Molecular Insights into Polyubiquitin Chain Assembly

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Advertisements

Analysis of human α globin gene mutations that impair binding to the α hemoglobin stabilizing protein by Xiang Yu, Todd L. Mollan, Andrew Butler, Andrew.
Volume 124, Issue 6, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Ping Wang, Katelyn A. Doxtader, Yunsun Nam  Molecular Cell 
Volume 58, Issue 1, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
The Structure of the Cytoplasmic Domain of the Chloride Channel ClC-Ka Reveals a Conserved Interaction Interface  Sandra Markovic, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
Structure of the Papillomavirus DNA-Tethering Complex E2:Brd4 and a Peptide that Ablates HPV Chromosomal Association  Eric A. Abbate, Christian Voitenleitner,
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (August 2016)
Volume 57, Issue 6, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (September 2013)
Volume 63, Issue 6, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 35, Issue 5, Pages (September 2009)
Structural Basis for the Specific Recognition of Methylated Histone H3 Lysine 4 by the WD-40 Protein WDR5  Zhifu Han, Lan Guo, Huayi Wang, Yue Shen, Xing.
Volume 64, Issue 3, Pages (November 2016)
Yvonne Groemping, Karine Lapouge, Stephen J. Smerdon, Katrin Rittinger 
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (April 2005)
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Ubiquitin Recognition by the Human TSG101 Protein
Structure of the TPR Domain of p67phox in Complex with Rac·GTP
Volume 34, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)
Crystal Structure of Tetrameric Arabidopsis MYC2 Reveals the Mechanism of Enhanced Interaction with DNA  Teng-fei Lian, Yong-ping Xu, Lan-fen Li, Xiao-Dong.
Erik Procko, Ian Ferrin-O'Connell, Sze-Ling Ng, Rachelle Gaudet 
Charlotte Hodson, Andrew Purkiss, Jennifer Anne Miles, Helen Walden 
Volume 24, Issue 10, Pages (October 2016)
Yanhui Xu, Yu Chen, Ping Zhang, Philip D. Jeffrey, Yigong Shi 
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (March 2006)
Imsang Lee, Hermann Schindelin  Cell 
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 9-19 (October 2005)
Volume 124, Issue 5, Pages (March 2006)
Structural Basis for Endosomal Targeting by the Bro1 Domain
Volume 37, Issue 2, Pages (January 2010)
Structural Basis for Protein Recognition by B30.2/SPRY Domains
Shaun K. Olsen, Christopher D. Lima  Molecular Cell 
Specificity Determinants in Phosphoinositide Dephosphorylation
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages (December 2003)
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (October 2017)
Volume 95, Issue 7, Pages (December 1998)
Structural Basis of EZH2 Recognition by EED
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (February 2007)
c-Src Activates Endonuclease-Mediated mRNA Decay
Volume 57, Issue 6, Pages (March 2015)
Structural Basis for Specific Recognition of Reelin by Its Receptors
Volume 30, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
ICAT Inhibits β-Catenin Binding to Tcf/Lef-Family Transcription Factors and the General Coactivator p300 Using Independent Structural Modules  Danette.
Volume 14, Issue 11, Pages (November 2006)
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages (February 2004)
Promiscuous Protein Binding as a Function of Protein Stability
Mirjana Lilic, Milos Vujanac, C. Erec Stebbins  Molecular Cell 
Mechanisms Contributing to T Cell Receptor Signaling and Assembly Revealed by the Solution Structure of an Ectodomain Fragment of the CD3ϵγ Heterodimer 
The Structure of the β-Catenin/E-Cadherin Complex and the Molecular Basis of Diverse Ligand Recognition by β-Catenin  Andrew H. Huber, William I. Weis 
Shiqian Qi, Do Jin Kim, Goran Stjepanovic, James H. Hurley  Structure 
Volume 52, Issue 3, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages (July 2015)
Jennifer Terrell, Susan Shih, Rebecca Dunn, Linda Hicke  Molecular Cell 
Involvement of PIAS1 in the Sumoylation of Tumor Suppressor p53
Ulp1-SUMO Crystal Structure and Genetic Analysis Reveal Conserved Interactions and a Regulatory Element Essential for Cell Growth in Yeast  Elena Mossessova,
Crystal Structure of the N-Terminal Domain of Sialoadhesin in Complex with 3′ Sialyllactose at 1.85 Å Resolution  A.P. May, R.C. Robinson, M. Vinson,
Structure of the Siz/PIAS SUMO E3 Ligase Siz1 and Determinants Required for SUMO Modification of PCNA  Ali A. Yunus, Christopher D. Lima  Molecular Cell 
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (August 2011)
Caroline M. Groft, Stephen K. Burley  Molecular Cell 
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (May 2006)
AppA Is a Blue Light Photoreceptor that Antirepresses Photosynthesis Gene Expression in Rhodobacter sphaeroides  Shinji Masuda, Carl E. Bauer  Cell  Volume.
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (October 2017)
Joshua J. Sims, Robert E. Cohen  Molecular Cell 
Structural Basis of SOSS1 Complex Assembly and Recognition of ssDNA
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (September 2004)
Presentation transcript:

Molecular Insights into Polyubiquitin Chain Assembly Andrew P. VanDemark, Roseanne M. Hofmann, Colleen Tsui, Cecile M. Pickart, Cynthia Wolberger  Cell  Volume 105, Issue 6, Pages 711-720 (June 2001) DOI: 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00387-7

Figure 1 Structure of the Mms2/Ubc13 Complex (A) Cartoon representation of Mms2/Ubc13 complex with Mms2 in blue and Ubc13 in green. Helices and strands are labeled. The side chain of the active site residue Ubc13-Cys87 is shown in yellow. (B) Alignment of Ubc13 from complex, green, with Ubc13 alone structure, gray. Only Cα are shown, plus Ubc13-Cys87 for orientation. (C) Primary sequence alignment of selected E2s and UEVs. The E2 active site cysteine position is outlined by a tan box; the Mms2 insertion containing F8 is shown in green. Ubc13 surface residues that are part of channel 1 are shown in magenta. Residues of UEVs and Ubc13s that make up channel 2 are shown in blue. Alignment was done with DALIGN Cell 2001 105, 711-720DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00387-7)

Figure 2 The Mms2/Ubc13 Binding Interface Contains Both Hydrophobic and Polar Surfaces (A) Mms2/Ubc13 heterodimerization interface. Ubc13 is displayed as a surface with Mms2 interface residues in light blue. (B) F8A-Mms2 (light blue) environment showing hydrophobic contacts with Ubc13 residues E55, L56, Y57, and R70 (green). The Ubc13 backbone is shown in green. (C) E55-Ubc13 environment highlighting hydrogen bonds that bridge the interface (black). The Mms2 backbone shown in blue, the Ubc13 backbone in green Cell 2001 105, 711-720DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00387-7)

Figure 3 Biochemical Properties of Mms2/Ubc13 Interface Mutants (A) Purified wild-type Mms2 (filled circles) or Mms2-F8A (open circles) was titrated against Ubc13 (0.5 μM) in 10 min assays of 125I-diubiquitin synthesis (Experimental Procedures). (B) Direct binding assays. A slight excess of Ubc13 was mixed with His10-Mms2 prior to incubation with nickel beads and elution with increasing salt concentration (50 mM to 1 M NaCl). The resin was stripped with EDTA at the end. In the bottom two strips, a slight excess of Mms2 was used; the reversed mobilities of Mms2 and Ubc13 are due to the use of different SDS-PAGE systems. (C) Intact complex interface is required for biological activity. His10-Mms2 and Ubc13-HA3 (wild-type or mutant proteins as indicated) were expressed from separate centromeric plasmids under the control of the respective endogenous promoters in strain SUB62 (Finley et al., 1994) deleted for both endogenous genes. The tagged wild-type proteins are fully functional based on protection against UV light (R.H. and C.P., unpublished data). Inverted triangles, cells transformed with the two empty vectors; filled circles, wild-type (wt) Mms2 plus wt Ubc13; open circles, wt Mms2 plus E55A-Ubc13; squares, F8A-Mms2 plus wt Ubc13; triangles, F8A-Mms2 plus E55A-Ubc13. (D) Expression of interface mutants in yeast cells. Selected liquid culture aliquots were lysed and extracts were probed by Western blotting for expression of H10Mms2 and Ubc13-HA3. “Std,” purified H10Mms2 protein. Purified E55A-Ubc13 migrates aberrantly in this SDS-PAGE system (data not shown) Cell 2001 105, 711-720DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00387-7)

Figure 4 Channels and Interfering Mutations The heterodimer is shown as a surface. The three channels referred to in the text are colored green and numbered, interfering mutations are shown in blue. Ubc13-Cys87 is shown in yellow. The figure was generated with VMD (Humphrey et al., 1996) and RENDER (Merritt and Bacon, 1997) Cell 2001 105, 711-720DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00387-7)

Figure 5 Biochemical Properties of Channel Mutants (A) Diubiquitin assembly assay. D77-ubiquitin and K63R-ubiquitin (117 μM each) served as acceptor and donor, respectively, in incubations containing 2 μM Mms2/Ubc13 and 0.1 μM E1. (Coomassie-stained gel.) (B) Binding of inert K63-tetraubiquitin to channel 1 and 3 mutants (filled circles, wild-type Mms2 plus wild-type Ubc13; crosses, wild-type Mms2 plus Ubc13-A110R; open circles, Mms2-E12R plus wild-type Ubc13). Competition was measured in assays of 125I-diubiquitin formation as described in Experimental Procedures. (C) Binding of inert K63-tetraubiquitin to channel 2 mutant (filled circles, wild-type Mms2 plus wild-type Ubc13; open circles, wild-type Mms2 plus Ubc13-D81A) Cell 2001 105, 711-720DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00387-7)

Figure 6 Model for Interaction of Mms2/Ubc13 Complex (Surface) with Rad5 (Red) and Two Ubiquitin Proteins (Purple) The donor Ub and acceptor Ub were positioned to place the C termini of the donor Ub and K63 of the acceptor Ub within 3 Å of the active site thiol (yellow) while avoiding steric clashes. Other modeling criteria are described in the text. The acceptor ubiquitin is at the lower left; the donor ubiquitin is at the right Cell 2001 105, 711-720DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00387-7)