Volume 63, Issue 1, Pages (July 2016)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A 3′ Poly(A) Tract Is Required for LINE-1 Retrotransposition
Advertisements

circRNA Biogenesis Competes with Pre-mRNA Splicing
Microprocessor Activity Controls Differential miRNA Biogenesis In Vivo
Volume 157, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 51, Issue 5, Pages (September 2013)
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages (November 2007)
Roger B. Deal, Steven Henikoff  Developmental Cell 
Volume 122, Issue 4, Pages (August 2005)
Steven J. Petesch, John T. Lis  Cell 
Volume 54, Issue 1, Pages (April 2014)
HnRNP L and HnRNP A1 Induce Extended U1 snRNA Interactions with an Exon to Repress Spliceosome Assembly  Ni-Ting Chiou, Ganesh Shankarling, Kristen W.
Volume 57, Issue 2, Pages (January 2015)
N6-Methyladenosines Modulate A-to-I RNA Editing
Human Senataxin Resolves RNA/DNA Hybrids Formed at Transcriptional Pause Sites to Promote Xrn2-Dependent Termination  Konstantina Skourti-Stathaki, Nicholas J.
circRNA Biogenesis Competes with Pre-mRNA Splicing
John T. Arigo, Kristina L. Carroll, Jessica M. Ames, Jeffry L. Corden 
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages (May 2018)
Volume 57, Issue 2, Pages (January 2015)
Adrien Le Thomas, Georgi K. Marinov, Alexei A. Aravin  Cell Reports 
Volume 55, Issue 2, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 66, Issue 1, Pages e5 (April 2017)
m6A Facilitates eIF4F-Independent mRNA Translation
Volume 50, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 65, Issue 2, Pages (January 2017)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (April 2005)
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages (December 2013)
DNA Methylation Mediated by a MicroRNA Pathway
Volume 59, Issue 5, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 135, Issue 4, Pages (November 2008)
PARP1 Represses PAP and Inhibits Polyadenylation during Heat Shock
Transcriptional Termination Enhances Protein Expression in Human Cells
A Major Epigenetic Programming Mechanism Guided by piRNAs
Volume 7, Issue 9, Pages (September 2014)
Shi-Yan Ng, Gireesh K. Bogu, Boon Seng Soh, Lawrence W. Stanton 
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 19, Issue 12, Pages (June 2017)
Olga Minkina, Craig P. Hunter  Molecular Cell 
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 60, Issue 3, Pages (November 2015)
Unlinking an lncRNA from Its Associated cis Element
Volume 55, Issue 3, Pages (August 2014)
A Transcriptome-wide RNAi Screen in the Drosophila Ovary Reveals Factors of the Germline piRNA Pathway  Benjamin Czech, Jonathan B. Preall, Jon McGinn,
Volume 50, Issue 2, Pages (April 2013)
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (November 2017)
Xudong Wu, Jens Vilstrup Johansen, Kristian Helin  Molecular Cell 
Ribosome Collision Is Critical for Quality Control during No-Go Decay
Volume 63, Issue 3, Pages (August 2016)
Distinct Pathways for snoRNA and mRNA Termination
Human Telomerase RNA Processing and Quality Control
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (July 2005)
Volume 47, Issue 1, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 66, Issue 3, Pages e4 (May 2017)
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (April 2006)
Paul B. Mason, Kevin Struhl  Molecular Cell 
Volume 66, Issue 3, Pages e6 (May 2017)
Sang-Hyun Song, Chunhui Hou, Ann Dean  Molecular Cell 
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (September 2014)
Enhancer RNA Facilitates NELF Release from Immediate Early Genes
Volume 9, Pages (November 2018)
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 30, Issue 1, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages e5 (October 2018)
Volume 62, Issue 3, Pages (May 2016)
Sharon Si Jia Ng, Ruther Teo Zheng, Ismail Osman, Jun Wei Pek
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (June 2004)
Enhancer Control of Transcriptional Bursting
Volume 150, Issue 1, Pages (July 2012)
Bacterial Argonaute Samples the Transcriptome to Identify Foreign DNA
Presentation transcript:

Volume 63, Issue 1, Pages 97-109 (July 2016) Cutoff Suppresses RNA Polymerase II Termination to Ensure Expression of piRNA Precursors  Yung-Chia Ariel Chen, Evelyn Stuwe, Yicheng Luo, Maria Ninova, Adrien Le Thomas, Ekaterina Rozhavskaya, Sisi Li, Sivani Vempati, John D. Laver, Dinshaw J. Patel, Craig A. Smibert, Howard D. Lipshitz, Katalin Fejes Toth, Alexei A. Aravin  Molecular Cell  Volume 63, Issue 1, Pages 97-109 (July 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.05.010 Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Molecular Cell 2016 63, 97-109DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2016.05.010) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Cuff Deficiency Eliminates the Majority of Transcripts from piRNA Clusters (A) Cuff depletion leads to diminished piRNA cluster transcription. Shown are profiles of piRNA, total cell and poly(A)-selected RNA-seq, chromatin RNA-seq, GRO-seq, and RNA polymerase II ChIP-seq from ovaries of control and cuff depleted flies on the dual-strand piRNA cluster 38C. The distribution of predicted poly(A) signals on plus and minus genomic strands is shown in the poly(A) signal (PAS) tracks. Below is an expansion of the indicated region from which polyadenylated transcripts detected by RT-PCR using a oligo-dT primer are produced in cuffwm25/qq37 flies. (B) Chromatin-associated RNA-seq libraries are depleted of signal recognition particle (7SL) RNA. (C) Chromatin-associated RNAs are enriched in intronic sequences as measured by the ratio of intronic to exonic RPKM signals. The solid line indicates no difference between standard and chromatin RNA-seq. (D) piRNA cluster transcripts are enriched in chromatin-associated RNA. (E) Cuff suppresses primary transcripts from Cuff-depended piRNA producing loci. The heatmap shows signal change in Cuff-depleted versus control ovaries for small RNA, total RNA, chromatin-associated RNA, and GRO-seq in genomic windows that produce piRNA in a Cuff-dependent manner. The intervals overlapping uni-strand piRNA clusters that are not affected by Cuff depletion are shown for comparison (Flam+20A). (F) Box plots show the distribution of piRNA, chromatin-associated RNA, total RNA, and GRO signals in control and Cuff-depleted ovaries. The green boxes correspond to all genomic regions that produce piRNA in a Cuff-dependent manner, and the pink boxes correspond to windows overlapping uni-strand piRNA clusters (flamenco and 20A). See also Figure S1. Molecular Cell 2016 63, 97-109DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2016.05.010) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Cuff Suppresses Transcription Termination at Canonical Poly(A) Sites (A) Profiles of different libraries over the 42AB cluster, which is further divided into three regions, A, B, and C. Shown below are the locations of two insertions of artificial MiMIC transposons and the site of CRISPR-mediated deletion of promoters of the Pld gene, which flanks the 42AB cluster. The entire cluster is shown in Figure S2A. (B) Cuff depletion leads to reduced transcription of the 42AB cluster. The normalized densities of GRO-seq and chromatin RNA-seq signals are calculated for three regions shown in (A). (C) Depletion of Cuff has a different effect on two promoterless MiMIC insertions located at different positions in the 42AB cluster. Shown is the amount of MiMIC RNA in control and cuff-depleted (shCuff) ovaries as determined by RT-qPCR. The error bars represent SE from three biological replicates. (D) Depletion of Cuff suppresses read-through transcription downstream of the canonical poly(A) site of the M8627 insertion. The amounts of RNA upstream (GFP1-4) and downstream (ppA) of the poly(A) site were quantified by strand-specific RT-qPCR and the ratios of read-through (ppA/GFP1-4) transcripts were plotted. The RT primers and qPCR amplicons are shown in (C). The error bars represent SE from three biological replicates. See also Figure S2B. Molecular Cell 2016 63, 97-109DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2016.05.010) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Exposure of Target Locus to Homologous piRNA Enhances Read-through Transcription (A) Exposure to maternally inherited homologous piRNAs activates piRNA biogenesis. The insertion of the P{lArB} construct in a subtelomeric piRNA cluster in the P1152 strain produces abundant piRNAs that target homologous loci, the lacZ-containing BC69 transgene, and the endogenous hsp70 locus, in trans. piRNA biogenesis from target loci is activated if inducer is inherited from the mother (“activated” progeny), but not in control flies produced by the reciprocal cross. The right shows the density of piRNAs at the endogenous hsp70 locus in the ovaries of activated and control progenies compared to the 42AB cluster. (B) Rhi and Cuff associate with target loci exposed to homologous piRNA. The binding of Rhi and Cuff to chromatin of the BC69 transgene (T1) and the hsp70 locus (H1) was measured in ovaries of activated and control progenies by ChIP-qPCR using amplicons shown in (A). The error bars represent SD of six technical replicates. (C) Activation of primary piRNA biogenesis on the hsp70 locus is associated with increased read-through transcription as measured by strand-specific RT-qPCR using primers shown in (A). The error bars represent the SD of three biological replicates. See also Figure S3. Molecular Cell 2016 63, 97-109DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2016.05.010) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Tethering of Cuff to a Heterologous mRNA Reporter Suppresses Termination and Poly(A) Site Cleavage (A) Schematic diagram of the reporter used to study the effect of Cuff recruitment to RNA. Cuff fused to the λN peptide, which binds BoxB hairpins in reporter RNA, was co-expressed with the reporter in ovaries. (B) Cuff tethering leads to increased reporter transcript levels. λN-Cuff or control λN-GFP were co-expressed with the reporter in fly ovaries and RNA levels from three regions shown in (A) were quantified by RT-qPCR. The error bars represent SE of four biological replicates. (C) Tethering of Cuff increases read-through transcription of the reporter pre-mRNA as measured by the fraction of read-through transcripts relative to total reporter RNA. The error bars represent SE from four biological replicates. p values were calculated by t test. See also Figure S4. (D) Tethering of Cuff suppresses Pol II termination as measured by Pol II ChIP-qPCR downstream of the poly(A) signals (fragments 4 and 5 on A). The error bars represent SE of two biological replicates. (E) Tethering of Cuff inhibits cleavage at poly(A) sites. Shown is the fraction of unprocessed transcripts calculated as described in Figure S4. The error bars represent SE from four biological replicates. p value was calculated by t test. (F) Unprocessed reporter transcripts that span the poly(A) site are detected by RT-PCR upon λN-Cuff tethering (amplified regions are shown in A). (G) Tethering of Cuff suppresses binding of CPSF complex as measured by Cpsf73 ChIP-qPCR on different portions of the reporter shown in (A). The error bars represent SE of four biological replicates. (H) The majority of read-through transcripts formed upon Cuff tethering are cleaved near poly(A) sites. The fractions of cleaved and unprocessed RNA in two biological replicas were determined using standard curves shown in Figure S5. Molecular Cell 2016 63, 97-109DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2016.05.010) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Cuff Is Required for Rhi-Mediated Suppression of Splicing (A) Schematic diagram of the intron-containing reporter used to study the effect of Cuff recruitment on splicing. (B) Cuff is required for Rhi-mediated suppression of splicing. The splicing efficiency was measured by the ratio of spliced to unspliced transcripts. Molecular Cell 2016 63, 97-109DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2016.05.010) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Cuff Stabilizes Non-capped Transcripts Formed by Cleavage at Poly(A) Sites (A) Anti-trimethylguanosine antibody specifically precipitates fully capped RNA. Radiolabeled RNAs with different groups at the 5′ end were precipitated with anti-trimethylguanosine antibody and bound (IP) and unbound fractions resolved on PAAG. (B) Tethering of Cuff increases the fraction of non-capped read-through reporter transcripts. The capped RNA was immunoprecipitated from total ovarian RNA of flies that express the 4BoxB reporter shown in Figure 4A. The error bars represent SE from six biological replicates. p values were calculated by t test. (C) Anti-CBP80 antibody specifically binds to Drosophila CBP80 protein. See also Figure S6. (D) Tethering of Cuff increases association of CBP80 with reporter RNA. The ovarian lysates from flies expressing the 4BoxB reporter were used for RIP with anti-CBP80 antibody. The error bars represent SD from two biological replicates. (E) Tethering of Cuff increases association of CBP80 with chromatin of the reporter locus. ChIP using paraformaldehyde (PFA) or ethylene glycol bis(succinimidyl succinate) (EGS) crosslinkers were used to determine association of CBP80 with several regions of the reporter shown in Figure 4A. The error bars represent SE from two technical replicates. Molecular Cell 2016 63, 97-109DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2016.05.010) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Depletion of Rat1 Exonuclease Suppresses Effects of the cuff Mutation (A) Drosophila Rat1 and dRai1 have exonuclease activity toward 5′-monophosphate RNA. After incubation with the purified proteins, radiolabeled RNA was resolved on a denaturing PAGE (no protein control: NC). (B) dRai1, but not Cuff, has pyrophosphohydrolase activity. See Supplemental Information for details. (C) Drosophila dRai1 and Cuff physically interact with Rat1 as measured by coIP/western of tagged proteins. (D) Cuff and Rat1 are localized in nuclei. The immunostaining of GFP-tagged Cuff and BioTAP-tagged Rat1 proteins in ovaries are shown. DAPI staining was used to locate nuclei. (E) Inhibition of expression of rat1 increases the levels of read-through transcripts downstream of the canonical poly(A) site as measured by RT-qPCR on reporter shown in Figure 4A. The error bars represent SE for three biological replicates. (F and G) Inhibition of rat1 in germline suppresses the phenotype of cuffwm25/qq37 mutation. The plots show the change in expression of piRNA cluster transcripts (F) and TEs (G) measured by RT-qPCR in ovaries of flies of specified genotype. The error bars represent SE among four (F) or three (G) biological replicates. p values are calculated by t test. Molecular Cell 2016 63, 97-109DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2016.05.010) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions