Figure 1 (a) Predicted dispersal success of hatchling turtles as a function of the interaction between hatchling body ... Figure 1 (a) Predicted dispersal.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Figure 1 Experimental arena to study female locations in response to a green LED. The LED was switched on in the LED ... Figure 1 Experimental arena to.
Advertisements

Figure 1 Female receptivity in the Playback Experiment
Figure 1 Waveforms of example stimuli illustrating how within-individual variation was manipulated. Invariant signals ... Figure 1 Waveforms of example.
Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the.
Figure 1 Survival plot showing the detection rate of experimental hosts as the proportion butterflies still searching ... Figure 1 Survival plot showing.
Figure 1 Movement of 10 individuals during the last 5000 time steps of 2 example simulations, without (a) or with (b) ... Figure 1 Movement of 10 individuals.
Figure 4 ROMs have a morph-specific effect relative to active aggression but not display behavior in dominant males. ... Figure 4 ROMs have a morph-specific.
Figure 1 We consider a scenario where the distributions of signals under safe or dangerous situations mean that a ... Figure 1 We consider a scenario where.
Figure 1 Fecal egg counts (eggs per gram = epg) (A through C) and corresponding infection probabilities estimated by ... Figure 1 Fecal egg counts (eggs.
Figure 3 Doctors leaving (Matthews, 2013, p.13.)
Figure 1 Data-selection process
Figure 1 Flow diagram detailing the systematic review process.
Figure 1 Schematic representation of the experimental design.
Figure 1 Mechanism of mortality benefit associated with radial access
Figure 1 Relationships between probability of prey discard and each parameter explored. To show the most robust ... Figure 1 Relationships between probability.
Figure 5 The effect of the spider color morph encountered by honeybees in Experiment 2 on the proportion of honeybees ... Figure 5 The effect of the spider.
Fig. 1. Relative potency ratios of 13 active ingredients used against a fall armyworm population collected in Puerto ... Fig. 1. Relative potency ratios.
Figure 1 Stegodyphus dumicola build retreats and 2-dimensional capture webs on (a) trees and (b) fences, 2 very ... Figure 1 Stegodyphus dumicola build.
Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the.
Figure 1 Mean (±SE) egg investment in female zebra finches shortly after a second injection with either tetanus toxoid ... Figure 1 Mean (±SE) egg investment.
Figure 1 The Kaplan–Meier curves of time to death post first hospitalization. hosp, hospitalization. Unless provided in the caption above, the following.
Figure 1. Serum ceftazidime concentrations following intravenous administration. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies.
Figure 1 A dot plot illustrating the correlation between the yearly absolute risk difference for both MACE and major ... Figure 1 A dot plot illustrating.
Figure 1 (A) Distributions of model (prey; dashed line) and Mimic (predator; solid line) cue values, showing ... Figure 1 (A) Distributions of model (prey;
Source: Figure created by the author based on data ...
Figure 1 Maternal relatedness between calves and non-calf unit members correlates with babysitting rate. Relatedness ... Figure 1 Maternal relatedness.
Figure 2 Boxplots indicating male (top) and female (bottom) mate preferences for native (positive numbers) or foreign ... Figure 2 Boxplots indicating.
Black: diagnosis ... Black: diagnosis from any department; grey: diagnosis at a rheumatology department. Unless provided in the caption above, the following.
RCTs: randomized controlled ...
Figure 1 (a) The distribution of paternity amongst 84 hatchlings sampled at a HDS on the western coastline of Little ... Figure 1 (a) The distribution.
Fig. 1 MRI aspect of an osteitis of the left acetabulum at baseline (A), 3 months (B), 1 year (C) and 2 years later, ... Fig. 1 MRI aspect of an osteitis.
Figure 2 (a) Color hexagon calculated for the stimuli used in the experiment, centered on the background; following ... Figure 2 (a) Color hexagon calculated.
Figure 1 Mean ± standard error proportions of (a) courtship and (b) copulation by female-male type pairing. Error bars ... Figure 1 Mean ± standard error.
Take home figure The protective role of CNP/NPR-B/NPRC.
Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the.
x-axis, post-partum days. Closed ...
Fig. 1 Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematous at the lower limbs
Fig. 1 Flow chart of included patients for analyses
Figure 1 (A) Proportion of major prey types found in the diet of 9–10-day-old pied flycatcher nestlings in the Drenthe ... Figure 1 (A) Proportion of major.
Fig. 1 Flow chart for selection of study subjects
Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.
Figure 1 Relationships between pair indices of dance performance (joint entropy or mutual information) and the past ... Figure 1 Relationships between.
Figure 1. Time–kill studies for selected isolates (each line represents the average of duplicate studies). AMP, ... Figure 1. Time–kill studies for selected.
Figure 1 Immunohistochemistry for human cell differentiation molecules in samples of the right ventricular septum from ... Figure 1 Immunohistochemistry.
Figure 1. Percentage of Pacific and European children completing all components of B4SC in 2013 and 2015 Figure 1. Percentage of Pacific and European.
Figure 1. Trunk and leg fat over study period. LS, log transformed.
Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.
Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.
Figure 1. Data access using HMP16SData
Fig. 1 Kaplan-Meier plot presenting no difference in progression to RA in patients with clinically suspect ... Fig. 1 Kaplan-Meier plot presenting no difference.
Figure 1. Oncoprint of selected pathogenic alterations detected in ctDNA. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the.
Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.
Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the.
Figure 2 Model flowchart: (1) Look for a resource; (2) determine whether there are one or more resources in the ... Figure 2 Model flowchart: (1) Look.
Fig. 1 A network representation of top 100 co-occurring terms
Figure 1 Changes in average first serve speed (km/h) over age in women (dark gray; online version red) and men (light ... Figure 1 Changes in average first.
Fig. 1 Statistics of the main characters’ dialogues.
Figure 1 Patient selection.
The figure shows the fraction of ...
Figure 1 Grant agencies and charitable foundations supporting Plan S.
Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.
Fig. 1: World distribution of field sampling locations of Aedes aegypti and Aedes mascarensis screened for Wolbachia ... Fig. 1: World distribution of.
Figure 1 Percentage of male and female helpers in different categories
Figure 1: Trade shares of South Korea's major trading partners (% of South Korea's total trade in goods) Figure 1: Trade shares of South Korea's major.
Figure 1. Kaplan Meier curves showing crude product limit survival estimates and 95% confidence intervals for time to ... Figure 1. Kaplan Meier curves.
Figure 1. Measuring respondent unhappiness with their child marrying someone from the other party and happiness with ... Figure 1. Measuring respondent.
Figure 1 ABCDE of primary prevention.2
Figure 1. Forest plot of lung cancer mortality in LDCT trials.
Figure 1. Evolutionary process of a policy field.
Table 2. Mean noise level results for hand dryers in dBA
Presentation transcript:

Figure 1 (a) Predicted dispersal success of hatchling turtles as a function of the interaction between hatchling body ... Figure 1 (a) Predicted dispersal success of hatchling turtles as a function of the interaction between hatchling body size and how far nests are laid from water. (b) Generalization of nest success (i.e., not depredated) increasing with distance to water. We predict optimal nest-site placement is a tradeoff between nest success increasing farther from water with offspring dispersal success decreasing farther from water. However, we also predict larger offspring will be less affected by increasing dispersal distances compared to smaller offspring. Thus, optimal distance from water for turtle nests should reside where the surfaces of panels A and B intersect. Panel A is a hypothetical surface based on our predictions, whereas panel B is a generalized surface based on previous work (Kolbe and Janzen 2002a; Marchand and Litvaitis 2004; Strickland et al. 2010). Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.comThis article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model) Behav Ecol, Volume 30, Issue 1, 24 November 2018, Pages 125–133, https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ary154 The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

Figure 2 Effects of dispersal distance on (a) survival, (b) time-to-fence, and (c) dispersion along the fence of ... Figure 2 Effects of dispersal distance on (a) survival, (b) time-to-fence, and (c) dispersion along the fence of hatchling Chelydra serpentina during experimental dispersal. Data are plotted as least squares means with standard errors. Statistical results are reported in Table 1. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.comThis article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model) Behav Ecol, Volume 30, Issue 1, 24 November 2018, Pages 125–133, https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ary154 The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

Figure 3 Effects of standardized straight carapace length and mass on the probability of survival for hatchling ... Figure 3 Effects of standardized straight carapace length and mass on the probability of survival for hatchling Chelydra serpentina as they dispersed from “nests” (a) 25 m, (b) 62.5 m, and (c) 100 m to a drift fence. Probability of survival was estimated using cubic splines, and dashed lines represent standard errors (Schluter 1988). Open circles along the top and bottom axes represent individual hatchlings. Statistical results are reported in Table 2. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.comThis article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model) Behav Ecol, Volume 30, Issue 1, 24 November 2018, Pages 125–133, https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ary154 The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

Figure 4 Relationships between the distance female Chelydra serpentina oviposited from water and the survival of ... Figure 4 Relationships between the distance female Chelydra serpentina oviposited from water and the survival of offspring dispersing from (a) 25 m, (b) 62.5 m, and (c) 100 m, and (d) average offspring mass. Statistical results are reported in Table 1. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.comThis article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model) Behav Ecol, Volume 30, Issue 1, 24 November 2018, Pages 125–133, https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ary154 The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.