Muon's speed determination using DQM database

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Atmospheric Neutrinos Barry Barish Bari, Bologna, Boston, Caltech, Drexel, Indiana, Frascati, Gran Sasso, L’Aquila, Lecce, Michigan, Napoli, Pisa, Roma.
Advertisements

1. Estimation ESTIMATION.
PERFORMANCE OF THE DELPHI REFRACTOMETER IN MONITORING THE RICH RADIATORS A. Filippas 1, E. Fokitis 1, S. Maltezos 1, K. Patrinos 1, and M. Davenport 2.
B a c kn e x t h o m e Classification of Variables Discrete Numerical Variable A variable that produces a response that comes from a counting process.
Analysis of Simulation Input.. Simulation Machine n Simulation can be considered as an Engine with input and output as follows: Simulation Engine Input.
Study of two pion channel from photoproduction on the deuteron Lewis Graham Proposal Phys 745 Class May 6, 2009.
The ANTARES experiment is currently the largest underwater neutrino telescope and is taking high quality data since Sea water is used as the detection.
Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations in Soudan 2
Education 793 Class Notes T-tests 29 October 2003.
14/02/2007 Paolo Walter Cattaneo 1 1.Trigger analysis 2.Muon rate 3.Q distribution 4.Baseline 5.Pulse shape 6.Z measurement 7.Att measurement OUTLINE.
Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Pearson Prentice-Hall, Inc.Chap 8-1 Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft® Excel 5th Edition.
W+jets and Z+jets studies at CMS Christopher S. Rogan, California Institute of Technology - HCP Evian-les-Bains Analysis Strategy Analysis Overview:
Fundamentals of Data Analysis Lecture 3 Basics of statistics.
OPERA Neutrino Experiment Tija Sīle presentation is based on: Doktorantūras skolas “Atomāro un nepārtrauktās vides fizikālo.
1 Motion Fuzzy Controller Structure(1/7) In this part, we start design the fuzzy logic controller aimed at producing the velocities of the robot right.
Measurement of the Charge Ratio of Cosmic Muons using CMS Data M. Aldaya, P. García-Abia (CIEMAT-Madrid) On behalf of the CMS Collaboration Sector 10 Sector.
Measurements and Their Analysis. Introduction Note that in this chapter, we are talking about multiple measurements of the same quantity Numerical analysis.
CHAPTER 2.3 PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS. 2.3 GAUSSIAN OR NORMAL ERROR DISTRIBUTION  The Gaussian distribution is an approximation to the binomial distribution.
CHAPTER – 1 UNCERTAINTIES IN MEASUREMENTS. 1.3 PARENT AND SAMPLE DISTRIBUTIONS  If we make a measurement x i in of a quantity x, we expect our observation.
Worked examples and exercises are in the text STROUD PROGRAMME 27 STATISTICS.
Lecture 8: Measurement Errors 1. Objectives List some sources of measurement errors. Classify measurement errors into systematic and random errors. Study.
Fundamentals of Data Analysis Lecture 3 Basics of statistics.
Design and Data Analysis in Psychology I English group (A) Salvador Chacón Moscoso Susana Sanduvete Chaves Milagrosa Sánchez Martín School of Psychology.
Non-Prompt J/ψ Measurements at STAR Zaochen Ye for the STAR Collaboration University of Illinois at Chicago The STAR Collaboration:
Cell Diameters and Normal Distribution. Frequency Distributions a frequency distribution is an arrangement of the values that one or more variables take.
Chapter 6 INFERENTIAL STATISTICS I: Foundations and sampling distribution.
Introduction to Marketing Research
Prof. Eric A. Suess Chapter 3
The normal distribution
I.I.S. A. Volta LODI Extreme Energy Events project 1 1.
Update on the analysis of muon angular distributions in equatorial coordinates F.Riggi Dept. of Physics and INFN, Catania.
SUR-2250 Error Theory.
MATH-138 Elementary Statistics
ESTIMATION.
Radio Coverage Prediction in Picocell Indoor Networks
1. Estimation ESTIMATION.
Properties of the Normal Distribution
Aim: How can we apply refraction to a laser beam through a glass block? HW:
Relative Values.
PCB 3043L - General Ecology Data Analysis.
Systematic uncertainties in MonteCarlo simulations of the atmospheric muon flux in the 5-lines ANTARES detector VLVnT08 - Toulon April 2008 Annarita.
Results of dN/dt Elastic
AP Biology Intro to Statistics
PROGRAMME 27 STATISTICS.
Understanding Standards Event Higher Statistics Award
Dipole Antennas Driven at High Voltages in the Plasmasphere
Statistical Reasoning in Everyday Life
Chapter 5 Normal Distribution
STEM Fair Graphs & Statistical Analysis
Elementary Statistics
° status report analysis details: overview; “where we are”; plans: before finalizing result.. I.Larin 02/13/2009.
Quarkonium production in ALICE
Claudio Bogazzi * - NIKHEF Amsterdam ICRC 2011 – Beijing 13/08/2011
Differential Modulation of Cardiac Ca2+ Channel Gating by β-Subunits
CHAPTER 9 Testing a Claim
Measure of muon velocity in EEE data
Study of e+e- pp process using initial state radiation with BaBar
CHAPTER 9 Testing a Claim
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages e4 (October 2017)
Experience-Dependent Asymmetric Shape of Hippocampal Receptive Fields
CHAPTER – 1.2 UNCERTAINTIES IN MEASUREMENTS.
Prof.ssa Antonella Azzone Prof. Francesco Cirrottola
DESIGN OF EXPERIMENT (DOE)
Liceo giolitti-gandino BRA
CHAPTER 9 Testing a Claim
CHAPTER 9 Testing a Claim
DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS by R. C. Baker
Felix Ruhnow, Linda Kloβ, Stefan Diez  Biophysical Journal 
° status report analysis details: overview; “where we are”; plans: before finalizing result.. I.Larin 02/13/2009.
CHAPTER – 1.2 UNCERTAINTIES IN MEASUREMENTS.
Presentation transcript:

Muon's speed determination using DQM database Liceo Cavour Roma Muon's speed determination using  DQM database Andrea Gennari, Sharyar Khan Referente: Prof.ssa Angela Antonucci Erice 6-8 Dicembre 2018

The problem The aim of the work is to determine the cosmic rays speed using the data collected in the DQM database The muons speed, that crossing the telescope can be determined using the length of the trace and the time that the particles take to cross the telescope exploit the formula v = length of the trace / flight time. The calculation data can be extracted from the DQM database by selecting the telescope of interest and setting some limitations that allow to use only the data really useful for the calculation. It is necessary to analyze the variability of the results according to the parameters that influence their value.

Phases of the Work Calculate the cosmic rays speed using the length of the trace and the flight time from DQM data Analyze the correspondence between the experimental and the simulated data coming from the same telescope Analyze the variation of the speed of cosmic rays as the angle of incidence changes, with respect to the vertical Analyze the variability of cosmic rays velocity using data from different telescopes

DQM Database By connecting to the Data Request the processing data can be obtained

Data Request Using the form in the figure, the data of interest and the values of the parameters that can determine the variability of the data, can be requested

Data Request In the CUT box, restrictions can be set for the extracted data. ChiSquare<10 && TimeOfFlight>0 && Theta<10 && Theta>0 && Run<10  With these limitations, the analysis is restricted to "good" traces; a positive flight time is required, to avoid the traces coming from the bottom that determine a negative time of flight. It is appropriate to insert a limitation for the angle to use the tracks that impact almost perpendicularly on the detector and finally we limit the run number to avoid an excessive number of data for the Excel sheet

Analysis of data compliance with theoretical predictions The first analysis carried out concerned the comparison between experimental and theoretical data expected for the phenomenon and generated randomly (Montecarlo method). A difference between these two sets of data could result in a correction of data to eliminate any systematic errors made in the collection of experimental data. The analysis was carried out on both the CERN01 and BOLOGNA01 telescope. For both telescopes, the experimental data and those indicated with MC were extracted. The results are expressed in graphical form. The two sets of data were made comparable using the same number of data (the experimental data are more numerous than those generated randomly)

CERN 01 (experimental data ID 864,Simulated data ID 944) Average = 30 cm/ns σ= 9 cm/ns Average = 28 cm/ns σ= 4 cm/ns The histograms shape of the experimental and simulated frequencies is comparable and therefore it is not necessary to impose corrections. We observed, for the CERN 01 telescope, a track length of less than 90 cm.

BOLOGNA 01 (dati sperimentali ID 1273, Dati simulati ID 1267) Media = 31 cm/ns Dev,.St= 5 cm/ns Media = 31 cm/ns Dev,.St=17 cm/ns The histograms shape of the experimental and simulated frequencies is comparable and therefore it is not necessary to impose corrections. The simulated data of BOLOGNA 01 show two peaks (frequencies at 26 and 36 cm/ns)

Dependence of the speed value on angle of the cosmic rays with respect to the normal to the detector The analysis is carried out by comparing the histograms The shape of the histograms is similar. By limiting the width of the angle, they get values distributed around the average in a more symmetrical way; the standard deviation is greater.

Muon speed for different telescopes Arezzo AVERAGE 27 cm/ns σ 4

Muon speed for different telescopes L’Aquila AVERAGE 29 cm/ns σ 4 cm/ns

Muon speed for different telescopes Lodi AVERAGE 31 cm/ns σ 22 cm/ns

Muon speed for different telescopes Bologna 01 AVERAGE 30 cm/ns σ 5 cm/ns

Comparison of the speed value for different telescopes The analysis is carried out by comparing the histograms The telescopes of Arezzo and L'Aquila reach higher peak values

Comparison of average muon velocity values The distribution of the averages obtained from the different telescopes is represented in the following histogram   Media cm/ns Dev.St cm/ns Cern 01 28 4 Bologna 01 31 17 Arezzo 27 l'Aquila 29 Lodi 22 Bologna 30 5 AVERAGE 29 cm/ns σ /√n 3

Muon speed The analysis of the data carried out on the DQM data makes it possible to state that the velocity of the muons is: V=(2.9 ± 0.3) 108 m/s

Conclusions Using the data collected in the DQM database it was possible to determine the velocity of the muons analyzing , for selected telescopes, the data related to the length of the trace and to the time of flight . The comparison between the experimental and simulated data allowed to exclude corrections on the experimental data The data were selected using tracks compatible with muonic traces, the most possible vertical with respect to the detector The variability of the data was analyzed by comparing data with and without limitations with respect to the perpendicularity of the trace and between data from different telescopes The averages of the velocities obtained from the various telescopes were analyzed and a small sample distribution of the averages was constructed The final result V = (2.9 ± 0.3) 108 m/s is compatible with the expected result given that the values greater than 3 108 m/s have no physical significance.

Thanks for the attention