Negligence Ms. Weigl.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Current Events High school student charged with possession of child pornography after girlfriend sends photo via cell phone. 20 million dollars awarded.
Advertisements

Tort Law Negligence.
DutyCausation DamagesBreach of Duty Elements of Negligence.
What You’ll Learn How to define negligence (p. 88)
Q UINCY COLLEGE Paralegal Studies Program Paralegal Studies Program Litigation and Procedure Negligence and Strict Liability Litigation and Procedure Negligence.
{ Chapter 10 TORTS: Negligence and Strict Liability.
Chapter 18: Torts A Civil Wrong
Chapter 3 Tort Law.
Copyright © 2004 by Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved. © 2007 Prentice Hall, Business Law, sixth edition, Henry R. Cheeseman Chapter 5 Negligence Chapter.
Tort Law – Unintentional torts
Torts and Cyber Torts Chapter 4.
By Monika, Max, Vanja, Nicole KEY PRINCIPLES OF NEGLIGENCE.
Intentional Torts
4Chapter SECTION OPENER / CLOSER: INSERT BOOK COVER ART Intentional Torts Section 4.1.
 1. Duty-The accused wrongdoer owed a duty of care to the injured person  2. Breach of Duty- the defendant’s conduct breached that duty  3. Causation-defendant’s.
Chapter 4 Classification of the Law. 2 Substantive and Procedural Law o Substantive Law o Defines our legal rights and duties o e.g. we have a duty to.
Unit 6 – Civil Law.
7-1 Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Criminal & Civil Law Chapter 15. Where do our laws come from? The Constitution – Constitutional Law The Legislature – Statutory law The Decisions of Judges.
Chapter 19 Objective At the Conclusion of this lesson students will be able to: Define negligence and its elements Use these elements to analyze cases.
Negligence. Homework 20.1 and 20.2 – read Chapter and 20.2 – read Chapter 20.
Chapter 20 Negligence. The failure to exercise a reasonable amount of care in either doing or not doing something resulting in harm or injury.
American Public School Law Torts n Definition of a tort – Intentional interference – Strict Liability – Negligence – Elements of Negligence – Defenses.
LAW for Business and Personal Use © 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible.
Tort Law Negligence. Civil Actions What is a civil action? Definition of a civil action: “A noncriminal lawsuit, brought to enforce a right or redress.
Chapter 09 Negligence and Strict Liability Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
 Understand the four elements of the tort of negligence  Understand the reasonable person standard  Understand how foreseeability (ability to anticipate.
 Crime – _______________________________ _______________________________________  Elements of a Crime: › A duty to do or not to do a certain thing ›
Torts Chapter 6. Basis of Tort Law What is a Tort? –A tort is a civil injury designed to provide a remedy (damages) for injury to a protected interest.
Unit 2 Chapter 5 Legal Environments of Business (LEB)
CHAPTER 12: NEGLIGENCE THE BASICS Emond Montgomery Publications 1.
Chapter 20. Conduct that falls below the standard established by law for protecting others against unreasonable risks of harm Surgeon forgets to remove.
TORTS: A CIVIL WRONG Chapter 18. TORTS: A CIVIL WRONG Under criminal law, wrongs committed are called crimes. Under civil law, wrongs committed are called.
CHAPTER 18 PART I Torts: A Civil Wrong. A Civil Wrong In criminal law, when someone commits a wrong, we call it a crime. In civil law, when someone commits.
Negligence. Definition Negligence in an unintentional Tort This occurs when a person fails to use reasonable care and it causes harm to another person.
Understanding Business and Personal Law Negligence and Strict Liability Section 4.2 The Law of Torts A person can commit an unintentional tort, when he.
Torts: Fact or Fiction? Raise your hand if you think the following actually happened: A woman sued a doctor for malpractice because he invited his friend.
UNIT 1 Chapter 3 Sports Law. Who’s often on the scene 1 st ? THE COACH Inappropriate decisions and actions may jeopardize the injured person and lead.
Negligence Tort law establishes standards for the care that people must show to one another. Negligence is the conduct that falls below this standard.
Certain professionals, such as doctors, pilots, and plumbers, are held to the standards of reasonably skilled professionals in their field. Even minors.
Law-Related Ch Notes I. Torts: 1. A tort is a civil wrong.
Section 4.2.
Chapter 6-1 Lesson Objectives
Neglect Torts Chapter 20.
Torts and Cyber Torts Chapter 5.2.
The Law of Torts I’m going to sue you!.
Bell-work 1/27/17 Read one of the two quotes under World Government and give a brief meaning.
Negligence Mr. Lugo.
BELL QUIZ ON CHAPTER 2 1. List two felony crimes. 2
Liability in negligence
Chapter 6 Tort Law Chapter 6: Tort Law.
2.03 Civil Law.
Introduction to Torts: Civil Law
Ch. 19 Negligence
“Private Injuries v. Public Offenses”
CHAPTER 5 Civil Law and Procedure
Tort Law Negligence.
Intentional Torts Mrs. Hill
Tort Law Negligence.
Negligence And Defences
Chapter 6-1 Lesson Objectives
Negligence.
Section Outline Unintentional Torts Negligence Strict Liability
Lesson 6-1 Civil Law (Tort Law).
Torts A Civil Wrong.
Tort Law Negligence.
Negligence Mrs. Hill.
Civil Law 3.5 Defenses to Torts
are presumed innocent until proven guilty”
Civil Law 3.4 negligence.
Presentation transcript:

Negligence Ms. Weigl

Civil Actions What is a civil action? Definition of a civil action: “An action brought to enforce, redress, or protect a private or civil right; a noncriminal litigation” Compare to the definition for a criminal action: “An action instituted by the government to punish offenses against the public”

Civil Actions are Different Criminal Actions Brought by the government Government is known as the prosecution Prosecution has the burden of proof – beyond a reasonable doubt Defendant loses if found guilty Usual penalty is a prison sentence Civil Actions Brought by private citizens Person bringing action is known as the plaintiff Plaintiff has the burden of proof – preponderance of the evidence Defendant loses if found liable Usual penalty is money damages

How to Prove Negligence The plaintiff needs to prove four elements by a preponderance of the evidence Duty Breach of Duty Causation (two parts) Damages

Duty Defined: “A legal obligation that is owed or due to another and that needs to be satisfied; an obligation for which somebody else has a corresponding right” Example: If you drive a car, you have a duty to obey the rules of the road

The Duty of Care By an objective standard Generally speaking, a person owes a “duty of care” to those around him or her (i.e. a duty to act reasonably) How is this duty of care determined? By an objective standard When evaluating a person’s conduct, tort law asks – would a reasonable person of ordinary prudence in the defendant’s position act as the defendant did?

The Duty of Care: Example Would a reasonable person drive down the street with a paper grocery bag over her head? The reasonable person would not do this Thus, part of the duty of care when driving is to not obstruct your vision

Breach of Duty Defined: “The violation of a legal or moral obligation; the failure to act as the law obligates one to act” What do you think constitutes a breach of duty? Once the duty is established, it is a simple matter to determine whether the defendant’s actions met this standard of care or not

Causation Also known as legal cause There are two aspects of causation that must be considered: cause in fact and proximate cause Cause in fact defined: “The cause without which the event could not have occurred” Proximate cause defined: “A cause that is legally sufficient to result in liability; an act or omission that is considered in law to result in a consequence, so that liability can be imposed on the actor” Also known as legal cause

Cause in Fact: The “But For” Test How does the law determine what is a cause in fact? The “but for” test: If the defendant had not acted negligently (by breaching the standard of care), the plaintiff would not have been injured

Proximate Cause: Foreseeability How does the law determine what is a proximate cause? Foreseeability: Most courts say that a defendant is liable only for consequences of his negligence that were reasonably foreseeable when he acted Seeks to limit the defendant’s liability to those results that are of the same general sort that made the conduct negligent in the first place

Damages There are two aspects of damages that must be considered: actual, physical harm and the monetary values ascribed to those harms The first aspect is straightforward – show that you suffered actual injury (e.g. broken arm, burned down house, etc.) Once you prove the actual, physical harm, the second aspect of damages comes into play: “Money claimed by, or ordered to be paid to, a person as compensation for loss or injury” The law tries to restore the plaintiff to her pre-injury condition using money

What Can Plaintiffs Recover? What do you think a plaintiff could recover if he or she proves the defendant acted negligently and caused his or her harm? Categories: Direct loss – value of the loss of certain bodily functions (e.g. loss of a leg) Economic loss – out-of-pocket costs resulting from the injury (e.g. medical bills, lost wages, reduced earnings capacity, property damage) Pain and suffering – value of the mental anguish plaintiff has suffered and will continue to suffer There are others, but these are the main categories

Defenses to Negligence Suits As you know, it is rare that an accident is caused solely because of one person’s actions If the plaintiff is partly at fault for his or her injuries, what can the defendant do to reduce his or her liability? Contributory negligence defense: If the plaintiff’s own negligence contributed to the harm suffered, the plaintiff cannot collect anything from the defendant Comparative negligence defense: Plaintiff’s recovery from the defendant is reduced by the percentage that the plaintiff’s own negligence contributed to the injury

Defenses to Negligent Suits Counterclaim- comparative fault. Assumption of risk- used when a person voluntarily encounters a known danger and decides to accept the risk of that danger. - this defense is also used when a warning is posted that gives notice of a certain danger. Example: A pool posting a sign that says, “Swim at your own risk.”

Courtesy of Washington State Law materials