Grid details of the NACA0015 Airfoil

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Property of Valeo – Duplication prohibited February WP6: CD Airfoil Test-case Experimental and numerical data base October 2008 S. Moreau VEC Manager.
Advertisements

CFD II w/Dr. Farouk By: Travis Peyton7/18/2015 Modifications to the SIMPLE Method for Non-Orthogonal, Non-Staggered Grids in k- E Turbulence Flow Model.
DESIGN OF AIRFOILS FOR WIND TURBINE BLADES Presented by Parezanovic Vladimir Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Belgrade University.
University of Southampton Southampton, UK
Andreas Krumbein > 30 January 2007 MIRACLE Final Meeting, ONERA Châtillon, Folie 1 Navier-Stokes High-Lift Airfoil Computations with Automatic Transition.
Static Extended Trailing Edge for Lift Enhancement: Experimental and Computational Studies T. Liu, J. Montefort, W. Liou Western Michigan University Kalamazoo,
The analysis of the two dimensional subsonic flow over a NACA 0012 airfoil using OpenFoam is presented. 1) Create the geometry and the flap Sequence of.
Computational Investigation of Two-Dimensional Ejector Performance
Development of Simulation Methodologies for Forced Mixers Anastasios Lyrintzis School of Aeronautics & Astronautics Purdue University.
Page 1© Crown copyright 2007 High-resolution modelling in support of T-REX observations Simon Vosper and Peter Sheridan Met Office, UK T-REX Workshop,
Meeting Report -Flow Past Airfoils NACA-0012
1 Effects of Inflow Forcing on Jet Noise Using Large Eddy Simulation P. Lew, A. Uzun, G. A. Blaisdell & A. S. Lyrintzis School of Aeronautics & Astronautics.
1/36 Gridless Method for Solving Moving Boundary Problems Wang Hong Department of Mathematical Information Technology University of Jyväskyklä
Flow past bluff-bodies
1 Hybrid RANS-LES modelling, single code & grid Juan Uribe - Nicolas Jarrin University of Manchester, PO Box 88, Manchester M60 1QD, UK.
 Purpose  Test design  Measurement system and Procedures  Uncertainty Analysis.
Applications of Adjoint Methods for Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Arron Melvin Adviser: Luigi Martinelli Princeton University FAA/NASA Joint University.
Janusz Podliński, Artur Berendt, Jerzy Mizeraczyk Centre for Plasma and Laser Engineering The Szewalski Institute of Fluid-Flow Machinery Polish Academy.
1 CFD Analysis Process. 2 1.Formulate the Flow Problem 2.Model the Geometry 3.Model the Flow (Computational) Domain 4.Generate the Grid 5.Specify the.
AE 1350 Lecture Notes #7 We have looked at.. Continuity Momentum Equation Bernoulli’s Equation Applications of Bernoulli’s Equation –Pitot’s Tube –Venturi.
Sandia is a multiprogram laboratory operated by Sandia Corporation, a Lockheed Martin Company, for the United States Department of Energy’s National Nuclear.
DUWIND, Delft University Wind Energy Institute 1 An overview of NACA 6-digit airfoil series characteristics with reference to airfoils for large wind turbine.
Steady control of laminar separation over airfoils with plasma sheet actuators Sosa Roberto Artana Guillermo Laboratorio de Fluidodinámica, Universidad.
Comparison of Numerical Predictions and Wind Tunnel Results for a Pitching Uninhabited Combat Air Vehicle Russell M. Cummings, Scott A. Morton, and Stefan.
Basic Study of Winglet Effects
Introduction Aerodynamic Performance Analysis of A Non Planar C Wing using Experimental and Numerical Tools Mano Prakash R., Manoj Kumar B., Lakshmi Narayanan.
I.Z. Naqavi 1, E. Savory 1 & R.J. Martinuzzi 2 1 Advanced Fluid Mechanics Research Group Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering The University.
Study of Oscillating Blades from Stable to Stalled Conditions 1 CFD Lab, Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Glasgow 2 Volvo Aero Corporation.
GLASGOW 2003 INTEGRATING CFD AND EXPERIMENT A Detailed CFD and Experimental Investigation of a Benchmark Turbulent Backward Facing Step Flow Stephen Hall.
Fluid Mechanics Laboratory University of Kentucky Active Control of Separation on a Wing with Conformal Camber David Munday and Jamey Jacob Department.
Cascade Flow Research Capability Following figures present experimental results dealing with the measurement of boundary layer development along the suction.
Engineering Engineer -> μηχανικος Engineering ?-> μηχανικη ?? (College of Engineering -> ???) Engineers create: -design and build machines, structures.
2D Airfoil Aerodynamics
Lecture 7: Unsteady Laminar Flow
1 Reduced-Order Modeling in the Frequency Domain for Actuated Flows Guy Ben-Dov* and Arne J. Pearlstein Department of Mechanical Science and Engineering.
The structure of turbulence in a shallow water wind-driven shear current with Langmuir circulation Andrés E. Tejada-Martínez and Chester E. Grosch Center.
1 Fluidic Load Control for Wind Turbine Blades C.S. Boeije, H. de Vries, I. Cleine, E. van Emden, G.G.M Zwart, H. Stobbe, A. Hirschberg, H.W.M. Hoeijmakers.
CFD Applications for Marine Foil Configurations Volker Bertram, Ould M
College of Engineering and Natural Sciences Mechanical Engineering Department 1 Project Number : PS 7.1 Rotorcraft Fuselage Drag Study using OVERFLOW-D2.
AE/ME 339 Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) K. M. Isaac Professor of Aerospace Engineering Introduction and Scope.
Compound Aircraft Transport 1) Mx – 1018 project B-29/F-84 2) Tom-Tom Project B-36F/F-84 Model Problems of Compound Flight Configuration IConfiguration.
Andreas Krumbein > 28 June th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii, Slide 1 Automatic Transition Prediction in Unsteady Airfoil.
DES Workshop, St. Petersburg, July 2./ DES at DLR Experience gained and Problems found K. Weinman, D.Schwamborn.
M.T. Arthur Integrating CFD and Experiments University of Glasgow, 8 th - 9 th September, 2003 Conference held in honour of Professor Bryan Richards The.
Turbomachinery Summary Equations. 2 Important Equations.
Fröhlich 9th IAHR / ERCOFTAC Workshop on Refined Turbulence Modelling, Darmstadt Test Case 9.2: Flow over a Series of Hills Presentation of Geometry.
Investigation of supersonic and hypersonic laminar shock/boundary-layer interactions R.O. Bura, Y.F.Yao, G.T. Roberts and N.D. Sandham School of Engineering.
XFLR5 Airfoil, Wing and Plane Analysis
Review of Airfoil Aerodynamics
A V&V Overview of the 31st Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics
Date of download: 10/7/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Swirl intensity influence on interaction between non-swirling and swirling co-axial jets in a combustor configuration: LES and modelling study S. Šarić,
With Andrew Magstadt and Dr. David Thayer
Partnerwise presentation
Control of Boundary Layer Structure for Low Re Blades
LARGE EDDY SIMILATIONS OF FULLY DEVELOPED TURBULENT CHANNEL FLOW
Fluid Mechanics & Hydraulics
APISAT 2010 Sep. 13~15, 2010, Xi’An, China
Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering
Model Problems of Compound Flight
Accurate Flow Prediction for Store Separation from Internal Bay M
Quantifying Cell Adhesion through Impingement of a Controlled Microjet
Steady-State Aerodynamics Codes for HAWTs
Analysis & Control of Profile Losses
The Dorr-Oliver Flotation cell
Accurate Flow Prediction for Store Separation from Internal Bay M
Prof. Dr. Mustafa Serdar GENÇ
Chapter 2 Navier-Stokes Modeling for HAWT by CFX 5.7
Low-Re Separation Control by Periodic Suction Surface Motion
14. Computational Fluid Dynamics
Presentation transcript:

Grid details of the NACA0015 Airfoil 14th of January 2008 Vassili Kitsios The University of Melbourne Université de Poitiers

Controlled with ZNMF-Jet Experimental Study NACA0015 with a ZNMF-Jet spanning entire leading edge normal to surface Key features Unsteady Laminar Separation Bubble (LSB) on suction surface ZNMF Jet used to reattach the flow Uncontrolled Controlled with ZNMF-Jet (Tuck & Soria 2004)

Experimental Study: Parameterisation Definition Range Explored in Experiments Greatest Lift Enhancement Re F+ cμ VR α Note: In the forthcoming LES model

Large Eddy Simulation (LES) Using Unstructured LES code CDP developed at Stanford CTR 3-D Dynamic Smagorinsky C-type Grid Configuration Domain size: (LC, LN, LZ) = (28c, 6c, 0.25c) Cell count: (NC, NN, NZ) = (650, 80, 128) ~6.6 Million Cells C N

Large Eddy Simulation (LES) Using Unstructured LES code CDP developed at Stanford CTR 3-D Dynamic Smagorinsky C-type Grid Configuration

LES: Viscous Cell Sizes On suction side of airfoil ∆x+ < 20 ∆y+ < 1 ∆z+ < 10

LES: Uncontrolled Streamlines α=18o The following comparison is for NZ= 40 as the NZ= 128 case is not yet statistically stationary Integrated forces agree with the measurements to within experimental error Qualitatively agreement of flow field PIV LES (NZ = 8) Taken at mid plane of airfoil