TGe Consensus Proposal

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /494r0 Submission July 2001 Michael Fischer, Intersil (TGe Editor)Slide 1 Provisional Tge Ballot Comment Resolutions from the May,
Advertisements

Doc: IEEE /625r1 Submission Amjad Soomro et. al September 2002 Slide 1 TGe ‘Fast track’ proposed Draft Normative Text Changes Sai Shankar, Javier.
Mathilde Benveniste Avaya Labs
Peer Power Save Mode Date: Authors: March 2008 March 2008
WUR coexistence with existing power save mode
DLS Power Save Delivery Mechanism
Parameters for Power Save Mechanisms
Simulation Framework Progress Update - Nov. 2000
IEEE Quality of Service
Submission Title: St. Louis e/ Liaison Report.
Clarifications on WUR/PCR interactions
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
Month Year Doc Title Jan 2018
Requirements and Implementations for Intra-flow/Intra-AC DiffServ
Requirements and Implementations for Intra-flow/Intra-AC DiffServ
Non-Automatic Power Saving Delivery
Summary of Changes to TSPEC (in Document 406r3)
A Scheduling Scheme for Level-2 Enhanced PCF MAC Service
Integration of WUR to Power Save Mode
EDCF Traffic Categories and Access Parameters
Clarifications on WUR/PCR interactions
TGe “Fast-Track” Proposal
An alternative mechanism to provide parameterized QoS
Proposed Specification Framework for TGac – Introductory Comments
Proposed Normative Text Changes Concerning QoS IBSS
TGe “Fast-Track” Proposal
Some Power-save changes in e Draft
Wake Up Response mode to WUR frame
Peer Power Save Mode Date: Authors: March 2008 March 2008
doc.: IEEE /xxx Authors:
Proposed Specification Framework for TGac – Introductory Comments
EDCF Issues and Suggestions
QoS STA function applied to Mesh STA
Directed Multicast Service (DMS)
QoS Poll Modifications Allowing Priority
AP Power Down Notification
Submission Title: Dallas e/ Liaison Report.
Proposed Specification Framework for TGac – Introductory Comments
Reducing Overhead in Active Scanning with Simulation Results
An alternative mechanism to provide parameterized QoS
Clarifications on WUR/PCR interactions
Suggested changes to Tge D3.3
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
QoS STA function applied to Mesh STA
Proposed Specification Framework for TGac – Introductory Comments
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
WME+ / Fasttrack Differences
Reducing Overhead in Active Scanning with Simulation Results
Requirements and Implementations for Intra-flow/Intra-AC DiffServ
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
Uniform e Admissions Control Signaling for HCF and EDCF
Suggested changes to Tge D3.3
PS-Poll TXOP Date: Authors: Month Year
Should Parameterized QoS be Optional
Proposed Normative Text Changes Concerning Interruptive Polling
Strawmodel ac Specification Framework
Resolutions of the Remaining Power Management Comments
Requirements and Implementations for Intra-flow/Intra-AC DiffServ
Dynamic TIM and Page Segmentation
Proposed Normative Text Changes Concerning Distributed Admissions
Use of More Data Field Date: Authors: Nov 2005 Month Year
WME Overview 7/20/03 doc.: IEEE /678r0 July 2003
Proposed Normative Text Changes Concerning Poll Responses
Chapter 11 Comment Resolution for Letter Ballot 63
Should Parameterized QoS be Optional
Signaling for Streaming in IEEE e
Power save state transition
Use of More Data Field Date: Authors: Jan 2006 Jan 2006
Reducing Overhead in Active Scanning
Admissions Control and Scheduling Behaviours for Scheduled EDCA
Presentation transcript:

TGe Consensus Proposal Month 2000 doc.: IEEE 802.11-00/xxx September 2002 TGe Consensus Proposal Authors: Airgo, Cisco, Intersil, AT&T, JVC, Matsushita, Motorola, Phillips, Pioneer, Sharp, Sony, Spectralink, TI This presents the status of the Date: September 12, 2002 Srini Kandela, et. al John Doe, His Company

September 2002 Context After 2+ years, insufficient support from 802.11 body to finalize TGe standard Major reasons for lack of consensus Bifurcation of market requirements data networking voice and audio visual Deeply held beliefs about how QoS should be in implemented in WLAN Continuous introduction of new concepts with varying levels of maturity Constant expansion of 802.11 membership Further delays in 802.11e standard may result in de-facto QoS standard forming outside IEEE Srini Kandela, et. al

Consensus Proposal Objectives: Month 2000 doc.: IEEE 802.11-00/xxx September 2002 Consensus Proposal Objectives: Pragmatic QoS standard that addresses key market segments: - data networking - voice - audio visual Easily accepted by >75% of the IEEE 802.11 body Focus on letter ballot comments. Goal is to: Simplify, Clarify, Unify Ad-hoc group members: Fast Track, Sharp, Intersil, Motorola. Socialized ideas with other members/ Srini Kandela, et. al John Doe, His Company

Status Ad-hoc group has reached consensus on September 2002 Status Ad-hoc group has reached consensus on eDCF improvements HCF polling Addresses needs of rate-based and time-based polling proposals Power Save extensions Normative text drafted for these proposals WME proposal (derived from Doc 02/592r0) HCF polling-spec (derived from Doc 02/524temp, original fast-track document) Power Save spec (Doc 02/562r2) Closure has not been achieved on all issues Srini Kandela, et. al

Status (cont.) What’s in What’s out Improved eDCF HCF Polling September 2002 Status (cont.) What’s in Improved eDCF HCF Polling Power Save extensions Direct Link Protocol (Optional) Burst Ack (Optional) What’s out FEC AP Mobility CC/RR AWMA Srini Kandela, et. al

Improved eDCF Distributed Admission Control September 2002 Improved eDCF Distributed Admission Control Automatic Power Save Delivery eDCF clarification and simplification Maximum of 4 queues at STA and AP Rules for setting 802.11 user priorities in MAC frames Mapping 802.1d priorities to 802.11 priorities for data frames User priorities for 802.11 management and control frames Sequence number generation rules Srini Kandela, et. al

HCF Polling Unified Tspec Added Schedule element September 2002 HCF Polling Unified Tspec Addresses needs of rate-based and time-based Clarified parameter definitions Application triggered or autonomous Tspec signaling Added Schedule element Allows power management by STAs Normative HCF scheduler behavior Improves interoperability & testability Informative description of packet classification Srini Kandela, et. al

Power Save Extensions Automatic power save delivery method September 2002 Power Save Extensions Automatic power save delivery method STA and AP negotiate a wake-up period STA wakes up at negotiated period to receive Beacon AP may deliver 1 or more MSDUs to a STA, without receiving a PS-Poll STA goes back to sleep when More Data bit is set to 0 or if it receives a Beacon with the TIM bit set to 0 STA dynamically transition between active and power-save modes PS-bit in MAC header used to signal transitions STA can continue to use legacy PS-Poll method Srini Kandela, et. al

Documents with Normative Text September 2002 Documents with Normative Text 524r1temp Srini Kandela, et. al

September 2002 Open Issues MAC SAP definition to support both prioritized and parameterized QoS traffic Data SAP: Size of user priority tag (3 or 4 bits) Control SAP: Extensions to support Tspecs Security for side-channel traffic AIFS definition HCF Polling: Mandatory or Optional at AP? Srini Kandela, et. al

Next Steps to a Ratified TGe September 2002 Next Steps to a Ratified TGe Period to review and modify draft text Letter-ballot ->Needs to be discussed Srini Kandela, et. al

September 2002 Backup Srini Kandela, et. al

September 2002 Motions Adopt changes described in IEEE 802.11 02/YYYrN into next TGe draft Srini Kandela, et. al