Cadre 8 Training, October 9, 2012 DIETS & Drivers.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Designing School Level Professional Development. Overview Assessing prior knowledge of professional development Defining professional development Designing.
SISEP IN ILLINOIS INTEGRATED SYSTEM FOR STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT August 7, 2009 Directors Conference Peoria, IL.
Implementation Science overview
SISEP Dean Fixsen, Karen Blase, Rob Horner, and George Sugai
BEST PRACTICES in RtI to Theresa M. Janczak, Ph.D.
Using the PBIS Tiered Fidelity Inventory (TFI) E-12
April 10, 2013 SPDG Implementation Science Webinar #3: Organization Drivers.
Welcome Coaching Competency Driver Thanks to State Implementation & Scaling-up of Evidence Based Practices Oregon.
The Council of Chief State School Officers State Consortium on Educator Effectiveness (SCEE) February 14, 2012 Implementing Your Educator Effectiveness.
Implementation Science
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
The Role and Expectations for School-wide PBS Coaches Rob Horner and George Sugai OSEP TA-Center on PBS Pbis.org.
Evidence-based Professional Development
Welcome Oregon Scaling-up EBISS Coaching Makes a Difference Expanding and Refining the Coaches Role Oregon 1.
Welcome Oregon Scaling-up EBISS The District Data Team Meeting Blending Behavioral and Academic Multi-tiered Systems of Support Oregon.
Dean Fixsen, Karen Blase, Rob Horner, and George Sugai University of North Carolina – Chapel Hill University of Oregon University of Connecticut Scaling.
The District Role in Implementing and Sustaining PBIS
9/15/20151 Scaling Up Presentation: SIG/SPDG Regional Meeting October 2009 Marick Tedesco, Ph.D. State Transformation Specialist for Scaling Up.
Allison Metz, Ph.D., Karen Blase, Ph.D., Dean L. Fixsen, Ph.D., Rob Horner, Ph.D., George Sugai, Ph.D. Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute.
No, Not the Drivers Again! (Or, RTI is a Journey Not a Destination)
Building Capacity with Implementation Drivers
Maine’s Response to Intervention Implementation: Moving Forward Presented by: Barbara Moody Title II Coordinator Maine Department of Education.
V Implementing and Sustaining Effective Programs and Services that Promote the Social-Emotional Development of Young Children Part I Karen Blase, Barbara.
Implementation Science 101 Vestena Robbins, PhD Kentucky Dept for Behavioral Health, Developmental and Intellectual Disabilities.
Implementation Science Vision 21: Linking Systems of Care June 2015 Lyman Legters.
“Current systems support current practices, which yield current outcomes. Revised systems are needed to support new practices to generate improved outcomes.”
Cynthia M. Anderson, University of Oregon Lisa Bateman, Bethel School District Bruce Stiller, School District 4j Chris Borgmeier, Portland State University.
Implementing School-wide PBIS Pennsylvania PBIS Implementer’s Forum Rob Horner University of Oregon.
Heidi Erstad and Peg Mazeika, Technical Assistance Coordinators Wisconsin RtI Center Bridget Blask, Rachel Blum, and Leslie Connors Franklin Elementary.
Coaches Training Introduction Data Systems and Fidelity.
Team Choice Activity What would it be like to present to the school board and district leadership? 1.Need for a District Leadership Implementation Team.
Implementation Drivers March 23, 2012
Oregon RTI The Who, What & How of Participation in
MiBLSi Systems of Support for Training October 9,
Michelle A. Duda, Ph.D. Melissa Van Dyke, LCSW Chris Borgmeier, Ph.D. Susan Davis, NC SPDG Margaret McGlinchey, MI SPDG Evidence-based Professional Development.
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
Oregon Response to Intervention Leadership Readiness Training: Tier 2 & 3 Practices 9/30/14 District Leadership Team Webinar.
Coaching for Competence Margie McGlinchey SPDG Regional Mtg. October 1, 2009 Steve Goodman Margie McGlinchey Kathryn Schallmo Co-Directors.
A Framework for Making a Difference Rob Horner, University of Oregon Deputy Director of the Research to Practice Division for the U.S. Department of Education’s.
How Do We Do This? Educate all students: – Build upon prior knowledge and experience –Address a wide range of skill levels –Instruct utilizing various.
New Coaches Training. Michael Lombardo Director Interagency Facilitation Rainbow Crane Behavior RtI Coordinator
Critical Elements Effective teaching Alignment of curriculum and instruction to standards Instructional program coherence Fidelity of implementation Evaluation.
Introduction to Coaching School-Wide PBS:RtIB. 2 Agenda PBS:RtIB Brief Overview Coaching Tier 1 Coaching Skills and Activities Resources and Barriers.
A collaborative project between the Florida Department of Education and the University of South Florida PS/RtI Train the Trainers Regional Meetings.
Scaling Up in Illinois Integrated System for Student Achievement (ISSA)
Putting it all together: How Facilitative Administrations can use Performance Assessment and a Comprehensive Assessment System to support Staff Competency.
Rob Horner OSEP Center on PBIS Jon Potter Oregon RTI David Putnam Oregon RTI.
DEVELOPING AN EVALUATION SYSTEM BOB ALGOZZINE AND STEVE GOODMAN National PBIS Leadership Forum Hyatt Regency O’Hare Rosemont, Illinois October 14, 2010.
Notes by Ben Boerkoel, Kent ISD, based on a training by Beth Steenwyk.
Michelle A. Duda, Ph.D., BCBA, Dean L. Fixsen, Ph.D. & Karen A. Blase Ph.D., Melissa Van Dyke, LCSW Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute University.
Scaling Up Improved Education Dean L. Fixsen, Ph.D. & Karen A. Blase, Ph.D. University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill Rob Horner, Ph.D. University of.
Integrated System for Student Achievement SISEP in Illinois.
IN-SIG: FOUNDATIONS & RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION November 1, 2007.
Circe Stumbo, West Wind Education Policy Inc. and CCSSO CCSSO/SCEE National Summit on Educator Effectiveness April 10, 2013 Implementation Science: Closing.
Choice Activity What would it be like to present to the school board and district leadership? 1.The need for an EBISS District Leadership Implementation.
Help to develop, improve, and sustain educators’ competence and confidence to implement effective educational practices and supports. Help ensure sustainability.
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE OVERVIEW. CONTEXT & RATIONALE.
Understanding Implementation and Leadership in School Mental Health.
Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental IV: Multi-Tiered System of Supports.
District Implementation of PBIS C-1 Rob Horner Brian Megert University of Oregon Springfield School District.
Michelle A. Duda Barbara Sims Dean L. Fixsen Karen A. Blase October 2, 2012 Making It Happen With Active Implementation Frameworks: Implementation Drivers.
Introduction to the Grant August-September, 2012 Facilitated/Presented by: The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel Development Grant (SPDG) project.
Tier 1 Positive Behavior Support Response to Intervention for Behavior Faculty Overview.
Coaching PLC April 5, 2011 Pat Mueller
Coaching for Impact Susan Barrett
Coaching as a Process Not a Person
Miblsi.cenmi.org Helping Students Become Better Readers with Social Skills Necessary for Success Steve Goodman Funded through OSEP.
Bringing RTI to Scale in Oregon
Presentation transcript:

Cadre 8 Training, October 9, 2012 DIETS & Drivers

All over the road! Weve inspected the whole vehicle: – RTI Essential elements – Core – Change But not HOW to maintain your car and keep it running smoothly for years… Where Weve Been

For too long we have focused on the what and not paid enough attention to the how of implementation Rob Horner

Good Intentions Actual Supports Years 1-3 Outcomes Every Teacher TrainedFewer than 50% of the teachers received some training Fewer than 10% of the schools used the CSR as intended Every Teacher Continually Supported Fewer than 25% of those teachers received support Vast majority of students did not benefit Aladjem & Borman, 2006; Vernez, Karam, Mariano, & DeMartini, 2006 Longitudinal Studies of a Variety of Comprehensive School Reforms Failure to Improve

Implementation Gone Wrong Insert video of the robbery

Integrated & Compensatory The How of Implementation: Drivers © Fixsen & Blase, 2007 Staff Competence Organization Supports Leadership Coaching Training Selection Performance Assessment (Fidelity) Systems Intervention Facilitative Administration Decision Support Data System Student Benefit Technical Adaptive

DIET-DB District Implementation Evaluation Tool– District Based (DIET-DB) District Implementation Evaluation Tool– District Based (DIET-DB) Indicator to Monitor Progress and guide planning Completed by district TEAM with guidance from OrRTI Coach 2X/year

DIET-DB: Selection

DIET-DB: Training

OUTCOMES (% of Participants who Demonstrate Knowledge, Demonstrate new Skills in a Training Setting, and Use new Skills in the Classroom) TRAINING COMPONENTS Knowledge Skill Demonstration Use in the Classroom Theory and Discussion 10% 5% 0% + Demonstration in Training 30%20% 0% + Practice & Feedback in training 60% 5% + Coaching in Classroom 95% Joyce and Showers, 2002 DIET-DB: Coaching

DIET-DB: Performance Assessments DIET-DB DIET-SB Elementary Schools Coaching Feedback Document Elementary Schools Coaching Feedback Document Elementary EBIS Team Planning Survey Fidelity and Walk Through Tools

DIET-DB: Performance Assessments

Decision Support Data System

Facilitative Administration Provide staff with support PEP – PIP Eliminate barriers Ensure fidelity

Facilitative Administration

DIET-DB: Systems Intervention Engage and grow champions Celebrate Success Access external support

DIET-DB: Systems Intervention

DIET-SB Measure the degree to which ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS of RTI are being implemented fully at each elementary school

DIET-SB 1.Leadership 2.Teaming 3.Research-Based Core (Tier 1) 4.Research-Based Interventions (Tier 2 & 3) 5.Screening 6.Progress Monitoring 7.Professional Development 8.(Coaching*)

End of DIET