Preliminary results from frequency tables and national quality reports

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
8th meeting of the Task Force on Health Expectancies Session 3 – Improving current HLY estimates The health questions in SILC 2007 and 2008.
Advertisements

Lessons from the Eurobarometer 2007 Additional analysis from the Belgian perspective Sergio Perelman CREPP, HEC-Ecole de Gestion, Université de Liège.
1 Owner-Occupied Housing Summary of the pilot Item 5 of the Agenda D4 – Price Statistics HICP Working Group Luxembourg October 2007.
Introduction to the training dataset Alexander Mack.
ESS Slide 1 Quality assessment of MEHM in SILC Eurostat Unit F5 “Health and Food Safety Statistics” 4 th meeting of the Task Force on Health Expectancies.
Eurostat Ag.no "Annex 2" supplement to Eurostat Annual Report, October 2015 Working Group on Article 64 and Article 65 of the Staff Regulations Meeting.
Gender Equality is key towards the eradication of Violence against Women.
European Health Interview Survey (EHIS) EHIS wave 2: implementation and next plans Agenda point November 2015 Public Health Statistics WG Jakub.
All Roads Lead to Rome Km 923 Km 489 Km 0 Km 989 Km 518 Km 898 Km 811
Highlights of 2016 and the outlook for 2017
Economic benefits of gender equality in the EU
Eurojust cases involving crimes against children
Urban Audit 3 State of play
Weighting issues in EU-LFS
Point 5. Countries plans on Time Use Surveys
Update on the UOE 2012 data collection
AES progress report and future plans
Ag.no. 15 Lessons from the 2015 A65 exercise
No document Ag 08 ESA2010 (SNA 2008)
Experience of the MAs with the structured survey on end recipients
GBV survey: progress EUROSTAT 20 March 2018.
2.1. ESS Agreement on Learning Mobility (IVET & Youth)
FEAD Mid-Term Evaluation
Ag.no.16 A65 country manuals and country assessments
SBS Compliance report item 3 of the agenda
3C. Update of Summary of WISE electronic delivery
Report on WISE Art.8 and GIS issues
Habides update (May 2011).
TG EHIS January 2012 Item 3.2 of the agenda EHIS wave 1 anonymised data Bart De Norre, Eurostat.
State of play Article 5 reports
MISSOC NETWORK MEETING Amsterdam, 6-7 June 2016
Agenda Item Minimum wages -
Education and Training Statistics Working Group
REGIO's 2014 communication priorities
LAMAS October 2016 Agenda Item 2.1
Representative sampling questionnaire
ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF GENDER EQUALITY IN THE EUROPEAN UNION
LAMAS Working Group 29 June-1 July 2016
Item 7.1 Implementation of the 2016 Adult Education Survey
Item 8.1 Implementation of the 2016 Adult Education Survey
Programme adoptions Cohesion Policy:
Ag.no. 15 Lessons from the 2016 A65 exercise
ETS Working Group meeting 24-25/9/2007 Agenda point 7 CVTS3 brief update /09/ 2007 ETS working group.
State of play: data transmission, validation and dissemination
Proposal for granting access to HOUSEHOLD BUDGET SURVEYS (HBS)
LAMAS Working Group 29 June-1 July 2016
Input Presentation for Working Group 4
LAMAS Working Group 7 – 8 December 2016
Item 4.3 – Repeal of CVTS legal acts
3.6. Impact of population and housing census results on population stocks and on LFS and SILC–follow-up DSS Meeting September 2012.
ESS Security and Secure exchange of information Expert Group (E4SEG) Item 1 of the agenda IT security assurance DIME/ITDG SG Meeting London 15/2/20189.
State of Play RBMPs and WISE reporting (9/07/10)
Item 4 Overview of the 2016 AES & 2015 CVTS data collection
Income distribution: flash estimates 2016 (FE) Item 3.6 of the agenda
FISIM State of play Agenda Item 3.
Update on implementation WG F 27 April 2010 Maria Brättemark
European Statistical Training Programme (ESTP)
Item 3 Observed consistency and revisions
LAMAS October 2018 Agenda Item 4.1 LMI Review – main scenarios
Update on status of reporting and validation process
LAMAS Working Group June 2018
LAMAS Working Group 7-8 December 2016
Doc.A6465/14/04 Ag.16 A65 country manuals
IT security assurance – 2018 and beyond Item 2 of the agenda DIME/ITDG Steering Group June 2018 Pascal JACQUES ESTAT B2/LISO.
LAMAS Working Group 5-6 October 2016
EU-SILC Tracing Rules Implementation: Pros and Cons
LAMAS Working Group June 2015
Input Presentation for Working Group 6
LAMAS Working Group June 2018
DG Environment, Unit C.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Presentation transcript:

Preliminary results from frequency tables and national quality reports Agenda point 2.2 Guillaume Blanc Lucian Agafitei ESTAT F-4 11-12 May 2016 EHIS Task Force

Outline Unit non-response Mode of data collection Interview duration Sample size Use of proxy respondents Item non-response Problematic variables Preliminary results from 20 national QRs Preliminary results from frequency tables of 23 Member States 11-12 May 2016 EHIS Task Force

Unit non-response Around 50-60% in AT, BE, FI, FR (and LT?) 10% or less in CY, RO, SK Subgroups with higher non-response: Elderly (AT) Men (FI) Young population (FI, CZ) Illiterate (FR) Seriously sick (FR) Non-French speakers (FR) 11-12 May 2016 EHIS Task Force

Mode of data collection   Face-to-face interviews Telephone interviews Self-administered questionnaire Use of administrative data BE ✓ - BG CZ EL ES FR(1) HR CY LV(2) LT LU NL(3) AT PL PT(3) RO SE(4) SK FI 11-12 May 2016 EHIS Task Force

Interview duration Face to face interview: 20'  45' Telephone interview: 20'  24' Self-administered questionnaire: 20'  41' Reporting issues: Not always indicated in the quality report Not always presented separately by data collection mode Not always clear if only EHIS part included 11-12 May 2016 EHIS Task Force

Minimum effective sample size MS Achieved sample size (1) Effective sample size (2) Minimum effective sample size (3) Ratio (2) / (3) (4) BE 9,951 4,692 6,500 0.72 BG 6,410 5,008 5,920 0.85 CZ 6,737 6,478 6,510 1.00 EL 8,223 4,691 6,667 0.70 ES 22,842 : 11,620 FR 15,756 11,847 13,110 0.90 HR 5,446 CY 4,958 4,948 4,095 1.21 LV 7,077 9,870 4,555 2.17 LT 5,205 6,426 4,850 1.32 LU 4,004 393? 4,000 0.10? HU NL 7,653 7,289 7,515 0.97 AT 15,771 10,729 6,050 1.77 PL 24,156 20,824 10,690 1.95 PT 18,204 6,515 RO 16,605 8,420 SE 6,200 SK 5,490 5,719 5,370 1.06 FI 6,226 5,330 Out of 12 MS (LU excluded), 5 seem not to comply with EHIS wave 2 regulation 11-12 May 2016 EHIS Task Force

Use of proxies for specific variables Recommendation for not using a proxy for some variables not followed by 6 countries (in 3 countries allowed for all variables) No proxies allowed in 5 countries Proportion of proxy: Less than 10 %: 11 MS More than 10 %: 3 MS (maximum: 36%) 11-12 May 2016 EHIS Task Force

Impact of using proxies Example: Variable PC3 "Need to receive help or more help with self-care activities Premise: 29% of the answers PROXY = 2 or 3 Result : % of Yes (weighted results) PROXY = 1 or 2 or 3 PROXY = 1 PROXY = 2 or 3 54 % 48 % 66 % 11-12 May 2016 EHIS Task Force

Item non-response Huge differences between countries and variables Examples: PL2 (difficulty in seeing): 38% (EE) PL4 (difficulty in hearing): 97% (EE) PN2 (pain interference with work): 45-50% (CZ, EE) PA1 (last time of vaccination against flu): 70-75% (BE, FI), 96% (EE) UN1A (unmet need for health care in the past 12 months due to long waiting list): 49% (FR) HHINCOME: more than 10% in 8 countries (max: 36% in HR) Would be good to give an idea on overall item-non-response 11-12 May 2016 EHIS Task Force