Big Sky Wastewater Facility Plan Update

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SPRINGETTSBURY TOWNSHIP.
Advertisements

Advanced Wastewater Treatment Plants.
JOINT MEETING OF ESSEX AND UNION COUNTIES Virtual Plant Tour.
Wastewater to Frac Water Presented by – Peter Bernard, CEO Active Water Solutions, LLC. Williston Basin Petroleum Conference May 22, 2012 A Smart Solution.
Welcome to Shawnee #2 Wastewater Treatment Plant.
Welcome to American #2 Wastewater Treatment Plant.
Treatment of Waste Brine from a Brackish Reverse Osmosis Plant
1000 Friends of Florida Presentation on May 12, 2005 Presenter: Kart Vaith/CDM
Treatment of Slaughterhouse Wastewater
Nutrient Issues at the Blue Plains WWTP February 2004.
Anne Arundel County Department of Public Works
w-fn005 1 Ocean Outfall Legislation Compliance City of Hollywood Department of Public Utilities LARGE USER MEETING October 2, 2008.
Why Does the Lake Community Need a Sewer Septic tanks are failing. The life expectancy of a septic tank in “ideal” conditions is 20 years. In many cases.
This presentation is an abbreviated version of the original PowerPoint presentation of June 23, This version was presented at the Commissioners’
Treated Wastewater Reuse For Landscape Irrigation and Amenity Lake Evaporation Make-Up Presented to: Houston Land/Water Sustainability Forum May 13, 2008.
Paving a Path to Potable Reuse Flexible Treatment for To Be Determined Regulations Michael Watts, PhD, PE Water Technology Leader Garver.
Introduction to Septic Tanks John R. Buchanan, Ph.D., P.E. University of Tennessee.
An-Najah National University Civil Engineering Department
GENERATION OF ADDITIONAL REVENUE FROM PRODUCTS OF
The Town of Discovery Bay Community Services District Wastewater Treatment Plant Master Plan NOVEMBER 9, 2011.
Coles Point Wastewater Treatment Plant
LEE COUNTY UTILITIES DIVISION Integrated Water Resources Master Plan
TEXAS COMMISSION on ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY. PROPOSED STUCTURE FOR CHAPTER 217 < Subchapter A Administrative Provisions < Subchapter B Design Bases < Subchapter.
 Why  Project Status  Future Course Lime Sludge Biosolids Water/Wastewater System Life Cycle Raw Water Wells (12) Water Treatment Plant Storage Tanks.
Muskegon Wastewater Treatment Facility
Wastewater Treatment Plant
Welcome to Shawnee #2 Wastewater Treatment Plant.
Welcome to Shawnee #2 Wastewater Treatment Plant.
Municipal Wastewater Efficiency Improvements Potential Savings for the 6 th Power Plan September 30, 2008 Regional Technical Forum South Treatment Plant.
Water Treatment for NYC Croton Schematic. NYC Filtration Plant for Delaware and Catskill Systems  Filtration avoidance criteria  Alternatives to Filtration.
Water Treatment for NYC Croton Schematic. NYC Filtration Plant for Delaware and Catskill Systems ä Filtration avoidance criteria ä Alternatives to Filtration.
L.R. Chevalier, Ph.D., P.E., D-WRE, BCEE, F-ASCE Curriculum for Sustainability at Southern Illinois University Carbondale Based on Chevalier, L.R., 2010,
 UAB Vilniaus waters - the largest water company in Lithuania, which operates not only in the city of Vilnius, but also the district, Svencionys and.
WATER TREATMENT.
COUNTRY PAPER ON REUSE OF LOW QUALITY WATER IN EGYPT.
City of Rehoboth Beach Wastewater Treatment Facilities A Historical Narrative June 16, 2008 Presented by Bob Stenger, Superintendent Rehoboth Beach Wastewater.
Short and Long Range Water Supply Planning and Aquifer Performance Test (APT)
Maximizing Water Supply Sustainability for the Goleta Valley Ryan Drake Water Supply and Conservation Manager 2015 Central Coast Sustainability Summit.
City of Tallahassee Wastewater Treatment System Hydrogeology Workshop – 2005 May 12 – 13, 2005.
November 17, 2015 Charting the Future of Water Reuse for the City of Raleigh Sheryl D. Smith, P.E. – CDM Smith Eileen M. Navarrete, P.E., PMP – City of.
Oregon Natural Treatment Systems for Wastewater Natural Treatment Systems – A Water Quality Match for Oregon’s Cities and Towns June, 2014 Oregon Department.
Reclaimed Water Solution for Disposal Capacity Village of Bald Head Island 2015 NC AWWA - WEA Annual Conference November 17, 2015.
EXPANSION OF BRUNSWICK COUNTY’S NORTHWEST WATER TREATMENT PLANT Public Utilities.
Public Information Meeting Wastewater Treatment January 26, 2016.
BY: MARTY WANIELISTA, PHD., P.E. BMPTRAINS MODEL: BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON HARVESTING.
Wastewater Treatment Principles and Regulation. What is Wastewater? Sewage released by residences, businesses and industry Contains liquid and solid components.
CTC 450 Review WW Collection Systems Types of pipes Installation.
NAS JACKSONVILLE WASTEWATER REUSE PROJECT
Town of Davie Utilities Department Renuka M. Bajnath John McGeary.
Welcome to the Key Largo Wastewater Treatment Plant.
It Starts Here... A day in the life of your waste water...
GWRS Final Expansion Project and SP-173 Update GWRS Steering Committee Meeting April 11, 2016.
Wastewater Treatment Plant Background Slide #1 5/27/2004 CITY OF GALT public works Wastewater Background May 2004.
County of Hawaii, Department of Environmental Management
Sewage Treatment.
Manchester’s CSO Program: A Look Behind and a Look Ahead
Wastewater Treatment.
Wastewater Surcharge Reduction for Manufacturing Processes
Flow Equalization Jae K. (Jim) Park Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Storm Water Storage and Treatment
Wastewater Treatment Dr.Gulve R.M..
Water Pollution.
Water treatment Potable water…water that is drinkable; safe for consumption Drinking water treatment is widespread in developed countries today However,
Big Sky Wastewater Facility Plan Update
Wastewater Facilities Upgrade Project
BIG SKY COUNTY WATER & SEWER DISTRICT NO. 363
City of Sunrise Wastewater Reuse Program
City of Janesville Wastewater Facility Plan Amendment Public Hearing
Nitrogen Removal University of Kansas
Advanced Wastewater Treatment
Presentation transcript:

Big Sky Wastewater Facility Plan Update Final Report August 25, 2015

Updated Projected flow Flows updated to include LMM and Spanish Peaks

Growth Projections High rate 4.82% Average rate 4.09% Low Rate 3.36 %

Calculated irrigation Disposal capacity (Million Gallons per year) Prior Calculated Capacities Revised Capacities Meadow Village Course 206* 140-160 YMC** 76 22-28 Spanish Peaks** 100.8 20-30 Total 382.8 182-218 YMC and Spanish Peaks based on preliminary design reports completed by Nicklin Earth and Water Maybe high based on actual irrigation volumes currently being used * Per DEQ approval ** Based on Design Reports

REASONS FOR DIFFERENCES Percolation rates used Spanish Peaks = 0.2 inches/hour (Based on SCS data) YC = 2.0 inches/ hour (Based on SCS data) Meadow Village = 1.58 inches/ hour (Based on perc tests) Nitrogen uptake Spanish Peaks= 178.4 pounds/ acre YC= 147 pound/acre Meadow Village 108 pound/acre ( from irrigation) Irrigation Period Spanish Peaks and YC used 24 hours/day Meadow Village used 6 hours/day 137 day growing season used for all three courses Spanish Peaks and YC perc rates based on SCS published data. No percolation testing has been done on YC or Spanish Peaks to confirm Irrigation Period; need to have a 3:1 dry- wet cycle to meet DEQ requirements. SP and YC calculation done using 24 hour per day All courses use a 137 day irrigation period. It is unlikely that SP and YC would have the same irrigation period as the Meadow Village

Growth Projections 218 MGY 182 MGY High rate 4.82% Average rate 4.09% Low Rate 3.36 % 182 MGY

Golf course Upgrades and recommendation Do testing on the YC and SP courses to determine actual percolation rates

Storage requirements no winter disposal

Existing storage Meadow Village Yellowstone Mountain Club Large Pond = 60.1 MG Small Pond = 19.6 MG Total Filtered Storage = 79.7 MG SBR Effluent = 8.2 MG ( but effectively zero due to piping) Yellowstone Mountain Club 80 MG Total Existing Storage = 159.7 MG

Existing & Future storage Meadow Village Large Pond = 60.1 MG Small Pond = 19.6 MG SBR Effluent = 8.2 MG (with piping change) Total Storage = 87.9 MG Yellowstone Mountain Club Existing = 80 MG Future = 50 MG Total Storage = 130 MG Grand Total Existing and Future = 217.9 MG Storage Needs (no winter disposal)= 226 MG

Storage requirement with winter disposal 100,000 gallons per day of winter disposal

Need for Project Projected Flows exceed current disposal capacity by 95.8 to 131.8 MGY Reduce the level of nutrients applied to the Meadow Village Couse to reduce impacts to the Middle Fork Provide additional disposal to allow the District to exercise its water right on the West Fork. Current disposal is 95.8 to 131.8 MGY short of the projected full buildout flows

Alternatives considered for additional Disposal 1. Disposal on the west side of the Madison Range near Ennis. Estimated Cost $13.1 million 2. Construct purple pipe system for effluent reuse in Meadow Village area. Estimated Cost $5 million + treatment plant upgrades. Could also be part of an expanded golf course irrigation 3. Indirect Potable Reuse Deep Injection Wells (not considered viable) Shallow injection Wells ( rough estimate $350,000 to $500,000 + advanced treatment $7-$9 million) Additional study would be required to determine the actual volume that could be injected

Alternatives considered for additional Disposal 4. Subsurface Disposal (drainfields) 5. Surface Discharge to the Gallatin River during the winter 6. Snowmaking 7. Direct Potable Reuse

Winter Disposal Options Subsurface drain fields or aquifer injection Indirect Potable Reuse Unlikely to meet all discharge needs Aquifer injection- must meet primary drinking water standards or non-degradation requirements at discharge point Additional treatment required Surface discharge Possible based on DEQ rules and non-degradation criteria

Existing treatment plant Plant Capacity Effluent Quality Metering Additional Process Monitoring Ammonia and ORP probes for SBR’s and digesters TSS meter for waste sludge to help control solids in system Adding VFD’s to blower motors to control DO

Plant Capacity Design Capacity – Peak Day 1.3 MGD Current Capacity – Peak Day 1.04 MGD Cycle time increased to improve nitrogen removal Current Peak Day 0.923 in 2014 but has been around 0.7 MGD in prior years Third basin needed by 2021, start planning by 2018. Total cycle time = 4.8 hours React 0.58 hours Mixed fill 0.67 hours Settling time 0.75 hours React fill 1.74 hours Decant time 1.07 hours Total cycle time = 6 hours React 1 hour Mixed fill Settling time React fill 2 hours Decant time

Effluent Quality

Cold Weather impacts Improved monitoring for solids control.

Aeration control

Metering

Metering

Treatment plant upgrades Add VFD drives to blowers $216,000 Modify piping for SBR effluent storage pond $187,000 Additional monitoring probes District has already purchased Additional work to resolve metering