Predicting poverty and wealth from mobile phone metadata

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
By Ruaridh and James. Definition Economic inequalities comprises all differences in the distribution of economic assets and income.
Advertisements

CASHPOR Micro Credit Social Performance and Impact Theme 1 - We operate in the poorest part of India, in terms of density of poverty, with 12 of our 15.
The Distribution of Wealth Imagine that the total population of a country is divided into five empty buckets with 20% of the population in each – they.
USING A GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM (GIS) TO MODEL SLOPE INSTABILITY AND DEBRIS FLOW HAZARDS IN THE FRENCH BROAD RIVER WATERSHED, NORTH CAROLINA Anne.
© 2003 By Default!Slide 1 Poverty Mapping Celia M. Reyes Introduction to Poverty Analysis NAI, Beijing, China Nov. 1-8, 2005.
6 am 11 am 5 pm Fig. 5: Population density estimates using the aggregated Markov chains. Colour scale represents people per km. Population Activity Estimation.
Quartiles of complete blood count components Jeffrey L. Anderson, et al. Am J Cardiol 2007;99:
February 07, 2012 National Institute of Statistics of Rwanda 1 NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STATISTICS OF RWANDA EDPRS2, EICV3 & DHS4 Joint Launch Key Statistics.
Distribution of Income Who has all the Money?. Income Distribution Free markets focus on EFFICIENCY not EQUALITY United States has enormous wealth but.
1 Chapter 14 Income Distribution © 2003 South-Western College Publishing.
Caterina Ruggeri Laderchi, Ramya Sundaram, Natsuko Kiso and Alexandru Cojocaru World Bank International Conference “Poverty and Social Inclusion in the.
How free markets create & divide wealth
Norway vs. Zimbabwe A Case Study in Development. Norway vs. Zimbabwe Stats for Comparison –Economic and Developmental Data –Dominance of Economic Sectors.
Changes in Tropical Cyclone Number, Duration, and Intensity in a Warming Environment by P. J. Webster, G. J. Holland, J. A. Curry, and H.-R. Chang Science.
Current Problems in the Management of Marine Fisheries by J. R. Beddington, D. J. Agnew, and C. W. Clark Science Volume 316(5832): June 22, 2007.
Michael Xie, Neal Jean, Stefano Ermon
Fig. 4 Careers and their Q parameter.
Daniel Ayalew Ali, Klaus Deininger
Mapping Population Density
MODELING THE CURRENT AND FUTURE DISTRIBUTIONS OF
Volume 383, Issue 9930, Pages (May 2014)
Comparison of the model incorporating daily dose to that incorporating Cmax. Comparison of the model incorporating daily dose to that incorporating Cmax.
Evaluation of models incorporating the base covariates.
Modulation of Neuronal Interactions Through Neuronal Synchronization
Ebola Outbreak Killed 5000 Gorillas
Four design-build-test cycles produced JCVI-syn3.0.
What is Income? What is Wealth?.
Volume 28, Issue 7, Pages e5 (April 2018)
Combining satellite imagery and machine learning to predict poverty
Stimulation induced variability of pulse plethysmography does not discriminate responsiveness to intubation  M Luginbu¨hl, M Ru¨fenacht, I Korhonen, M.
Distribution of Income
by A. L. Westerling, H. G. Hidalgo, D. R. Cayan, and T. W. Swetnam
University of Washington, Autumn 2018
Integration of omic networks in a developmental atlas of maize
Profiling indices geographically: A platform for targeted action
University of Washington, Autumn 2018
Unique in the shopping mall: On the reidentifiability of credit card metadata by Yves-Alexandre de Montjoye, Laura Radaelli, Vivek Kumar Singh, and Alex.
The Antisense Transcriptomes of Human Cells
Fig. 2. Best model fits. Best model fits. Illustration of the best model fits for the (A) basic, (B) continuous, and (C) cluster models. See Table 1 and.
Prediction of hypertension in chronic hemodialysis patients
Volume 88, Issue 3, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages e4 (October 2017)
Countering Zika in Latin America
ROC for predicted combined death or neurodevelopmental impairment compared with actual death or neurodevelopmental impairment as stratified by gestational.
Fig. 1. Map showing the study catchment area in the East of England.
(A) Illustration of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (discrimination) of the recalibrated model on the external validation set data. (A)
What's So Special About Science (And How Much Should We Spend on It?)‏
by Asaf Inbal, Jean Paul Ampuero, and Robert W. Clayton
Congratulations! Now Get to Work
by Katelyn M. Gostic, Monique Ambrose, Michael Worobey, and James O
by Kenneth W. Latimer, Jacob L. Yates, Miriam L. R
Christopher T. Nguyen et al. BTS 2018;3:97-109
by Rory Van Tuyl, and Asya Pereltsvaig
TTL: Nyambura Githagui
Comparative receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the area under the curve (AUC) in association with 30-day mortality for severity scores.
Fig. 3 Band dispersions along on the KHgSb (010) surface.
In vivo tracking of PD-L1+NCMs in the microcirculation.
Scoring of Coronary Artery Disease Characteristics on Coronary CT Angiograms by Using Machine Learning For prediction of all-cause mortality on the basis.
Volume 383, Issue 9930, Pages (May 2014)
Volume 28, Issue 7, Pages e5 (April 2018)
Receiver operating characteristic ROC curve of Lung Clearance Index (LCI)1/40, LCI1/30, LCI1/20, LCI1/10 and inverse forced expiratory volume in 1 s %
A statistic for microtubule order in mitotic spindles.
Breadth of antigen response as a correlate of protection.
by Andreas Keiling, Scott Thaller, John Wygant, and John Dombeck
Fig. 5 Stability of the Q parameter.
Comparison of MGM-FCI-MAX-derived with retrained lung cancer prediction models on the training cohort. Comparison of MGM-FCI-MAX-derived with retrained.
Number of ESBL carriers in the community in 2010, according to WHO region grouping. Number of ESBL carriers in the community in 2010, according to WHO.
Urban scaling and the regional divide
Evolution-informed forecasting of seasonal influenza A (H3N2)‏
Fig. 1 Global primate species richness, distributions, and the percentage of species threatened and with declining populations. Global primate species.
Presentation transcript:

Predicting poverty and wealth from mobile phone metadata by Joshua Blumenstock, Gabriel Cadamuro, and Robert On Science Volume 350(6264):1073-1076 November 27, 2015 Published by AAAS

Fig. 1 Predicting survey responses with phone data. Predicting survey responses with phone data. (A) Relation between actual wealth (as reported in a phone survey) and predicted wealth (as inferred from mobile phone data) for each of the 856 survey respondents. (B) Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve showing the model’s ability to predict whether the respondent owns several different assets. AUC values for electricity, motorcycle, television, and fridge, respectively, are as follows: 0.85, 0.67, 0.84, and 0.88. (C) ROC curve illustrates the model’s ability to correctly identify the poorest individuals. The poor are defined as those in the 5th percentile (AUC = 0.72) and the 25th percentile (AUC = 0.81) of the composite wealth index distribution. Joshua Blumenstock et al. Science 2015;350:1073-1076 Published by AAAS

Fig. 2 Construction of high-resolution maps of poverty and wealth from call records. Construction of high-resolution maps of poverty and wealth from call records. Information derived from the call records of 1.5 million subscribers is overlaid on a map of Rwanda. The northern and western provinces are divided into cells (the smallest administrative unit of the country), and the cell is shaded according to the average (predicted) wealth of all mobile subscribers in that cell. The southern province is overlaid with a Voronoi division that uses geographic identifiers in the call data to segment the region into several hundred thousand small partitions. (Bottom right inset) Enlargement of a 1-km2 region near Kiyonza, with Voronoi cells shaded by the predicted wealth of small groups (5 to 15 subscribers) who live in each region. Joshua Blumenstock et al. Science 2015;350:1073-1076 Published by AAAS

Fig. 3 Comparison of wealth predictions to government survey data. Comparison of wealth predictions to government survey data. (A) Predicted composite wealth index (district average), computed from 2009 call data and aggregated by administrative district. (B) Actual composite wealth index (district average), as computed from a 2010 government DHS of 12,792 households. (C) Comparison of actual and predicted district wealth, for each of the 30 districts, with dots sized by population. (D) Comparison of actual and predicted rates of electrification, for each of the 30 districts. (E) Comparison of actual and predicted cluster wealth, for each of the 492 DHS clusters. CDR, call detail records. Joshua Blumenstock et al. Science 2015;350:1073-1076 Published by AAAS