A Long Term Perspective on Transportation Models and Software

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
OVERVIEW OF CMAPS ADVANCED TRAVEL MODEL CADRE Kermit Wies, Deputy Executive Director for Research and Analysis AMPO Modeling Group, November 2010.
Advertisements

Dynamic Traffic Assignment: Integrating Dynameq into Long Range Planning Studies Model City 2011 – Portland, Oregon Richard Walker - Portland Metro Scott.
Time of day choice models The “weakest link” in our current methods(?) Change the use of network models… Run static assignments for more periods of the.
Management and Operations In MPO Planning Christopher O’Neill.
Enhanced analytical decision support tools The Scheme level Final workshop of the DISTILLATE programme Great Minster House, London Tuesday 22 nd January.
University of Minho School of Engineering Centre Algoritmi Uma Escola a Reinventar o Futuro – Semana da Escola de Engenharia - 24 a 27 de Outubro de 2011.
Norman W. Garrick Transportation Forecasting What is it? Transportation Forecasting is used to estimate the number of travelers or vehicles that will use.
Measuing Preferences, Establishing Values, The Empirical Basis for Understanding Behavior David Levinson.
CE 573 Transportation Planning1 Societal Changes and Transportation Planning CE 573 Transportation Planning Lecture 8.
New Trends in Urban Planning and Development and their Impact on Parking, Transit and Community Transportation Presented by: R. C. “Rick” Mobley, ASLA,
Route Planning and Evaluation
Model Task Force Meeting November 29, 2007 Activity-based Modeling from an Academic Perspective Transportation Research Center (TRC) Dept. of Civil & Coastal.
Professor: Keren Mertens Horn Office: Wheatley 5-78B Office Hours: TuTh 2:30-4:00 pm ECONOMICS OF THE METROPOLITAN AREA 212G,
ITS America 2005 Enhanced Transit Information CIN RTO Consumer Information Network Regional Transit Organization Presented by: Jesus A. Martinez, P.E.
Calculating Transportation System User Benefits: Interface Challenges between EMME/2 and Summit Principle Author: Jennifer John Senior Transportation Planner.
1 Development and Evaluation of Selected Mobility Applications for VII (a.k.a. IntelliDrive) Steven E. Shladover, Sc.D. California PATH Program Institute.
Introduction Nablus is the largest city in the West Bank after Jerusalem. 150,000 inhabitants live in Nablus. Nablus has the largest university in the.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to TRB Planning Applications Conference presented by Vamsee Modugula Cambridge Systematics, Inc. May.
Some network flow problems in urban road networks Michael Zhang Civil and Environmental Engineering University of California Davis.
Integration of Transportation System Analyses in Cube Wade L. White, AICP Citilabs Inc.
Regional Traffic Simulation/Assignment Model for Evaluation of Transit Performance and Asset Utilization April 22, 2003 Athanasios Ziliaskopoulos Elaine.
Jennifer Murray Traffic Forecasting Section Chief, WisDOT Metropolitan Planning Organization Quarterly Meeting July 28 th, 2015.
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY San Francisco’s Dynamic Traffic Assignment Model Background SFCTA DTA Model Peer Review Panel Meeting July.
Improving the Models, SACOG Perspectives Sustainable Communities Implementation Challenges and Opportunities UC Davis Policy Forum Gordon Garry March 5,
Client Name Here - In Title Master Slide Data Requirements to Support Road Pricing Analyses Johanna Zmud, Ph.D. NuStats Partners, LP Expert Forum on Road.
Managed Lanes CE 550: Advanced Highway Design Damion Pregitzer.
0 Christopher A. Pangilinan, P.E. Special Assistant to the Deputy Administrator Research and Innovative Technology Administration, ITS Joint Program Office.
Getting to Know Cube.
Managing Travel for Planned Special Events: What, Why, & Benefits Walt Dunn, P.E. Dunn Engineering Associates, P.C. Talking Operations Seminar January.
Exploring Cube Base and Cube Voyager. Exploring Cube Base and Cube Voyager Use Cube Base and Cube Voyager to develop data, run scenarios, and examine.
FDOT Transit Office Modeling Initiatives The Transit Office has undertaken a number of initiatives in collaboration with the Systems Planning Office and.
Www-civil.monash.edu.au/its Institute of Transport Studies National Urban Transport Modelling Workshop, 5 March 2008 Travel Demand Management Geoff Rose.
Presented to Time of Day Subcommittee May 9, 2011 Time of Day Modeling in FSUTMS.
Route and Network Planning
Transportation Forecasting The Four Step Model. Norman W. Garrick Transportation Forecasting What is it? Transportation Forecasting is used to estimate.
3/12/2013Computer Engg, IIT(BHU)1 CLOUD COMPUTING-1.
Housing and Transportation Affordability Index Study MWCOG Transportation Planning Board September 9, 2011.
Generated Trips and their Implications for Transport Modelling using EMME/2 Marwan AL-Azzawi Senior Transport Planner PDC Consultants, UK Also at Napier.
Travel Demand Forecasting: Traffic Assignment CE331 Transportation Engineering.
The Gauteng Economic Indaba Transport and Logistics Mr Piet Sebola Group Executive Strategic Asset Development Date: 09 th June 2016.
Presented to Model Task Force Meeting presented by Danny Lamb, Florida DOT District 7 November 9, 2009 Model Task Force Priorities Survey.
TfGM Innovation Agenda
Latency and Communication Challenges in Automated Manufacturing
Chapter 3 Supply Chain Drivers and Obstacles
Chapter 3 Supply Chain Drivers and Obstacles
GENESYS Redevelopment Strawman Proposal
GSM+GPS Based School Kids Tracking System
Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) ACEC Presentation May 25, 2017
Houstonf1rst.
Autonomous Vehicles The Implications on Urban Transportation
How Transit Agencies Can Plan for Driverless Cars
1st November, 2016 Transport Modelling – Developing a better understanding of Short Lived Events Marcel Pooke – Operational Modelling & Visualisation Manager.
“To inspire and influence the evolution of integrated mobility”
Service Routes and Community Transit Hubs: Right Sizing Transit

TRANSPORT TECHNOLOGY Ground transportation by road is one of the most important today as well as for freight and people, due to the great development of.
Modelling Sustainable Urban Transport
Presented to 2017 TRB Planning Applications Conference
Internet Interconnection
Chapter 3 Supply Chain Drivers and Obstacles
Ventura County Traffic Model (VCTM) VCTC Update
Transportation Task Force Mission and Vision
Chapter 3 Supply Chain Drivers and Metrics
MODULE 2: TSMO Strategies
SiMobility Innovative technology that moves you.
Norman Washington Garrick CE 2710 Spring 2016 Lecture 07
1. Where should buses run and with what frequency?
MODULE 2: TSMO Strategies
Chicago to Council Bluffs-Omaha
  Use of Dynamic Traffic Assignment in FSUTMS in Support of Transportation Planning in Florida FDOT Research #BDK80 Task Work Order No June.
Presentation transcript:

A Long Term Perspective on Transportation Models and Software presented to Florida Model Task Force November 10, 2009

What is long-term? The MTF has defined short-term priorities that should be in place in the next 3-4 years Long-term: should be in place in around 2015’ish

Putting software advances and modeling needs in context In 2015, modelers will forecast transportation demand and flows for 2040. We see, even today, forecasts for 2065. Considerations: Current/short-term FSUTMS is the starting point What will change about transportation demand and supply by 2040? How will data evolve? How will technology change how we model?

Changes to transportation demand/supply in 2040 ‘Trip Generation’ and ‘Time of Day’ Demographics The graying of the population—but they will drive longer Changes to the household dynamic of household size and vehicle availability Workforce: part-time, full-time, ‘all the time’ ‘Trip-Making’ behavior See today: more people working at home See today: people working from satellite offices See today: more variable work hours See today: more virtual meetings (go to meeting) Correcting issues with 4-step: vehicle sharing/competition; ‘related’ trips (‘tours’) This all ‘begs’ to be modeled as activities and not as trips Time of departure becomes mandatory

Changes to transportation demand/supply in 2040 ‘Car Ownership’ Private automobile: We see specialization of vehicles We see car-sharing growing in cities We see automobile ‘driving’ technologies evolving We see changes in fuel type Some think: Private vehicles will disappear over time as vehicle sharing becomes the standard. The line between public and private transportation disappears—transportation becomes a super-efficient taxi service (automated driving or self-driven) with customizable vehicles (vehicle provided depends on needs). Improvement of vehicle ownership models: type, use, fuel type, technology

Changes to transportation demand/supply in 2040 Transit technology Expanded transit guideways – separation of transit from congestion Increased use of ITS systems both on the passenger and vehicles sides Vehicle routing and adaptive scheduling Vehicle location: where is the bus? What time will it arrive? On demand services The merging of car sharing/transit Express services/point to point High speed rail Considerations on wait time, wait time perception, vehicle-technology utility

Changes to transportation demand in 2040 Travel patterns Higher vehicle speeds and capacity due to vehicle technology and ITS More variation in peaking / congestion as time of day changes Home to work commuting modified by increased flexibilities (where you work, when you work, how you work) Correction in four-step: incorporation of land use in modeling Will the traditional commute ‘disappear’? Will cities become more spread out? Will cities become more focused on high-speed transit corridors? A need for land use-transportation modeling; combining steps such as mode/destination choice or more model integration

Changes to transportation demand in 2040 Mode choice today: car/transit tomorrow: guided versus non-guided vehicles – transit? Or ‘smart vehicles’ versus ‘dumb vehicles’ – transit As ITS has more of an impact on vehicles the need to estimate amount of technology in the vehicles increases Self-driven versus ‘system’ driven Perhaps vehicle types: single passenger versus multi Privately owned versus shared

Changes to transportation demand in 2040 Assignment ITS/vehicle technology perhaps enabling higher speeds and smaller distances between vehicles System routing versus assisted routing versus self-routing ITS providing current traffic conditions and short-term forecasts Pricing : congestion charging; tolling…what will be the business models? Transit: flexible schedules and routing? Movement to system equilibrium but with some ‘selfish’ drivers/vehicles Model knowledge of traffic conditions Model queuing delay—dynamic conditions: DTA Increased ability to model different pricing ‘business models’ and VMT by service provider/jurisdiction

What data will we have? Every person will be connected to the internet (example, a badge we wear). Today: internet-connected telephone Every vehicle will be connected to the internet—sending and receiving information to the ‘system’ and to other vehicles and people. Today: GPS receives traffic information. Personal information will become less and less private—trading off privacy for the provided benefits. Today: my bank is on-line

Much more information about vehicle location and use Much more information about the individual’s travel and location Potentially more information about the household and personal characteristics from private sources Consequences on: How we estimate model parameters How we validate models How we store/share and protect data What data will we have?

How will technology influence modeling? Much higher communications speeds across the internet Much faster grid/cloud computing resources enabling increased predictive modeling and more complex modeling Predictive Modeling will be ‘everywhere’ Yesterday: public hearings Today: public hearings, streaming, twittering, blogging Tomorrow: web-based public meetings with shared information—web-based collaborative planning

What Citilabs is doing today for modeling 2015 The geodatabase/multiple data formats—enables all data to be geo-referenced. Today: where people live and work. Tomorrow: every vehicle or person by second. Activity models: premise being we can no longer directly model ‘trips’ but peoples activities and desires. The modes could become physically move or virtual movement. Internet—the software, data, calculations, results are all moved to a web-accessed, cloud computing environment. A much better place to receive and transmit data (then from a desktop PC); take advantage of grid/cloud computing speeds and storage; all of the information and models themselves can be much more easily shared and integrated into other models and systems.

What the MTF Needs to Consider Movement to activity models Time of departure/day Movement to complex vehicle type modeling – private/shared, fuel type, technology of vehicle, type of vehicle Changes to transit: on-demand, transit system knowledge Modeling of pricing and pricing approaches (subscription..) Movement to dynamic traffic assignment/simulation Incorporation, storage and use of new data types Land use/transport interaction Use of internet in modeling/planning and use in other systems

How can Citilabs and the MTF work together A definite need to establish a long-term development strategy and plan by the MTF or its tools and techniques will not be capable of testing long-term strategies or how the world ‘will work’ in 2040. Create a vision of Modeling and software in 2020 for scenarios to be evaluated for 2040 Once the goal is established, then plan and budget for the intermediate steps to get to that goal and how the short- term plans relate to these long-term goals

Thank you!