Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages (February 1999)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 13, Pages (November 2016)
Advertisements

Chemically induced dimerization of dihydrofolate reductase by a homobifunctional dimer of methotrexate  Stephan J Kopytek, Robert F Standaert, John CD.
Sustained Interactions between T Cell Receptors and Antigens Promote the Differentiation of CD4+ Memory T Cells  Chulwoo Kim, Theodore Wilson, Kael F.
Affinity Dependence of the B Cell Response to Antigen: A Threshold, a Ceiling, and the Importance of Off-Rate  Facundo D Batista, Michael S Neuberger 
Kinetic Analysis of High Affinity Forms of Interleukin (IL)-13 Receptors: Suppression of IL-13 Binding by IL-2 Receptor γ Chain  Vladimir A. Kuznetsov,
Volume 81, Issue 3, Pages (September 2001)
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (October 2000)
Sanjay Kumar Aggarwal, Roderick MacKinnon  Neuron 
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (July 2005)
Volume 113, Issue 12, Pages (December 2017)
High- and Low-Potency Ligands with Similar Affinities for the TCR
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (June 1998)
TCR Binding to Peptide-MHC Stabilizes a Flexible Recognition Interface
Peter A Savage, J.Jay Boniface, Mark M Davis  Immunity 
Volume 91, Issue 6, Pages (December 1997)
Complex Energy Landscape of a Giant Repeat Protein
The Interaction Properties of Costimulatory Molecules Revisited
Volume 18, Issue 8, Pages (August 2010)
Structure of the Angiopoietin-2 Receptor Binding Domain and Identification of Surfaces Involved in Tie2 Recognition  William A. Barton, Dorothea Tzvetkova,
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (May 2013)
Volume 99, Issue 1, Pages (July 2010)
Volume 30, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Erik Procko, Ian Ferrin-O'Connell, Sze-Ling Ng, Rachelle Gaudet 
Mutations Changing the Kinetics of Class II MHC Peptide Exchange
TCR Binding to Peptide-MHC Stabilizes a Flexible Recognition Interface
Volume 5, Issue 2, Pages (August 1996)
Volume 101, Issue 7, Pages (October 2011)
Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 16, Issue 11, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages (July 1999)
Molecular Competition for NKG2D
Volume 4, Issue 6, Pages (June 1996)
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (March 2004)
Yasunori Aizawa, Qing Xiang, Alan M. Lambowitz, Anna Marie Pyle 
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
Structure and function of mutationally generated monomers of dimeric phosphoribosylanthranilate isomerase from Thermotoga maritima  Ralf Thoma, Michael.
Role of the regulatory domain of the EGF-receptor cytoplasmic tail in selective binding of the clathrin-associated complex AP-2  Werner Boll, Andreas.
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (July 1996)
Volume 32, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 99, Issue 1, Pages (July 2010)
The Relationship of MHC-Peptide Binding and T Cell Activation Probed Using Chemically Defined MHC Class II Oligomers  Jennifer R Cochran, Thomas O Cameron,
Artem G. Ayuyan, Fredric S. Cohen  Biophysical Journal 
αβ T Cell Receptor Ligand-Specific Oligomerization Revisited
Volume 109, Issue 3, Pages (August 2015)
Volume 102, Issue 2, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Saswata Sankar Sarkar, Jayant B. Udgaonkar, Guruswamy Krishnamoorthy 
Volume 37, Issue 4, Pages (October 2012)
Thermodynamic Characterization of the Unfolding of the Prion Protein
Formation of a Highly Peptide-Receptive State of Class II MHC
Biophysical Characterization of Styryl Dye-Membrane Interactions
Saswata Sankar Sarkar, Jayant B. Udgaonkar, Guruswamy Krishnamoorthy 
Rinat Nahum-Levy, Dafna Lipinski, Sara Shavit, Morris Benveniste 
Regulating the Conducting States of a Mammalian Serotonin Transporter
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages (April 2000)
Benjamin Misselwitz, Oliver Staeck, Tom A Rapoport  Molecular Cell 
Rogert Bauer, Rita Carrotta, Christian Rischel, Lars Øgendal 
The Inhibitory Receptor LIR-1 Uses a Common Binding Interaction to Recognize Class I MHC Molecules and the Viral Homolog UL18  Tara L Chapman, Astrid.
Phillip D. Holler, David M. Kranz  Immunity 
Increased TCR Avidity after T Cell Activation
Volume 11, Pages (January 2019)
Volume 81, Issue 4, Pages (October 2001)
Probing the Dynamics of Clot-Bound Thrombin at Venous Shear Rates
Volume 96, Issue 3, Pages (February 2009)
Interaction of the NK Cell Inhibitory Receptor Ly49A with H-2Dd
Characterization of a Specificity Factor for an AAA+ ATPase
The Relationship of MHC-Peptide Binding and T Cell Activation Probed Using Chemically Defined MHC Class II Oligomers  Jennifer R Cochran, Thomas O Cameron,
DNA Polymerase V and RecA Protein, a Minimal Mutasome
Kinetic Analysis of High Affinity Forms of Interleukin (IL)-13 Receptors: Suppression of IL-13 Binding by IL-2 Receptor γ Chain  Vladimir A. Kuznetsov,
αβ T Cell Receptor Ligand-Specific Oligomerization Revisited
Presentation transcript:

Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages 219-225 (February 1999) T Cell Receptor and Coreceptor CD8αα Bind Peptide-MHC Independently and with Distinct Kinetics  Jessica R Wyer, Benjamin E Willcox, George F Gao, Ulrich C Gerth, Simon J Davis, John I Bell, P.Anton van der Merwe, Bent K Jakobsen  Immunity  Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages 219-225 (February 1999) DOI: 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80022-9

Figure 1 Specific Binding of CD8αα to HLA-A2 (A) Gel-filtration of CD8αα. CD8αα (50 μL at ∼300 μM) was separated on a Superdex S-200 column. The elution positions of albumin (66 kDa), carbonic anhydrase (29 kDa), and cytochrome c (12 kDa) are shown. (B) CD8αα binds specifically to immobilized HLA-A2. Similar concentrations (∼300 μM) of wild-type CD8αα or the CD8αα mutant Q54E/N55D were injected (solid bars) for 90 s through flow cells with HLA-A2 (solid trace) or the control protein OX68 (dotted trace) immobilized. HLA-A2 presented an influenza matrix peptide (HLA-A2-flu, see Table 1) and was coupled via biotinylated β2-microglob-ulin. This experiment was performed at 25°C using a flow rate of 5 μl × min−1 with ∼1500 RU of HLA-A2 or the control protein OX68 immobilized. The high background responses seen in the control flow-cell reflect the high refractive index of the injected CD8αα samples, a consequence of very high protein concentrations. Immunity 1999 10, 219-225DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80022-9)

Figure 2 The Affinity of CD8αα Binding to HLA-A2 (A) CD8αα was injected at the indicated concentrations for 30 s through flow cells with ∼8000 RUs of either HLA-A2-flu (solid trace) or the control protein OX68 (dotted trace) immobilized. HLA-A2-flu was coupled via biotinylated β2-microglobulin. The amount of CD8αα that bound HLA-A2-flu at each concentration was calculated as the difference between the responses at equilibrium in the HLA-A2-flu and control flow cells and is plotted in (B). (C) A similar experiment was performed at 37°C using HLA-A2-HY (∼2400 RU) coupled via biotinylated heavy chain and OX68 (∼4000 RU) as a control protein. In (B) and (C) the solid lines in the main plots represent nonlinear fits of the Langmuir binding isotherm to the data. These yielded Kd values of 156 and 205 μM, respectively. The insets show Scatchard transformations of the same data; the Kd values shown were obtained from the slopes by linear regression (Kd = −1/slope). These experiments were performed at a flow-rate of 10 μl × min−1. Immunity 1999 10, 219-225DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80022-9)

Figure 3 The Kinetics of CD8αα Binding HLA-A2 (A) CD8αα (23 μM) was injected (solid bar) at 0.83 μL × s−1 (50 μL × min−1) through a flow cell with HLA-A2-flu (∼6600 RUs) or a control protein CAMPATH-1 (∼3000 RUs) immobilized to the sensor surface. Individual data points are shown (circles). (B) The dissociation phase is shown following injection of CD8αα at 0.83 μl × s−1 or 1.67 μl × s−1 through flow cells with HLA-A2-flu or CAMPATH-1 immobilized. HLA-A2-flu was coupled via biotinylated β2-microglobulin. The response in the control flow cell was subtracted from the response in the HLA-A2-flu flow cell. To aid comparison, the data are normalized, with the response at the start of the dissociation phase set at 100%. The lines are first order exponential fits to the data and give the apparent koff values shown. This experiment was performed at 25°C. Immunity 1999 10, 219-225DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80022-9)

Figure 4 The Effect of CD8αα Binding on a Soluble TCR Binding to the Same HLA-A2-flu Complex (A) The indicated soluble TCR concentrations were injected for 60 s with (filled circles) or without (open circles) CD8αα (120 μM) through flow cells with HLA-A2-flu (∼4700 RUs) or a control protein CD5 (∼4100 RUs) immobilized. HLA-A2-flu was coupled via biotinylated β2-microglobulin. Binding was calculated as the difference between equilibrium responses measured in the HLA-A2-flu and control flow cells. The difference in the binding seen with or without CD8αα is also plotted (squares) and ranges between 240–340 RUs. In the absence of TCR binding (i.e., with injection over ∼4700 RUs of immobilized HLA-A2-pol), the same concentration of CD8αα gives a binding response ([response in HLA-A2-pol flow cell]—[response in control flow cell]) of 306 ± 30 RUs (triangles). (B) Time-dependence of response following injection of soluble TCR (49 μM, open circles) alone or with CD8αα (120 μM, filled circles) through a flow cell with HLA-A2-flu immobilized (∼4700 RU). The background responses measured simultaneously in the control flow cell (∼4100 RUs of CD5 immobilized) have been subtracted. First order exponential decay curves (from t = 63 s to t = 100 s) fitted these data well (solid lines) and gave identical koff values (0.08 ± 0.005 s−1). These experiments were performed at 25°C at a flow-rate of 5 μl × min−1. Immunity 1999 10, 219-225DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80022-9)