Jack Grinband, Joy Hirsch, Vincent P. Ferrera  Neuron 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Heterogeneous Coding of Temporally Discounted Values in the Dorsal and Ventral Striatum during Intertemporal Choice  Xinying Cai, Soyoun Kim, Daeyeol.
Advertisements

Bram-Ernst Verhoef, Rufin Vogels, Peter Janssen  Neuron 
Davide Nardo, Valerio Santangelo, Emiliano Macaluso  Neuron 
Attention Narrows Position Tuning of Population Responses in V1
Volume 60, Issue 4, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 54, Issue 5, Pages (June 2007)
Volume 47, Issue 6, Pages (September 2005)
Elizabeth V. Goldfarb, Marvin M. Chun, Elizabeth A. Phelps  Neuron 
Volume 87, Issue 4, Pages (August 2015)
Rei Akaishi, Kazumasa Umeda, Asako Nagase, Katsuyuki Sakai  Neuron 
Volume 72, Issue 4, Pages (November 2011)
Frontal Cortex and the Discovery of Abstract Action Rules
Habit Learning by Naive Macaques Is Marked by Response Sharpening of Striatal Neurons Representing the Cost and Outcome of Acquired Action Sequences 
Neural Mechanisms of Hierarchical Planning in a Virtual Subway Network
Choice Certainty Is Informed by Both Evidence and Decision Time
John-Dylan Haynes, Jon Driver, Geraint Rees  Neuron 
Disruption of Large-Scale Brain Systems in Advanced Aging
Braden A. Purcell, Roozbeh Kiani  Neuron 
Learning to Simulate Others' Decisions
Rajeev D.S. Raizada, Russell A. Poldrack  Neuron 
Predicting Value of Pain and Analgesia: Nucleus Accumbens Response to Noxious Stimuli Changes in the Presence of Chronic Pain  Marwan N. Baliki, Paul.
Sheng Li, Stephen D. Mayhew, Zoe Kourtzi  Neuron 
Alteration of Visual Perception prior to Microsaccades
Volume 81, Issue 6, Pages (March 2014)
Perceptual Learning and Decision-Making in Human Medial Frontal Cortex
Volume 53, Issue 6, Pages (March 2007)
Volume 62, Issue 5, Pages (June 2009)
Volume 79, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)
Feature- and Order-Based Timing Representations in the Frontal Cortex
Hedging Your Bets by Learning Reward Correlations in the Human Brain
A Role for the Superior Colliculus in Decision Criteria
Dustin E. Stansbury, Thomas Naselaris, Jack L. Gallant  Neuron 
Volume 82, Issue 5, Pages (June 2014)
Cortical Mechanisms of Smooth Eye Movements Revealed by Dynamic Covariations of Neural and Behavioral Responses  David Schoppik, Katherine I. Nagel, Stephen.
FMRI Activation in Response to Illusory Contours and Salient Regions in the Human Lateral Occipital Complex  Damian A. Stanley, Nava Rubin  Neuron  Volume.
Neural Correlates of Visual Working Memory
Volume 75, Issue 1, Pages (July 2012)
Between Thoughts and Actions: Motivationally Salient Cues Invigorate Mental Action in the Human Brain  Avi Mendelsohn, Alex Pine, Daniela Schiller  Neuron 
Attention Reduces Spatial Uncertainty in Human Ventral Temporal Cortex
Volume 45, Issue 4, Pages (February 2005)
Liu D. Liu, Christopher C. Pack  Neuron 
Human Orbitofrontal Cortex Represents a Cognitive Map of State Space
Action Selection and Action Value in Frontal-Striatal Circuits
Volume 28, Issue 15, Pages e5 (August 2018)
Volume 22, Issue 18, Pages (September 2012)
Eye Movement Preparation Modulates Neuronal Responses in Area V4 When Dissociated from Attentional Demands  Nicholas A. Steinmetz, Tirin Moore  Neuron 
John T. Arsenault, Koen Nelissen, Bechir Jarraya, Wim Vanduffel  Neuron 
Neural Mechanisms of Speed-Accuracy Tradeoff
Ethan S. Bromberg-Martin, Masayuki Matsumoto, Okihide Hikosaka  Neuron 
Kerstin Preuschoff, Peter Bossaerts, Steven R. Quartz  Neuron 
Volume 89, Issue 6, Pages (March 2016)
Erie D. Boorman, John P. O’Doherty, Ralph Adolphs, Antonio Rangel 
Rei Akaishi, Kazumasa Umeda, Asako Nagase, Katsuyuki Sakai  Neuron 
Serial, Covert Shifts of Attention during Visual Search Are Reflected by the Frontal Eye Fields and Correlated with Population Oscillations  Timothy J.
Broca's Area and the Hierarchical Organization of Human Behavior
Value-Based Modulations in Human Visual Cortex
Visual Feature-Tolerance in the Reading Network
Nicholas E. Bowman, Konrad P. Kording, Jay A. Gottfried  Neuron 
Michael A. Silver, Amitai Shenhav, Mark D'Esposito  Neuron 
Volume 76, Issue 4, Pages (November 2012)
Learning to Simulate Others' Decisions
Brain Mechanisms for Extracting Spatial Information from Smell
Predictive Neural Coding of Reward Preference Involves Dissociable Responses in Human Ventral Midbrain and Ventral Striatum  John P. O'Doherty, Tony W.
Volume 47, Issue 6, Pages (September 2005)
Predicting Value of Pain and Analgesia: Nucleus Accumbens Response to Noxious Stimuli Changes in the Presence of Chronic Pain  Marwan N. Baliki, Paul.
Volume 16, Issue 15, Pages (August 2006)
Yuko Yotsumoto, Takeo Watanabe, Yuka Sasaki  Neuron 
Maxwell H. Turner, Fred Rieke  Neuron 
Visual Feature-Tolerance in the Reading Network
Michael A. Silver, Amitai Shenhav, Mark D'Esposito  Neuron 
Presentation transcript:

A Neural Representation of Categorization Uncertainty in the Human Brain  Jack Grinband, Joy Hirsch, Vincent P. Ferrera  Neuron  Volume 49, Issue 5, Pages 757-763 (March 2006) DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.01.032 Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Experimental Design (Top) Subjects were presented with one of two cues. After a delay, a line segment was presented, and subjects indicated whether the line appeared “long” or “short” relative to the categorical boundary (CB) indicated by the cue. The line remained on screen until the subject responded. A tone indicated whether the response was correct or incorrect. (Bottom) The black circle (actual cue was red) represented a CB located between stimulus 5 and stimulus 6 (dashed line); the gray circle (actual cue was green) represented a CB between stimulus 11 and stimulus 12. For example, if the gray cue is presented, stimuli 1–11 are “short,” while stimuli 12–16 are “long.” To minimize learning effects in the scanner, subjects learned to associate the cue with its CB over the course of 1000 prescanning practice trials. Neuron 2006 49, 757-763DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2006.01.032) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Psychometric and Uncertainty Functions (A) Trials were sorted to create percent “long” responses as a function of stimulus length in pixels (top panel). The two curves correspond to the two cues (black and gray), respectively, for one typical subject. The psychophysical data were acquired simultaneously with the fMRI data. To create uncertainty functions (bottom panel), each psychometric function was rectified around the PSE and normalized such that the range varied from 0 to 1. Thus, by definition, the PSE has maximum uncertainty and the endpoint stimuli have minimum uncertainty. Each stimulus can have variable uncertainty depending on which cue preceded it (although the biggest differences in uncertainty between the two cues are near the categorical boundaries). (B) The mean linear correlation coefficient between RT and uncertainty is 0.342 (n = 10). The relationship between uncertainty and reaction time, however, is not linear. There is no significant difference in this relationship between the two cues. Error bars represent standard error across ten subjects. Neuron 2006 49, 757-763DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2006.01.032) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Activity Correlated to Categorization Uncertainty Group (mixed effects) analysis of ten subjects, ∼750 trials/subject (Z threshold at p < 0.05, resel corrected). (A) The network of uncertainty-related areas consists of the medial frontal gyrus (MFG), anterior insula (AI), ventral striatum (VS), and dorsomedial thalamus (dmTh). (B) The unthresholded Z statistic map demonstrates the underlying correlational structure of the brain activity. Blue indicates negatively correlated activity (Z < −1.6), red indicates positively correlated activity (Z > 1.6), and black/white indicates the 95% confidence interval (−1.96 < Z > 1.96), which contains voxels that are not correlated to uncertainty. This figure illustrates that the result in (A) is not a product of fortuitous thresholding. Cross hairs intersect at the same point in all slices (MNI152: 0, 30, −4). The unthresholded map is superimposed on a gray outline of an average brain; the solid gray represents regions that were not scanned in all subjects. Neuron 2006 49, 757-763DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2006.01.032) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Attention and Categorization Networks Are Spatially Dissociated Activation map (p < 0.05, resel corrected) for a simple center-out saccade task (left) shows that eye movements elicit activity in the frontal eye fields, supplementary eye fields, and parietal eye fields. The outlines of the activation clusters are overlaid on the unthresholded Z statistic map of the uncertainty regressor, in which blue indicates negative correlation with uncertainty (Z < −1.6), red indicates positive correlation (Z < 1.6), and gray indicates the 95% confidence interval (−1.96 < Z < 1.96) in which activity is not correlated to uncertainty. The saccade activity overlay fits almost perfectly into the gray regions of the unthresholded activation map, indicating that the areas involved in directing spatial attention/oculomotor control are not correlated to categorization uncertainty and are therefore not involved in making categorical judgments. Neuron 2006 49, 757-763DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2006.01.032) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Hemodynamic Responses (A) Percent BOLD signal change for trials within a 200 ms response time window. The response time window for each subject was chosen so as to maximize the total number of high-uncertainty trials. However, the results were the same for three other nonoverlapping windows (see Figure S6). Black, brown, and red represent low, medium, and high uncertainty, respectively. Error bars represent standard error. The oculomotor/attention brain regions show no significant modulation by categorization uncertainty. However, AI, VS, and MFG all show a positive correlation with uncertainty. (B) To quantify this relationship, we computed the area under the BOLD response curve over the first 8 s. The integral of the BOLD response as a function of uncertainty clearly shows a monotonically increasing relationship in AI, VS, and MFG. Neuron 2006 49, 757-763DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2006.01.032) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Extended Diffusion Model The model explicitly represents three state variables. Proximity to categorical boundary is encoded as the rate of the diffusion process. Accumulated evidence is the time integral of the diffusion rate. Decision uncertainty is the time integral of the accumulated evidence. The model predicts that response times are proportional to decision uncertainty and explains how response times can vary when stimulus strength remains constant. Neuron 2006 49, 757-763DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2006.01.032) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions