Texas Search and Seizure

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SEARCH AND SEIZURE: COMPLICATED BY TECHNOLOGY
Advertisements

Paul Ohm Associate Professor, CU Law Initiative Director, Silicon Flatirons December 4, 2009.
Phases of a Criminal Drug Case From Start to Finish.
COMPLAINTS REGIONAL CLERKS SEMINAR March 24, 2010 Joe Gorfida, Jr.
Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. Terminal Objective Upon completion of this module, the participant will be knowledgeable about the sections of the Code.
Presented by Jennifer Coughlin Eugene, Oregon April 10, 2013.
The Timing and the Number of Interviews Brit Tammiste Ministry of Justice of Estonia Criminal Policy Department, Analysis division
Criminal Procedure for the Criminal Justice Professional 11 th Edition John N. Ferdico Henry F. Fradella Christopher Totten Prepared by Tony Wolusky Searches.
Legal Considerations in Obtaining Electronic Evidence in Online Investigations CSC 486/586 1.
The Patriot Act And computing. /criminal/cybercrime/PatriotAct.htm US Department of Justice.
Pre-Trial Procedure.
Chapter 13: Criminal Justice Process ~ Proceedings Before Trial Objective: The student should be able to identify the required procedures before a trial.
Blood Will Tell: Blood Search Warrants
Chapter 15 Counter-terrorism. Introduction  United and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism.
1 Chapter 15 Search Warrants. 2 Search warrants fall under the 4 th Amendment Search warrants fall under the 4 th Amendment The police must have “probable.
Pretrial Proceedings Law and Justice Chapter 13. Booking and Initial Appearance Booking and Initial Appearance Booking and Initial Appearance Booking.
INTRODUCTION TO THE LAW OF EVIDENCE
Pretext Phone Calls Legal in Canada!!. Police-guided pretext phone calls do not violate Charter s. 8 if prior: -One party consent -Judicial Authorization.
Rules of Discovery and Privileged Communications Court Systems and Practices.
The Judicial Branch The Criminal Justice Process.
THE BILL OF COSTS JULY 2014 Ted Wood Assistant General Counsel Office of Court Administration (512) (512)
Class 11 Internet Privacy Law Government Surveillance.
Privacy, Confidentiality and Duty to Warn in School Guidance Services March 2006 Disclaimer - While the information in these slides are designed to reflect.
Civil Law Security Services. Copyright © Texas Education Agency, All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission.
1 Chapter 15 Search Warrants Search Warrants. 2 Search Warrants Search warrants fall under the 4 th Amendment Search warrants fall under the 4 th Amendment.
Investigating Cybercrime DATALAWS Information Technology Law Consultants Presented by F. F Akinsuyi (MSc, LLM)MBCS.
1 Copyright © 2013 M. E. Kabay, D. J. Blythe, J. Tower-Pierce & P. R. Stephenson. All rights reserved. Legal Issues in Cybercrime Cases: Search & Seizure.
Chapter Seven – Searches and Seizures and the Right to Privacy Rolando V. del Carmen.
Chapter 2 Legal Aspects of Investigation © 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved. LEARNING OBJECTIVES Explain the historical evolution.
Pre-Trial Procedures Search and Seizure.  The law seeks to balance individual’s right to privacy and need for police to conduct a thorough investigation.
The Bill of Rights The First Fundamental Changes of the Constitution.
1 Policy Types l Program l Issue Specific l System l Overall l Most Generic User Policies should be publicized l Internal Operations Policies should be.
11 CHANGES IN ARREST POWERS IN HB NOTE: Officers should have a copy of DOCJT handout entitled: “House Bill 463 Training Letter” “House Bill 463.
& SELECTED TOPICS: DIGITAL FORENSICS Xinwen Fu, UMass Lowell, USA Center for Cyber Forensics, UMass Lowell.
The Bill of Rights and the Criminal Trial Process.
INVESTIGATION KAROLINA KREMENS, LL.M. (Ottawa), Ph.D. International Criminal Procedure.
 Understanding the Texas Criminal Legal System. Definitions  Your individually responsible for looking up definitions of words, that I have put in red.
Arrest and Detainment How do you know you’ve been arrested?
Criminal Justice Process: Proceedings Before Trial – Chp 13 Booking – Formal process of making a police record of an arrest -Give private info such as:
Criminal Justice Process: Proceedings Before Trial Chapter 13.
VI. CRIMINAL PROCESS FROM ARREST TO CONCLUSION PRESENTED BY: JUDGE MARK A. SPEISER.
Criminal Prosecution Process May 5, Arrest Police officers arrest suspects when in their professional judgment they believe that a crime has been.
Criminal Prosecution Process
Criminal Justice Process: The Investigation
Subpoenas and Expunctions
Courts System Search Warrants.
Outline of the U.S. and Arizona Criminal Justice Systems
Evidence Preservation/Records Retention
VI. CRIMINAL PROCESS FROM ARREST TO CONCLUSION
Prosecution Process.
Networking 2002 USA-Patriot Act Tracy Mitrano Cornell University
Lesson # 7 A Practical Guide to Computer Forensics Investigations
How Does Electronic Surveillance Work Legally?
Criminal Prosecution Process
Search warrant Writing an Affidavit.
Juvenile vs. Adult Differences in the Criminal Justice System
Electronic Search & Seizure
Overview of the Budapest Convention on Cybercrime (2001)
The Bill of Rights and the Criminal Trial Process
DEVELOPING A LEGAL FRAMEWORK TO COMBAT CYBERCRIME
Search and Seizure Concepts
Laws Governing Police Surveillance
Pre-Trial Procedures Search and Seizure.
The University of Adelaide, School of Computer Science
The Bill of Rights and the Criminal Trial Process
Warrant Searches Or, I Got 99 Problems But My Search Ain’t One
Rules of Discovery and Privileged Communications
Sadi R. Antonmattei-Goitia Sullo & Sullo, LLP February 16, 2019
State of florida tax information sharing Paula Barfield August 5, 2015
On-Site Investigations
Presentation transcript:

Texas Search and Seizure © Dr. D. Kall Loper, all rights reserved Computer Crime Texas Search and Seizure

Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article 18.20 § 4: Offenses for Which Interceptions May be Authorized A judge of competent jurisdiction may issue an order authorizing interception of wire, oral, or electronic communications only if the prosecutor applying for the order shows probable cause to believe that the interception will provide evidence of the commission of: Interceptions Citation © Dr. D. Kall Loper, all rights reserved

TCCP 18.20 § 4 (1) a felony under Section 19.03(a)(3) [murder for remuneration] or Section 43.26 [possession or promotion of child pornography], Penal Code; (2) a felony under: (A) Chapter 481, Health and Safety Code [Texas Controlled Substances Act], other than felony possession of marihuana; (B) Section 485.033, Health and Safety Code [inhalant paraphernalia]; or (C) Chapter 483, Health and Safety Code [Dangerous Drugs]; or Interceptions Citation © Dr. D. Kall Loper, all rights reserved

TCCP 18.20 § 4 (3) an attempt, conspiracy, or solicitation to commit an offense listed in this section. Interceptions Citation © Dr. D. Kall Loper, all rights reserved

Computer Crime Warning from the Defense Some states have two-party consent requirements. That means that both parties to wire communications must consent to interception or recording. Texas is a one-party consent state, but calls originating outside of Texas may become complicated. Consult your legal counsel or prosecutor before proceeding. © Dr. D. Kall Loper, all rights reserved

Esterline v. State, (1986) Citation Recording of defendant's telephone conversations with the witness did not violate TCCP 18.20, § 1(4) because the statute applied only to nonconsensual communications; although defendant had not consented to the taping of such conversations where the witness, in cooperation with the police, telephoned defendant from the police station to set up a meeting with defendant to buy drugs from him,… One-party Consent State Esterline v. State, 707 S.W.2d 171, 1986 Tex. App. LEXIS 12292 (Tex. App. Corpus Christi 1986). Citation © Dr. D. Kall Loper, all rights reserved

Esterline v. State, (1986) Citation …no court order for taping such conversations was required as defendant, in talking to such witness, took the risk that the witness would repeat or record their conversation. Esterline v. State, 707 S.W.2d 171, 1986 Tex. App. LEXIS 12292 (Tex. App. Corpus Christi 1986). Citation © Dr. D. Kall Loper, all rights reserved

Texas Code of Criminal Procedure ARTICLE 18.21. Pen registers and trap and trace devices; access to stored communications; mobile tracking devices Sec. 2. (c)(1 & 3) [Application and Order] The application must be made in writing under oath and state that the installation and use of the device or equipment will likely produce information that is material to an ongoing criminal investigation. Standard for a Pen Register/Trap and Trace/ESN Reader. Citation © Dr. D. Kall Loper, all rights reserved

Uresti v. State, (2003) Citation Under TCCP 18.20, § 1(14) [I]n a gambling case, a court did not err by denying defendant's motion to suppress evidence gathered by the use of a pen register, where, although defendant's conduct may have been calculated to keep the contents of conversations private, defendant's conduct was not and could not have been calculated to preserve the privacy of the number defendant dialed. Content versus Transmittal Uresti v. State, 98 S.W.3d 321, 2003 Tex. App. LEXIS 734 (Tex. App. Houston 1st Dist. 2003). Citation © Dr. D. Kall Loper, all rights reserved

Texas Code of Criminal Procedure ARTICLE 18.21. Pen registers and trap and trace devices; access to stored communications; mobile tracking devices Sec. 6. (a) [Backup Preservation] A subpoena or court order for disclosure of the contents of an electronic communication in a remote computing service under Section 4(c) of this article may require that… Preservation Subpoena Citation © Dr. D. Kall Loper, all rights reserved

TCCP 18.21 § 6(a) Citation Preservation Subpoena …the service provider to whom the request is directed create a copy of the contents of the electronic communications sought by the subpoena or court order for the purpose of preserving those contents. The service provider may not inform the subscriber or customer whose communications are being sought that the subpoena or court order has been issued. Preservation Subpoena Citation © Dr. D. Kall Loper, all rights reserved

TCCP 18.21 § 6(a) Citation Preservation Subpoena The service provider shall create the copy not later than two business days after the date of the receipt by the service provider of the subpoena or court order. Preservation Subpoena Citation © Dr. D. Kall Loper, all rights reserved