Dearborn Employee Evaluation Update

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Discuss the charge of the Michigan Council for Educator Effectiveness (MCEE) Summarize the MCEE Interim Report Provide an Overview of the Pilot.
Advertisements

TEACHER EVALUATION What it is going to look like….
PUSD Teacher Evaluation SY12/13 Governing Board Presentation May 10, 2012.
Education Committee Meeting Professional Development Plan November 3, 2014.
OTES & OPES DEADLINES/REQUIREMENTS/CHANGES
Freehold Borough Teacher Evaluation System Freehold Intermediate School Friday – February 15, 2013 Rich Pepe Director of Curriculum & Instruction.
Most current teacher evaluations provide little information that can be used to give teachers the training and tools they need to be effective; better.
Teacher Evaluation & Developing Goals Glenn Maleyko, Executive Director, Ph.D Haigh Elementary September 8, 2014.
Multiple Measures for Teacher Effectiveness
Teacher Evaluation Update
1. Learning Targets 2 Staff will understand the various Teachscape platforms offered by South Dakota Staff will be able to login to their Teachscape account.
Michigan Council for Educator Effectiveness Toward an Improvement-Focused System of Educator Evaluation Jennifer Hammond OCTE Meeting November 7, 2013.
Teacher and Administrator Evaluation Update Before The Board of Education By Ms. Christine Sipperley, Mr. Brian Whiston, and Dr. Glenn Maleyko. February.
SCPS is…  We are a high-performing district  We are focused on student achievement  We are committed to achieving excellence and equity through continuous.
Teacher Evaluation Training and Update Glenn Maleyko, Executive Director, Ph.D Elementary Forum September 23, 2014 A portion of this information is based.
Today’s website:
Courageous Journey End of Course Presentation by: Glenn Maleyko, Ph.D August 12, 2014 Lansing, Michigan.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
LCSD APPR: Overview Review and Focus on the 60 points December 3, 2012.
Union and District Relations: Positive Collaboration and Team Work Chris Sipperley, DFT President Glenn Maleyko, Executive Director, Ph.D Stout Middle.
Master Teacher Program Presenters:Ginny Elliott Winifred Nweke.
Human Resources: Teacher Evaluation Presentation at U of M Dearborn May 30, 2013 BY GLENN MALEYKO, Ph.D Executive Director Staff and Student Services May.
TEACHER EVALUATION TRAINING November 1 st, 2012 General Admin Meeting BY GLENN MALEYKO, Ph.D Director of Human Resources John McKelvey– Teachscape November.
TEACHER DEVELOPMENT, EVALUATION, AND PEER SUPPORT Overview Session for MPS Staff March 10, 2014.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
Michigan Tenure Law Update By Glenn Maleyko Director of Human Resources Dearborn Public Schools August 25th, 2011 General Administrators meeting.
Dearborn Teacher Evaluation Program By Chris Sipperley, Glenn Maleyko, and the evaluation committee November 14th, 2011.
TEACHER EVALUATION TRAINING November 1 st, 2012 General Admin Meeting BY GLENN MALEYKO, Ph.D Director of Human Resources John McKelvey– Teachscape November.
Politics Everywhere Courageous Journey Presentation by: Glenn Maleyko, Ph.D February 4, 2014.
Materials for today’s session  Shared website – Wiki   Wireless.
Standards IV and VI. Possible Artifacts:  School Improvement Plan  School Improvement Team  North Carolina Teacher Working Conditions Survey  Student.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Guidelines for Uniform Performance Standards and Evaluation Criteria for Teachers Virginia Department of Education Approved April 2011.
Proposed Dearborn Teacher and Administrator Layoff, Recall and Placement Policies Dearborn Board of Education Meeting, May 13, 2013 By: Brian Whiston,
Jeffrey Freund. Jeff Freund: Education and Work History Class of 2000 Class of 2004 Elementary Education Middle Level Mathematics.
Guidelines for Uniform Performance Standards and Evaluation Criteria for Teachers Virginia Department of Education Approved April 2011.
Dearborn Administrator Evaluation Program Dearborn Board of Education Meeting, November 26, 2012 By Andy Denison, ADSA President and Glenn Maleyko, Director.
Educator Effectiveness Summit School District’s Recommendation for the School Year.
Worthington Teacher Evaluation System Dr. Trent Bowers.
Collaborative Action Research (CAR). Objective : Teacher will lead and participate in a collaborative action group exploring a topic based on student.
Teaching and Learning Courageous Journey Presentation by: Glenn Maleyko, Ph.D December 9, 2013.
TEACHER EVALUATION TRAINING June 19, 2012 Administrative Retreat BY GLENN MALEYKO, Ph.D Director of Human Resources June 19, 2012 Administrative Retreat.
Weighting components of teacher evaluation models Laura Goe, Ph.D. Research Scientist, ETS Principal Investigator for Research and Dissemination, The National.
Dearborn Administrator Evaluation Program The General Administrators Meeting: By Andy Denison, Glenn Maleyko, and the evaluation committee September 13.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
TEACHER EVALUATION Presentation Before New Teaching Faculty May 8th and 9th, 2012 New Teacher PD at Dearborn High BY GLENN MALEYKO, Ph.D Director of Human.
State Tenure Law Changes and the Dearborn Teacher Evaluation Program Presented to the Dearborn Public Schools Board of Education: By Chris Sipperley and.
Differentiated Teacher Supervision and Evaluation Models
Introduction to the Marzano Teacher Evaluation Model for USD 259
Using the Snyder Student Rubric Presentation Link:
Evaluations (TPGES) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. Bourbon.
Licensed Educator Professional Growth and Evaluation Process
Teacher Evaluation System
Wethersfield Teacher Evaluation and Support Plan
ABE Instructional Strategies: Getting Teachers Off to the Right Start
Value-Added Evaluation & Tenure Law
Glenn Maleyko, Superintendent, Ph.D
Okeechobee County Instructional Evaluation
Evaluation Updates.
Leadership Day 16 February 2018
TEACHER EVALUATION TRAINING
The General Administrators: September 12, 2013
Human Resources Presentation at AP Leadership Meeting
KSDE Board Presentation Educator Evaluation Systems Update
TEACHER EVALUATION Updates
State Board of Education Progress Update
I am a Teacher… Now What? Jason Parsons
Overview of Implementation and Local Decisions
The best way to predict the future is to create it.
Presentation transcript:

Dearborn Employee Evaluation Update Before The Board of Education By Christine Sipperley, Rene Ziaja, Brian Whiston, and Glenn Maleyko, Ph.D. March 9, 2015

Important Changes 2005 Dearborn brought in a researched based model and abandoned the checklist evaluation system 2010 State Law Changed requiring all teachers to receive evaluations 2011 Major Changes to the State Law on Evaluations. Student Growth Data included for teachers and administrators. Went to a four category scale: Highly Effective, Effective, Minimally Effective, and Ineffective. glenn

DFT/Teacher Evaluation Committee Maysam Alie-Bazzi Mark Palise                 Jill Chochol                  Shannon Peterson                 Andrew Denison           Linda Lazar                 Fatme Faraj                 Robert Seeterlin                 Hassane Jaafar            Gail Shenkman                 Julia Maconochie         Chris Sipperley                 Wyatt David Steve Saleh       Glenn Maleyko Nicole Chubb Wanda Beydoun Chris slide

DFSE/DSOEA and Non-Instructional- Evaluation Committee Rene Ziaja Ruth Bankhead Tom Hand Gary Shelby Jeff Murphy Tony Sarkins Don Ball Yvonne Ravenscroft Andy Denison Cheryl Dughlas Shawn Cornea Chris slide 4

A High Level of Collaboration A High Level of Collaboration among the teacher evaluation committee as well as the administrator evaluation committee. The union is part of both committees. We have recently formed a non-instructional evaluation committee and a there has been a similar collaborative culture

Teachscape We are ahead of the game and leaders with the training that we have been providing We are requiring all administrators that evaluate teachers to take the teachscape class and Test. Average about 20-30 practice hours on-line The assessment takes between 5-7 hours to complete Over 80 administrators have been through the training – We start our 3rd cohort this year

Teachscape Our current model is based on a the 2005 Danielson model which has been modified We are now planning to move to the 2013 Danielson model We are confident that this will be one of the state approved models We are also going to move to a full on-line evaluation tool via the Teachscape Reflection mode

Weighted Formula 75% will be based on Observation Protocol and the 5 Standards for Effective Teaching. This includes observations (formal and not formal), walkthroughs, other performance measures that are related to the teacher evaluation rubric which includes all 5 standards. Professional Responsibilities are included as one of the standards.

25% Growth Data 5% District growth based on state accountability measures 10% Building Growth 10% Classroom Growth

10% Building Growth Data Based on multiple measures which must include NWEA (reading, Language Usage, math and science), Explore, Plan, MME and State Accountability growth measures (when state data is made available).

10% Classroom Growth Data Based on NWEA for the specific subject area, State Assessments, Classroom Assessments, DRA, Performance or product measures, other formative assessments, pre and post tests (specific % proficient) are required.

5% District Growth Based on state accountability measures and other student growth measures available to the District. We will continue to monitor state progress in this area.

Proposed Legislation There are different bills being debated in Lansing We would have thought that they would have passed something by now since their initial deadline was April 2012 However, that has not occurred

Non instructional evaluations We have held committee meetings We are looking to get the evaluations in personnel files It will be a positive experience for most. Safe guards for employees that might not receive effective ratings and required written documentation Working in positive cooperation with the union.

Administrator Evaluation Still not sure what will happen here but it is possible that we will have to choose one of the state approved models. 3 models Marzano, Doug Reeves, and MASA model by Pat Reeves

Questions or Comments? Thank you for your support.