Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages (May 2016)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Federico Dajas-Bailador, Emma V. Jones, Alan J. Whitmarsh 
Advertisements

Volume 50, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (April 2003)
Volume 63, Issue 5, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 129, Issue 6, Pages (June 2007)
The Unique N Terminus of the UbcH10 E2 Enzyme Controls the Threshold for APC Activation and Enhances Checkpoint Regulation of the APC  Matthew K. Summers,
Volume 58, Issue 2, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 21, Issue 13, Pages (December 2017)
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (April 2013)
Phosphorylation of Cdc20 by Bub1 Provides a Catalytic Mechanism for APC/C Inhibition by the Spindle Checkpoint  Zhanyun Tang, Hongjun Shu, Dilhan Oncel,
Marius K Lemberg, Bruno Martoglio  Molecular Cell 
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 45, Issue 4, Pages (February 2012)
Fátima Gebauer, Marica Grskovic, Matthias W Hentze  Molecular Cell 
Monica C. Rodrigo-Brenni, Erik Gutierrez, Ramanujan S. Hegde 
Volume 4, Issue 6, Pages (December 1999)
Volume 55, Issue 2, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
The Mechanism of Tail-Anchored Protein Insertion into the ER Membrane
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (April 2009)
Volume 21, Issue 8, Pages (August 2014)
Amie J. McClellan, Melissa D. Scott, Judith Frydman  Cell 
Calnexin Controls the STAT3-Mediated Transcriptional Response to EGF
Volume 115, Issue 5, Pages (November 2003)
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (September 2004)
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Role of Sec61α in the Regulated Transfer of the Ribosome–Nascent Chain Complex from the Signal Recognition Particle to the Translocation Channel  Weiqun.
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages (February 2009)
Volume 94, Issue 6, Pages (September 1998)
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages (February 2016)
Monica Kong-Beltran, Jennifer Stamos, Dineli Wickramasinghe 
Volume 20, Issue 13, Pages (July 2010)
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (March 2011)
Kelly L. Shaffer, Ajay Sharma, Erik L. Snapp, Ramanujan S. Hegde 
Inactivation of the SMN Complex by Oxidative Stress
A Chaperone Cascade Sorts Proteins for Posttranslational Membrane Insertion into the Endoplasmic Reticulum  Fei Wang, Emily C. Brown, Gary Mak, Jimmy.
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages e3 (June 2017)
Volume 89, Issue 4, Pages (May 1997)
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (March 2007)
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages e5 (December 2017)
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (October 2017)
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages e5 (April 2017)
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages (May 2018)
Molecular Basis of Drug Resistance in Aurora Kinases
Protein Translocation Is Mediated by Oligomers of the SecY Complex with One SecY Copy Forming the Channel  Andrew R. Osborne, Tom A. Rapoport  Cell  Volume.
Volume 22, Issue 8, Pages (August 2015)
Yi Tang, Jianyuan Luo, Wenzhu Zhang, Wei Gu  Molecular Cell 
Susan K Lyman, Randy Schekman  Cell 
Jason C. Young, Nicholas J. Hoogenraad, F.Ulrich Hartl  Cell 
Volume 17, Issue 11, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 19, Issue 11, Pages (November 2012)
Protein Kinase D Inhibitors Uncouple Phosphorylation from Activity by Promoting Agonist-Dependent Activation Loop Phosphorylation  Maya T. Kunkel, Alexandra C.
Volume 50, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Soo Jung Kim, Devarati Mitra, Jeffrey R. Salerno, Ramanujan S. Hegde 
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (May 2011)
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (June 2010)
Ligand-Driven Vectorial Folding of Ribosome-Bound Human CFTR NBD1
Volume 22, Issue 11, Pages (November 2015)
Sandra Stefanovic, Ramanujan S. Hegde  Cell 
Discovery of Antagonist Peptides against Bacterial Helicase-Primase Interaction in B. stearothermophilus by Reverse Yeast Three-Hybrid  Laurence Gardiner,
Sequence-Specific Alteration of the Ribosome–Membrane Junction Exposes Nascent Secretory Proteins to the Cytosol  Ramanujan S Hegde, Vishwanath R Lingappa 
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (April 2009)
Transcriptional Regulation by p53 through Intrinsic DNA/Chromatin Binding and Site- Directed Cofactor Recruitment  Joaquin M Espinosa, Beverly M Emerson 
Volume 26, Issue 11, Pages e11 (March 2019)
Dual Function of the Voltage-Dependent Ca2+ Channel α2δ Subunit in Current Stimulation and Subunit Interaction  Christina A Gurnett, Michel De Waard,
Empty Site Forms of the SRP54 and SRα GTPases Mediate Targeting of Ribosome– Nascent Chain Complexes to the Endoplasmic Reticulum  Peter J Rapiejko, Reid.
Lateral Opening and Exit Pore Formation Are Required for BamA Function
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages (November 2009)
EMC Is Required to Initiate Accurate Membrane Protein Topogenesis
Presentation transcript:

Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages 561-566 (May 2016) Apratoxin Kills Cells by Direct Blockade of the Sec61 Protein Translocation Channel  Anja O. Paatero, Juho Kellosalo, Bryan M. Dunyak, Jehad Almaliti, Jason E. Gestwicki, William H. Gerwick, Jack Taunton, Ville O. Paavilainen  Cell Chemical Biology  Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages 561-566 (May 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2016.04.008 Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Apratoxin Does Not Target Hsp70 In Vitro (A) Structure of apratoxin A. (B) The human J protein DnaJB4 stimulates ATP turnover by the Hsp70 molecular chaperones, Hsc70 (HSPA8) or BiP (HSPA5), as determined by the colorimetric malachite green assay. (C) Apratoxin A does not inhibit the J-stimulated ATPase activity of Hsc70 or BiP. Hsc70 or BiP (5 μM) were stimulated by subsaturating concentrations of J protein (0.1 μM DnaJB4) to optimize sensitivity to inhibitors. (D) Incubation of apratoxin with DnaJB4 plus Hsc70 has a negligible effect on the J-mediated refolding of chemically denatured firefly luciferase by Hsp70 molecular chaperones. (E) As in (D), except BiP was used instead of Hsc70. The data represent the mean ± SEM, n = 3. Cell Chemical Biology 2016 23, 561-566DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2016.04.008) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Apratoxin Targets Lumenal End of Sec61α (A) Parental HCT-116 cells and resistant clones were treated with increasing concentrations of apratoxin for 72 h, and viability was assessed by the Alamar Blue assay (mean ± SD, n = 4). (B) Homology model of human Sec61α showing the location of apratoxin resistance mutations (red). Lateral gate helices are colored blue (TM2/3) and green (TM7/8). (C) HEK293-FRT cells stably expressing wild-type (WT) or mutant Sec61α were assayed as in (A). (D) CT7 photo-crosslinking with ER microsomes. Microsomes were incubated with 100 nM CT7 in the presence or absence of excess CT9 or apratoxin, photolyzed, and the photo-crosslinked CT7/Sec61α adduct was detected by click chemistry with TAMRA-azide, followed by in-gel fluorescence imaging. See also Figures S1 and S2. Cell Chemical Biology 2016 23, 561-566DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2016.04.008) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Apratoxin Is a Broad-Spectrum Sec61 Inhibitor (A) In vitro translocation (IVT) assays for secreted proteins analyzed by protease protection. Full-length bovine prolactin (Prl), hamster binding immunoglobulin protein (Bip), and human hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) were translated in the presence of canine rough microsomes, 35S-methionine, and increasing concentrations of apratoxin. ER translocation was assessed by treatment with proteinase K (PK). It should be noted that BiP is largely protease resistant and upon PK treatment forms shorter fragments. The protease-protected species are indicated by a closed triangle. (B) IVT of integral membrane proteins analyzed without PK treatment. Apratoxin inhibits membrane insertion of human tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα), human mucolipin 1 (MCOLN), and human interleukin-7 receptor (IL7R). Correctly integrated glycosylated proteins and non-translocated unglycosylated species are indicated (closed and open triangles, respectively). The TNFα construct used contains an engineered glycosylation site (I134N) in its C-terminal ectodomain. CRM, canine rough microsomes; PK, proteinase K. (C) Schematic of membrane topologies of the integral membrane proteins assayed in (B). The putative glycosylation sites of the model proteins are indicated. Cell Chemical Biology 2016 23, 561-566DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2016.04.008) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Apratoxin Prevents Formation of an Early Pre-gating Intermediate (A) TNFα 126-mers containing an N-terminal FLAG- or HA-tag were translated in the presence or absence of 1 μM apratoxin and CRMs, solubilized with digitonin, and immunoprecipitated with anti-FLAG affinity resin. Immunoprecipitation eluates were analyzed by immunoblotting for FLAG-TNFα and Sec61α. (B) Autoradiograph showing microsome-targeted TNFα C30A 96-mers assembled in the presence or absence of CT8 or apratoxin (1 μM), isolated, and treated with bis-maleimidohexane (BMH) as indicated. Bands corresponding to the nascent chain (NC) and the NC crosslinked to Sec61α and Sec61β are indicated (for immunoprecipitation confirmation, see Figure S3). Residual NC-tRNA is also indicated. (C) BMH crosslinking reactions of TNFα 96-mers containing a single cysteine at indicated positions in the TMD. The intensities of NC crosslinked to Sec61α were quantified from the gels shown. (D) Nascent chain crosslinking intensities for Sec61α or Sec61β were quantified from phosphorimaging data in (C) and plotted as a function of cysteine position. (E) Model for apratoxin-mediated inhibition of translocation. Apratoxin does not affect RNC targeting to Sec61, but instead prevents the TMD from docking onto the Sec61 lateral gate. See also Figure S3. Cell Chemical Biology 2016 23, 561-566DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2016.04.008) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions