Logical Claims.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reason and Argument Chapter 7 (1/2).
Advertisements

Inductive vs. Deductive Reasoning
Step 1: Identify the conclusion Step 2: Identify the given premises Step 3: Identify the implied premises Breaking Down the Argument.
Birds and Mammals Sixth Grade Gail Howard Birds The Physics of Bird Flight What Is a Mammal? Diversity of Mammals.
Copyright © Peter Cappello Logical Inferences Goals for propositional logic 1.Introduce notion of a valid argument & rules of inference. 2.Use inference.
Deductive and Inductive Reasoning
TODAY’S TONGUE TWISTER!~ Four furious friends fought for the phone.
Deduction, Validity, Soundness Lecture II – 01/25/11.
Venn Diagrams and Categorical Syllogisms
Mike McGuire MV Community College COM 101 A Closer Look at Logos Syllogism, Enthymeme, and Logical Fallacies ENGL102 Ordover Fall 2008.
Introduction to Toulmin Logic Scott Hale English
LS Seminar 6 Unit 6 Seminar Dr. Vicki Hill Planning the Major Project Constructing a Thesis Using Deductive Logic Avoiding Logical Fallacies Sources.
ACADEMIC ENGLISH III Class 12 April 17, Today Continue argumentative writing.
Lesson#1 – What is an argument and how do I know its parts?
DEDUCTIVE VS. INDUCTIVE REASONING. Problem Solving Logic – The science of correct reasoning. Reasoning – The drawing of inferences or conclusions from.
BBI 3420 Critical Reading and Thinking Critical Reading Strategies: Identifying Arguments.
DEDUCTIVE VS. INDUCTIVE REASONING Section 1.1. PROBLEM SOLVING Logic – The science of correct reasoning. Reasoning – The drawing of inferences or conclusions.
Logic and Reasoning.
Deductive and Inductive Reasoning
C OMP 3, LAP 3, D AY 6 Logical Fallacies. H OMEWORK -Finish taking notes -Decide upon claims that will be used throughout essay Open Labs.
Deductive s. Inductive Reasoning
LS Unit 7 Seminar 1/26/12 Unit 7 Seminar Agenda »The Research Project »APA Style »Deductive Logic »Avoiding Logical Fallacies Sources: KU Writing.
Logic: The Language of Philosophy. What is Logic? Logic is the study of argumentation o In Philosophy, there are no right or wrong opinions, but there.
ACADEMIC ENGLISH III Class 9 March 31, Today Argumentative writing (continued) - Using basic logical construction - Avoiding logical fallacies.
Logic Section 2.1. Symbols         and or If …, then… not.
Deductive Reasoning. Process through which premises provide conclusive proof for the conclusion.
Do now Can you make sure that you have finished your Venn diagrams from last lesson. Can you name 5 famous mathematicians (including one that is still.
ACADEMIC ENGLISH III Sept. 24, What is the author trying to argue? How does he/she support his/her point? What kind of evidence is used? Do you.
Claims and Enthymemes: Rudiments of Argument
Copyright © Peter Cappello
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING
Logic in Argumentative Writing
a valid argument with true premises.
Animals Unit 1 lesson 2 activity 1.
Academic english iii Class 11 April 12, 2013.
What makes a Good Argument?
Classification of Animals
Proposition of Fact In areas without an absolute answer, persuade your audience that one thing or another is fact. For example, if we don't know whether.
Chapter 1, Unit D Analyzing Arguments.
Syllogism, Enthymeme, and Logical Fallacies
Vertebrates There are five groups of vertebrates.
The Ontological Argument
Miss Stieg Third Grade May 4, 2006
Quantified Propositions
Logical Inferences: A set of premises accompanied by a suggested conclusion regardless of whether or not the conclusion is a logical consequence of the.
Testing for Validity and Invalidity
Building Argument and Integrating Evidence
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING
DEDUCTIVE REASONING Forensic Science.
Created by; Mrs. Clark Edited by; Lynn Garner
Interdependence and Adaptation
The Ontological Argument
Classification of Animals
Classification.
Classification of Animals
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING Section 1.1. Problem Solving Logic – The science of correct reasoning. Reasoning – The drawing of inferences or conclusions.
Comp 3, LAP 3, Day 6 Note-Taking Strategies Types of Arguments
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING
Notes 2.3 Deductive Reasoning.
8C Truth Tables, 8D, 8E Implications 8F Valid Arguments
The Persuasive Speech Ch. 24.
Phil2303 intro to logic.
Critical Thinking Lecture 10 The Syllogism
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING
Classification of Animals
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
Unit 3 Exam Objectives.
Academic English IIi Class 7 September 27, 2013.
Presentation transcript:

Logical Claims

Basics of Logic Premise 1: All men are mortal. Premise 2: Socrates is a man. Conclusion: Therefore, Socrates is mortal.

Basics of Logic Premise 1: Non-renewable resources do not exist in infinite supply. Premise 2: Coal is a non-renewable resource. Conclusion: Coal does not exist in infinite supply.

Basics of Logic Premise 1: All monkeys are primates. Premise 2: All primates are mammals. Premise 3: All mammals are vertebrate animals.  Conclusions: Monkeys are vertebrate animals.

Basics of Logic Premise 1: All squares are rectangles. Premise 2: Figure 1 is a square. Conclusion: Figure 1 is also a rectangle.

Importance of the Premises Premise 1: People with red hair are not good at checkers. Premise 2: Bill has red hair. Conclusion: Bill is not good at checkers.

Explain the Faulty Premises Premise 1: All birds lay eggs. Premise 2: Platypuses lay eggs. Conclusion: Platypuses are birds.

Logic in Writing Premise 1: Projects funded by taxpayer dollars should benefit a majority of the public. Premise 2: The proposed stadium construction benefits very few members of the public. Conclusion: Therefore, the stadium construction should not be funded by taxpayer dollars.

Logic in Writing Premise 1: Minimum wage should match the cost of living in society. Premise 2: The current minimum wage does not match the cost of living in society. Conclusion: Therefore, minimum wage should be increased.

Does Logic Always Work? Premise 1: The government that governs least, governs best.  Premise 2: The government I am proposing does very little governing. Conclusion: Therefore, the government I am proposing is best.