Description of Show and Tell

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
COUNTER: improving usage statistics Peter Shepherd Director COUNTER December 2006.
Advertisements

The Enterprise Skills Story
Writing Good User Stories Bob Schommer, CSP, PMP Senior Project Manager Skyline Technologies, Inc.
Performing an educational supervisor report. Step by Step guide By Dr Kim Emerson January 2013.
The NAR flowchart – the moderation cycle
[Title of meeting] [Name of sponsor] [Date] For guidance on working with PowerPoint and reformatting slides, click on Help, then Microsoft PowerPoint Help,
Student Evaluations. Introduction: Conducted: Qualtrics Survey Fall 2011 o Sample Size: 642 o FT Tenured: 158, FT Untenured: 59 o Adjunct: 190 o Students:
GAI Proprietary Information
How Can IOLP Help Me? If you are planning to continue your studies, find an apprenticeship or a job an employer, trainer or educator will be looking for.
1 Session 7 Story Board Sessions. 2 Story Boards Story Boards analyse problems and suggest solutions They help people move from story telling to problem.
Effectively applying ISO9001:2000 clauses 5 and 8
Usability Methods: Cognitive Walkthrough & Heuristic Evaluation Dr. Dania Bilal IS 588 Spring 2008 Dr. D. Bilal.
PTLLS – Embedding Literacy, language & numeracy L3 – Explain ways to embed elements of functional skills, in your specialist area. L4 – Evaluate a range.
Research Papers. Critical Thinking Observations: From a series of observations we can establish facts. You have all experienced some sort of interactive.
CaDSR Software Development Update Denise Warzel Semantic Infrastructure Operations Team Presented to caDSR Content team November 2012.
Future Aspirations Dr Maire Shelly Associate Postgraduate Dean North Western Deanery.
COMP3615,5615 Capstone Projects Week 4. Overview Where should you be now? What are the pragmatics of getting established? The grading over the next 2.
Focus Group on the Draft InTASC Model Core Teaching Standards.
Communications AND TRAINING PLAN FOR [project]
T Iteration Demo Team WiseGUI I2 Iteration
Rhona Sharpe, Head of OCSLD Liz Turner, Head of APQO 11 th April 2013 CHAIRING VALIDATION PANELS.
Rapid software development 1. Topics covered Agile methods Extreme programming Rapid application development Software prototyping 2.
Strategy Development Group 1 Maximising our Reach (Services & Knowledge)
Task Analysis Exercise Project criteria Command term objectives Describe – give a detailed account of the PROBLEM and DESIGN NEED OR OPPORTUNITY (Page.
January 24, 2009 Agile Product Management Making Things Happen Walter Bodwell Planigle.
INFO3600 Capstone Projects Week 4. Overview Where should you be now? What are the pragmatics of getting established? The grading over the next 2 weeks.
SCRUM.
Worldwide Protein Data Bank wwPDB Common D&A Project Full Project Team Meeting Rutgers March 16-19, 2010.
Negotiation of Proposals Dr. Evangelos Ouzounis Directorate C DG Information Society European Commission.
Usability Testing Instructions. Why is usability testing important? In a perfect world, we would always user test instructions before we set them loose.
Marking and Feedback CPD Action research – Concluding Session.
1 CARRY-OVER BUDGET (COB) REQUESTS WHY AND HOW TO SUBMIT THEM.
CERN IT Department CH-1211 Genève 23 Switzerland t Services and Resources Web IT Services and Resources Web Pages A Proposal Tim Bell 1.
The Patient Choice Project Use Case Working Session February 12 th, 2016.
Usability Engineering Dr. Dania Bilal IS 587 Fall 2007.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Early Delivery System Testing Environments & Planning – Involving Market Participants TPTF May.
Query Health Operations Workgroup Standards & Interoperability (S&I) Framework October 13, :00am – 12:00pm ET.
Facilitation Tool: Team Agreement
Progress Review.
COMP 135: Human-Computer Interface Design
Meeting Procedure.
Overview of the RHIS Rapid Assessment Tool
Infrastructure Area EMI All Hands Summary.
Performance Feedback Training
Online ILAC Newsletter
So You Want to Be a Product Owner
CSCE 741 Software Process Lecture 04 Availability
Making the Most of the Ellucian Support Center
Epic View Only Referrals
Johanna Rothman Know What “Done” Means Chapter 11
How Laws Are Made.
How laws are made.
CSCE 741 Software Process Lecture 04 Availability
Key Information Contact Details for everyone
Scrum Science NGSS: Engineering, Technology, Applications of Science
How Laws Are Made.
0433: Inclusion of the Transmission to Distribution “System Operator Agreement Guidelines” within the Offtake Arrangements Document.
PSHE at Key Stages 1 – 2 Guidance on Assessment, Recording and Reporting If it is not assessment for learning – why are we doing it? Assessment must.
Progress Review.
Scrum Science NGSS: Engineering, Technology, Applications of Science
Outline Do not start an outline until your video is approved.
Progress Review.
PIE Planning & Resources
Unit 4 - A06 – Review Grade Criteria To get a c
ACTION LOG GUIDANCE NOTES
Reporting Status or Progress
[Ballot code, contract number] [Project title]
[Ballot code, contract number] [Project title]
Nonconformity Writing
KPI and KVI Review Approach & Plan
Presentation transcript:

Description of Show and Tell Project Name Description of Show and Tell 00 Month 0000 | Firstname Lastname

User stories covered Instructions: List all the user stories (use cases for non-Scrum) to be shown, taken from the project tracker. If there is more than one product owner, include the name of the product owner for each user story. (Scrum best practices state there should only be one product owner)

Rules “This session is to show…” (Give a business description of what is going to be shown.) It is a work in progress. Interfaces are all stubbed / partially stubbed as appropriate. UI standards are draft. This session is not to have a business discussion about how things should work or for people seeing this for the first time to suggest changes. This session is to demonstrate progress against a set of elaboration requirements we have already agreed to.

What feedback would we like ? Anything that is different from what was agreed during elaboration and documented in the user stories (product/process owners mainly). Anything that stands out as missing. (Just make note of what’s missing. There is no need to go into detail during this discussion because there will be another opportunity to get feedback from smaller audiences for specific areas.) Opinions on UI are notoriously hard to get agreement on as everyone has a different view. These to be fed via the person responsible for UI (product owner or UI specialist) Opinions on UI, which is notoriously hard to get an agreement on as everyone has a different view, should come from the product owner or UI specialist. Feedback, question, and comments should go through the product owner who will decide what is valid and prioritize the feedback for inclusion as appropriate.

SHOW AND tell

Questions?