Lessons Learned from Operation Iraqi Freedom

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presentation for OAS meeting 1 Dec MEASURING MILITARY CAPABILITIES MILITARY EXPENDITURE & ARMS ACQUISITIONS AND THEIR RELATION TO MILITARY CAPABILITIES.
Advertisements

GOFC/GOLD - Fire Requirements for Fire Observations.
A History of the M72 LAW and Current Improvement Programs
Integrated Ocean Observing System (IOOS) Data Management and Communication (DMAC) Standards Process Julie Bosch NOAA National Coastal Data Development.
F/A-18E/F SUPER HORNET BLOCK II MULTI-YEAR PROCUREMENT
Cost and Management Challenges of Systems of Systems True Program Success TM Cost and Management Challenges of System of Systems Arlene Minkiewicz, Chief.
Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company DAU JSF Program and Interoperability DAU 8 June, 2004 JSF Program and Interoperability DAU 8 June,
JOINT FIRES AND EFFECTS TRAINER SYSTEM (JFETS). We currently rely on service component schools to inform on service capabilities, and train component.
© 2013 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved. Systems Engineering: MITRE & SERC Dr. J. Providakes Director, SE Tech Center “The SERC-MITRE Doctoral.
DoD Acquisition Domain (Sourcing) (DADS) Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) E-Business/SPS Joint Users’ Conference November 15-19, 2004 Houston, TX.
This Briefing is Classified UNCLASSIFIED Arctic SOF Capabilities Work Shop Back Brief 20 Nov 14 1 UNCLASSIFIED.
Mr. Charles Riechers Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Acquisition and Management 17 April 2007 SAE/CAE Panel on Acquisition of Services.
Good morning ladies and gentlemen and welcome to the 2004 National Defense Industrial Association Combat Vehicle Conference and to Fort Knox, the Home.
CoCom Involvement in the Joint Capabilities Process November 4, 2003.
Working in the Virtual Environment Practical Experience
March 2004 At A Glance NASA’s GSFC GMSEC architecture provides a scalable, extensible ground and flight system approach for future missions. Benefits Simplifies.
Continuous Learning Module (CLM) Status Update Defense Acquisition University.
December 2004 Acquisition of REMEC Defense and Space.
Doing Business with the Naval Air Systems Command Presented to: SMART PROC 2015 Presented by: Ken Carkhuff Deputy Associate Director NAVAIR Office of Small.
13 May 2003 PROGRAM EXECUTIVE OFFICE, SPECIAL PROGRAMS SPECIAL OPERATIONS ACQUISITION AND LOGISTICS CENTER JOINT SERVICE SMALL ARMS PROGRAM (JSSAP) National.
Defense Acquisition University Acquisition Community Connection Overview November 2007.
March 2004 At A Glance The AutoFDS provides a web- based interface to acquire, generate, and distribute products, using the GMSEC Reference Architecture.
Snipers & Observers Current Operations Looking Towards the Future MSG Carey.
TRANSFORMATION FOCUSED ON JOINTNESS AND INTEROPERABILITY JUDY A STOKLEY, SES DEPUTY FOR ACQUISITION AIR ARMAMENT CENTER PRECISION STRIKE ASSOCIATION CONFERENCE.
GORT Planning/Guidance Session with LTG Barclay
Incoming Themes for 2017 Frank Kelly, USGS
Performance Based Logistics
U.S. Joint Forces Command Allied Command Transformation (NATO)
UNIQUELY FOCUSED IN A CRITICAL DISCIPLINE
Performance-Based Logistics
Name of the idea Description and Military Application Maturity
Acquisition and Cross-Servicing Agreements (ACSA) 101
Real Lethality — Learning from After Action Reports
Name of the idea Description and Military Application Maturity
Basic Policy Overview Palo Alto.
Program Executive Officer Commander, U.S. Joint Forces Command
Winner 2008 Great Ideas Competition at Maintenance Symposium
[Project Name] Post-Mortem
National Defense Industrial Association (NDIA)
CV-1: Vision The overall vision for transformational endeavors, which provides a strategic context for the capabilities described and a high-level scope.
CTMA Investment - $2.3M; Industry Cost Share - $4.8M
PROJECT NAME POST-MORTEM
NDIA Naval Log Conference “THE FUTURE OF ARMY LOGISTICS”
National Defense Industrial Association (NDIA)
Committee of Small Arms Producers (CSAP) National Small Arms Technology Center (NSATC) and Consortium Overview 5 February 2004.
41st Annual Targets, UAVs & Range Operations Symposium & Exhibition
Multi-Domain Battle: Achieving Cross-Domain Synergy
BASIC MACHINEGUN COURSE
13 November 2018.
Force Packaging.
DoD Automatic Test Systems (ATS) Strategies
NDIA Targets, UAVs and Range Operations
The Strategic Information Technology Formulation
Site classifications, definitions, and updates to Landnet
Team: ______Houston Euler________
Mission -- Improve Weapon Technology -- Improve Defense Management
“Exploring New Solutions” The Joint Non-Lethal Weapons Program
Possible technology domains and project categories of EDIDP Industrial Forum Andrea Barbagelata , (Leonardo), ASD Task Force on the European Defence.
Day One Activities Day Two Activities Strengths and Challenges –
NDIA / USMC War Game 2006 “Adapting to Change” Cell 1 Outbrief.
20 Years of DOT&E What Have We Learned & How Can We Make It Better
Defense Logistics: Integrated and Efficient
[Project Name] Post-Mortem Presentation Template
Phase Zero Social Media Applications
Project Name Post-Mortem
OPERATIONAL TEST & EVALUATION PERSPECTIVE
Lessons Learned from Operation Iraqi Freedom
Team Based Care Kick off Webinar
Perspectives on Transforming DT and OT Industry-Government Roundtable
*Separate register for CTF at:
Presentation transcript:

Lessons Learned from Operation Iraqi Freedom Panel Discussion Lessons Learned from Operation Iraqi Freedom 0800 – 0900 12 May 2004

OIF Lessons Learned Panel Members

OIF Panel Format Moderator – Open: Set the objectives — approach Top level questions Panel members: 5-10 minute comments — observations Each panel member Panel dialogue: Exchange and dialogue among panel Moderator facilitate Written questions: Submitted from the attendees Open questions: From attendees Closing comments: From panel members

Objectives Capture “lessons learned” influence on Small Arms weapon/armaments and related systems Operations System integration Subsystems Technology Supportability Readiness Identify what was positive and what changes are needed Identify technology, system integration, and supportability drivers from lessons learned Priority guidelines/objectives for DoD laboratories/acquisitions Industry

OIF “Lessons Learned” Panel 1. What went well? 2. What were limitations? 3. What were issues – problems? 4. Was the armament community (DoD and industry) effective and responsive? 5. Response and result of rapid response — needs — new items — mods — quantity — schedule 6. What are the top take-away messages to: – Address specifically – Carry forward 7. Actions to DoD developers and acquisition 8. Actions to industry

Service Unique Observations Army SOF Navy Air Force Marines Impact/Benefits of Joint Operations — JROC Process Weapon/armament Requirements Commonality Availability Supportability Lessons learned unique to each service Capability Based Force How Did OIF Shape Future Joint Operations?

OIF Discussion Topics Readiness – response – availability Future force impact Systems Capability Quantity Training JROC process — What is impact? Capability based force impact DoD lab resources response Industry response National Center impact?

Lessons Learned: OIF Weapons/armaments positive observations/capabilities What went well? Weapons Ammunition Electro-optical and fire control Communications Mounts Small Arms capability Lethality Range Type of warhead Impact of precision weapons/armaments/munition? How can we build on experience?

OIF “Lessons Learned” Panel What weapon/armament capability was not available? Ammunition resources Were weapons/armaments limited by system integration factor? Acquisition Fire control Targeting information Communication Was weapon/armament capability mix adequate for Operations Asymmetric threats Urban environments What should change — when — how?

OIF “Lessons Learned” Panel Was weapon/armament training matched to operational scenarios? Were weapons/armaments/munition available and supportable? Production base responsiveness Maintenance Spares Logistics Is Small Arms community impacted by capability based force? How will “lessons learned” – system/ammo usage impact acquisition?

OIF “Lessons Learned” Panel What weapon/armament/ammunition capability was desired but not available? What specific technologies are needed? Weapons Ammunition Electro-optics/fire controls Networked fires What system integration changes are priority? New platforms Robotics Network fires Impact of joint operations How does jointness impact Small Arms? What is needed to support jointness? JROC process

OIF Lesson Learned “Bottom Line” Capture and use of “lessons learned” is critical to Current force readiness Future force definition and implementation Joint operational capability will evolve from “lessons learned” — JROC? Priority needs Key characteristics identify Additional will be added Capability based force — acquisition plans/need — future Open Architecture and Spiral Development Enable “Lessons Learned” Responsiveness