Non-Classroom Teacher Evaluation Guidelines

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Non-Classroom Teacher Evaluation Guidelines. The single most influential component of an effective school is the individual teachers within that school.
Advertisements

Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
A Vehicle to Promote Student Learning
Goals-Based Evaluation (GBE)
Educational Specialists Performance Evaluation System
TEACHER EVALUATIONS TEACHER EVALUATIONS An Orientation/Training Guide to the Eight Performance Appraisal Job Context Service Headings August, 2008.
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Purpose of Instruction
PORTFOLIO.
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
Marzano Causal Model: A Framework for Teaching and Learning
Training Module for Cooperating Teachers and Supervising Faculty
National Association for Sport and Physical Education (NASPE) PE Coordinator’s Mini-Conference Wednesday, March 14, 2012 Framework for Effective Teaching.
Understanding the EPC Rating rubrics
The Webster Groves School District’s Journey to a More Effective Evaluation Process September, 2014.
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Kyrene Professional Growth Plan
Differentiated Supervision
Your Mentoring Program: Step by Step including the Danielson Framework North Palos #117 Presenters: Marilyn Marino, NBCT – Mentor Coordinator David Creagan.
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
IES e-PATT Grant e-PATT: Parents and Teachers Together.
GTEP Resource Manual Training 2 The Education Trust Study (1998) Katie Haycock “However important demographic variables may appear in their association.
A New Approach to Assessment Based on extensive research that has identified teaching and instructional practices that are most effective in impacting.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
July 31, 2014 Dr. Ann-Marie Trammell.  BISD Learning Platform.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
BEGINNING EDUCATOR INDUCTION PROGRAM MEETING CCSD Professional Development Mrs. Jackie Miller Dr. Shannon Carroll August 6, 2014.
 When working with children, staff learns to communicate with a variety of people for different purposes:  Building relationships with colleagues 
Curriculum and Instruction: Management of the Learning Environment
Writing a Professional Development Plan.  Step 1–Identify Indicators to be Assessed  Step 2 –Determine Average Baseline Score  Step 3 –Develop a Growth.
HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Teacher Appraisal and Development System Update Training HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Learning Goals & Scales EAGLE POINT ELEMENTARY SEPTEMBER 16, 2015 SCHOOL PRESENTATION.
TLE The Basics…. Who is here today? Corner 1- New to OKCPS Corner 2- New to Teaching Corner 3- New to Oklahoma Corner 4- New to the U. S.
An Overview of Revisions to the Rhode Island Model
Supplemental Text Project Kenn Ward EDL 678 Dr. Pfennig June 2013.
1 OBSERVATION CYCLE: CONNECTING DOMAINS 1, 2, AND 3.
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
Tell Survey May 12, To encourage large response rates, the Kentucky Education Association, Kentucky Association of School Administrators, Kentucky.
Effective Supervision Supporting the Art and Science of Teaching An overview by Olivia L. Boucher Robert J. Marzano Tony Frontier David Livingston Robert.
Summative Evaluation Shasta Davis. Dimension: Preparation (Score- 4) Plans for instructional strategies that encourage the development of critical thinking,
Last Updated: 5/12/2016 Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS) Teacher Overview.
Human Capital Accountability
Sample evidences for Teacher Evaluation Robyn White
Thinking about assessment…
Avon Grove School District October 2009
2016 NC Teacher Working Conditions Survey Results
INSTRUCTIONAL EVALUATION SYSTEM
Advancing Student and Educator Growth through Peer Feedback
Wethersfield Teacher Evaluation and Support Plan
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
Transforming Grading Robert Marzano
What to include in your Portfolio؟
FEAPs (Florida Educator Accomplished Practices)
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
School Improvement Plans and School Data Teams
Instructional Learning Cycle:
Introduction to Core Professionalism
Resident Educator Program
Non-Classroom Teacher Evaluation Guidelines
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
An Overview April 2012.
SGM Mid-Year Conference Gina Graham
Welcome to Your New Position As An Instructor
OBSERVATION AND FEEDBACK
Teacher Practice Instruments
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Presentation transcript:

Non-Classroom Teacher Evaluation Guidelines September, 2012

“The single most influential component of an effective school is the individual teachers within that school.” Marzano (The Art and Science of Teaching, 2007) “A research-based evaluation/observation model can be instrumental in producing incremental gains in teacher expertise, which can produce incremental gains in student achievement.” Marzano (Effective Supervision, 2011)

The purpose of this presentation is to provide guidance for teachers and administrators in using the Santa Rosa District Schools Teacher Evaluation System for non-classroom based teachers.

District Philosophy Non-Classroom Teachers are expected to incorporate Marzano research-based strategies into their areas of work, just as core-curriculum teachers are. Currently the district will use one evaluation/observation instrument to measure all instructional personnel.

District Philosophy Non-classroom teachers will receive formal observations when appropriate. Non-classroom teacher formal observations could include: Facilitating meetings (teacher, parent, student, etc.) Facilitating school-wide activities Teaching a lesson Training staff Planning or gathering information

District Philosophy The main idea is that all instructional personnel begin to speak a “common language” based on Marzano research. Administrators will observe non-classroom teachers during lessons or job related activities and identify research strategies that impact student performance. Domains 2, 3, and 4 may be weighted more heavily for non-classroom instructional personnel as those domains are more readily observable outside of the regular classroom setting.

District philosophy Domains 2, 3, and 4 may be marked at any time they are observed. During a formal observation Following a post conference or feedback session Randomly as elements are observed during the course of the non-classroom teacher’s work day, but not associated with a formal or informal observation

Domain #1 Classroom Strategies & Behaviors Routine Event Tracking Student Progress Celebrating Success Addressing Content Enacted on the Spot Keep in mind that not all strategies and behaviors in Domain #1 may be observable. Only those on the instrument that apply should be marked. Unmarked indicators do not penalize a teacher’s final evaluation outcome.

Pointers for Domain #1 Research tells us that learning goals increase student achievement when they are visible to the students. Non-classroom teachers should also have learning goals. This may be handled in a variety of ways agreed upon by the instructional personnel and the site administrator. Learning goals should relate to the outcome expectations for activities non-classroom teachers are leading. (i.e., a learning goal may be to improve student interaction in the library, or increasing attendance, parent involvement, or student participation).

Pointers Domain #1 Ideas for posting the learning goals: Post your goals somewhere visible in your area. Some libraries have used a window with a poster board on the inside. Goals are written on the outside of the glass that can be erased and rewritten. Goals may be included in lesson plans or other ways agreed upon with your administrator. Learning goals should be referenced during the activity. Vary learning goals based on job needs.

Learning Goals Learning goals can remain the same for a day, week, a couple of weeks, or even a 9 week grading period in some instances for non-classroom instructional personnel. In some instances, for a non-classroom teacher, an annual learning goal may be appropriate.

Tracking Student Progress Identify items from your job activities that are track- able. (i.e., AR Data, lesson specific assignments or quizzes, attendance, participation, agendas).

Evaluation Student Evaluation Use rubrics or survey data to continually evaluate activity effectiveness. Research tells us that students telling us what they know increases learning. Non-classroom teachers may evaluate their activities using survey data, or feedback from groups of teachers or parents that has been well documented. This documentation should apply to the activity/activities targeted.

Grouping Students for learning Grouping students for learning for non-classroom based teachers could be related to work with students, teachers, parents, or other individuals on a daily basis. Do you wait for individuals to come to you, or do you take the initiative to plan and group them for collaboration? Are you proactive when issues arise? Point this out to your administrator in pre/post conferences or email this information in the event you are unable to speak face to face with administrators following an observation.

Domain #2 Planning & Preparing Planning and preparing for lessons Planning and preparing for use of materials and technology Planning and preparing for special needs of students The manner in which teachers design and organize the content for their class has a direct effect on student performance.

Domain #2 Considerations Effective planning includes prior knowledge, tracking student progress, monitoring student, teacher or parent engagement, and how you adhered to rules and procedures. Do you recognize when a lesson is not working? How flexible are you at adjusting activities on-the-fly? How do/did you make adjustments? Trained observers can readily observe teacher flexibility.

Planning (Domain #2) Lessons or focus activities should be data driven, applicable and leading toward a deeper understanding of material at hand. Plan books or calendars can reflect planning. Lesson Study is a great way to demonstrate effective planning to prepare a lesson that requires deeper understanding of content. Technology use should focus on the primary objective being taught not the technology itself.

Domain #3 Reflection on Teaching Evaluating Personal Performance

Domain #3 Considerations How effectively and accurately does the non-classroom teacher identify and evaluate activity success? Are actions regularly proactive in nature? What steps are consistently taken once activities are evaluated and needs identified?

Domain #4 Collegiality and Professionalism Promoting a positive environment Does the non-classroom based teacher adhere to district and school rules.

Domain #4 Considerations The teacher’s primary role is for the development of the student’s potential as a learner. How does the non-classroom based teacher interact with peers, students, administrators and parents? Does the non-classroom based teacher help extinguish or resolve negative conversations about others?

Domain #4 considerations Maintain honesty in all dealings Does not engage in harassment or make malicious or intentionally false statements about a colleague Does not misrepresent professional qualifications, and to submit fraudulent information on any document Maintain respect and confidence of colleagues by exhibiting the highest degree of ethical conduct.

Considerations Non-classroom teachers should ask, “How does the Marzano research strategies fit into what I am doing in my job?” Empower yourself! Know your lesson, activity or presentation Understand your instructional strategies (Plan to incorporate the research into your lessons, or activities even if it is one strategy at a time as they fit or are applicable.)

Specific Considerations Scaffold the new information (research strategies) into what you are already doing. As the research strategies are implemented, classroom instruction will look different.

Pre/Post Conference Meetings Use your pre/post conference meetings for your formal observations to point out strategies that you are using in your area that may not be directly observable. Point out strategies in your pre-conference meeting that you want the administrator to look for in your lesson or activity. Provide documentation. Reiterate lesson components in your post-conference meeting that may not have been directly observable. Provide documentation.

Pre/Post Conference/Formal Talk about the needs of your students and what the administrator can do to support your professional growth. Talk about your flexibility in meeting student needs. Do you stick to the plan, or do you make adjustments based on student/teacher needs? This may be adults that you work with at the school or district level instead of students.

Summary In summary, GOOD LUCK! Focus on strategies that are applicable to your area and apply them as they fit. Communicate with your administrator unique ways that you are implementing the research and focus strategies. GOOD LUCK!