pure Antiestrogen
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Pingwei Li, Gerry McDermott, Roland K. Strong  Immunity 
Structure of a HoxB1–Pbx1 Heterodimer Bound to DNA
Luc Bousset, Hassan Belrhali, Joël Janin, Ronald Melki, Solange Morera 
Structure of the Oxygen Sensor in Bacillus subtilis
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages (July 2007)
Rachelle Gaudet, Andrew Bohm, Paul B Sigler  Cell 
Volume 126, Issue 4, Pages (August 2006)
Sabine Pokutta, William I. Weis  Molecular Cell 
Structural Basis for Activation of ARF GTPase
Yogesh K. Gupta, Deepak T. Nair, Robin P. Wharton, Aneel K. Aggarwal 
Volume 10, Issue 7, Pages (July 2002)
The Structure of the MAP2K MEK6 Reveals an Autoinhibitory Dimer
Presentation transcript:

Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages 1093-1100 (April 2003) Structural Basis for Bile Acid Binding and Activation of the Nuclear Receptor FXR  Li-Zhi Mi, Srikripa Devarakonda, Joel M. Harp, Qing Han, Roberto Pellicciari, Timothy M. Willson, Sepideh Khorasanizadeh, Fraydoon Rastinejad  Molecular Cell  Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages 1093-1100 (April 2003) DOI: 10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00112-6 Copyright © 2003 Cell Press Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Overall Views of FXR and Its Ligand Interactions (A) Perpendicular views of the FXR LBD (purple) from complex b of the 6ECDCA complex. Helix 12 of the receptor is shown in yellow, the GRIP-1 peptides are shown in blue and red, and 6ECDCA is shown in green. (B) Stereo view of a simulated annealing omit electron density (Fo-Fc) map showing the bound 6ECDCA. The ligand was excluded in map calculation. (C) Schematic representation of the FXR/6ECDCA interactions. Dotted red lines indicate hydrogen bonds; dotted blue lines indicate van der Waals contacts. Molecular Cell 2003 11, 1093-1100DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00112-6) Copyright © 2003 Cell Press Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 The Activation Mechanism of FXR (A) 6ECDCA and 3-deoxyCDCA interactions with the activation switch of FXR. Shown is the superposition of their two crystal structures in the vicinity of the ligand and residues His444 and Trp466. (B) The binding of GRIP-1 NID-3 coactivator peptide to FXR as a function of increasing 3-deoxyCDCA (black triangles) and CDCA (red circles). Molecular Cell 2003 11, 1093-1100DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00112-6) Copyright © 2003 Cell Press Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 The Interaction of FXR with Coactivator (A) Comparison of the a and b complexes in the asymmetric unit of the 6ECDCA structure. Helix 12 is shown in yellow, the peptide in the primary coactivator groove is shown in blue, and the second peptide seen in the b complex (of both the 6ECDCA and 3-deoxyCDCA containing structures) is shown in red. The numbers indicate the location of the conserved leucines. (B) A section of a composite omit map (2Fo-Fc) showing electron density for the two coactivator peptides in complex b. The primary coactivator peptide is in blue; the second peptide is in red. (C) A schematic representation showing the contacts of the primary coactivator peptide (blue) with the second peptide (red) and with FXR (residues indicated in boxes). Circles represent hydrogen bonds; dotted lines indicate van der Waals contacts. (D) FXR binding to different NID regions of GRIP1 in the presence of CDCA. The NID-1 peptide has the sequence KGQTKLLQLLTTK, the NID-2 is EKHKILHRLLQDS, and the NID-3 is KENALLRYLLDKD. The NID (1-3) protein consists of the three consecutive NID regions of GRIP-1. (E) Gel filtration chromatography (Pharmacia 100 cm Superdex-75) showing the migration of FXR-LBD, the NID (1-3) region of GRIP-1, and the FXR-LBD + NID (1-3). The elution profiles are shown as a function of increasing time (left to right). The migration of several molecular weight standards is indicated at the top. FXR-LBD elutes at the expected size of a monomer (∼29 kDa). The NID (1-3) polypeptide alone elutes at a larger size (∼46 kDa) than expected (calculated mass ∼24 kDa), presumably due to a noncompact fold. FXR-LBD + NID (1-3) migrates at a size of ∼60 kDa, consistent with one FXR-LBD bound to a more compact NID (1-3) and not consistent with the cooperative binding of two FXR-LBDs subunits with one NID (1-3) fragment (expected migration at a size >82 kDa). Molecular Cell 2003 11, 1093-1100DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00112-6) Copyright © 2003 Cell Press Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Sequences Used for Ligand Binding by the Steroid Receptors Yellow shading shows the position of the α helices; blue shows β strands. Red boxes indicate the residues that contact the steroids as determined from crystal structures (Bledsoe et al., 2002; Brzozowski et al., 1997; Rochel et al., 2000; Sack et al., 2001; Shiau et al., 1998; Williams and Sigler, 1998), and black ovals indicate the residues involved in forming the π-cation molecular switch for ligand-induced activation of FXR. All of the residues in rFXR that contact CDCA-derived ligands are identical with human FXR but not as closely shared with mFXRβ, which has been shown to respond to lanosterol (Otte et al., 2003). The crystal structures of hFXR, mFXRβ, LXRα, LXRβ, and MR are unavailable. Molecular Cell 2003 11, 1093-1100DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00112-6) Copyright © 2003 Cell Press Terms and Conditions