The Texas A&M University System Agricultural Research and Extension Center at Amarillo Manure Concentration of N:P, Animal Performance, and Blood Urea.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BYPRODUCT FEEDS FROM GRAIN PROCESSING Pages
Advertisements

Forage Quality for Profitable Milk Production Jim Linn, Professor Emeritus Univ. of Minnesota.
Feeder Calf Grades: Do Better Grades Really Pay? David Gonsoulin USDA.
Introduction to Live Animal Evaluation Kenneth Geuns Michigan State University Dept. of Animal Science.
Managing Phosphorus with Distillers Grains Diets Allen Trenkle Iowa State University.
Nutrient Reduction in Manure through Livestock Nutritional Management.
Horse Nutrition Bob Coleman Ph. D. PAS Extension Horse Specialist.
Replacement Heifers: Target Weights, Target Dates, and Fat Supplementation Replacement Heifers: Target Weights, Target Dates, and Fat Supplementation Rick.
Feeding Value of Oats in Livestock Diets
Co-product Feeds are “Taylor Made” for Sheep Jeff Held SDSU Extension Sheep Specialist.
Nutrition for Show Steers Jim Sprinkle Area Extension Agent, Animal Science University of Arizona American Hereford Association.
By C Kohn, Department of Agricultural Sciences Waterford, WI
ABSTRACT Two thousand three hundred and sixty-four high-risk calves were procured through sale barns by three order buyers in Arkansas, Mississippi, and.
Feeding Show Lambs Jim Sprinkle Area Extension Agent, Animal Sciences University of Arizona.
IFAD Partner Logo Nutritional management of dairy animals Y. Ramana Reddy Milk IT Project Nainital, Uttarakhand, India November, 2014.
Effects of delayed implant protocols on performance, carcass characteristics and meat tenderness in Holstein steers J. L. Beckett, and J. Algeo Cal Poly.
Evaluation of Conventional vs. Grass Fed Beef Production G. C. Duff Department of Animal Sciences The University of Arizona, Tucson July 29, 2009.
GPP 5 – Ruminant Nutrition Safely Meeting The Nutritional Needs of 4 – H & FFA Youth Projects.
Minerals and Vitamins Galen Erickson. Calcium and Phosphorus Chapter 5, 96 NRC pp Brief metabolism Importance Ca:P ratios Requirements, sources.
FEEDING TO ENHANCE LIVESTOCK PRODUCTIVITY
Dietary Strategies to Reduce Nutrient Excretion from Cattle Dr. Tim L. Stanton Extension Feedlot Specialist Dept. of Animal Sciences, CSU.
Choosing the Right Hay & Feed for Your Horse University of Maryland Horse Conference Montgomery College November 10, 2007 Erin D. Petersen, MS, PAS Extension.
Basics to Small Farm Beef Cow Nutrition Adam Hady Agriculture Agent Richland County UWEX Basics to Beef Cow Nutrition.
Livestock Feeding Practices By: Mariah Gumfory, Arlene Barrett, Haley Vrazel, & Dennis Bratton.
ENERGY SUPPLEMENTS pp Fats and Oils Types –Animal fats Types –Choice white grease –Beef tallow –Poultry fat –Fish oil Characteristics –Saturation.
Animal Science 1.  Major groups of nutrients  Carbohydrates  Fats and Oils  Proteins  Vitamins  Minerals  Water.
Natural vs. Conventional
1 Supplementation of Low Quality Forages Norman Suverly WSU Okanogan County Extension Educator.
LECTURE 25 FEEDLOT CATTLE NUTRITION
Equine Nutrition Equine Science. Introduction  Feed is the greatest expense for horse owners.  Feeding horses means:  Furnishing horses with a daily.
FEEDS & FEED PROCESSING MANAGEMENT By David R. Hawkins Michigan State University.
Lesson 4 Balancing Rations.
P. C. Hoffman Department of Dairy Science University of Wisconsin-Madison Strategies to Improve Feed Efficiency in Dairy Replacement Heifers.
Animal, Plant & Soil Science
Feeding Dried Distillers Grains to Hogs Ron Plain, University of Missouri.
Abstract: This study was conducted to determine the effects of reducing rumen degradable protein (RDP) with constant rumen undegradable protein in mid-lactation.
Feeding Strategies to Lower P in Manure Dr. Mireille Chahine, Extension Dairy Specialist Dr. Rick Norell, Extension Dairy Specialist.
Utilization of byproducts by growing & finishing cattle G. Erickson, T. Klopfenstein & many students.
Forage Quality I: Nutritional Quality Lawton Stewart SE Hay Convention March 29, 2011.
Matt Akins, Luiz Ferraretto, Shane Fredin & Randy Shaver Dairy Science Department, UW Madison.
Mineral & Vitamin Supplementation for Beef Cattle on Pasture.
Ration Formulation 2/05/2001 ANS Steps in Balancing a Ration Nutrient requirements generally represent the minimum quantity of the nutrients that.
Animal and Range Sciences Feed Values for Dry Distillers Grains for Feedlot Lambs Y. Diaz.
Forage Analysis For Beef Cattle: Why, How, and So What Dr. Matt Hersom Dept. of Animal Sciences.
Animal Science 1.  Major groups of nutrients  Carbohydrates  Fats and Oils  Proteins  Vitamins  Minerals  Water.
Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle - MP 391 Overview.
SUMMER SUPPLEMENTATION: PLANT AND ANIMAL RESPONSE – A KANSAS PERSPECTIVE Lyle Lomas and Joe Moyer KSU SE Agricultural Research Center Parsons.
NE for Growing/Finishing Beef Cattle NE values of feeds + feed intake can be used to: Predict amount of feed required for particular gain (programmed feeding)
Developmental Stages of Lambs
Energy Value of Feeding Distillers in a Forage Diet and Feeding Fresh versus Stored Distillers Terry Klopfenstein, B.L. Nuttelman, Crystal Buckner Animal.
Segregating herds based on animal class and nutritional need Lawton Stewart Grazing School September 22, 2011.
Classify animal feeds. Objective 7.01.
Winter Supplementation Utilizing Co-Products as a Supplement on Winter Range and Crop Residue Systems Aaron Stalker University of Nebraska.
Animal Nutrition. Terms Objectives Carbohydrates Carbohydrates Fats & Oils Fats & Oils Proteins Proteins Vitamins Vitamins Minerals Minerals Water Water.
Feeding Productive Ewes n Realistic and practical n Facilities and equipment n Flock size.
1 Animal Science 1 Adapted from: Traci Tate Croatan High School.
Know how. Know now. Jerry D. Volesky Walter H. Schacht University of Nebraska-Lincoln Ethanol CoProduct Conference Grazing Management when Supplementing.
Pasture-Based Nutritional Considerations for Beef Cattle Lawton Stewart Grazing School May 6, 2010.
Nutrient Requirements of Horses Presentation Part 3: Protein #8895-C.
Animal Nutrition Nutrients General Information  Nutrient- chemical element or compound that aids in the support of life.  Ration- the amount and.
Distillers Grains for Beef Cattle Steve Boyles Dept. of Animal Sciences The Ohio State University Distillers Grains for Beef Cattle Steve Boyles Dept.
Title of Research: Effects of Alfalfa Hay Particle Size and Feeding Frequency on Lamb Performance and Digestibility Traits PhD Degree Candidate: Hafiz.
Animal, Plant & Soil Science Lesson C3-1 Nutrients and Their Importance to Animals.
PRODUCTIVE PERFORMANCE, CARCASS TRAITS AND SOME PHYSIOLOGICAL CHANGES IN RABBITS FED ON ACACIA DESERT PLANTS عنوان الرسالة الاداء الانتاجى وصفات الذبيحة.
SOUTHEAST AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH CENTER BEEF CATTLE RESEARCH PROGRAM
Developmental Stages of Lambs
N P Mokotedi2, K-J Leeuw#1, U Marume3, N Thiebaut1 & S Breytenbach4
Alternative supplementation strategies for replacement beef heifers grazing dry California foothills annual range during summer. R. B. Monteiro1,2, G.
Presentation transcript:

The Texas A&M University System Agricultural Research and Extension Center at Amarillo Manure Concentration of N:P, Animal Performance, and Blood Urea Nitrogen Concentrations of Feedlot Steers Phase Fed Different Levels of Protein. L.W. Greene 1, 2 and J. T. Vasconcelos 1,3 1 Texas Agricultural Experiment Station - Amarillo 2 West Texas A&M University, Canyon 3 Texas A&M University

The Texas A&M University System Agricultural Research and Extension Center at Amarillo Introduction Cattle are started on high concentrate finish diets at approximately 750 lbs and fed to an average weight of 1250 lbs. Early in the feeding period, cattle have a greater deposition of lean tissue and less deposition of fat compared to later in the feeding period. As animals mature through the feeding period, the composition of gain changes -- protein gain decreases and fat gain increases in relative proportion.

The Texas A&M University System Agricultural Research and Extension Center at Amarillo Introduction The typical feedlot diet in the Southern Plains contains 13.0 to 13.5% Crude Protein (% N X 6.25)

The Texas A&M University System Agricultural Research and Extension Center at Amarillo Days on Feed Crude protein excess or deficiency (g/d) during feeding period given a typical diet (adapted from Galyean) Days on Feed Average excess = 50 g/d

The Texas A&M University System Agricultural Research and Extension Center at Amarillo Nitrogen retained, % of intake Collection Period %

The Texas A&M University System Agricultural Research and Extension Center at Amarillo The typical feedlot diet in the Southern Plains contains approximately 0.33% P The typical feedlot steer requirement for P is likely < 0.18%. Introduction

The Texas A&M University System Agricultural Research and Extension Center at Amarillo Phosphorus excess or deficiency (g/d) during feeding period given a typical diet (adapted from Galyean) Days on Feed Average excess 6.7 g/d

The Texas A&M University System Agricultural Research and Extension Center at Amarillo Phosphorus retained, % of intake Collection Period %

The Texas A&M University System Agricultural Research and Extension Center at Amarillo The typical feedlot diet does not contain supplemented P. The dietary P is supplied from the dietary ingredients. Introduction Dried distillers grains Cottonseed meal Alfalfa hay Sorghum silage Corn silage Corn grain Phosphorus, %Crude Protein, %Source

The Texas A&M University System Agricultural Research and Extension Center at Amarillo Objective Determine the effects of phase- feeding of protein in finishing steers on –Steer performance –Blood urea nitrogen concentration –Manure N concentration –Manure P concentration –Carcass characteristics

The Texas A&M University System Agricultural Research and Extension Center at Amarillo Methods One hundred eighty four steers Randomized block design (blocked by weight into heavy medium and light and by start date) 54 steers started on June 6, steers started on June 17, 2003 Steers were housed in 21 pens (7 pens/treatment)

The Texas A&M University System Agricultural Research and Extension Center at Amarillo Methods Three dietary treatments 1. Control diet – 13% Crude protein diet fed continually throughout the feeding period % Crude protein – 13% Crude protein diet fed until cattle the average of the block reached 477 kg, then switched to an 11.5% crude protein diet % Crude protein – 13% Crude protein diet fed until cattle the average of the block reached 477 kg, then switched to no supplemental crude protein diet

The Texas A&M University System Agricultural Research and Extension Center at Amarillo Methods The supplemental protein was supplied from equal amounts of nitrogen from urea and cottonseed meal

The Texas A&M University System Agricultural Research and Extension Center at Amarillo Methods Ingredient composition of finishing diets (DM basis) Item13.0% CP11.5% CP10.0% CP Corn grain, Steam flaked, % Sorghum-sudan silage, %7.50 Molasses, cane, %4.00 Fat, %3.00 Limestone, %1.00 Mineral and vitamin premix, %5.00 Urea, % Cottonseed meal, %

The Texas A&M University System Agricultural Research and Extension Center at Amarillo Analyzed chemical composition of finishing diets. Item13.0% CP11.5% CP10.0% CP Crude protein, % NDF, % NE l, (Mcal/lb) NE m, (Mcal/lb) NE g, (Mcal/lb) Ca, % P, % Methods

The Texas A&M University System Agricultural Research and Extension Center at Amarillo kg/d Average Daily Gain Beginning until diet change P-value =0.912

The Texas A&M University System Agricultural Research and Extension Center at Amarillo kg/d Average Daily Gain Diet change until finish P-value =0.213

The Texas A&M University System Agricultural Research and Extension Center at Amarillo kg/d Average Daily Gain Beginning until finish P-value =0.094

The Texas A&M University System Agricultural Research and Extension Center at Amarillo kg/d Dry matter intake Beginning until diet change P-value =0.619

The Texas A&M University System Agricultural Research and Extension Center at Amarillo kg/d Dry matter intake Diet change until finish P-value =0.008

The Texas A&M University System Agricultural Research and Extension Center at Amarillo kg/d Dry matter intake Beginning until finish P-value =0.056

The Texas A&M University System Agricultural Research and Extension Center at Amarillo Kg gain/ Kg intake Gain efficiency Beginning until diet change P-value =0.832

The Texas A&M University System Agricultural Research and Extension Center at Amarillo Gain efficiency Diet change until finish P-value =0.294 Kg gain/ Kg intake

The Texas A&M University System Agricultural Research and Extension Center at Amarillo Gain efficiency Beginning until finish P-value =0.094 Kg gain/ Kg intake

The Texas A&M University System Agricultural Research and Extension Center at Amarillo Plasma Urea Nitrogen (mg/dL) P-value = Day 0 P-value = Diet change P-value = Harvest

The Texas A&M University System Agricultural Research and Extension Center at Amarillo Pen surface manure concentration Nitrogen P-value =0.600 %

The Texas A&M University System Agricultural Research and Extension Center at Amarillo Pen surface manure concentration Ammonia Nitrogen P-value =0.931 %

The Texas A&M University System Agricultural Research and Extension Center at Amarillo Pen surface manure concentration Organic Nitrogen P-value =0.549 %

The Texas A&M University System Agricultural Research and Extension Center at Amarillo Pen surface manure concentration Phosphorus P-value =0.642 %

The Texas A&M University System Agricultural Research and Extension Center at Amarillo Pen surface manure concentration Nitrogen:Phosphorus P-value =0.038

The Texas A&M University System Agricultural Research and Extension Center at Amarillo Carcass Characteristics Fat thickness, cm P-value =0.227

The Texas A&M University System Agricultural Research and Extension Center at Amarillo Carcass Characteristics Longissimus area, cm 2 P-value =0.192

The Texas A&M University System Agricultural Research and Extension Center at Amarillo Carcass Characteristics Kidney, Pelvic and Heart Fat, % P-value =0.459

The Texas A&M University System Agricultural Research and Extension Center at Amarillo Carcass Characteristics Hot carcass wt, kg P-value =0.663

The Texas A&M University System Agricultural Research and Extension Center at Amarillo Carcass Characteristics Live weight, kg P-value =0.763

The Texas A&M University System Agricultural Research and Extension Center at Amarillo Carcass Characteristics Dressing percentage, % P-value =0.874

The Texas A&M University System Agricultural Research and Extension Center at Amarillo Carcass Characteristics Marbling score P-value =0.173

The Texas A&M University System Agricultural Research and Extension Center at Amarillo Carcass Characteristics Yield grade P-value =0.174

The Texas A&M University System Agricultural Research and Extension Center at Amarillo Variation of crude protein in the experimental diet resulted in lower than expected crude protein intake. Reducing crude protein intake to 8.3% reduced feed intake and tended to reduce ADG when summarized across the entire feeding period. No differences were detected in manure nutrient concentrations but the N:P ratio was increased when the lower CP diet was fed. No differences were detected in USDA Carcass Characteristics. Summary