J. García-Serrano (LOCEAN/IPSL, BSC), C. Frankignoul (LOCEAN/IPSL)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The role of the stratosphere in extended- range forecasting Thomas Jung Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research Germany.
Advertisements

The midlatitude influence of the AMOC onto the atmosphere Guillaume Gastineau 1, Blandine L’Hévéder 2, Francis Codron 2, Claude Frankignoul 1 1 LOCEAN/IPSL.
Seasonal to decadal prediction of the Arctic Oscillation D. Smith, A. Scaife, A. Arribas, E. Blockley, A. Brookshaw, R.T. Clark, N. Dunstone, R. Eade,
Euro-Atlantic winter atmospheric response to the Tropical Atlantic Variability T. Losada (1), B. Rodríguez-Fonseca (1), J. García- Serrano (1) C.R. Mechoso.
How does the QBO affect the stratospheric polar vortex? Peter Watson, Lesley Gray Atmospheric, Oceanic and Planetary Physics, Oxford University Peter Watson.
Can the Stratosphere Control the Extratropical Circulation Response to Surface Forcing? Chris Fletcher and Paul Kushner Atmospheric Physics Group University.
Stratosphere-Troposphere Coupling and Links with Eurasian Land Surface Variability Cohen et. al, 2007: Journal of Climate, 20, Adam Turchioe.
The influence of the stratosphere on tropospheric circulation and implications for forecasting Nili Harnik Department of Geophysics and Planetary Sciences,
Spring Onset in the Northern Hemisphere: A Role for the Stratosphere? Robert X. Black Brent A. McDaniel School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences Georgia.
NACLIM Annual Meeting, 14-15/10/2014 J. García-Serrano, C. Frankignoul LOCEAN-IPSL, Paris, France On the feedback of the winter NAO-driven sea ice anomalies.
M.Vicomte (1),C. Claud (1), M. Rojo (1), P.-E. Mallet (1), T. Laffineur (2) (1)CNRS/IPSL/LMD, Palaiseau, France (UPMC) (2) ENM, Météo France, Toulouse,
Enhanced seasonal forecast skill following SSWs DynVar/SNAP Workshop, Reading, UK, April 2013 Michael Sigmond (CCCma) John Scinocca, Slava Kharin.
Mojib Latif, Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research and Kiel University
Review of Northern Winter 2010/11
© Crown copyright /0653 Met Office and the Met Office logo are registered trademarks Met Office Hadley Centre, FitzRoy Road, Exeter, Devon, EX1.
Influence of the stratosphere on surface winter climate Adam Scaife, Jeff Knight, Anders Moberg, Lisa Alexander, Chris Folland and Sarah Ineson. CLIVAR.
Atlantic water transports to the Arctic and their impact on sea ice
Winter sea ice variability in the Barents Sea C. Herbaut, M.-N. Houssais et A.-C. Blaizot LOCEAN, UPMC.
Stratospheric harbingers of anomalous weather regimes. M.P. Baldwin and T.J Dunkerton Science, 294:581. Propagation of the Arctic Oscillation from.
NACLIM CT1/CT3 1 st CT workshop April 2013 Hamburg (DE) Johann Jungclaus.
NACLIM CT1-3 meeting, at MPI, 19-20/03/2014 On the predictability of the winter North Atlantic Oscillation: lagged influence of autumn Arctic sea-ice and.
Recent variability of the solar spectral irradiance and its impact on climate modelling - TOSCA WG1 Workshop, May 2012, Berlin Stratospheric and tropospheric.
Long-Term Changes in Northern and Southern Annular Modes Part I: Observations Christopher L. Castro AT 750.
Decadal predictability of winter SST in the Nordic Seas and Barents Sea in three CMIP5 models NACLIM ANNUAL MEETING, OCTOBER 14, 2014 BERLIN H. R. Langehaug,
Only 1 major sudden stratospheric warming (SSW) observed in SH (2002) but minor warmings occurred in 2009 and 2012 NH events occur in 3 out of every 5.
S 1 Core Theme 1 Predictability of core ocean and atmosphere quantities UHAM, MPG, UPMC, GEOMAR, NERSC.
CT1/CT3 Meeting April 2013 Hamburg Predictability associated with the Atlantic ocean SST variability G. Gastineau, J. Garcia-Serrano, C. Frankignoul.
Page 1© Crown copyright 2004 The Hadley Centre The forcing of sea ice characteristics by the NAO in HadGEM1 UK Sea Ice Workshop, 9 September 2005 Chris.
A dynamical/statistical approach to predict multidecadal AMOC variability and related North Atlantic SST anomalies Mojib Latif GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre.
Modes of variability and teleconnections: Part II Hai Lin Meteorological Research Division, Environment Canada Advanced School and Workshop on S2S ICTP,
Climate Variability and Basin Scale Forcing over the North Atlantic Jim Hurrell Climate and Global Dynamics Division National Center for Atmospheric Research.
© Crown copyright Met Office Strategy for Seasonal Prediction Development: UKMO and WGSIP activities Adam Scaife Head Monthly to Decadal Prediction Met.
The ENSO Signal in Stratospheric Temperatures from Radiosonde Observations Melissa Free NOAA Air Resources Lab Silver Spring 1.
MICHAEL A. ALEXANDER, ILEANA BLADE, MATTHEW NEWMAN, JOHN R. LANZANTE AND NGAR-CHEUNG LAU, JAMES D. SCOTT Mike Groenke (Atmospheric Sciences Major)
Observed influence of North Pacific SST anomalies on the atmospheric circulation Claude Frankignoul and Nathalie Sennéchael LOCEAN/IPSL, Université Pierre.
Page 1© Crown copyright 2007 Influence of ENSO on European Climate via the Stratosphere Sarah Ineson and Adam Scaife 2007.
1 Assessment of the CFSv2 real-time seasonal forecasts for 2014 Wanqiu Wang, Mingyue Chen, and Arun Kumar CPC/NCEP/NOAA.
Tentative reconstruction of the recent Hiatus using IPSL-CM5A-LR
June Haiyan Teng NCAR/CGD
Makoto INOUE and Masaaki TAKAHASHI (CCSR, Univ. of Tokyo)
Changes in the Melt Season and the Declining Arctic Sea Ice
Seasonal Forecast of Antarctic Sea Ice
Seasonal Arctic heat budget in CMIP5 models
Working Group on Seasonal-to-Interannual Prediction
15th EMS Annual Meeting & 12th ECAM | 07– | Sofia, Bulgaria
Variation of tropical cyclone season in the western North Pacific
Climate and Global Dynamics Laboratory, NCAR
CNU-KOPRI-KMA activities for winter climate prediction
IRI Multi-model Probability Forecasts
WP4: Enhancing the capacity of seasonal-to-decadal predictions in the Arctic and over the Northern Hemisphere Daniela Matei (MPI) and Noel Keenlyside (UiB)
The role of Arctic sea ice in defining European extreme winters
Task 3.2 : Arctic warming impacts : role of air-sea coupling
Overview of 2016/17 Winter Climate over South Korea
The Interannual variability of the Arctic energy budget
Why Should We Care About the Stratosphere?
Antarctic Sea Ice Variability in the CCSM2 Control Simulation
The Climate System TOPICS ENSO Impacts Seasonal Climate Forecasts
The Arctic Ocean in CMIP5 Simulations
Tropical/extratropical forcing on wintertime variability of the extratropical temperature and circulation Bin Yu1 and Hai Lin2 1. Climate Research Division,
ENSO-NAO interactions via the stratosphere
Alexey Karpechko & Elisa Manzini
Prospects for Wintertime European Seasonal Prediction
Impact of SIC/SST for multi-decadal climatic trends; Results from coordinated AGCM experiments Fumiaki Ogawa1,2, Yongqi Gao2,3, Noel Keenlyside1,2, Torben.
Liping Zhang, Thomas L. Delworth, Will Cooke, and Xiaosong Yang
Nonlinearity of atmospheric response
Strat-trop interaction and Met Office seasonal forecasting
Extratropical Climate and Variability in CCSM3
Ocean/atmosphere variability related to the development of tropical Pacific sea-surface temperature anomalies in the CCSM2.0 and CCSM3.0 Bruce T. Anderson,
Characteristics of 2018/2019 winter monsoon in Japan
Presentation transcript:

J. García-Serrano (LOCEAN/IPSL, BSC), C. Frankignoul (LOCEAN/IPSL) M-CLIX workshop, 5-7 Oct 2015 Predictability of the Euro-Atlantic climate from Arctic sea-ice variability J. García-Serrano (LOCEAN/IPSL, BSC), C. Frankignoul (LOCEAN/IPSL) with contributions/feedback: [OBS] G. Gastineau (LOCEAN/IPSL), A. de la Cámara (LMD/IPSL, NCAR) [MOD] A. Arribas (MetOffice), Y. Gao (NERSC/BCCR), V. Guemas (BSC, CNRM), M. P. King (URC/BCCR), D. Matei (MPI-M), R. Msadek (GFDL, CERFACS), W. Park (GEOMAR), E. Sanchez-Gomez (CERFACS)

M-CLIX workshop, 5-7 Oct 2015 might be non-linear to SIC reduction! Inoue et al. (2012, GRL) Z250 / WAF (DJF) Kim et al. (2014, Nat.Comms) Honda et al. (2009, GRL) Grassi et al. (2013, JCLIM) might be non-linear to SIC reduction! Petoukhov and Semenov (2010, JGR) RECENT REVIEWS: Bader et al. 2011; Cohen et al. 2014; Vihma 2014; Walsh 2014; Gao et al. 2015; Overland et al. 2015

M-CLIX workshop, 5-7 Oct 2015 the equilibrium response to SIC reduction over G-B Seas, which projects on the negative NAO, is reached in about two months Deser et al. (2007, JCLIM)

M-CLIX workshop, 5-7 Oct 2015 detrended, monthly anomalies; period 1979-2013; target – cold season (Sep-to-Feb)

M-CLIX workshop, 5-7 Oct 2015 might be linked to winter blocking over Eurasia Mori et al. 2014 (Nat.Geosci); García-Serrano et al. (2015, JCLIM) but the lead-time is longer than the expected atmospheric response time to SIC forcing detrended, monthly anomalies; period 1979-2013; target – cold season (Sep-to-Feb)

M-CLIX workshop, 5-7 Oct 2015 detrended, monthly anomalies; period 1979-2013; target – cold season (Sep-to-Feb)

M-CLIX workshop, 5-7 Oct 2015 García-Serrano et al. (2015, JCLIM); similar to King et al. (2015, ClimDyn) STRATOSPHERIC PATHWAY Honda et al. (2009, GRL)

M-CLIX workshop, 5-7 Oct 2015 detrended, monthly anomalies; period 1979-2013; target – cold season (Sep-to-Feb) García-Serrano et al. (2015, JCLIM); in agreement with Scaife et al. (2014, GRL) and Koenigk et al. (2015, ClimDyn)

M-CLIX workshop, 5-7 Oct 2015 detrended, monthly anomalies; period 1979-2013; target – cold season (Sep-to-Feb)

García-Serrano and Frankignoul (2015, ClimDyn – under review) M-CLIX workshop, 5-7 Oct 2015 Deser et al. (2007, JCLIM) García-Serrano and Frankignoul (2015, ClimDyn – under review)

TROPOSPHERIC DYNAMICS M-CLIX workshop, 5-7 Oct 2015 Deser et al. (2007, JCLIM) TROPOSPHERIC DYNAMICS García-Serrano and Frankignoul (2015, ClimDyn – under review)

M-CLIX workshop, 5-7 Oct 2015 detrended, monthly anomalies; period 1979-2013; target – cold season (Sep-to-Feb) CMIP5: no multi-model, each model individually; CCSM4 (5mb), CNRM-CM5 (10mb), EC-EARTH2.3 (3mb), GFDL-CM2.1 (10mb), HadGEM2-ES (4mb), IPSL-CM5A-LR (3mb), MPI-ESM-MR (3mb), NorESM1-M (3mb) - HISTORICAL RUNS

eG Dec / SLP Feb: resembles the observed MCA mode (with 2-month lag); SLP anomalies over Polar Cap change sign from Dec to Jan, and amplify into Feb (statistical significance as well); lagged SLP anomalies over North Atlantic become stronger in Mar (also Z200), likely eddy-driven

M-CLIX workshop, 5-7 Oct 2015 eG Dec / SLP Feb: anomalous anticyclone over northern Siberia (Z200) consistent with direct linear response to SIC reduction (see SLP). there is no clear weakening of the polar vortex in Dec (Z050), and in Jan it’s not significant; it becomes significant in Feb (not shown), once the AO-like anomaly is established in the troposphere (Jan-Feb), suggesting that tropospheric dynamics is key in driving the lagged anomalies whereas the stratosphere acts as positive feedback (e.g. Ambaum and Hoskins 2002)

M-CLIX workshop, 5-7 Oct 2015 eG Dec / SLP Jan: resembles the observed MCA mode with SIC in Nov (with 1-month lag), but different timing (Dec->Jan vs Nov->Dec); it yields anomalous anticyclone over Siberia preceding the negative NAO-like pattern

M-CLIX workshop, 5-7 Oct 2015 eG Dec / SLP Jan: anomalous anticyclone over northern Siberia (Z200) consistent with direct linear response to SIC reduction (see SLP); Z200 anomalies show some downstream extension, with negative anomalies over eastern Eurasia-western North Pacific (as shown in observations). there is a weakening of the polar vortex in Dec (Z050), projecting on a wavenumber-2 structure, preceding the establishment of the negative NAO-like patter at surface (in Jan), suggesting that a stratospheric pathway could act as driving mechanism

M-CLIX workshop, 5-7 Oct 2015 eG Oct / SLP Nov: it resembles the observed MCA with SIC in Nov (1-month lag towards negative NAO-like), but different timing – prior to obs (Oct->Nov vs Nov->Dec) vs CNRM and EC-EARTH showing 1-month delay; it also shows anomalous anticyclone over Siberia

M-CLIX workshop, 5-7 Oct 2015 eG Oct / SLP Nov: the anomalous anticyclone over northern Siberia (Z200) shows some baroclinicity (cf. SLP), consistent with direct linear response to SIC reduction. there is also an apparent downstream propagation of anomalies. the weakening of the polar vortex in Oct (Z050), preceding the establishment of the negative NAO-like patter at surface (in Nov), is quite barotropic - projecting on a mixture of wavenumber-2 structure and vortex displacement. in Jan, the weakening remains. these results suggest an active role of the stratosphere in driving the lagged negative NAO-like pattern. NOTE: the polar vortex is probably developing at this time (Oct-Nov)

M-CLIX workshop, 5-7 Oct 2015 eG Feb / SLP Apr: resembles observations with SIC in Dec (2-month lag), with SIC reduction over Greenland-Barents Seas followed by negative NAO-like pattern; in Mar (b) the circulation anomalies already show a negative NAO signature, but not significant – likely eddy-feedback

M-CLIX workshop, 5-7 Oct 2015 eG Feb / SLP Apr: anomalous anticyclone over northern Siberia (Z200) consistent with direct linear response to SIC reduction (see SLP). there is no clear weakening of the polar vortex in Feb (Z050) – barotropic anomaly over USA, and in Mar it’s not significant; it becomes significant in Apr (not shown), once the NAO-like anomaly is established in the troposphere, suggesting that tropospheric dynamics is key in driving the lagged anomalies / eddy-driven

M-CLIX workshop, 5-7 Oct 2015 SUMMARY CMIP5 models analysed here show a significant link with sea-ice reduction over the eastern Arctic (Greenland-Barents-Kara Seas) followed by a negative NAO-like pattern If the simulated relationship takes one month – the results suggest (in general) that a stratospheric pathway could be at play [in observations, this is shown for SIC in Nov] If the simulated relationship takes two months – the results suggest (in general) that tropospheric dynamics is dominant [in observations, this is shown for SIC in Dec] Sea-ice information should be incorporated in seasonal forecast systems

M-CLIX workshop, 5-7 Oct 2015 J. García-Serrano, C. Frankignoul, G. Gastineau, A. de la Cámara (2015): On the predictability of the winter Euro-Atlantic climate: lagged influence of autumn Arctic sea ice. J Clim 28:5195-5216. J. García-Serrano and C. Frankignoul (2015): On the feedback of the winter NAO-driven sea ice anomalies. Clim Dyn (under review) J. García-Serrano, C. Frankignoul, A. Arribas, Y. Gao, V. Guemas, M. P. King, D. Matei, R. Msadek, W. Park, E. Sanchez-Gomez (2016): Reproducibility assessment of the observed links between Arctic sea-ice variability and the Euro-Atlantic atmospheric circulation in CMIP5 present climate. (in elaboration) The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union 7th Framework Programme (FP7 2007-2013), under grant agreement n.308299 (NACLIM – www.naclim.eu)

eG Oct / SLP Nov: resembles the observational one-month lagged linkage, but with SIC reduction over northern-BK and Laptev Seas.

eG Oct / SLP Nov: anomalous anticyclone over northern Siberia (Z200), consistent with response to SIC reduction (cf. SLP), but confined to polar latitudes; this could help interpreting the nagative AO-like pattern established in one month but without stratospheric pathway. no clear weakening of the polar vortex in Oct (Z050) is found, indeed. the polar vortex shows significant anomalies in Nov (c), once the AO has been established; this suggests a dominant role of tropospheric dynamics

might be linked to winter blocking over Eurasia Mori et al. 2014 (Nat.Geosci); García-Serrano et al. (2015, JCLIM) but the lead-time is longer than the expected atmospheric response time to SIC forcing OBS MOD Mori et al. (2014, Nat.Geosci)

M-CLIX workshop, 5-7 Oct 2015 García-Serrano et al. (2015, JCLIM); similar to King et al. (2015, ClimDyn) STRATOSPHERIC PATHWAY