Publication metrics and success on the academic job market

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Why some bird brains are larger than others
Advertisements

Multisensory Integration: What You See Is Where You Hear
Volume 27, Issue 11, Pages R447-R448 (June 2017)
The nature of Drosophila melanogaster
Joshua J. Foster, Emma M. Bsales, Russell J. Jaffe, Edward Awh 
Prey–Predator Communication: For Your Sensors Only
Volume 26, Issue 21, Pages R1135-R1136 (November 2016)
Volume 2, Issue 6, Pages (June 2008)
Aaron R. Seitz, Praveen K. Pilly, Christopher C. Pack  Current Biology 
Generalizable Learning: Practice Makes Perfect — But at What?
Whistled Turkish alters language asymmetries
Honeybee Vision: In Good Shape for Shape Recognition
Cell Biology: Microtubule Collisions to the Rescue
Lymphoid tissue inducer cells
Cell Division: Experiments and Modelling Unite to Resolve the Middle
Volume 21, Issue 20, Pages R837-R838 (October 2011)
Marr's vision: Twenty-five years on
Meiosis: Organizing Microtubule Organizers
Optic Flow Cues Guide Flight in Birds
Multisensory Integration: What You See Is Where You Hear
G. Lorimer Moseley, Timothy J. Parsons, Charles Spence  Current Biology 
Emergent acoustic order in arrays of mosquitoes
Volume 25, Issue 24, Pages R1156-R1158 (December 2015)
A Statistical Description of Plant Shoot Architecture
Volume 23, Issue 23, Pages R1025-R1026 (December 2013)
Attention Robustly Gates a Closed-Loop Touch Reflex
A Statistical Description of Plant Shoot Architecture
Marine Battesti, Celine Moreno, Dominique Joly, Frederic Mery 
Differential Impact of Behavioral Relevance on Quantity Coding in Primate Frontal and Parietal Neurons  Pooja Viswanathan, Andreas Nieder  Current Biology 
Visual Attention: Size Matters
Volume 21, Issue 11, Pages R414-R415 (June 2011)
Feature- and Order-Based Timing Representations in the Frontal Cortex
Young Children Do Not Integrate Visual and Haptic Form Information
Cultural Confusions Show that Facial Expressions Are Not Universal
Contrast Adaptation and Representation in Human Early Visual Cortex
Purple Tomatoes: Longer Lasting, Less Disease, and Better for You
Marr's vision: Twenty-five years on
Rosa Lafer-Sousa, Katherine L. Hermann, Bevil R. Conway 
Optic Flow Cues Guide Flight in Birds
Gut Microbiota and Extreme Longevity
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages e5 (January 2018)
BOLD fMRI Correlation Reflects Frequency-Specific Neuronal Correlation
Imaginal discs Current Biology
Mosquitoes Use Vision to Associate Odor Plumes with Thermal Targets
Developmental Patterning: Putting the Squeeze on Mis-specified Cells
Fish choose appropriately when and with whom to collaborate
Planar Cell Polarity: Microtubules Make the Connection with Cilia
Volume 23, Issue 9, Pages (May 2013)
Benoît Fontaine, Adrien Perrard, Philippe Bouchet  Current Biology 
Dissociable Effects of Salience on Attention and Goal-Directed Action
Meiosis: Checking Chromosomes Pair up Properly
Neural Coding: Bumps on the Move
Centrosome Size: Scaling Without Measuring
Visual aftereffects Current Biology
Motor Planning, Not Execution, Separates Motor Memories
Motor Control: No Constant but Change
Category Selectivity in the Ventral Visual Pathway Confers Robustness to Clutter and Diverted Attention  Leila Reddy, Nancy Kanwisher  Current Biology 
Inteins Current Biology
Gaze and the Control of Foot Placement When Walking in Natural Terrain
Christina Bergonzo, Thomas E. Cheatham  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages R353-R355 (May 2009)
Insect Navigation: How Flies Keep Track of Their Snack
Cécile Fruteau, Eric van Damme, Ronald Noë  Current Biology 
Volume 23, Issue 9, Pages (May 2013)
David A. McVea, Keir G. Pearson  Current Biology 
A Visual Sense of Number
Gaby Maimon, Andrew D. Straw, Michael H. Dickinson  Current Biology 
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages R198-R202 (March 2008)
Responsibility Assignment in Redundant Systems
A way of selectively degrading colour constancy demonstrates the experience dependence of colour vision  Eli Brenner, Frans W. Cornelissen  Current Biology 
Presentation transcript:

Publication metrics and success on the academic job market David van Dijk, Ohad Manor, Lucas B. Carey  Current Biology  Volume 24, Issue 11, Pages R516-R517 (June 2014) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.04.039 Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Publication features, prior to becoming a PI or leaving academia, accurately separate future PIs from non-PIs. (A) In our data set of 25,604 authors, 1583 (6.2%) become a PI (A, left). (A, right) Histogram of the distribution of time to PI for all authors that become PIs. (B) Shown are publication features that separate PIs from non-PIs. The blue bar shows the total fraction (6.2%) of authors that become PIs. Green, red, cyan, magenta, orange and yellow bars show the fraction of authors in the top 10% for a given grouping that becomes a PI. Error bars show the standard deviation for this calculated fraction following 100 bootstraps. For each author, only non-last author publications prior to becoming a PI are used for the calculation. (B, cyan bar) Authors are grouped according to the mean number of citations per IF (journal impact factor) for publications in which they are first author (left cyan bar) or middle author (right cyan bar). (B, magenta bar) Authors are grouped according to the mean number of citations for publications in which they are first author (left magenta bar) or middle author (right magenta bar). (B, orange bar) Authors are grouped according to their average number of co-authors, for papers in which they are either first (left yellow bar) or middle (right yellow bar) author. (B, yellow bar) Authors are grouped according to their h-index. (C) Principal component analysis is shown in which the first two principal components explain 92% of the variance. Future PIs are shown in blue circles, future non-PIs in green triangles. (D–G) Shown are the trajectories of various publication features in time, for authors that will eventually become PI and for authors that will eventually leave academia. Dotted lines are error-bars obtained by bootstrapping. Authors who will eventually become PI (red lines) show, on average (compared to authors who will eventually leave academia, blue lines), already in early career, an increased rate of publication (D, mean publication rate in time), and an increased journal impact factor (E, mean IF in time). Authors that have longer pre-PI careers show an increased number of citations per IF (F, mean number of citations per IF in time). Authors who will eventually become PI go to higher ranked universities (G, mean university rank in time). In addition, for authors that will become PI, university rank appears to increase within the first 5 years of their careers (G, arrow). Current Biology 2014 24, R516-R517DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2014.04.039) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions