(Procter & Gamble, Brussels)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
R E 1 Some Experiences with Data and Models in International (Water) Assessments Ton Bresser National Institute of Public Health and Environment Frans.
Advertisements

Chemicals in the context of the Water Information System for Europe (WISE) Bo N Jacobsen EEA Chemicals and Water workshop 6-7 December 2010, EEA, Copenhagen.
HERA at XXXI CED Kay Fox Human & Environmental Risk Assessment Environmental Risk Assessment under HERA: Challenges and Solutions Kay Fox Chair of the.
HERA European Stakeholders Workshop: Brussels, Oct Environmental Risk Assessment Progress and Lessons Learned Kay Fox Chair of the HERA Environmental.
PROTECTFP Work Package 1:- results from questionnaire and overview of tools for chemical assessment.
USES guia del USES EUSES (European Union System for the Evaluation of Substances) Multimedia.
Geographical & Environmental Modelling Dr Nigel Trodd Coventry University.
EGGG 167 CEE Lecture 2 Environmental Engineering and Risk Analysis.
Implementation of the Water Framework Directive - Uncertainty issues - Michiel Blind, RWS-RIZA.
Surveillance monitoring Operational and investigative monitoring Chemical fate fugacity model QSAR Select substance Are physical data and toxicity information.
European Commission, DG Environment Unit B.1: Water, the Marine and Soil TAIEX Seminar « Management of Water Resources: River Basin Management in the Baltic.
Research & Science Advancing Risk Assessment Presentation March Association of Chemical Industry of the Czech Republic Monique Marrec Fairley.
Twinning water quality modelling in Latvia Helene Ejhed, Final workshop Twinning on development of modelling capacity to support water quality.
Twinning water quality modelling in Latvia Helene Ejhed
Priority Substances Inventory Guidance a step towards international harmonization Joost van den Roovaart.
Types of Models Marti Blad Northern Arizona University College of Engineering & Technology.
Rob Collins Water Group EEA Hazardous Substances in Europe’s fresh and marine waters – An overview Report for publication – 1 st half of 2011 Rob Collins.
GMES Global Monitoring of Environment and Security Possible GMES contributions for the WFD implementation Thomas Dworak (Ecologic) Steffen Kuntz (Infoterra)
INTRODUCTION TO ENVIRONMENTAL MODELING. EIA Scientific Tools and Techniques2 Lesson Learning Goals At the end of this lesson you should be able to: 
1 INSPIRE Conference, Edinburgh 1 Theme Theme Soil inventories, providing a one-off assessment of soil conditions and/or properties at a point in time,
Building WFD into impact assessment Richard Sharp Geomorphology IEMA webinar Thursday 31 March 2016.
Exposure Modelling Day 1.
Environmental Intelligence Platform – Monitoring Nutrients Pollution with Earth Observation Data for Sustainable Agriculture and Clean Waters Blue.
US Environmental Protection Agency
Water Quality Acquisition Systems in Australia
Relationship between EUROWATERNET and the Water Framework Directive, and for broader water reporting Steve Nixon ETC/WTR.
Climate Change & Environmental Risks Unit Research Directorate General
Background CRiteria for the IDentification of Groundwater thrEsholds BRIDGE Project Presentation Contract N° (SSPI) Co-ordinator: BRGM (Fr)
Water Information System for Europe (WISE) Concept and state-of-play
Agenda item 8b WISE SoE reporting 2015 state of the play
Marine Strategy Framework Directive: an introduction
Han Blok, Royal Haskoning
Models for Assessing and Forecasting the Impact of Environmental Key
‘Basic approach: Reporting and data handling’
Chemicals and their properties Day 1.
Experiences of designing WFD-monitoring networks in the Netherlands
Results of breakout group
on Priority Substances Strategic Coordination Group
Background CRiteria for the IDentification of Groundwater ThrEsholds
for Multi-Modal Transport
Inventory preparation for priority substances
1. Implementation of the Water Framework Directive: notifications & infringements, RBMP assessments for the agricultural sector Expert Group on WFD & agriculture.
Preliminary feedback on analysis of Article V reports
Change and adapt the Eionet water data flow to meet WFD requirements
River Basin Management Plans
Unit D.2 – Water and Marine, DG Environment, European Commission
- Priority Substances - Strategic Coordination Group
Background document: How to build the Inventory of Emissions, Discharges and Losses: main elements and compilation of existing datasets (2007) DG on inventory.
Background CRiteria for the IDentification of Groundwater thrEsholds BRIDGE Summary of BRIDGE achievements Contract N° (SSPI) Co-ordinator:
Workshop on WFD Article 8 reporting tools and WISE GIS
Mandate of the EEA To provide the Community and Member States with:
Priority Substances Emissions Inventory
Part I.
Water Information System for Europe
NIVA - Norwegian Institute for Water Research
WG E on Priority Substances
Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive
Preparation of the second RBMP in Romania
IMPRESS Guidance and Policy Summary Water Directors Copenhagen, 21-22nd November 2002 Working Group leaders: Volker Mohaupt, Umwelt Bundes Amt Isobel.
PRB Workshop, Ghent, 4-5 October 2004
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Anna-Stiina Heiskanen Luc Feyen
EIONET and EUROWATERNET Common Implementation Strategy
WG Hazardous substances * Marine Strategy 19 November 2003
Benoît FRIBOURG-BLANC, IOW
Netherlands Institute for Fisheries Research (RIVO)
NORMAN 6th FP - Proposal n°: Priority
Brussels – 20 April 2007 European Commission - DG Environment
History EU+Norway Water Directors meeting in Paris Oct 2000 Member States and the European Commission agreed in Paris to developed a Common Strategy.
Some concepts for quantifying emissions of Priority Substances
Presentation transcript:

(Procter & Gamble, Brussels) GREAT-ER: a new tool for management and risk assessment of chemicals in river basins Dr. Simon Webb (Procter & Gamble, Brussels) Third Meeting of the Expert Advisory Forum (EAF 3) on Priority Substances and Pollution Control 4th March 2002 Brussels

GREAT-ER Geography referenced Regional Exposure Assessment Tool for European Rivers

What is GREAT-ER ? GREAT-ER is environmental software designed as a new support tool for EU chemical risk assessment and basin infrastructure management, developed by ECETOC for the European Detergent Industry (AISE/CESIO) and the UK Environment Agency GREAT-ER predicts chemical concentrations in river basins across Europe GREAT-ER combines environmental models with a GIS (Geographical Information System) to produce clear maps which visualise chemical concentrations and water quality

Why GREAT-ER ? Current models (e.g., EUSES) generate exposure concentrations averaged over an entire fictive region. Current tools (e.g., EU TGD and EUSES) offer one deterministic result that can vary in accuracy (factor 10 - 1000). Spatial, temporal and demographic variations should be used in a probabilistic approach. A system is needed for river basin and water quality management tools (e.g., for EU Water Framework Directive)

“Fictive” “Real” GREAT-ER Refinement Multimedia fugacity model PEC 70% treated AIR 30% untreated WATER SOIL AQUATIC BIOTA “Fictive” SEDIMENT “Real” Atmospheric Transport and Deposition Treated Discharge GREAT-ER Refinement Erosion & Runoff WWTP PEC Pseudo-Diffuse Discharges Untreated Discharge

mechanistic and/or empirical Mode 1 Deterministic core of the model with 3 different complexity levels lumped decay rate k Mode 3 mechanistic and/or empirical process descriptions biodeg. - sorb/diss - DO photodeg. degradation rate kdeg - depth, SS - extinction hydrolysis - pH volatilization rate kvol chemical + river properties volatilization - wind speed - flow velocity - depth settling rate ksed settling Mode 2 - SS, sorption - sediment characteristics - depth

GREAT-ER Outputs 1) GIS maps of river network with colour-coded chemical concentrations 2) Profiles of river concentrations 3) Aggregated PEC values (‘average values’, cf. EU ‘PEC’ regional).

lowest concentration highest concentration

GREAT-ER Calibration and Validation Programme In order to calibrate and verify the model predictions two-year monitoring studies were carried out in rivers and at sewage treatment plants in: UK (4 rivers) Italy (1 river) Germany (1 river)

Future Developments: Pan-European Expansion of Pilot Areas Finished: UK : Aire, Calder, Went & Rother Germany: Itter, Unter-Main Italy : Lambro Belgium: Rupel Ongoing: France: Mayenne Germany: Elbe, Rhine & Main Spain: Llobregat

Future Developments: Additional Environmental Compartments and Fate Models Euro 138,000 Euro 295,000 Euro 558,000 http://www.cefic.org/lri

Future Developments: Conversion of Stand-Alone Software to Server Application with Central Database K E Analysis Spatial Data Models Non-spatial Data Source Inventory SQL- Database Common Database API ArcView GUI Map Object WWW Server Modern modular architecture Internet Browser Euro 334,000

Water Framework Directive (WFD) - Some Key Elements Integrated river basin management (= natural geographical/hydrological unit). “Good Status” objective. All emissions and discharges controlled (ELVs). Control of pollutants requires knowledge of concentrations in the receiving aquatic environment and benchmraking against effects thresholds (EQSs) “Combined Approach”. Priority (“Riskier”) chemical pollutants.

GREAT-ER & the WFD Based on river basins/catchments. GIS produces site-specific exposure estimations. Facilitates benchmarking of exposure against effects thresholds (EQSs). Ideal tool for Priority Substances. Soon upgraded for other compartments/exposure pathways (run-off, atmospheric, estuaries). “What-if” Scenarios (simulation of amelioration measures i.e., WWTP infrastructure). Existing and increasing accepted tool. Fully documented and free!

Click on the GREAT-ER icon on the PC From this map of Europe… Click on the GREAT-ER icon on the PC

select the following chemical data (link with IUCLID) river basin scenario name

Sewage treatment plants CALDER RIVER BASIN (YORKSHIRE, UK) Sewage treatment plants