Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Solution structure of the constant region of nuclear envelope protein LAP2 reveals two LEM‐domain structures: one binds BAF and the other binds DNA by.
Advertisements

Riboswitch Structures: Purine Ligands Replace Tertiary Contacts
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (November 2011)
In Vitro Discriminative Antipseudomonal Properties Resulting from Acyl Substitution of N-Terminal Sequence of Dermaseptin S4 Derivatives  Keren Marynka,
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 107, Issue 12, Pages (December 2014)
Volume 12, Issue 10, Pages (October 2005)
Natalie K. Garcia, Miklos Guttman, Jamie L. Ebner, Kelly K. Lee 
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
Olivier Fisette, Stéphane Gagné, Patrick Lagüe  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 9, Issue 10, Pages (October 2002)
Christopher A. Hunter, Salvador Tomas  Chemistry & Biology 
Volume 14, Issue 9, Pages (September 2006)
Volume 110, Issue 2, Pages (January 2016)
Solution Structure of the U11-48K CHHC Zinc-Finger Domain that Specifically Binds the 5′ Splice Site of U12-Type Introns  Henning Tidow, Antonina Andreeva,
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Barley lipid-transfer protein complexed with palmitoyl CoA: the structure reveals a hydrophobic binding site that can expand to fit both large and small.
Volume 24, Issue 10, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 14, Issue 10, Pages (October 2007)
Volume 12, Issue 8, Pages (August 2005)
Visualization of Redox-Controlled Protein Fold in Living Cells
Volume 108, Issue 6, Pages (March 2015)
Multivalent Recruitment of Human Argonaute by GW182
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Structure and RNA Interactions of the N-Terminal RRM Domains of PTB
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages (April 2016)
Volume 12, Issue 9, Pages (September 2005)
Volume 13, Issue 9, Pages (December 2015)
Structure-Guided Design of Fluorescent S-Adenosylmethionine Analogs for a High- Throughput Screen to Target SAM-I Riboswitch RNAs  Scott F. Hickey, Ming C.
Solution and Crystal Structures of a Sugar Binding Site Mutant of Cyanovirin-N: No Evidence of Domain Swapping  Elena Matei, William Furey, Angela M.
Beena Krishnan, Lila M. Gierasch  Chemistry & Biology 
Volume 83, Issue 2, Pages (August 2002)
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (September 2010)
Nicholas J Skelton, Cliff Quan, Dorothea Reilly, Henry Lowman 
G. Fiorin, A. Pastore, P. Carloni, M. Parrinello  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 83, Issue 2, Pages (August 2002)
A Conformational Switch in the CRIB-PDZ Module of Par-6
Dynamic Motions of the HIV-1 Frameshift Site RNA
Supertertiary Structure of the MAGUK Core from PSD-95
Structural Dynamics of Light-Driven Proton Pumps
Volume 25, Issue 12, Pages e2 (December 2017)
NikR Repressor Chemistry & Biology
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 122, Issue 2, Pages (July 2005)
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 95, Issue 9, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 109, Issue 3, Pages (August 2015)
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages (May 2013)
Volume 110, Issue 2, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
A Self-Sequestered Calmodulin-like Ca2+ Sensor of Mitochondrial SCaMC Carrier and Its Implication to Ca2+-Dependent ATP-Mg/Pi Transport  Qin Yang, Sven.
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages e2 (January 2018)
Biophysical Characterization of Styryl Dye-Membrane Interactions
Volume 17, Issue 8, Pages (August 2010)
Volume 24, Issue 10, Pages (October 2016)
On the Role of Acylation of Transmembrane Proteins
Volume 102, Issue 10, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 110, Issue 7, Pages (April 2016)
Volume 114, Issue 3, Pages (February 2018)
A Novel Class of Small Functional Peptides that Bind and Inhibit Human α-Thrombin Isolated by mRNA Display  Nikolai A Raffler, Jens Schneider-Mergener,
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages e5 (July 2019)
Christina Karatzaferi, Marc K. Chinn, Roger Cooke  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 25, Issue 9, Pages e3 (September 2017)
Jochen Zimmer, Declan A. Doyle, J. Günter Grossmann 
Matthew T. Eddy, Tatiana Didenko, Raymond C. Stevens, Kurt Wüthrich 
Volume 14, Issue 10, Pages (October 2007)
Volume 98, Issue 4, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages 89-97 (January 2005) Enhanced Ligand Affinity for Receptors in which Components of the Binding Site Are Independently Mobile  Clare R. Trevitt, C. Jeremy Craven, Lilia Milanesi, Karl Syson, Maija-Liisa Mattinen, Julie Perkins, Arto Annila, Christopher A. Hunter, Jonathan P. Waltho  Chemistry & Biology  Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages 89-97 (January 2005) DOI: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2004.11.007 Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 A Schematic Representation of the Closure of CaM in Response to a Bifunctional Ligand Calcium-loaded CaM (left) displays motional independence of the two domains, each of which has a hydrophobic pocket capable of binding a tryptophan moiety. In order to accommodate the bifunctional ligands consisting of two linked tryptophan head groups (right), CaM is required to form a closed conformation. The models are based on the pdb entries 3cln (left) and 1cll (right), with the bifunctional ligand inserted with MACROMODEL [49]. The picture was generated with MOLSCRIPT [50] and Raster3D [51]. Below each model is the radius of gyration for the state determined from small-angle X-ray scattering distribution functions (see Figure 5) recorded on both 0.5 mM CaM and a 0.5 mM 1:1 complex between CaM and ligand BT1 (see Figure 2B). Chemistry & Biology 2005 12, 89-97DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2004.11.007) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 The Structures of the Ligands (A) Monofunctional tryptophan (R2 = COOR) and tryptamine (R2 = H) ligands. (B) The peptide-mimic bifunctional ligands, comprising two linked MT2 moieties. (C) The second-generation bifunctional ligands, based on naphthalene sulphonamide head groups. Chemistry & Biology 2005 12, 89-97DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2004.11.007) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 NMR Screen of Ligand Binding (A) Aromatic region of diffusion-edited 1H NMR spectra for 1 mM CaM samples containing two ligand equivalents (a, c, e), in comparison with free ligand spectra (b, d, f) for ligands (a and b) MT1, (c and d) MT4, and (e and f) MT2. Free ligand spectra were acquired by using 5 mM samples in D2O (MT1, MT2) or 20% d3-MeOH (MT4). (B) Summary of NMR probes indicative of interaction between CaM and ligands MT1–MT6. For each measurement, larger bars indicate higher-affinity binding. Protein chemical shifts (black bars) and ligand indole NH chemical shifts (light-gray bars) were measured from initial-final chemical shifts in the titration of five aliquots of 0.5 equivalents of ligand into 1 mM CaM. Diffusion-edited spectra were derived from experiments acquired at 0% and 100% (50W) gradient strength. The intensity of the diffusion-edited spectrum is given relative to the intensity of the PGSE spectrum with 0% gradient power (dark-gray bars, right vertical scale). The average chemical shift changes for aromatic ligand resonances (white bars) were measured from the difference between the diffusion-edited spectrum and the free ligand spectrum for identifiable signals. 1Average ligand chemical shifts are the lower limits for MT2, due to very low-intensity signals. 2For MT5, the protein chemical shift change is an estimated maximum value, since protein I27 NH and ligand indole NH resonances converge upon increasing ligand:CaM ratios. Chemistry & Biology 2005 12, 89-97DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2004.11.007) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Plots Showing the Change in Observed Signal for Representative Titrations, Together with the Lines of Best Fit Obtained by Least-Squares Fitting of the Data (A) Normalized NMR chemical shift changes for CaM I27 amide resonance upon addition of ligands MT2 (open circles) or BT1 (filled diamonds). (B) Normalized fluorescence changes observed upon addition of CaM to peptide-mimic ligands MT2 (open circles) or BT2 (filled squares), monitored at 350 nm and 460 nm, respectively. For consistency in reported fluorescence changes, the observed values for the BT2 experiment (decreasing fluorescence) are inverted relative to those for MT2 (increasing fluorescence). (C) Normalized fluorescence changes observed upon addition of CaM to ligands BN1 (open triangles) and BN2 (filled triangles) monitored at 550 nm. Chemistry & Biology 2005 12, 89-97DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2004.11.007) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 SAXS Measurements of Unliganded and Bifunctional Ligand Bound CaM A comparison of the distance distribution P(r) functions for calcium-loaded CaM (solid line) and a 1:1 complex of BT1 and calcium-loaded CaM (broken line), illustrating the compaction that occurs upon binding of the bifunctional ligands. The radius of gyration falls from 21.7 Å to 18.7 Å upon formation of a 1:1 complex. Chemistry & Biology 2005 12, 89-97DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2004.11.007) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions