Demographics and macroeconomic effects in aesthetic surgery in the UK C.O Duncan, M Ho-Asjoe, R Hittinger, H Nishikawa, N Waterhouse, B Coghlan, B Jones  British Journal of Plastic Surgery  Volume 57, Issue 6, Pages 561-566 (September 2004) DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2004.03.003

Figure 1 Bar chart showing rises in overall activity to 2002 compared with activity in 1998. British Journal of Plastic Surgery 2004 57, 561-566DOI: (10.1016/j.bjps.2004.03.003)

Figure. 2 Line chart showing the ratio of male to female patients between 1998 and the first quarter of 2003. British Journal of Plastic Surgery 2004 57, 561-566DOI: (10.1016/j.bjps.2004.03.003)

Figure 3 Line chart comparing mean age of male and female patients presenting to the department of plastic surgery between 1998 and 2003. Error bars represent standard deviations. British Journal of Plastic Surgery 2004 57, 561-566DOI: (10.1016/j.bjps.2004.03.003)

Figure 4 Line chart showing percentage changes in numbers of facelifts performed between 1998 and early 2003 compared with percentage change in LIBOR in the same period. British Journal of Plastic Surgery 2004 57, 561-566DOI: (10.1016/j.bjps.2004.03.003)

Figure 5 Line chart showing percentage changes in numbers of blepharoplasty's performed between 1998 and early 2003 compared with percentage change in LIBOR in the same period. British Journal of Plastic Surgery 2004 57, 561-566DOI: (10.1016/j.bjps.2004.03.003)

Figure 6 Line chart showing percentage changes in numbers of breast augmentations performed between 1998 and early 2003 compared with percentage change in LIBOR in the same period. British Journal of Plastic Surgery 2004 57, 561-566DOI: (10.1016/j.bjps.2004.03.003)