Molecular Organization of Drosophila Neuroendocrine Cells by Dimmed

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Molecular Organization of Drosophila Neuroendocrine Cells by Dimmed Dongkook Park, Tarik Hadžić, Ping Yin, Jannette Rusch, Katharine Abruzzi, Michael Rosbash,
Advertisements

Atrial Identity Is Determined by a COUP-TFII Regulatory Network
Organization of the Drosophila Circadian Control Circuit
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 13, Issue 20, Pages (October 2003)
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (August 2005)
Volume 19, Issue 23, Pages (December 2009)
Atrial Identity Is Determined by a COUP-TFII Regulatory Network
Anna Kloc, Mikel Zaratiegui, Elphege Nora, Rob Martienssen 
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages (November 2011)
Volume 22, Issue 10, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 22, Issue 20, Pages (October 2012)
Volume 21, Issue 19, Pages (October 2011)
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages (January 2010)
Transcriptional Memory in the Drosophila Embryo
Volume 24, Issue 11, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 24, Issue 16, Pages (August 2014)
Volume 48, Issue 2, Pages (October 2005)
Mutual Repression by Bantam miRNA and Capicua Links the EGFR/MAPK and Hippo Pathways in Growth Control  Héctor Herranz, Xin Hong, Stephen M. Cohen  Current.
Temporal Control of Plant Organ Growth by TCP Transcription Factors
Anne L. Sapiro, Patricia Deng, Rui Zhang, Jin Billy Li  Cell Reports 
Volume 57, Issue 2, Pages (January 2015)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 9-18 (January 2010)
Fuqing Wu, David J. Menn, Xiao Wang  Chemistry & Biology 
Volume 21, Issue 22, Pages (November 2011)
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (February 2013)
Andrew D. Bosson, Jesse R. Zamudio, Phillip A. Sharp  Molecular Cell 
Precision of Hunchback Expression in the Drosophila Embryo
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (February 2013)
Mobile 24 nt Small RNAs Direct Transcriptional Gene Silencing in the Root Meristems of Arabidopsis thaliana  Charles W. Melnyk, Attila Molnar, Andrew.
Volume 49, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Joseph Rodriguez, Jerome S. Menet, Michael Rosbash  Molecular Cell 
Cell-Type-Specific Control of Enhancer Activity by H3K9 Trimethylation
Daniel F. Tardiff, Scott A. Lacadie, Michael Rosbash  Molecular Cell 
Volume 126, Issue 6, Pages (September 2006)
Volume 7, Issue 9, Pages (September 2014)
The Efficacy of siRNAs against Hepatitis C Virus Is Strongly Influenced by Structure and Target Site Accessibility  Selena M. Sagan, Neda Nasheri, Christian.
BZR1 Positively Regulates Freezing Tolerance via CBF-Dependent and CBF- Independent Pathways in Arabidopsis  Hui Li, Keyi Ye, Yiting Shi, Jinkui Cheng,
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (November 2004)
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages (November 2011)
Identification of the Transcriptional Targets of FOXP2, a Gene Linked to Speech and Language, in Developing Human Brain  Elizabeth Spiteri, Genevieve.
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (July 2014)
Drosophila CRYPTOCHROME Is a Circadian Transcriptional Repressor
MyoD Targets TAF3/TRF3 to Activate Myogenin Transcription
ADAR Regulates RNA Editing, Transcript Stability, and Gene Expression
Codependent Activators Direct Myoblast-Specific MyoD Transcription
Volume 25, Issue 11, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 122, Issue 6, Pages (September 2005)
Jillian L. Brechbiel, Elizabeth R. Gavis  Current Biology 
VRILLE Controls PDF Neuropeptide Accumulation and Arborization Rhythms in Small Ventrolateral Neurons to Drive Rhythmic Behavior in Drosophila  Kushan.
Drosophila Maelstrom Ensures Proper Germline Stem Cell Lineage Differentiation by Repressing microRNA-7  Jun Wei Pek, Ai Khim Lim, Toshie Kai  Developmental.
Yuichiro Mishima, Yukihide Tomari  Molecular Cell 
H2B Ubiquitylation Promotes RNA Pol II Processivity via PAF1 and pTEFb
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 17, Issue 18, Pages (September 2007)
Nuclear Localization and Transcriptional Repression Are Confined to Separable Domains in the Circadian Protein CRYPTOCHROME  Haisun Zhu, Francesca Conte,
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages 1-10 (January 2014)
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 123, Issue 2, Pages (October 2005)
Growth Factor-Dependent Trafficking of Cerebellar NMDA Receptors via Protein Kinase B/Akt Phosphorylation of NR2C  Bo-Shiun Chen, Katherine W. Roche 
Feng Xu, Qiongyi Zhang, Kangling Zhang, Wei Xie, Michael Grunstein 
Volume 24, Issue 13, Pages (July 2014)
The Transcription Factor Mef2 Links the Drosophila Core Clock to Fas2, Neuronal Morphology, and Circadian Behavior  Anna Sivachenko, Yue Li, Katharine C.
Nuclear Localization and Transcriptional Repression Are Confined to Separable Domains in the Circadian Protein CRYPTOCHROME  Haisun Zhu, Francesca Conte,
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (April 2010)
Volume 24, Issue 11, Pages (June 2014)
Presentation transcript:

Molecular Organization of Drosophila Neuroendocrine Cells by Dimmed Dongkook Park, Tarik Hadžić, Ping Yin, Jannette Rusch, Katharine Abruzzi, Michael Rosbash, James B. Skeath, Satchidananda Panda, Jonathan V. Sweedler, Paul H. Taghert  Current Biology  Volume 21, Issue 18, Pages 1515-1524 (September 2011) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.08.015 Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Current Biology 2011 21, 1515-1524DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2011.08.015) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Schematic Overview of Workplan for This Study A genome-wide search for dimm targets was performed by gene chip, and the results then were evaluated by three downstream analyses of DIMM regulation and a functional in vivo assay. Current Biology 2011 21, 1515-1524DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2011.08.015) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 RNA In Situ Hybridization in Control Embryos and Embryos that Overexpress dim (A–H) Control (w1118). (A′–H′) elav>dimm. The following probes were used: dimm (A and A′), Phm (B and B′), CG1275 (C and C′), CG13248 (D and D′), CG11254 (mael) (E and E′), CG17293 (F and F′), CG7785 (G and G′), and CG32850 (H and H′). See also Figure S1. Current Biology 2011 21, 1515-1524DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2011.08.015) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Transactivation by DIMM of Genomic Fragments of Candidate Genes in Drosophila BG3-c2 Neuronal Cell Lines Fold ratios represent luciferase levels with dimm cotransfection divided by those without. Histograms represent means and standard errors of the mean (SEMs) of at least three independent replicate assays. (A) Results of testing ten DIMM targets. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01 versus empty vector by Student's t test. (B) Results from analysis of E box sequence requirements within the CG13248 regulatory region. E1, E2, and E3 indicate three separate E boxes, which were mutated singly, doubly, or triply. ∗p < 0.01 versus CG13248 wild-type sequence by Student's t test. See also Figure S3, which illustrates E box positions in and around these candidate targets. Current Biology 2011 21, 1515-1524DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2011.08.015) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 ChIP Analysis In Vivo of Putative DIMM Binding at E Boxes within dimm-Dependent Candidates Genes Black bars show the level of enrichment of the putative DIMM-binding sites defined by the value in experimental versus control genotypes (see Supplemental Experimental Procedures). Gray bars show the level of enrichment of arbitrarily chosen sites ∼6 kb upstream of the putative DIMM-binding sites, in the same experimental versus control genotypes. Histogram represents average and SEMs at least two independent assays (two biological replicates). Current Biology 2011 21, 1515-1524DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2011.08.015) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 MS-Based Label-Free Quantitative Analysis of Alterations in MII Peptide Accumulation in Photoreceptors following RNA Interference of Candidate DIMM Targets (A) Mass spectra of MII in the control (GMR>dimm;ppMII, red) and experimental (GMR>dimm;ppMII;Phm-RNAi, blue) samples. The intensity ratio of MII in experimental versus control samples in these spectra is 0.54. (B) Mass spectra of MT2 in the control and experimental samples. The intensity ratio of MT2 in experimental versus control samples in these spectra is 1.02. (C) Exogenous MII level in the experimental samples with RNAi compared to that in the control samples. Histogram represents means and SEMs; ∗p < 0.05 versus control (GMR>UAS-dimm) by Student's t test. n indicates number of biological replicates. See also Figure S3 for analysis of MS-based quantitation of the endogenous peptide Drm-MT2. Current Biology 2011 21, 1515-1524DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2011.08.015) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Enrichment of CG13248 (CAT-4) in DIMM Neurons and Its Regulation by dimm In Vivo (A) DIMM-like and CAT-4-like immunoreactivity (IR) are extensively colocalized in the adult brain. Genotype shown is c929>GFP. Anti-GFP is shown in green and anti-CAT-4 in red; a merged image is shown at the bottom. (B–D′) CAT-4-like IR following RNAi knockdown of dimm. Anti-CAT-4 is shown in red in (B)–(D); anti-DIMM is shown in red in (B′)–(D′). (B and B′) Parental control (386y-GAL4). (C and C′) 386y>UAS-DCR2/UAS-CAT-4-RNAi. (D and D′) 386y>DCR2/dimm-RNAi. (E and F) CAT-4-like IR is normally present in the two DIMM-positive neurons of the four-cell Tv cluster; following DIMM misexpression throughout the cluster, CAT-4 appears in all four cells. (E) Genotype shown is ap>GFP. Anti-GFP is shown in green and anti-CAT-4 in red. (F) Genotype shown is ap>dimm. Anti-MYC (which is an index for DIMM) is shown in green and anti-CAT-4 in red. See also Figure S4 for high-power images of cDAT-4-like IR in different adult brain DIMM neurons. Current Biology 2011 21, 1515-1524DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2011.08.015) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Comparison of Transcripts Upregulated by DIMM in Embryos with Transcripts Enriched in DIMM-Positive Peptidergic Neurons of the Adult Brain The Venn diagram illustrates the identification of 18 genes (13% of 134) out of those upregulated by DIMM overexpression among the 537 normally enriched in DIMM-positive l-LNvs [29]. The list below the diagram shows the 18-gene intersection; red text indicates those genes that were shown to be direct DIMM targets by the current experiments. Current Biology 2011 21, 1515-1524DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2011.08.015) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions