Study on non-compliance of ozone target values and potential air quality improvements in relation to ozone.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Air quality in Europe report. Air pollution impacts human health, contributes to climate change and damages ecosystems. Here are some of the pollutants.
Advertisements

EUROPEAN UNION INITIATIVES AND REQUIREMENTS : AIR QUALITY ASSESSMENT AS A POLICY MECHANISM Sonja Vidič Meteorological and Hydrological Service of Croatia.
IMPLEMENTATION OF EU AQ LEGISLATION IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC J. FIALA Czech Hydrometeorological Institute Prague, Czech Republic.
1 Introduction, reporting requirements, workshop objectives Workshop on greenhouse gas and ammonia emission inventories and projections from agriculture.
INTEGRATED INFORMATION E & H Action Plan Implementation.
Towards a harmonised approach for collection and interpretation of data on emerging substances in the environment in support of European environmental.
Assessment on the implementation of the Mediterranean Strategy for Sustainable Development Dr Nicola Cantore Overseas Development Institute,
” Particulates „ Characterisation of Exhaust Particulate Emissions from Road Vehicles Key Action KA2:Sustainable Mobility and Intermodality Task 2.2:Infrastructures.
EU Legislation in the field of environment – key developments in 2007 and rd ECENA Plenary Meeting 18 September 2008.
WHO European Centre for Environment and Health Towards a pan-European Environment and Health Information System World Health Organization European Centre.
Meeting of the High Level Group on Administrative Burdens Dr. Johannes Ludewig Chairman of the Nationaler Normenkontrollrat Brussels, 23 July 2013.
European Commission: DG Environment Streamlining and harmonizing climate change and air pollution requirements TFEIP, 23 – 24 May 2007, Dessau Eduard Dame.
SEVESO II transposition and implementation – possible approaches and lessons learned from MS/NMS SEVESO II transposition and implementation – possible.
Recommendation 2001/331/EC: Review and relation to sectoral inspection requirements Miroslav Angelov European Commission DG Environment, Unit A 1 Enforcement,
ISO MONITORING AND MEASUREMENT. ISO Environmental Management Systems2 Lesson Learning Goals At the end of this lesson you should be.
Assessment of options to streamline legislation on industrial emissions IPPC Review Stakeholder Hearing 4 May 2007 Caspar Corden Entec UK Limited.
Technical Support for the Impact Assessment of the Review of Priority Substances under Directive 2000/60/EC Updated Project Method for WG/E Brussels 22/10/10.
Evaluate Phase Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0774/Information Technology Capital Budgeting Tahun: 2009.
Creating the environment for business Streamlining industrial emissions legislation Caspar Corden (Entec) Andrew Farmer (IEEP) IPPC Review Advisory Group.
1 Agri-environment analysis at the EEA Projects and goals of the European Environment Agency.
Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis Cost-effectiveness Analysis in CAFE and the Need for Information about Urban Air Quality.
SEVESO II transposition and implementation: Possible approaches and lessons learned from member states and new member states SEVESO II transposition and.
Creating the environment for business Assessment of the Implementation by the Member States of the IPPC Directive Advisory Group Meeting Friday 13 th January.
1 European air indicator reporting Process and experience © iStockphoto.com/cmisje.
1 Černikovský, Krejčí, Volná (ETC/ACM): Air pollution by ozone in Europe during the summer 2012 & comparison with previous years 17th EIONET Workshop on.
STREAMLINING CLIMATE CHANGE AND AIR POLLUTION REPORTING REQUIREMENTS TFEIP – Dublin 23 – 24 October2007.
ISO 14001:2004 Clause 4.3 Planning. Clause 4.3 Planning Key Requirements of Environmental Management System Certification.
Alison Donnelly Terry Prendergast, Mike Jones, Tadhg O’Mahony
Vesa Tanner European Commission Directorate-General Energy
Business environment in the EU Prepared by Dr. Endre Domonkos (PhD)
CAFE SG 23 November Brussels
Background CRiteria for the IDentification of Groundwater thrEsholds BRIDGE Project Presentation Contract N° (SSPI) Co-ordinator: BRGM (Fr)
Forum for Air quality Modelling FAIRMODE ew. eea
Diffuse Sources of Water Pollution
Representative Measurements – AQ-Workshop Bucharest, July 2008
Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) Updating the Baseline and Maximum Control scenarios State of play of the.
Agenda item 5(b) the Committee’s activities related to the overview of progress in implementing the strategic plan for 2015–2020, including the evaluation.
Working Group on estuaries and coastal zones
9th Noise Expert Group Centre Borschette, Brussels, Belgium.
Update of Guidance document on Wind ENErgy and natura 2000
Change Assurance Update
Good Practices on Disaster Prevention in Europe
Balázs Horváth DG ENV C.1 Water Unit
GPP Training Toolkit An Introduction European Commission
Task Force on Target Setting and Reporting TFTSR
Commission report on Art. 8 WFD Monitoring programmes
IMPROVING PUBLIC INFORMATION
Diffuse Sources of Water Pollution
LIFE and the implementation of the Water Framework Directive
Information on projects
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
LIFE and the implementation of the Water Framework Directive
European Commission, DG Environment Air & Industrial Emissions Unit
OECD good practices for setting up an RIA system Regional Capacity-Building Seminar on Regulatory Impact Assessment Istanbul, Turkey 20 November 2007.
Ongoing work on CIS Guidance Article 4.7
Reduction of total releases from unintentional production of POPs
Fitness Check EU Water Policy
Overview of Canada’s Air Quality Activities
Streamlining of monitoring and reporting under WFD, Nitrates Directive and EEA's SoE –concept paper DG Environment.
PROVISIONS UNDER THE HABITATS DIRECTIVE RELEVANT TO NEEI
Analysis of the notification of compensatory measures
European Commission, DG Environment, Marine Unit
Working party ‘Agriculture and Environment’, Eurostat, June 2008
Contributions to total changes in emissions of ozone precursors
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
An Overview of Europe’s Air Quality and Air Pollutant Emissions
A general introduction
© Fresh Thoughts Consulting
Industrial Emissions Directive Targeted stakeholder survey
Presentation transcript:

Study on non-compliance of ozone target values and potential air quality improvements in relation to ozone

Introduction Ozone precursor emissions reduced Average ozone concentration unchanged (1999-2009) Ozone concentrations have adverse health effects 17% of European citizens exposed to ozone above EU target values (2009) 95% of European citizens exposed to ozone above WHO Guidelines (2009) 1/3 of arable land in EEA Member Countries exposed to levels above EU target (2009)

Background The Air Quality Directive 2008/50/EC established two target values for ozone to be met by 1 January 2010: Protection of human health:120 µg/m3 as maximum daily 8 hour mean, not to be exceeded more than 25 days per year averaged over three years Protection of vegetation: AOT40 (Accumulated Ozone over a Threshold of 40 ppb) 18,000 µg/m3-h averaged over five years. Several MS face difficulties meeting the target for protection of human health

Rational A review for the target values for ozone must consider: existing air quality situation incl. potential for reduction of emissions of ozone precursors and ozone concentrations better understanding of the excedances of target values; the current overall ozone exposure and environmental and health impacts reasons for MS difficulties or failure to comply with the ozone standard; project the compliance situation over time measures to meet both the target values and move towards long term objectives.

Objectives of the study Assess current air quality situation in relation to ozone Assess MS experiences in applying the Directive: assessing and managing ground-level ozone Evaluate analysis and monitoring techniques and requirements Effectiveness of current provisions of the Directive – lessons learned International experiences and appraoches Recommendations for improving implementation including amending the Directive if necessary

Task 1: Current air quality situation Goal: Establish the current situation in air quality for ozone Aspects: Current and historical trends and exposure. Methods: Modelling, mapping, spatial and temporal analysis Results: Air quality situation for ozone Recommendations for improvements of data, data analysis Suggestions on how to overcome gaps and weaknesses The recommendations for further work where relevant

Task 2: Assessment methodologies for ozone Goal: Evaluate feasibility and accuracy of the sampling, analytical, measuring and monitoring techniques Aspects: Data quality objectives; current methods; and the inclusion of near real-time monitoring for warning purposes Methods: Questionnaires to MS; analysis of national reporting; review of measurement techniques (current and new) Results: Recommendations based on the weaknesses and gaps in current ozone monitoring in EU Member States Recommendations for the review of the Directive by 2013

Task 3: Response to ozone exceedances Goal: Establish a clear picture of the relative significance of ozone exceedences for each country, and a ‘significance score’ allowing a prioritisation and categorisation. Aspects: Identify responses of MS; costs and effectiveness of the measures Methods: Document analysis, internet-based questionnaire, systematic, consistent analysis across MS using Results: Information on Member States' response to ozone exceedences on their territory (report)

Task 4: Factors for projected non-compliance Goal: Identify the reasons or factors responsible for projected non-compliance Aspects: disproportionate costs, organisation of management in the MS, shortcomings in the Directive, EU legislation and/or international conventions. Methods: Literature review; information from Task 1-3; case studies in approx. 5 MS for in-depth analysis and interviews Results: Identify the reasons or factors responsible for a projected non-compliance.

Task 5: International experiences and approaches Goal: Information on the management regimes for ozone outside the EU comparing with the US, Japan, China, India, Canada, and Australia. Aspects: Legislative frameworks, current status; reasons for (non-) compliance, trends in policy and lessons learned Methods: Literature review; interviews with national authorities and relevant stakeholders Results: Country and summary reports on legislative frameworks, current status, and reasons for (non-)compliance; Summary of key issues, lessons learned and good practices for the management of ground-level ozone

Task 6: Future objectives for ozone Goal: Propose future objectives based on results emerging from Tasks1-5. Aspects: i) Metrics for new standards/targets: level, binding nature, spatial and temporal aggregation; ii) Scenarios and projections linked to energy system modelling; iii) Integrated assessment of proposed, new standards Methods: Air pollution, energy system and health impact modelling; integrated assessment modelling using EVA and GAINS Results: Strengths and weaknesses of current legislation as regards ozone The cost implications for the Member States in having to comply with any new standards and the added value of new air quality objectives. Suggestions for setting up more ambitious standards taking into account all the mentioned factors.

Time schedule

Thank you for the attention!