Nickel Risk Assessment

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chemicals in the context of the Water Information System for Europe (WISE) Bo N Jacobsen EEA Chemicals and Water workshop 6-7 December 2010, EEA, Copenhagen.
Advertisements

1 EU Risk Assessment on Nickel Joint Meeting Birmingham, 4 th October 2007.
Discharges of Dangerous Substance Directive 76/464/EEC and “daughter” directives Multilateral Screening Meeting - Croatia and Turkey Chapter 27 – Environment.
Overview of EFSA’s work on opinions and guidance
Katrien Delbeke, ECI, Frank Van Assche,IZA- Europe Frank Van Assche,IZA- Europe On behalf of the Eurometaux Water Project Team Accounting for bioavailability.
PROTECTFP Work Package 1:- results from questionnaire and overview of tools for chemical assessment.
Environmental risk assessment of chemicals Paul Howe Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, UK.
European Commission, DG Environment Unit B.1: Water, Marine and Soil EU Substitution Conference - Hamburg, 13/14 June 2002 Slide 1 EU Conference on Substitution.
1 REACh Registration, Evaluation and Authorization of Chemicals and Restriction! Ohio Valley SOT Wednesday, August 26, 2009 REACh: The New Toxicology Frontier.
1 Incorporation of bioavailability Patrick Van Sprang – ARCHE OECD Workshop on Metals Specificities in Environmental Hazard Assessment, Paris, 7-8 september.
The Biocidal Products Directive Presentation to the European Aerosol Federation 28 September 2005 Athens Greece Steve Smith, SC Johnson.
Development and application of guidance documents – industry view Dr Martin Schaefer ECCA-ECPA Conference March 2014.
EU Nickel Risk Assessment under EU Regulation 793/93 Human Health Classification a review by Dr. Tony Hart – Nickel Institute Consultant Given to the Nickel.
Research & Science Advancing Risk Assessment Presentation March Association of Chemical Industry of the Czech Republic Monique Marrec Fairley.
Charge Question 4-1: Please comment on the ecotoxicity studies selected to represent the most sensitive species in each of the risk scenarios (acute aquatic,
Nanomaterials classification and labelling – status of work undertaken in GHS (Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals)
Refined determination of metal availability in sediments (Acid Volatile Sulphide measurements) K. Delbeke, on behalf of Metals assoxiations and Euras.
JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE EUROPEAN COMMISSION European Chemicals Bureau Risk Assessment - New and Existing Substances Risk Assessment - New and Existing Substances.
Setting Standards: The Science of Water Quality Criteria EA Engineering, Science, and Technology ® Presented by: James B. Whitaker Review of Annex 1 of.
Technical Support for the Impact Assessment of the Review of Priority Substances under Directive 2000/60/EC Updated Project Method for WG/E Brussels 22/10/10.
A Global Review of Methodologies for Aquatic Ecological Risk Assessment.
A practical approach to account for the bioavailability of metals Bruce Brown WCA Environment REPRESENTING Eurometaux November 25 th 2010.
1 State of play and outlook of modelling based prioritisation Klaus Daginnus Institute for Health & Consumer Protection Joint Research Centre, European.
Biology-Based Modelling Tjalling Jager Bas Kooijman Dept. Theoretical Biology.
1 State of Play Prioritisation of Substances By modelling Hazard & Exposure Klaus Daginnus Institute for Health & Consumer Protection Joint Research Centre,
1 Workshop on Metal bioavailability under the Water Framework Directive Jorge Rodriquez Romero & Madalina David DG Environment D2 Gerrit Niebeek – NL Graham.
Office of Research and Development National Center for Environmental Assessment Human Health Risk Assessment and Information for SRP July 28, 2009 Reeder.
Flame Retardant Product Risk Assessments Veronique Steukers, 1 April 2003.
Health and Food Safety EU strategy for Pharmaceuticals in the Environment Patrizia Tosetti DG SANTE European Commission China/EU Pharmaceutical Industry.
Air Toxics & Public Health Committee Update Heidi Hales Monitoring and Assessment Committee Meeting Troy, NH April 24, 2007.
Volker J. Soballa Evonik Degussa GmbH Essen, Germany
New Ecological Science Advice for Ecosystem Protection The EPA Science Advisory Board (SAB) Staff Office supports three external scientific advisory committees.
Voluntary Risk Assessment on Lead - background and environmental issues Dr Andy Bush Lead Development Association International.
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
Development of Compliance Tools for Metals
Identification of River Basin Specific Pollutants and Derivation of Environmental Quality Standards under Water Framework Directive: Turkish Experience.
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Diffuse Sources of Water Pollution
Christof Mainz European Commission
ASSESSING THE ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCE OF POTENTIAL MAJOR ACCIDENTS
Review of the WFD priority substances list
Outline Introduction Extending the validated boundaries of the BLMs – Progress? Nickel Copper Zinc Future BLM/User-friendly tool boundaries Regulatory.
on Priority Substances Strategic Coordination Group
1. Implementation of the Water Framework Directive: notifications & infringements, RBMP assessments for the agricultural sector Expert Group on WFD & agriculture.
Drought Management and Water Scarcity Adaptation
Balázs Horváth DG ENV C.1 Water Unit
on Priority Substances Strategic Coordination Group
Derivation of ecotoxicological quality standards for PAHs
The proposed legislation
Bioavailability and Metals Standards- Workshop
Commission report on Art. 8 WFD Monitoring programmes
Introduction- Link with WG E activity CMEP PLENARY MEETING-PRAGUE
Project leader of the Nickel Risk Assessment
Diffuse Sources of Water Pollution
- Priority Substances - Strategic Coordination Group
Drafting group Mixing Zones
Background CRiteria for the IDentification of Groundwater thrEsholds BRIDGE Summary of BRIDGE achievements Contract N° (SSPI) Co-ordinator:
European Commission, DG Environment Air & Industrial Emissions Unit
Paul Whitehouse Environment Agency, UK
Refined determination of metal availability in sediments (Acid Volatile Sulphide measurements) Presentation for the CMA meeting Paris, 17 November 2006.
Background CRiteria for the IDentification of Groundwater thrEsholds: BRIDGE Co-ordinator: BRGM (Fr) Groundwater Characterisation workshop, 25 June 2004.
Role of Higher Tier Data in the Derivation of the Ni EQS
Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC
Workshop on metals bioavailability under the Water Framework Directive
WG E on Priority Substances
Preparation of the second RBMP in Romania
WG Hazardous substances * Marine Strategy 19 November 2003
Assessment scales and aggregation
Mandate and proposal for working methods
Presentation transcript:

Nickel Risk Assessment Introduction to EU Risk Assessments + Status of the Nickel Risk Assessment part Environment Wouter Ghyoot, ENIA Nickel Risk Assessment part Human Health Tony Hart, consultant to the Nickel Institute Business Implications Paola DiDiscordia, ENIA

ENIA Formed in April 2005 by merger of Nickel Institute Europe European Nickel Group ENIA = European branch of the Nickel Institute Offices in Brussels and Alvechurch (UK) www.enia.org

Aim A practical view on complex regulatory science Background and results of EU Nickel Risk Assessment Consequences of the outcomes within the EU regulatory system

Introduction to EU Risk Assessments Status of Environmental Risk Assessment Wouter Ghyoot European Nickel Industry Association Information Day for the Surface Finishing Industry Birmingham, 16th March 2006

Content EU Risk Assessment Nickel Risk Assessment - Environment Exposure Assessment Effects Assessment Bioavailability EU regulatory impact Water Framework Directive 5

EU Risk Assessment

EU framework EU regulation 793/93/EEC Protect Priority-list Rapporteur Requires from MS the evaluation and control of risks from the production and use of existing substances Protect General population, consumers, workers Environmental compartments: air, water, soil, sediments Priority-list Existing substances enter full Risk Assessment when determined as EC priority-list substances. Rapporteur A Member State volunteers as rapporteur

EU framework Legal instruments Manufacturers and importers are required to supply data Technical Guidance Document (European Commission) Sets out the methods for carrying out Risk Assessment TC NES (Technical Committee on New and Existing Substances) Discusses and validates the sections of the RA Report as regards scientific aspects EU Commission – JRC – ECB manage TC NES SCHER (Scientific Committee) Peer review of Rapporteur’s final draft report EC Committee Discusses and promulgates needed risk reduction measures http://www.nickelinstitute.org/index.cfm/ci_id/12913/la_id/1.htm

Risk Assessment Exposure Assessment Effects Assessment Risk Characterization

Exposure Assessment Human Health: workers, consumers and via the environment Environment: water, air, soil, sediments For different scenarios (Ni production and Ni use)

Effects Assessment Hazard identification Dose-response (effect) assessment For different endpoints: Human Health: acute and chronic toxicity, respiratory sensitization, dermal sensitization, carcinogenicity, mutagenicity, reproductive toxicity, … Environment: acute and chronic toxicity

Risk Characterization Evaluation of effects data Comparison with exposure data Possible conclusions: (i) Further testing/information needed (ii) Risks are adequately controlled (iii) Additional risk reduction measures required

Metals undergoing Risk Assessment Priority list metals Zn Cd Ni Sb2O3 Voluntary Risk Assessment: Cu Pb 13

Nickel Risk Assessment

Nickel RA Five listed nickel priority substances Metallic nickel Nickel sulphate Nickel chloride Nickel nitrate Nickel carbonate D-EPA is Rapporteur for the Nickel RA and carries final responsibility Industry contribution: Filling the data gaps, research programmes Bilateral discussions with DEPA

Environment

Environmental Risk Assessment Exposure assessment  PEC = Predicted Environmental Concentration Effects assessment  PNEC = Predicted No Effect Concentration Risk Characterization PEC/PNEC > 1  risk

Exposure Assessment

Exposure Assessment Components of Exposure Analysis: Emissions Inventory diffuse and point sources of Ni within the EU Regional Exposure Assessment estimation of PEC at the (hypothetical) regional scale representative of a worst case for EU area of 40,000 km, population of 20 million (close to NL) Local Exposure Assessment estimation of PEC at the operational level, using site estimation of emission characteristics when sector coverage is sufficient critical for risk management process

Emissions Inventory for Nickel

Exposure Assessment

Exposure Assessment PEC determined on the Continental level (PECcont) Regional level (PECreg) Local level (PEClocal) PEClocal = Clocal + PECregional PECreg = Creg + PECcont PECcont = Ccont + natural background

water, sediment, soil, air Nickel producing/processing sectors Overview PEC values water, sediment, soil, air Nickel producing/processing sectors

PECtotal, local water (µg/l) Platers: wide spread; Median values in range of other sectors

PECtotal, local sediment (mg/kg) Platers: wide spread; Median values in range of other sectors

PECtotal, local soil (mg/kg) Platers: wide spread; Median values in range of other sectors

PECadded, local air (µg/m3) Platers

Effects assessment

Aquatic Aim of effects assessment is to determine the PNEC = Predicted No Effect Concentration Methodology Establish dose-response curves For different species Determine NOEC or LOEC Species Sensitivity Distribution (SSD) Cumulative frequency distribution of NOECs/LOECs for different species Derive PNEC

Species Sensitivity Distribution (SSD) Oncorhynchus mykiss Ceriodaphnia dubia Daphnia magna Raphidocelis subcapitata Ni Species Sensitivity Distribution HC5

PNEC derivation Derive HC5 = 5th percentile of SSD HC5 = concentration at which 5% of the species is affected Determine assessment factor (AF) AF depends on number of species in distribution etc. There are rules to derive AF  PNEC = HC5/AF

Risk Characterisation PEC/PNEC BUT refinement possible Bioavailability incorporation

Bioavailability Not the total or dissolved concentration is relevant for the biological effects, but the concentration at the biotic ligand The concentration at the biotic ligand is influenced by complexation (e.g. organic carbon) and competition (e.g. cations) processes

Aquatic Biotic Ligand Model (BLM)

Status Research programme about finalized Dossier reviewed at TC NES (Technical Committee New and Existing Substances): March 2006 June 2006 September 2006 (risk characterization)

Use of the outcomes in EU legislation Example: Water Framework Directive and setting of EQS (Environmental Quality Standards)

! Thank you for your attention !