Impact of Baseline NNRTI Mutations on the Virologic Response to TMC125 in the Phase III Clinical Trials DUET-1 and DUET-2 J Vingerhoets, A Buelens, M.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TMC278 Update, 30th January 2009  C204 data  ECHO and THRIVE - Phase III studies  New TMC278 formulations Peter Williams Tibotec BVBA, Mechelen, Belgium.
Advertisements

Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI  ENCORE  EFV vs RPV –ECHO-THRIVE –STAR  EFV vs ETR –SENSE.
INTELENCE (Etravirine) UPDATE Global Clinical Research Rekha Sinha, MD January 30, 2009.
TMC125 Safety and Tolerability: 24-week Results of the Pooled DUET-1 and -2 Trials R Haubrich, M Schechter, S Walmsley, M Peeters, M Janssens, G De Smedt.
NNRTI Resistance David H. Spach, MD Principal Investigator, NW AETC
Persisting long term benefit of genotypic guided treatment in HIV infected patients failing HAART and Importance of Protease Inhibitor plasma levels. Viradapt.
Switch to ATV/r + RAL  HARNESS Study. ATV/r 300/100 mg qd + TDF/FTC N = 37 N = 72 ATV/r 300/100 mg qd + RAL 400 mg bid  Design Randomisation 2: 1 Open-label.
Switch to TDF/FTC/RPV  SPIRIT Study. SPIRIT study: Switch PI/r + 2 NRTI to TDF/FTC/RPV TDF/FTC/RPV STR 24 weeks 48 weeks Primary Endpoint Secondary Endpoint.
Predicting NNRTI Resistance – do polymorphisms matter? Nicola E Mackie 1, Lucy Garvey 1, Anna Maria Geretti 2, Linda Harrison 3, Peter Tilston 4, Andrew.
1 Resistance and Tropism - Maraviroc Lisa K. Naeger, Ph.D. Division of Antiviral Products Food and Drug Administration April 24, 2007 FDA Antiviral Advisory.
Connection Domain Mutations in Treatment-Experienced Patients in the OPTIMA (Options in Management with Antiretrovirals) Trial Birgitt Dau, M.D. Postdoctoral.
TITAN = TMC114/r In Treatment-experienced pAtients Naïve to lopinavir
Combined PI and NNRTI Resistance Analysis of the Pooled DUET Trial: Towards a Regimen-Based Resistance Interpretation J. M. Schapiro, J. Vingerhoets, S.
A prospective, randomized, Phase III trial of NRTI-, PI-, and NNRTI-sparing regimens for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection – ACTG 5142 Riddler S.A.,
Efficacy and Safety of Maraviroc in Treatment- Experienced (TE) Patients Infected with R5 HIV-1: 96-week Combined Analysis of the MOTIVATE 1 & 2 Studies.
Switch to DRV/r monotherapy  MONOI  MONET  PROTEA  DRV600.
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r  EFV vs LPV/r vs EFV + LPV/r –A5142 –Mexican Study  NVP vs ATV/r –ARTEN  EFV vs ATV/r –A5202.
Evaluation of the WHO immunologic criteria for treatment failure among adults on first-line HAART in south India Snigdha Vallabhaneni 1, Sara Chandy 2,
Clinical development programme for Second-Line treatment Anton Pozniak World AIDS Conference, July 2014.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI  ENCORE  EFV vs RPV –ECHO-THRIVE –STAR  EFV vs ETR –SENSE.
Results From DUET-1 and DUET-2: ETR Plus DRV/RTV Associated With High Rates of Viral Suppression in Treatment-Experienced Patients This program is supported.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI  ENCORE  EFV vs RPV –ECHO-THRIVE –STAR  EFV vs ETR –SENSE.
Copyright © 2008 Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, USA All rights Reserved Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) Analyses for Raltegravir.
FLAMINGO Efficacy and safety of dolutegravir (DTG) in treatment-naïve subjects SE/HIV/0023/14c January 2014.
VIKING Efficacy and safety of dolutegravir in treatment-experienced subjects SE/HIV/0023/14b January 2014.
POWER 3 Study Confirms Safety and Efficacy of Darunavir/Ritonavir in Treatment-Experienced Patients Slideset on: Molina JM, Cohen C, Katlama C, et al.
First-Line Treatment of HIV Infection With Either NNRTI- or PI-Based Regimens Effective for Long-term Disease Control Slideset on: MacArthur RD, Novak.
KLEAN Study: Fosamprenavir/Ritonavir Associated With Similar Efficacy and Safety as Lopinavir/Ritonavir SGC in Treatment- Naive Patients Slideset on: Eron.
HIV Drug Resistance Surveillance Satellite Session: HIV Drug Resistance Surveillance and Control: a Global Concern Silvia Bertagnolio, MD WHO,
Tipranavir/Ritonavir Superior to Comparator PI/Ritonavir at Week 48 in Multiclass-Experienced Patients Slideset on: Hicks CB, Cahn P, Cooper DA, et al.
#AIDS2016 Dolutegravir (DTG) plus Rilpivirine (RPV) in Suppressed Heavily Pretreated HIV-Infected Patients A. Díaz, J.L. Casado, F.
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
Rilpivirine-TDF-FTC versus Efavirenz-TDF-FTC STaR Trial
Treatment-Naïve Adults
Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI
Dolutegravir plus Rilpivirine as Maintenance Dual Therapy SWORD-1 and SWORD- 2: Design
Phylogenetic relationships of HIV-1 Pol RT strains
Figure 1 Inclusion criteria, exclusion criteria, and criteria for virologic failure. CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; ddC, zalcitabine;
Etravirine in Treatment Experienced DUET-2 (TMC125-C216)
Switch to RPV-TDF-FTC from Ritonavir-boosted PI Regimen SPIRIT STUDY
Lopinavir-ritonavir mg BID (n = 354)
Etravirine versus Protease Inhibitor in ARV-Experienced TMC 125-C227
Introduction Results Objectives Methods Conclusion Funding
Once Daily Etravirine versus Efavirenz in Treatment-Naive SENSE Trial
Dolutegravir versus Raltegravir in Treatment Experienced SAILING Study
Etravirine in Treatment Experienced DUET-1 (TMC125-C206)
Atazanavir + ritonavir vs. Lopinavir-ritonavir CASTLE Study
Darunavir/r versus Other PIs in Treatment Experienced POWER 1 and 2
LPV-RTV versus LPV-RTV + ZDV-3TC in Treatment-Naïve MONARK Trial
ARV-trial.com Switch to MVC MARCH Study 1.
Switch to DTG + 3TC ASPIRE Study.
Changes in HIV-1 Co-receptor Tropism for Patients Participating in the Maraviroc MOTIVATE 1 and 2 Clinical Trials E van der Ryst and M Westby Pfizer Global.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Long-Term Clinical and Immunologic Outcomes Are Similar in HIV-Infected Persons Randomized to NNRTI versus PI versus NNRTI+PI-based Antiretroviral Regimens.
Changes in HIV-1 Co-receptor Tropism for Patients Participating in the Maraviroc MOTIVATE 1 and 2 Clinical Trials E van der Ryst and M Westby Pfizer Global.
Switch to DRV/r monotherapy
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r
Switch to RAL-containing regimen
Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
A prospective, randomized, Phase III trial of NRTI-, PI-, and NNRTI-sparing regimens for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection – ACTG 5142 Riddler S.A.,
ARV-trial.com Switch to ATV/r + RAL HARNESS Study 1.
Background. Long-Term B/F/TAF Switch Efficacy in Patients with Archived Pre-Existing Resistance.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Differential Detection of M184V/I Between Plasma Historical HIV Genotypes and Proviral DNA from PBMCs N Margot, R Ram, IR McNicholl, R Haubrich, C Callebaut.
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
HVDRS STUDY RESISTANCE: WE CARE
Presentation transcript:

Impact of Baseline NNRTI Mutations on the Virologic Response to TMC125 in the Phase III Clinical Trials DUET-1 and DUET-2 J Vingerhoets, A Buelens, M Peeters, G Picchio, L Tambuyzer, H Van Marck, G De Smedt, B Woodfall and MP de Béthune Tibotec

Objectives To identify the baseline genotypic determinants of decreased virological response to TMC125, in the Phase III DUET-1 and DUET-2 trials (pooled data) To provide guidance in the interpretation of genotypic resistance information related to TMC125

DUET-1 and DUET-2: trial design and inclusion criteria Screening 6 weeks 48-week treatment period with optional 48-week extension Follow-up 4 weeks 24-week primary analysis TMC125 (200 mg b.i.d.) + BR* 600 patients per trial n=300 per trial Placebo + BR* n=300 per trial *BR = DRV/r with optimised NRTIs and optional enfuvirtide Plasma viral load at screening: >5,000 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL Stable antiretroviral therapy for at least 8 weeks at screening, and remain on that treatment until baseline At least three primary protease inhibitor mutations at screening At least one NNRTI resistance-associated mutation (either at screening or in documented historical genotype) BR = background regimen; DRV/r = darunavir with low-dose ritonavir

DUET-1 and DUET-2: timeline 24 week last patient last visit DUET-1 DUET-2 RESISTANCE PROFILE TMC125 IHDRW Barbados EFFICACY DATA IAS Sydney Analysis 2007 Jan Mar Jun Jul Feb Apr May Aug Database LOCK No efficacy data will be shown. Virologic response data will be shown relative to the response in the subgroup of TMC125 treated subjects without detectable baseline NNRTI mutations.

Methods Effect of baseline genotype on the virological response to TMC125 at Week 24, was studied in the subgroup of patients not using enfuvirtide as a new drug, and excluding the patients who discontinued for other reasons than virological failure (n=406). Virological response at Week 24 is presented relative to the response achieved by the subgroup of patients without detectable NNRTI RAMs at baseline* (n=52; relative response = 1.0) (*patients had NNRTI mutations from previous genotype) Decreased virological response was defined as a response that was at least 25% lower than that of the subgroup of patients without detectable NNRTI RAMs at baseline, using the primary efficacy endpoint of confirmed viral load <50 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL RT mutations were included in the analysis if they were present at baseline in 5 or more patients

Which NNRTI RAMs were evaluated ? L100I K103N V106A V106M V108I Y181C Y181I Y188C Y188H Y188L G190A G190S P225H P236L 14 NNRTI RAMs listed by IAS-USA1 1Johnson et al. Topics in HIV Med 2006; 14(3):125-130

Which NNRTI RAMs were evaluated ? A98G L100I K101E K101P K101Q K103H K103N K103S K103T V106A V106M V108I E138G E138K E138Q V179D V179E V179F V179G V179I Y181C Y181I Y181V Y188C Y188H Y188L G190A G190C G190E G190Q G190S H221Y P225H F227C F227L M230I M230L P236L K238N K238T Y318F L100I K103N V106A V106M V108I Y181C Y181I Y188C Y188H Y188L G190A G190S P225H P236L 14 NNRTI RAMs listed by IAS-USA1 27 additional NNRTI RAMs2 1Johnson et al. Topics in HIV Med 2006; 14(3):125-130 2Tambuyzer et al, EHDRW 2007; Rimsky et al., IHDRW 2007 (poster 63)

Total list of NNRTI RAMs (n=44) V90I A98G L100I K101E K101P K101Q K103H K103N K103S K103T V106A V106I V106M V108I E138G E138K E138Q V179D V179E V179F V179G V179I Y181C Y181I Y181V Y188C Y188H Y188L V189I G190A G190C G190E G190Q G190S H221Y P225H F227C F227L M230I M230L P236L K238N K238T Y318F L100I K103N V106A V106M V108I Y181C Y181I Y188C Y188H Y188L G190A G190S P225H P236L A98G L100I K101E K101P K101Q K103H K103N K103S K103T V106A V106M V108I E138G E138K E138Q V179D V179E V179F V179G V179I Y181C Y181I Y181V Y188C Y188H Y188L G190A G190C G190E G190Q G190S H221Y P225H F227C F227L M230I M230L P236L K238N K238T Y318F 14 NNRTI RAMs listed by IAS-USA1 27 additional NNRTI RAMs2 3 additional NNRTI RAMs associated with increased TMC125 FC identified by linear regression analysis of recombinant clinical isolates 44 1Johnson et al. Topics in HIV Med 2006; 14(3):125-130 2Tambuyzer et al, EHDRW 2007; Rimsky et al., IHDRW 2007 (poster 63)

Identification of the TMC125 resistance-associated mutations V90I A98G L100I K101E K101P K101Q K103H K103N K103S K103T V106A V106I V106M V108I E138G E138K E138Q V179D V179E V179F V179G V179I Y181C Y181I Y181V Y188C Y188H Y188L V189I G190A G190C G190E G190Q G190S H221Y P225H F227C F227L M230I M230L P236L K238N K238T Y318F 44 NNRTI mutations were studied

Identification of the TMC125 resistance-associated mutations V90I A98G L100I K101E K101P K101Q K103H K103N K103S K103T V106A V106I V106M V108I E138G E138K E138Q V179D V179E V179F V179G V179I Y181C Y181I Y181V Y188C Y188H Y188L V189I G190A G190C G190E G190Q G190S H221Y P225H F227C F227L M230I M230L P236L K238N K238T Y318F V90I A98G L100I K101E K101P K101Q K103H K103N K103S K103T V106A V106I V106M V108I E138G E138K E138Q V179D V179E V179F V179G V179I Y181C Y181I Y181V Y188C Y188H Y188L V189I G190A G190C G190E G190Q G190S H221Y P225H F227C F227L M230I M230L P236L K238N K238T Y318F 44 NNRTI mutations were studied 26 NNRTI mutations were present in  5 patients

Identification of the TMC125 resistance-associated mutations V90I A98G L100I K101E K101P K101Q K103H K103N K103S K103T V106A V106I V106M V108I E138G E138K E138Q V179D V179E V179F V179G V179I Y181C Y181I Y181V Y188C Y188H Y188L V189I G190A G190C G190E G190Q G190S H221Y P225H F227C F227L M230I M230L P236L K238N K238T Y318F 44 NNRTI mutations were studied 26 NNRTI mutations were present in  5 patients 13 TMC125 RAMs were identified at baseline to have a significant impact on virological response

The effect of baseline TMC125 RAMs on virological response 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 Response relative to the subgroup with no NNRTI RAMs 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 No mut. (ref)* L100I G190A Y181I V90I A98G Y181C K101E K101P V179D V106I Y181V G190S V179F† K103N‡ Patients (n) 52 117 2 2–3 No. of NNRTI RAMs (median) No. of NNRTI RAMs (IQR) IQR = interquartile range; *no detectable baseline NNRTI RAMs from the list of 44 †V179F was always observed in the presence of Y181C; ‡K103N included as a reference for a commonly occurring NNRTI RAM; The 13 TMC125 RAMs are represented by red bars

The effect of baseline TMC125 RAMs on virological response 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 Response relative to the subgroup with no NNRTI RAMs 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 No mut. (ref)* L100I G190A Y181I V90I A98G Y181C K101E K101P V179D V106I Y181V G190S V179F† K103N‡ Patients (n) 52 34 115 8 22 59 110 53 9 5 24 6 14 7 117 No. of NNRTI RAMs (median) 2 4 4 3 4 4 4 3 3 5 3 3 5 2 No. of NNRTI RAMs (IQR) 2–3 3–5 3–5 2–4 2–5 3–5 3–6 2–3 2–4 4–6 2–3 2–4 4–6 2–3 IQR = interquartile range; *no detectable baseline NNRTI RAMs from the list of 44 †V179F was always observed in the presence of Y181C; ‡K103N included as a reference for a commonly occurring NNRTI RAM; The 13 TMC125 RAMs are represented by red bars

The number of baseline TMC125 RAMs correlated with the virological response to TMC125 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 Response relative to the subgroup with no NNRTI RAMs 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 No mutation (reference)* 1 2 3 4 5 Number of TMC125 RAMs (13) Patients (n) 52 161 121 64 32 19 9 Patients† (%) 40 85% 30 16 8 5 2 *no detectable baseline NNRTI RAMs from the list of 44; †n=406 (100%)

Response relative to the subgroup with no NNRTI RAMs Decreased virological response is only observed with multiple concomitant TMC125 RAMs Response relative to the subgroup with no NNRTI RAMs No mut (ref)*. 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 Y181C + 0 TMC125 RAMs Y181C + 1 Y181C + 2 Y181C + 3 Y181C + 4 52 23 36 26 17 8 Patients (n) Y181C No mut (ref)* G190A + 0 TMC125 RAMs G190A + 1 G190A + 2 G190A + 3 G190A + 4 52 18 46 25 17 9 G190A 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 *no detectable baseline NNRTI RAMs from the list of 44

CONCLUSIONS Using the pooled data from DUET-1 and DUET-2, thirteen baseline RT mutations were associated with resistance to TMC125: V90I, A98G, L100I, K101E/P, V106I, V179D/F, Y181C/I/V, G190A/S 85% of the subjects had 0, 1 or 2 TMC125 RAMs, only 15% had 3 or more TMC125 RAMs the TMC125 RAMs occurred mainly in the presence of other NNRTI RAMs The number of baseline TMC125 RAMs was associated with a decreased virologic response to TMC125: The largest impact on virologic response was observed in the subgroup of patients with 3 or more TMC125 RAMs These data provide guidance in the interpretation of genotype resistance data related to TMC125

Acknowledgements Thanks to the patients and their families the investigators the study center staff Tibotec clinical trial staff Tibotec Clinical Virology, Biometrics