Content of an M&E Matrix

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 UN Coherence: High level monitoring and evaluation approach.
Advertisements

Results Based Monitoring (RBM)
Introduction to the Results Framework. What is a Results Framework? Graphic and narrative representation of a strategy for achieving a specific objective.
Data Quality Considerations
Srinivasulu Rajendran Centre for the Study of Regional Development (CSRD) Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) New Delhi India
Indicator Performance Tracking Table
Evaluation Capacity Building Identifying and Addressing the Fields Needs.
Towards a model M&E system for AIDS programs Kampala April
Overview M&E Capacity Strengthening Workshop, Maputo 19 and 20 September 2011.
Donald T. Simeon Caribbean Health Research Council
Bridging food security and nutrition
Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance III Project (FANTA) FHI Connecticut Ave., NW Washington, DC Tel: Fax:
Improving Program Outcomes: Workshop on Uses of Title II Reporting Requirements Beatrice Lorge Rogers Tufts University TOPS FSN Knowledge Management Workshop.
Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance III Project (FANTA) FHI Connecticut Ave., NW Washington, DC Tel: Fax:
A new vision for agriculture and nutrition - Implications for accountability and impact measurement Bibi Giyose, FAO Senior Nutrition Policy and Programme.
HUMANITARIAN RESPONSE MONITORING. HOW TO USE THIS PRESENTATION This presentation contains a complete overview of all aspects of Response Monitoring Presenting.
Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance III Project (FANTA) FHI Connecticut Ave., NW Washington, DC Tel: Fax:
Sierra Leone Consortium for Relief and Development (CORAD) CARE Int., AFRICARE, Catholic Relief Services, World Vision Int. Action Plan for Making Monitoring.
Dimensions of Data Quality M&E Capacity Strengthening Workshop, Addis Ababa 4 to 8 June 2012 Arif Rashid, TOPS.
M&E Plan Overview M&E Capacity Strengthening Workshop Addis Ababa
Monitoring & Evaluation in World Bank Agriculture and Rural Development Operations SASAR Monitoring & Evaluation Workshop New Delhi; June 20, 2006.
Developing a Strategy: Managing the process Neil Fantom Development Data Group.
IRRIGATION, RURAL LIVELIHOODS AND AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT 1 MONITORING AND EVALUATION: GOOD PRACTICES REGIONAL IMPLEMENTATION WORKSHOP FOR IFAD-
1 Improving Community Health Worker Programs. USAID HEALTH CARE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT HCI’s CHW Program Improvement Work CHW AIM (The Community Health Worker.
Student Learning Objectives The SLO Process Student Learning Objectives Training Series Module 3 of 3.
Monitoring the Impact of the IFAD-funded Participatory Resource Management Project (PRMP) in Tuyen Quang Province, Viet Nam Objectives of PRMP Improved.
The Evaluation Plan.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Planning a Statistical Project Section A 1.
Multisector Program Integration
TOPS Gender Task Force M&E Capacity Strengthening Workshop, Addis Ababa 4 to 8 June 2012 Kristi Tabaj, TOPS/Save the Children.
Understanding Indicators M&E Capacity Strengthening Workshop Addis Ababa 4 to 8 June 2012 Arif Rashid, TOPS.
MARKETS II M&E FRAMEWORK AND CHALLENGES Joseph Obado.
Tracking national portfolios and assessing results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points Western and Central Africa Dakar, May 2007.
Development Hypothesis or Theory of Change M&E Capacity Strengthening Workshop, Maputo 19 and 20 September 2011 Arif Rashid, TOPS.
SUB-MODULE 5. MEANS OF VERIFICATION RESULTS BASED LOGICAL FRAMEWORK TRAINING Quality Assurance and Results Department (ORQR.2)
TANZANIA’S MONITORING SYSTEM: CHALLENGES AND WAY FORWARD BY EKINGO MAGEMBE POVERTY MONITORING OFFICER (MoF-TANZANIA )
M&E requirements for grant signing: M&E Plan Workshop on effective Global Fund Grant negotiation and implementation planning January 2008 Manila,
Sources of Errors M&E Capacity Strengthening Workshop, Addis Ababa 4 to 8 June 2012 Arif Rashid, TOPS.
Presented by: Shubha Chakravarty (Economist, AFTPM) Impact Evaluation team: Mattias Lundberg (Sr. Economist, HDNCY) Markus Goldstein (Sr. Economist, AFTPM.
Tracking national portfolios and assessing results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in West and Central Africa June 2008, Douala, Cameroon.
Africa RISING M&E Expert Meeting Addis Ababa, 5-7 September 2012.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Breastfeeding rates and practices: Monitoring, evaluation and research gaps.
Changing the way the New Zealand Aid Programme monitors and evaluates its Aid Ingrid van Aalst Principal Evaluation Manager Development Strategy & Effectiveness.
Deeping Skill in Working with Logical Frameworks Examples.
Monitoring Afghanistan, 2015 Food Security and Agriculture Working Group – 9 December 2015.
27/04/2017 Strengthening of the Monitoring and Evaluation system for FTPP/FTTP in FAO /SEC December 2015 FTPP/FTFP Workshop, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan.
Does the value chain approach help the most vulnerable?
HUMANITARIAN RESPONSE MONITORING. HOW TO USE THIS PRESENTATION This presentation contains a complete overview of all aspects of Response Monitoring Presenting.
Evaluation Results MRI’s Evaluation Activities: Surveys Teacher Beliefs and Practices (pre/post) Annual Participant Questionnaire Data Collection.
Company LOGO. Company LOGO PE, PMP, PgMP, PME, MCT, PRINCE2 Practitioner.
Introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation. Learning Objectives By the end of the session, participants will be able to: Define program components Define.
Development of Gender Sensitive M&E: Tools and Strategies.
Introduction to Group Work. Learning Objectives The goal of the group project is to provide workshop participants with an opportunity to further develop.
An Overview of CLP-2’s M&E System. What was our baseline?
MEASURE Evaluation Data Quality Assurance Workshop Session 3 Introduction to Routine Data Quality Assessment.
Developing a Monitoring & Evaluation Plan MEASURE Evaluation.
Building an ENI CBC project
Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) Plan
Session VII: Formulation of Monitoring and Evaluation Plan
Session: 5 Using the RDQA tool for System Assessment
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 2. Session 6. Developing indicators.
Mercy Corps PAHAL Data Use
منهج الإطار المنطقي وإطار الرصد والتقييم وإطار النتائج
Session: 6 Understanding & Using the RDQA Tool Output
Sharing What We Know: Strengthening Implementer Capacity
Dimensions of Data Quality
Session: 9 On-going Monitoring & Follow Up
Integrating Gender M&E Capacity Strengthening Workshop, Addis Ababa
How is an M & E framework derived from the logframe?
Presentation transcript:

Content of an M&E Matrix M&E Capacity Strengthening Workshop Addis Ababa 4 to 8 June 2012 Arif Rashid, TOPS

M&E Matrix M&E Matrix is ONLY a key component of the overall M&E Plan. It provides detailed information about how the goal, strategic objectives, intermediate results, outputs and activities will be monitored and evaluated. The M&E matrix covers all the information required to understand, collect, tabulate/analyze, disseminate and report on any indicator. It is an extension of PMP Slide # 1

Content of a M&E Matrix We need to develop a matrix for each indicator that the M&E system will track. In the next few slides we are going to present the content of a Matrix. We have used Average Household Dietary Diversity Score as an example to create this matrix. Slide # 2

M & E Matrix Indicator Title Average Household Dietary Diversity Score Description Household dietary diversity is defined as the number of different food groups consumed over a given reference period. This is a proxy indicator of household food access. Indicator type Impact Direction of Change Higher is better Unit Household Rationale A diversified diet is highly correlated with factors such as caloric and protein adequacy and household income. Even in very poor households, increased food expenditure resulting from additional income is associated with increased quantity and quality of the diet. Number of food groups is a better measure of dietary diversity compared to number of foods, because a household may consume five different food items in a day and three of them might be cereals or starch. Slide # 3

M & E Matrix Information need Number of food groups out of 12 consumed in the past 24 hours Tabulation HDDS = Sum (All food groups consumed by a household) Numerator/Denominator Sum (HDDS of all households)/ Total number of household Target group All households in the project target areas Data source/means of verification Households from a representative sample of the target population. Means of verification will be baseline and end line survey report Data collection method Population-based quantitative household survey for baseline and endline Strata None Frequency of collection Baseline, end-line and annual Slide # 4

M & E Matrix Data analysis temporal, among strata, progress towards target Baseline value 3.0 Target and timeframe 4.5 in Y5 Communication strategy Survey report, bulletin tailored to the needs and interest of managers, technical team, food security adviser, and field staff; stakeholder presentation and discussion of baseline and final evaluation survey findings Reporting In baseline and final evaluation reports and in Annual Results Reports following the baseline and final evaluation surveys. Also to government line ministries if agreed. Primary responsibility M&E Coordinator/ M&E Manager Slide # 5

Performance Tracking Table Baseline Targets Value Year Source Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 3.0 2010 Baseline surveys 3.5 4.5 Slide # 6

Overview of Data Collection for Average HDDS Measurement Effort General method Application High Population based household survey of a representative sample in baseline and end-line. Baseline and end-line survey will be carried out by external independent contractor following FANTA guidelines. Slide # 7

Practice Session Please use a similar format presented here to develop M&E Matrix for one impact indicator, one outcome indicator and one output indicator. Using indicators from the IPTT of your project, please develop the following: A matrix for each indicator Performance tracking table, and Data collection method for each indicator Each participant will work independently or in a group with the participants form the same project Slide # 8

This presentation was made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents are the responsibility of Save the Children and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government.